Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits of space mission
Advantage of space exploration
Benefits of space mission
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Benefits of space mission
Space Exploration, Creating a Better World
319 million people, but only one country to aid. Over the years space exploration has brought humankind closer to a new planet to live on and new materials to use. Space exploration should continue because it represents a pathway to a more advanced lifestyle on our society and it has strongly improved our health and safety on our lives developing new technology therefore, helping the people on Earth.
Space Exploration should be funded because NASA is working on finding life on Mars. According to NASA, “Mars has always been a source of inspiration for explorers and scientists. Robotic missions have found evidence of water, but if life exists beyond Earth still remains a mystery.” If NASA isn’t funded
…show more content…
But much of the technology NASA developed in reaching for the stars has filtered down to the masses, leading to innovations such as more nutritious infant formula and sunglasses that block harmful ultraviolet light. ‘We get better airplanes, or we get better weather forecasting from space stuff, sure,’ said Daniel Lockney, program executive in technology transfer and spinoff partnerships at NASA headquarters in Washington, D.C. ‘But we also get better-fed children. That kind of stuff, people don't necessarily associate.’” NASA doesn’t only deal with things that happen/deal with space, but they gather materials they find from space to make goods that are comfortable and easy to use, which would mean that they are a group of inventors as well. According to New York Times, president Obama said that “‘In the years that have followed, the space race inspired a generation of scientists and innovators, including, I’m sure, many of you. It’s contributed to immeasurable technological advances that have improved our health and well-being, from satellite navigation to water purification, from aerospace manufacturing to medical imaging.’” Everyone contributes to NASA every year, and NASA has given many people jobs which has changed so many of the workers lives by inspiring and innovating. If space exploration stopped then many jobs will be lost from the citizens of the US. Think about the other …show more content…
As reported by CNN News “The reasons such efforts drive up the costs include: A human needs a return ticket, while a robot can go one way. Space vehicles for humans must be made safe, while NASA can risk a bunch of robots without losing sleep. Robots are much easier to feed, experience little trouble when subject to prolonged weightlessness, and are much easier to shield from radiation. And they can do most tasks humans can.” A robot can do MOST things that humans can, but not all. A robot can miss the most significant detail that could be life changing. Humans can also bring back evidence from a planet that robots can’t if they don’t have a return ticket. If the robots always return, it would cost more money than sending a person which you don’t have to build with money and a spacecraft. Furthermore, if a space shuttle isn’t made correctly and there is a robot in it and something happened to it, then we would lose the spacecraft and the robot thus losing the money the government used to make the special objects. As stated in BBC News “Space is a disease and danger, wrapped in darkness and silence. Leonardo ‘Bones’ McCoy has a point, space travel leaves you weak, tired, sick, and possibly depressed. ‘Space isn’t an environment we’ve involved to survive in…’ It’s wrong to conceive space travel as this long haul flight with
NASA helped usher in a promising new future in the 1960s and it was rewarded with a rapidly-eroding budget. The U.S. should invest more money in NASA and less on unnecessary health care and military. Budget cuts are affecting our technology development. Evidently, increasing NASA’s budget to 1 percent of the federal budget will not hurt the economy. But instead it would benefit by creating jobs here on earth, especially for the next generation of American scientists and engineers.
Lind, Michael. "Why We Should Embrace the End of Human Spaceflight."Salon.com. N.p.: n.p., 2011. N. pag. Rpt. in NASA. Ed. Margaret Haerens. Detroit: Greenhaven, 2012. Opposing Viewpoints. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 21 Mar. 2014.
Space has lots of radiation. Exposure to space radiation can have a bad effect on a person’s health. Support C: Travelling and exploring space can actually endanger the life of an astronaut. THIRD POINT:
Michael Massimino, one of NASA’s astronauts, says it best, “you have bills to pay, but you always want to put something away for your kids’ college fund. NASA is like a college fund, we are the future” (Massimino 1). NASA not only does space research, but daily around the world items developed from NASA’s research are used.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Bill Nye, the “Science Guy,” asserts, “NASA is an engine of innovation and inspiration as well as the world's premier space exploration agency, and we are well served by politicians working to keep it that way, instead of turning it into a mere jobs program, or worse, cutting its budget.” The United States of America’s government is currently in an economic debt encompassing billions of US dollars. Unfortunately, the government has attempted to balance finances by cutting the funding for most programs, including NASA, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. NASA, in over half a century, has brought the most economic, technological, and social benefits than any other program held here in the USA, as well as any other extraterrestrial program in the world. The last thing this nation needs is the cutting of NASA finances. NASA should be receiving more funding because the Earth will not last forever and humans will need a place to live, there’s a curiosity within humans about the vast universe they live in, there is evidence to suggest life on other planets, the USA’s superpower status will be improved, and the economical income NASA brings is more efficient than any other governmental or educational program.
Wasteful, useless, pointless – and many more colorful words have been used to describe the budget allotted to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration of the United States, NASA. You could almost make 24 stacks of one-dollar bills tall enough to reach space with the $17.5 billion that was budgeted this year alone. It’s a staggering amount at first glance, I’ll admit, but there is so much more return in NASA’s work that many fail to see. NASA is known mostly for its achievements in space exploration, but positive ripples from the effects of its breakthroughs have touched so many different industries in our country. In fact, since 1976 NASA has been publishing an annual publication called “SpinOff” highlighting what is defined as “A commercialized product incorporating NASA technology or expertise that benefits the public” (Lockney).
This essay is being written to prove that NASA spending has a negative impact on American society. Continuing NASA and the programs run by it is harmful to American society and Government. NASA harms the economy. NASA also harms the environment in which we live. And the money that NASA spends could be used to help solve problems in our country, not on another planet.
The most common misconception people have is that NASA doesn’t really do anything for us anymore. Completely to the contrary; NASA is like a plant. Just like a plant takes in CO2 then puts out life giving oxygen as a byproduct, so does NASA take in existing “primitive” technology and world issues and put out life saving applications as a by-product. If anyone has been alive anytime after 1958 you have benefited from at least 30 of NASA’s 30,000 different applications. They’ve created fire-fighting gear, laser heart surgery, and weather satellites that prevent the deaths of thousands because of forewarned hurricanes.
“Space, the final frontier….” These are the words that stirred the imaginations of millions of men, women and children with the debut of “Star Trek” in 1966. The show has arguably one of the most loyal followings of any production, and has inspired scores of people to consider the stars and wonder if we as a people will ever travel outside of our own solar system. The idea of space travel and exploration was not new when “Star Trek” hit the airwaves though. The United States was at odds with the Soviet Union, and both powers were locked in a battle that would come to be known as “The Space Race” during the height of the cold war. It was in 1961 that President John Kennedy made his famous appeal to the American people, challenging us as a nation to put a man on the moon before the decade was out. On July 20, 1969, that challenge was achieved when the astronauts of Apollo 11 made the first manned landing on the moon, and returned safely to earth. This, the highest achievement in the United States space program, will turn 45 years old this year. After 45 years, and a technological explosion over the past 25 years, the greatest achievement in the space program has been a manned lunar landing. Countless billions of American tax payer dollars have been spent on the space program over the decades, and there have been no achievements to match that of the moon landings. Though the budget for NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) is but a tiny fraction of the entire annual budget for the country, many of those billions that are allotted in the NASA budget for space exploration would better serve the country if they were re-directed to other areas. De-funding the space exploration portion of the NASA programs could create a “...
"That's one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind." - Neil Armstrong (Dunbar). When Armstrong took those first steps on the moon he probably never realized that, in the future, people would be questioning whether we should continue spaceflight. Some question whether human space flight is worth all the money that goes into it. So why not send robots, others inquire, they are less expensive to send. Some question whether space flight is necessary at all and plead with others to focus on the problems we face here on Earth. Others would refute that remark and say that space flight helps us to understand our own planet and is therefore benefiting us. Not to mention all the inventions that are created that aid in everyday life that were created in the space flight endeavor
For many of NASA's projects the technology known at the time wasn’t always good enough, or might not have been as cost effective as they needed. Because of this NASA would then invent new technology to suit what they need, and a lot of this is being used in the world around you. Many people don’t even realize this. The number of things they have made that we use everyday is a lot more than some may think. A few inventions that came out of NASA’s work include cameras on phones, scratch resistant lenses, LEDs (Light-emitting diodes), water and air purification systems, memory foam, wireless headphones, and much more (Nelson). People may argue that we would have invented these things sooner or later, so why is it such a big deal that NASA invented them. This could be considered a valid argument, but there is no way of really knowing when it would have been invented, and we could be much less technically advanced than we are today. Not only that but the work NASA does can help underdeveloped countries with their daily lives through things such as water purifiers or with programs such as SMAP. Clean water is essential for life and yet many countries around the world and mainly in Africa do not have easy access to it. An article found on NASA's website states “a deep-water well failure in the tiny Kurdish village of Kendala, Iraq,
NASA’s research and innovation looked promising, but it came at a cost. Money, resources, and spacecraft accidents, most famously Apollo 13 all hindered NASA’s research. In the 21st century, the debate over funding for NASA is at its peak since the birth of the organization in 1958, especially when there are numerous problems throughout the world. Is the money spent on space exploration worth the advantages and advances it contributes to society? When considering this topic, one might ask themselves, why explore space?
Even if we disregard the economic value of the space program, the achievements of NASA speak for themselves. The ability to send humans onto the moon, survey the surface of Mars using the Curiosity rover, and even find water on a foreign planet is astounding. Even looking at the International Space Station, it seems abundantly clear that the space program brings more unanimity between nations than the military will ever hope to achieve, while the military has a budget 33 times that of the space program. Hence, blaming the costs of the space program is an absurd argument, as the budget that is put into the program is used very proficiently.
Mankind has always been fascinated with exploring the unknown. From sailing to distant lands to someday setting foot on other planets, the spirit of exploration is the same. Bur now with the current economic situation and the high cost of sending people to space, NASA is being looked at as a way to free up some much needed funds. Although, there is many problems here on planet Earth that need addressing, the benefits of space exploration far out weight the disadvantages. Space exploration has given us more advanced technology, advances in the medical field, and a boost to the economy and these facts cannot be disputed.
The 1960's brought new advancements for all of Earth. Machines and men were sent into space, and this sparked a new government agency, called NASA. Space was a new frontier, and virtually everyone was interested in exploring it. Over the years, the interest in space exploration has weakened, and NASA was almost terminated from existence, although there have been many advancements in it over that time. Space exploration should continue because it could help solve many problems on Earth, such as overpopulation and lack of resources. Exploration of the final frontier must continue in order for human life to continue.