In my controlled assessment I will be explore many different attitudes displayed in both ‘Anthem of Doomed Youth’ and ‘Solider’. Both poems attempt to paint a picture of their personal feelings of war. ‘Anthem of Doomed Youth’ was written by Wilfred Owen while ‘Solider’ was written by Rupert Brooks. Both Poets have had their fair share on the battlefield, so they are able to help us picture a very strong picture of war. Wilfred Owen tries to transfer his feelings to the reader of war being bad, on the other hand Rupert Brooks displays the good of war and tries persuade the reader about the benefits of fight for your family, for your people and for your country.
Wilfred Owen was a soldier during the World War one, therefore Owens description of war is accurate as possible. He was always against war and was shocked by the Impacts of war towards the children and their families. Owens writes “No mockeries now for them; no prayers nor bells” The example shows the reader that when the young soldiers die, there will be no one to show respect to their body as they are just left to rotten like an apple. The use of the word mockeries tells us that the young soldiers will no more enjoy their youth. As they have wasted their childhood.
…show more content…
Rupert Brooks loved his country, England. He was kind of a patriotic soldier who wanted to be honoured for his efforts at war. The poet states “If I should die … there’s some corner of a foreign field. That is forever England”. This emphasises that where-ever he ends up that place is be known as a foreign area to the locals. The word ‘forever’ illustrates the place to be evil amongst the locals eternally. Rupert Brooks says “, and the earth there will be a richer dust.” The phrase ‘richer dust’ emphasises the how Brooks believes that England is always the better country as they are more advanced to any country in any
Wilfred Owen expresses his feelings about war in “Anthem for a Doomed Youth”, which revolves around the events that took place in World War I. Throughout the sonnet, the speaker talks bitterly about modern warfare, noting the harsh sounds of war and questioning the treatment of the soldiers that perish. In the octave, the speaker wonders what can be done to honor the soldiers that died, but realizes negatively that the soldiers only receive death instead of ceremonies. In the sestet, the speaker expands upon this idea of a proper ceremony for the deceased soldiers, saying that the families must be the ones to properly honor their dead. Owen’s use of the Petrarchan sonnet with a Shakespearean rhyme scheme, helps him express his frustration about war and its subsequent treatment of the dead.
Many people were touched by the terror of the war, and have written pieces of literature about the massacre ‘WW1’. When Wilfred Owen wrote this poem, he was aiming for people to understand the horror and tragedy that befell those involved. His poem is a magnificent description of a gas attack suffered by a group of soldiers in World War 1. The poet seeks to convince us that the horror of war far outweighed the patriotic clichés of those who glamorize war. His poem is one such elegy that presents to the reader a vivid, horrifying description of the war, aiming to illustrate that war is not romantic or heroic, but a senseless and devastating event.
‘Poetry can challenge the reader to think about the world in new ways.’ It provokes the readers to consider events, issues and people with revised understanding and perspectives. The poems Dulce Et Decorum Est (Wilfred Owen, 1917) and Suicide in the Trenches (Siegfried Sassoon, 1917), were composed during World War One and represented the poets’ point of views in regards to the glorification of war and encouraged readers to challenge their perspectives and reflect upon the real consequences behind the fabrications of the glory and pride of fighting for one’s nation.
World War One had an inevitable effect on the lives of many young and naive individuals, including Wilfred Owen, who, like many others, joined the military effort with the belief that he would find honour, wealth and adventure. The optimism which Owen initially had toward the conflict is emphasised in the excerpt, in which he is described as “a young poet…with a romantic view of war common among the young” (narrator), a view which rapidly changed upon reaching the front. Owen presents responders with an overwhelming exploration of human cruelty on other individuals through acts of war and the clash of individual’s opposed feelings influenced by the experiences of human cruelty. This is presented through the horrific nature of war which the
To conclude this essay, with regards to all of the analysis above, I have concluded that Owens poem shows how cruel war is in our time but Shakespeare's speech is mainly to inspire and motivate whether Owen's poem is to inform about the reality and the harshness of war it self. Owen has experienced the war personally and is so able to write about it in detail hence the similes and the metaphors. However due to the fact the Shakespeare has no experience in war itself, he would have to improvise and make up some limes.
Owen was able to evoke emotions through the use of imagery, as well as the usages of literary devices. This poet tends to use a lot of similes, metaphors and personification to express his image of the death and destruction of the war. ‘The shrill, demented choirs of wailing shells; And bugles calling for them from sad shires.’ The use of personification gives the reader a clear feeling of what Owen is trying to express. Furthermore, sense of demonic force is also shown about torture for the soldiers. . Only the stuttering rifles’ rapid rattle’- personification, alliteration and onomatopoeia combine as methods to make war seen more brutal, violent and cruel. His uses of describing ...
As a poet, Wilfred Owens wants to show the effects of warfare from the viewpoint of a soldier during a War. Owens uses his own experience as a fighter to capture the reader’s attention and get across his point. He often uses graphic imagery and words to depict his thoughts about war. Wilfred Owens, poems, “Dulce et Decorum est” and “Anthem for doomed youth” talk blatantly about the effects of warfare on the soldiers, their loved ones, and those who make an ultimate sacrifice by making a statement about the efficacy of war.
In 'The Soldier', Brooke's sense of indebtedness to his country completely blots out any sense of loss or regret over possible death on her behalf. Brooke doesn't even mention war in his poem. He is ready to give "back the thoughts by England given". He accepts death in war as a suitable repayment to his country for what England has done for him.
Brooke’s poem expands on this familiarity, while Owen attempts to deliberately sabotage it. In regards to content, Brooke shows throughout his perception of the nobility of dying for one’s country, whilst Owen uses all of his poetic techniques to show the opposite.
... Instead of idealizing war in a romantic way, war poets such as Wilfred Owen aimed to expose gruesome truths about these wars and how they impacted lives. It points a finger and criticizes the governments and authorities that wage these wars but don’t fight in them themselves but rather watch as lives are lost. It exposes propaganda for what it is, a tool for brainwashing. It puts into question the notion of dying for ones country to be noble, honourable and admirable.
Wilfred Owen can be considered as one of the finest war poets of all times. His war poems, a collection of works composed between January 1917, when he was first sent to the Western Front, and November 1918, when he was killed in action, use a variety of poetic techniques to allow the reader to empathise with his world, situation, emotions and thoughts. The sonnet form, para-rhymes, ironic titles, voice, and various imagery used by Owen grasp the prominent central idea of the complete futility of war as well as explore underlying themes such as the massive waste of young lives, the horrors of war, the hopelessness of war and the loss of religion. These can be seen in the three poems, ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’, ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ and ‘The Last Laugh’, in which this essay will look into.
... middle of paper ... ... Unlike other poets who glorified war and eluded people’s minds, Owen brought the reality of war and death in front of people’s eyes. War is not just fighting for your nation and gaining victory, it is looking at death and inhumanity eye to eye and experiencing agony, suffering and reality.
Wilfred Owen joined the war at the age of twenty-two. During the war, he saw the worst of the battlefield and often wrote poetry to document his perspective on the war. In 1917, he was affected by an explosion and after he healed, he returned to service and died in battle in 1918. His biographical context is important to understand Owen’s point of view for this poem.
War consumes the youth of young men and completely alters a person. From numerous poems, it is made clear that war exhausts the youth of young men, and has left their lives with no meaning. These poems are “Dulce Et Decorum Est” and “Mental Cases” written by Wilfred Owen. Similarly, they both employ the same techniques, such as similes and metaphors. However, a somewhat different perspective is projected through the poem “In Flanders Field” by John McCrae, which dissimilitudes yet intensifies the main message. Whether from a more emotional perspective or from a physical view, war has devastated the prime time of many young men in multitudinous ways.
In this comparative piece on these two anti-war sonnets, from World War One and the Battle of Vinegar Hill, I will attempt to explain how each writer displays the particular event in their poetry. Both these poems have irregular rhyme schemes and around 10 syllables on each line. The aim of these poems is to remind us to respect those men who lost their lives in battle, and how disgraceful war really is. In Anthem for Doomed Youth, Owen splits his sonnet into two stanzas, an octet and a sestet. The octet describes the imagery of the battlefield and the trenches on the front line.