Sonnet 43 Elizabeth Browning Essay

625 Words2 Pages

“The act of reading is a partnership. The author builds a house, but the reader makes it a home.” (Jodi Picoult) Elizabeth Browning has built a house that attracts readers of all kinds. Diversity flows throughout her metaphorical home, which disproves a numerous amount of scholars’ claims about her. Browning’s “Sonnet 43” has been criticized for overly personal emotion and dated language. Browning’s immense fan base has actually resulted from the same aspect that she is criticized for. Her diction creates a sympathetic view for her readers. Elizabeth Browning’s criticism is unjust as she creates a relatable feeling for her readers, the diction in which she uses sparks immense thought, and her creativity is captivating. Elizabeth Browning’s …show more content…

Although language has become more modernized, “Sonnet 43” conjures cavernous thought. In “Sonnet 43,” Elizabeth Browning states, “My soul can reach, when feeling out of sight/ For the ends of Being and ideal Grace” (3-4). Her statement has meaning much deeper than that of appearance. She is stating that she has the capacity to reach much farther than most humans. Her soul can wander into the realm of spiritual healing, and it is within that realm where she finds the meaning of living justly. Not only does her writing force the reader to find a hidden meaning, it also is filled with an abundance of literary elements. Internal rhyme, the use of metaphorical comparisons, and personification are major contributors for captivating the audience’s …show more content…

Through creating a relatable feeling for readers, sparking immense thought from her diction, and displaying inventive creativity, Elizabeth captivates her audience. Elizabeth Browning impacted the literary world in such a powerful way. The presence of “Sonnet 43” in today’s education system demonstrates how valuable piece is. Although society has become more advanced and human preferences have changed, “Sonnet 43” interests individuals of all backgrounds, thus disproving criticism from

Open Document