Spatial Epistemology: Heterotopia Lived Space, And Thirdspace

701 Words2 Pages

1- Spatial Epistemology: Heterotopia, Lived Space, and Thirdspace

As Foucault ([1967] 1984) points out, human beings are obsessed more with the notion of time (pondered as dynamic and diverse) than space (considered as homogenous and empty), whereas, the new epoch, which in Foucault’s sense is the modern time after the nineteenth century, especially requires attention on the knowledge of the space, because now human beings experience the world “less that of a long life developing through time, than that of a network that connects points and intersects with its own skein”. Yet this argument does not “entail the denial of time”, but acknowledge the “fatal intersection of time with space”. Space in Foucault’s mind is by no means void, but inhabits …show more content…

either the physical or the imagined, into a “both/and logic” and the ontological trialectic of “Spatiality-Historicality-Sociality”. Similar to the perceived space in Lefebvre’s term, the Firstspace refers to the real, and physical space, as the geographical site shown in the map, while the Secondspace regards the space as symbolic and poetic. The imagined geography, like utopia, tends to become the “real geography”, with the image or representation coming to define and order the reality. Arguing even while the two ways of thinking are at odds, they also “embody and nourish” each other, Soja protests against the binary between the First- and Secondspace, and puts forward the idea of the Thirdspace, as the mergence of the two. Favouring the trialectic ontology of Historicality-Socialcality-Spatiality, Thirdspace denotes the belief that the historical, social and spatial are interviewing with each other. On the other hand, the significance of Thirdspace lies on its defences against “totalling closure and all permanent constructions” and the tendency of always opening up for more dynamics and possibilities. The notion of Thirdspace makes more sense in the modern context of globalisation, although Homi Bhabha’s employment of this term slightly deviates from Soja’s definition: the former

Open Document