Socrates's Theory Of Beauty

1175 Words3 Pages

What is beauty? Beauty is consider as you have a good figure, the looks, and style. According to the book “Plato Symposium” by Robin Waterfield, Socrates argues that beauty comes from love to desire of getting back what is taken from them, where they lack in beautiful or good things. As where Agathon thinks love is a beauty from what you see in your eyes. For Diotime, the priestess, who “…argue that knowledge of beauty begins with direct experience of particular cases and knowledge of the abstract form of beauty is the highest and final stage, distilled from everyday experience” (Ilien). Also believe that there is middle between knowledge and ignorance. If you are interest into something you love, it brings out the beauty looks. Inner human …show more content…

Beauty defines in as an expression of emotion results the judgements of beauty individual and subjective. Regulating in human nature, taste was for appreciating beauty. Further, Francis Hutcheson defines beauty “…as a source of pleasure that indicates not only qualities found in the object, but also the character of the spectator’s sense of beauty” (Ilien). Notably, not by looking on the outside of a person, but what brings into them that shines out their beauty. However in Socrates theory of beauty, “…if you found pleasure in objects, there were to be found beautiful” (Catwalkgrl). Socrates finds pleasure in the geometric shapes, single colors, and musical notes. Another way that can bring beauty into life and appreciating the way how it is. Significantly, Plato extended its definition as good and proper. Similarly, Plato agrees that beauty does provoke pleasure, but “…beauty consists of symmetry and exactness” (Catwalkgrl). Beauty is structured by measure and related to intelligence. Despite that beauty and good are different under certain conditions to be called beautiful. Basing on how someone is look, one may look good but have the beauty. While on the other scenario, the other one is beauty, yet they are …show more content…

Although ugliness seems to be the opposite of beauty, the “complexity and peculiarity” concept provoke more than one view, each contrasting of beauty in a different way. George E. Moore defines beauty, “…the admiring contemplation is good in itself-and, accordingly, ugliness in terms of evil-that of which admiring contemplation is evil in itself” (Ilien). In effect, understanding beauty in ugliness is a form of disorder. Surprisingly, when a women dye her hair color to red, meaning she is associated with prostitution and creating a conflict in the standard of dressing look. Furthermore, dyeing hair color was no longer shocking, but gives the beauty looks. Next, boredom fails to maintain interest the observer. Where they gradually loses their charm and fails to pleasure when they use to show. Then, an insignificant object like well-crafted, may be cute, but not as beautiful. Later, “…meaningless object is neither beautiful nor ugly” (Ilien), cannot be beautiful when one cannot be grab by parts or be moved by it. In due time, Kitsch is consists of beautiful elements like using images of a “…bouquet of red roses or a red-roof hut on the edge of a breathtaking lake-that appeal to many in order to manipulate sentiments and desires for commercial or political purposes” (Ilien). In the event that opposite of beauty defines in different way, somehow will be shown in anywhere or express

Open Document