Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critical analysis of sonnet 130
Love in victorian literature
Sonnets love comparison
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critical analysis of sonnet 130
Paper 1-Literary Explication
When one thinks of a sonnet about love, one thinks of beautiful description of the speaker’s lover or a lovely illustration about love in a general sense. Love poems contains emphasis on emotional and imaginative spontaneity as oppose to “Sonnet 130” that compares the speaker’s lover in a decretory sense. In “Sonnet 130- My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun..." by William Shakespeare is a parody of love poetry; love is not always like it is presented in other contemporize poems. Someone doesn’t need to be beautiful to be loved. Shakespeare contradicts the exaggerated comparisons some poets of his days made about their lovers.
The parody of this sonnet starts with the writer using the traditional English
…show more content…
Instead of being a fully developed character like Hamlet or Juliet, she is mostly to give a chance to poke at a cliché love poem. The descriptions about her are vague and negative like in line one “My mistress’ eyes are nothing like the sun”. The speaker refuses to compare his lover's eyes to the sun. He then picks an exaggerated simile so that one can see just how absurd this kind of comparison can be. In line eight, the speaker uses the word "reeks" conveying a strong image of how non-perfect this woman is. In line 11, the speaker uses the words "grant…goddess" creating a hyperbole, the speaker then illustrates two portrayals, one of an ideal woman, and the other is of the real, imperfect woman the speaker has been describing all along. In these last lines the speaker chooses the real woman over the goddess usually portray in other poems. In “Coral is far more red than her lips’ red” (line 2) the speaker compares his mistress’s lips to red coral giving us another example of an over-the-top simile. For lips to be red they would have to be painted, and that's the kind of false image of beauty that this poem is pushing back
Shakespeare is known for his extravagant tales of love and tragedy. Whether it’s in his plays “Romeo and Juliet” or “Hamlet”. He can take simple concept such as flowers blooming or a butterfly flapping its wings, and turn it into the most romantic thing that you’ve ever heard. In his poem “Sonnet XVII”, he creates a romantic confession of love by using romantic language, euphonious diction, and juxtaposition to swoon his readers.
In “Sonnet,” Billy Collins satirizes the classical sonnet’s volume to illustrate love in only “.fourteen lines.” (1). Collins’s poem subsists as a “Sonnet,” though there exists many differences in it, countering the customarily conventional structure of a sonnet. Like Collins’s “Sonnet,” Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 130” also faces incongruities with the classic sonnet form as he satirizes the concept of ideal beauty that was largely a convention of writings and art during the Elizabethan era. Although these poems venture through different techniques to appear individually different from the classic sonnet, the theme of love makes the poems analogous.
Sonnet 130 openly mocks the traditional love sonnets of the time. This is, perhaps, made most apparent through the use of subversive comparisons and exaggerated similes. The intention of a subversive comparison is to mimic a traditional comparison yet highlight the opposite purpose. Whereas his contemporaries would compare their love’s beauty to alabaster or pearls, Shakespeare notes, “If snow be white, why then her breasts are dun” (3), therefore intentionally downplaying the beauty of his mistress. Later he states, “...in some perfumes there is more delight / than in the breath that from my mistress reeks” (7-8). Both of these exemplify that Shakespeare ridicules the traditional love sonnet by employing the same imagery to convey opposite intentions.
William Shakespeare’s “Sonnet 130”, was published in the mid-1590, and published with the rest of Shakespeare’s sonnets in 1609. The sonnet has fourteen lines, and divided into three quatrains and one couplet at the end. The rhyme scheme is cross rhyme, with the last two lines being couplets that rhyme. The sonnet compares between nature and the poets’ lover or mistress. He shows a more realistic view of his lover. Needless to say his significant other wasn’t physically attractive, yet he loved her inside beauty. Today we may use the term, “It’s not all about looks, but what’s inside”.
At the start, the first stanza of the poem is full of flattery. This is the appeal to pathos. The speaker is using the mistress's emotions and vanity to gain her attention. By complimenting her on her beauty and the kind of love she deserves, he's getting her attention. In this first stanza, the speaker claims to agree with the mistress - he says he knows waiting for love provides the best relationships. It feels quasi-Rogerian, as the man is giving credit to the woman's claim, he's trying to see her point of view, he's seemingly compliant. He appears to know what she wants and how she should be loved. This is the appeal to ethos. The speaker seems to understand how relationships work, how much time they can take, and the effort that should be put forth. The woman, if only reading stanza one, would think her and the speaker are in total agreement.
“Sonnet 130” by William Shakespeare, uses many similes to be able to highlight the beauties of his love and how nothing is as beautiful as her. “And in some perfumes, is there more delight, than in the breath that from my mistress reeks. I love to hear her speak, yet well I know, that music hath a far more pleasing sound” this line describes how she is not perfect and she may not be the most beautiful woman, or the most pleasing to hear; she is perfect in every way to him because his love is true. 7.
When a comparison is made between There is a Garden in Her Face by Thomas Campion and Sonnet 130 by William Shakespeare, the difference between lustful adoration and true love becomes evident. Both poems involve descriptions of a beloved lady seen through the eyes of the speaker, but the speaker in Campion's poem discusses the woman's beautiful perfections, while the speaker in Shakespeare's poem shows that it is the woman's faults which make her beautiful.
Shakespeare’s style of writing sonnets subverts the Barrate-Browning’s style of writing sonnets, where they antithesis the traditional view of love. The most basic gist in both sonnets that they both address to their loved ones which is courtly described the reality in both sonnets. In comparison Shakespeare addresses his sonnet to a “Dark Lady” which lacks of clichés and very touched poignancy. In addition Elizabeth Barrett –Browning addresses her sonnet t...
When he writes "And yet, by heaven, I think my love as rare as any she, belied with false compare." (lines 13-14) in the final couplet, one responds with an enlightened appreciation, making them understand Shakespeare's message that true love consists of something deeper than physical beauty. Shakespeare expresses his ideas in a wonderful fashion. Not only does he express himself through direct interpretation of his sonnet, but also through the levels at which he styled and produced it. One cannot help but appreciate his message of true love over lust, along with his creative criticism of Petrarchan sonnets.
The use of metaphors seems to shine through each of the three sections in the poem. The first section of the poem the speaker compares his love for his mistress to “vegetable love” (Marvell 11), in which, he is telling his mistress his love for her grows slowly. The speaker imagines his love for his mistress turning into ashes, while the chance for them to sleep together will be lost forever. In the final stanza he uses the word sun for imagery, when he replaced the word son with sun (45). The switching of imagery and metaphors in the poem, is to confuse the audience in order to persuade that that she is submitting to him. The allusion of this poem occurs in the first
At the time of its writing, Shakespeare's one hundred thirtieth sonnet, a highly candid, simple work, introduced a new era of poems. Shakespeare's expression of love was far different from traditional sonnets in the early 1600s, in which poets highly praised their loved ones with sweet words. Instead, Shakespeare satirizes the tradition of comparing one's beloved to the beauties of the sun. From its opening phrase "My mistress' eyes are nothing like the sun", shocks the audience because it does not portray a soft, beautiful woman. Despite the negative connotations of his mistress, Shakespeare speaks a true woman and true love. The sonnet is a "how-to" guide to love.
This sonnet is an anti-love poem that ironically shows how the fairness of a lady is contingent upon nature's blessings and her external manifestations. The Spenserian style brings unity to this sonnet, in that it's theme and rhyme is interwoven throughout, but the focus of her "fairness" is divided into an octave and a sestet. The first eight lines praise her physical features (hair, cheeks, smile), while the last six lines praise her internal features (words, spirit, heart). This sonnet intentionally hides the speaker's ridicule behind counterfeit love-language, using phrases like: "fair golden hairs" (line 1), and "rose in her red cheeks" (line 3), and "her eyes the fire of love does spark" (line 4). This traditional love language fills pages of literature and song, and has conventionally been used to praise the attributes of a lover; but this sonnet betrays such language by exhibiting a critique rather than commendation. This sonnet appears to praise the beauty of a lady but ironically ridicules her by declaring that her "fairness" is contingent upon nature, physical features, and displaying a gentle spirit, which hides her pride.
Shakespeare and Petrarch, two poets popular for their contributions on the issue of love, both tackle the subject of their work through sonnet, yet there are key contrasts in their style, structure, and in the way, each approaches their subjects. Moreover, it is clear that in "Sonnet 130," Shakespeare in fact parodies Petrarch's style and thoughts as his storyteller describes his mistress, whose "eyes are in no way as the sun" (Shakespeare 1918). Shakespeare seems, by all accounts, to mock the exaggerated descriptions expanded throughout Petrarch’s piece by giving an English poem portraying the speaker’s love in terms that are characteristic of a flawed woman not a goddess. On the other hand, Petrarch's work is full of symbolism. In reviewing "Sonnet 292" from the Canzoniere, through “Introduction to Literature and Arts,” Petrarch’s utilization of resemblance and the romanticizing of Petrarch's female subject are normal for the Petrarchan work. The leading major contrast between the two poems is the piece structure utilized (McLaughlin).
Shakespeare’s sonnets include love, the danger of lust and love, difference between real beauty and clichéd beauty, the significance of time, life and death and other natural symbols such as, star, weather and so on. Among the sonnets, I found two sonnets are more interesting that show Shakespeare’s love for his addressee. The first sonnet is about the handsome young man, where William Shakespeare elucidated about his boundless love for him and that is sonnet 116. The poem explains about the lovers who have come to each other freely and entered into a relationship based on trust and understanding. The first four lines reveal the poet’s love towards his lover that is constant and strong and will not change if there any alternation comes. Next four lines explain about his love which is not breakable or shaken by the storm and that love can guide others as an example of true love but that extent of love cannot be measured or calculated. The remaining lines of the third quatrain refer the natural love which can’t be affected by anything throughout the time (it can also mean to death). In the last couplet, if
In Shakespeare’s sonnet 130, the speaker ponders the beauty, or the lack thereof, of his lover. Throughout the sonnet, the speaker presents his lover as an unattractive mistress with displeasing features, but in fact, the speaker is ridiculing, through the use of vivid imagery, the conventions of love poems and the way woman are portrayed through the use of false comparisons. In the end, the speaker argues that his mistress may not be perfect, but in his eyes, her beauty is equal to any woman who is abundantly admired and put through the untrue comparison.