Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on socrates trial
Thesis of apology of socrates
Trial and death of socrates critical summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on socrates trial
Knowledge is the key to life, as some might say. After all, few people do not get accepted to Harvard College or operate a fruitful business or attain their life goal of ultimately retiring if they do not have some level of knowledge. Yet what does knowledge truly gain us? Is it more just a stepping stone to get to where we want to be, such as getting accepted into Harvard or running a fruitful business or getting to retire? Socrates would say knowledge is goodness, and, when paired with virtue, is necessary for a happy life. If our ultimate goal is be happy, even above circumstance and condition, we have to choose to pursue virtues, like piety, courage, love, and justice. Happiness requires a thorough understanding of these intangible necessities, …show more content…
The enemy to his good news, as Socrates is well aware, are the material gains people chase after rather than the parts of life that truly matter. These parts—the virtues like piety and justice—are both the stones Socrates’ accusers use against him as well as the supports of his own defense argument. Perhaps the virtue that seems most pertinent to Socrates’ story is justice, in that the convictions brought against him in Plato’s Apology are anything but just. The trial for his life is based on convictions for corrupting youth with his teachings and not believing in the gods of Athens. Socrates is swift to defend himself, not to preserve his life but to preserve justice. Convicting a man for crimes he has not committed would, indeed, be injustice. Yet his defense is not enough to convince his judges, as the result of his trial is still death. Most interesting about Socrates’ trial lies in his response to the verdict ruling the death penalty. Rather than plead for his life as some would, he practically mocks it by noting that his true charges are in …show more content…
In the case of his trial, his courage over death is perhaps most profound. To preface his reaction in Crito, he first acknowledges the possibility of his death in Apology. After he has been given the verdict, he makes the bold claim that he “would much rather die after this kind of defense than live making the other” and that “neither [he] nor any other man should, on trial or in war, contrive to avoid death at any cost” (Apology, 42). Socrates clearly expresses a lack of fear in the face of death, even after receiving the inevitability of it. While most people would have rejected their values to preserve their life, his values give him the peace to surrender his. By the point he reaches the final hours of his life in a jail cell in Crito, Socrates no longer even speaks of death as a matter of personal concern but now addresses it as a matter of the state and the implications of it should he evade it. Towards the end of his conversation with his friend, Socrates speaks for the city when he says that he “will not think it better or more just or more pious here, nor will any one of [his] friends, nor will it be better for [him] when [he arrives] yonder” (57). Socrates acknowledges that nothing will benefit from his escape, and that he would be rejecting goodness by doing so anyway. His knowledge allows him to abide his courage, which in turn prevents him
Socrates was a one of the first philosophers and teachers known to Western philosophy. He lived in Athens Greece from 470 – 399 B.C. and is studied to this day because of his insights and understanding of the way people should live. Towards the end of his life, Socrates was accused of a myriad of crimes including criminal meddling and the corruption of the minds of the young. Eventually, Socrates was found guilty of his crimes and shortly after he was condemned to death. During the time of his incarceration, he was visited by a friend known as Crito to discuss the matter of his death in addition to the proposal of escape from prison. Crito initially believed that it would be in Socrates best interest to escape prison and live in exile instead of facing death. Socrates, however, had a different view on escape and chose not to flee. Instead, he faced his sentence and explained his reasoning to be what he believed was right. Escaping could have been feasible for a few different reasons including instances such as his children and the people that he taught. For the type of teacher that he was, his reasons for not escaping are understandable and respectable, and he believed that escaping was wrong. Since he believed it wrong, it was good that Socrates chose not to escape. Escaping would essentially nullify his teaching of morals and honor and his reasons for living.
When Socrates was sentenced to death, his friend Crito offers to help him escape, but he refuse to escape. He explains to Crito that if he were to escape he would be running away his whole life. He would stay at Athens and comply with the sentence as set by Athens law and die for his cause. Another reason that he gave Crito for not escaping was that he was already death alive and that he was too old to be running away .
...st of his life. Then when Socrates pass away, he will be harshly judged in the afterlife for behaving in an unjust manner towards his state’s laws. Thus, this is why he will not try to escape and based on his reasoning Crito has been convinced that it would be better for Socrates not attempt an escape.
Socrates' response to Crito's question “Why don't you escape if I'll provide you the means?” is that the primary criterion for moral action is justice, and escaping would be unjust, so he should not escape. Socrates reasons that if he were to escape, this would break the system of law enforcement since avoiding punishment when a city has deemed it necessary makes the law ineffectual if there is no consequence for breaking it. He would be a 'destroyer' of the law (Crito, 51a), an injustice he does not wish to commit.
In Plato’s Apology, Socrates uses religious appeals, proof by contradictions and various examples to argue for his innocence in court. Socrates is forced to argue for the sake of his life to prove that he is not guilty. In Socrates’ speech, however, he is not apologizing for anything instead, the word comes from the Greek word “apologia,” that translates to a speech made in defense. In this paper, I will argue that Socrates’ decision to stay in Athens and to accept suicide was unethical, because he purposefully antagonized the people who control his fate and this ultimately led to the death penalty.
According to Crito, there are three major reasons as to why Socrates should escape from the prison. Notably, Crito offers lame self centered excuses for Socrates escape. Indeed, two of the reasons do not stand ground whereas the third concentrates on the victim’s responsibility to his offspring. Crito begins by proposing Socrates escape because failing to do so will doubly hurt him. Firstly, Crito enjoys a warm and cordial friendship with Socrates. Therefore, his execution would distraught and melancholy him. On the other hand, Crito says that the execution of Socrates will harm his reputation. People will tantalize, taunt and jeer him for valuing his monies more than the life of his friend. This is because Crito can bribe Socrates way out of prison. According to Crito, the population will be prejudicial to him un...
The dialogue "Crito" recounts Socrates' last days, immediately before his execution. As the text reveals, his friend Crito proposes to Socrates that he escape from prison. In a dialogue with Crito, Socrates considers the proposal, trying to establish whether an act like that would be just and morally justified. Eventually, he came to argue that by rejecting his sentence and by trying to escape from prison he would commit unjust and morally unjustified acts. Therefore, he decided to accept his death penalty and execution. Because of his decision, he became one of the cult figures in the history of philosophy, a man of intact moral integrity who had made his final decision according to the very same principles that guided his entire life. He was praised as a grand rationalist who had acted rationally and justly—a view which, I believe, represents one of the greatest myths in the history of philosophy.
In the retelling of his trial by his associate, Plato, entitled “The Apology”; Socrates claims in his defense that he only wishes to do good for the polis. I believe that Socrates was innocent of the accusations that were made against him, but he possessed contempt for the court and displayed that in his conceitedness and these actions led to his death.
Socrates, according to Plato challenged the norms of society by questioning life and having others question it as well. He was labeled of “corrupting the youth” and for not believing in the Athenians gods. “Socrates is guilty of corrupting the young, and of not acknowledging the gods the city acknowledges, but new daimonic activities instead.” (The Apology, pp 654) Although, he was cast by being “corrupt”, Socrates had many followers that saw him as a wise man. Socrates trial was made up of thirty jurors, who were later known as “The Thirty.” The “Thirty” really wanted was to silence Socrates, rather than taking his life. However, Socrates did not want to disobey the laws, he did not want to be violated of his right to freedom of speech, nor did he did he want to be undermine his moral position. (The Apology, pp. 647) He stood against injustice acts several times while he was in counsel. “I was the sort...
In 399 BC, Socrates, the great philosopher in ancient Greece, was put to death under the hands of his Athenian fellow-citizens to whom he had a strong attachment, after a final vote with over two-thirds of jurymen against him. We cannot experience the situation where Socrates gave his final argument in the court of law. From Plato’s Apology, we admire Socrates’ brilliant rhetoric and rigorous logic, while at the same time feel pity for him and indignant with those ruthless jurymen. However, the question of what exactly caused his death and why was Socrates, such a remarkable thinker sentenced to death in the very society that valued democracy the most is not easy and straightforward to answer. There are multiple elements involved that finally caused this tragedy in which “a person of high moral principle is confronted step by step with a situation from which there is no escape” (38). First of all, the moral principle and belief in divinity held by Socrates are inconsistent with those of the Athenian society, implying the very crimes charged upon Socrates were not completely groundless. Secondly, the imperfect juridical system of Athens played a role in causing this tragedy. What’s more, Socrates himself, could have offered better defense in the court, also had a hand in his own death by his stubbornness regarding to his own interpretation of wisdom and piety. His rebuttal, though brilliant and insightful, was not persuasive enough to move the fellow-citizens for his wrong approach and sophistry in his cross-examination on Meletus.
The State of Athens found Socrates guilty of “impiety and corrupting the youth.”1 He was sentenced to death, but in the meanwhile, he was being held in a jail cell. Crito, Socrates' old friend, came to visit him one morning. Crito explained that they have the money and supplies to get Socrates out of his jail cell, and away from Athens to be a fugitive, thus saving Socrates his life. Socrates answered all Crito's options with an argument stating how he cannot escape from his cell, and death, because he would be defying all the laws of the State. If he denies all laws of the State, Socrates believes that if he leaves, then he would be proven guilty, and the charge of death against him would be correct. Socrates believes that if he stays, and
Plato’s “Defense of Socrates” follows the trial of Socrates for charges of corruption of the youth. His accuser, Meletus, claims he is doing so by teaching the youth of Athens of a separate spirituality from that which was widely accepted.
Socrates discusses that people should not fear death because we do not know the qualities of death. Even though we do not know what death is, he makes some suggestions for the possibilities after death. He suggests that maybe death is just an endless sleep without dreaming, it is where we can finally come to peace with ourselves. He also suggest that maybe in the afterlife he will be able to meet heroic people in the past, where he can share his experience and question people to see whether they are wise. Even in death Socrates is still going to practice philosophy even if the place is bad. Even if he did not live a just life that he thought he did, he can examine what he did wrong and fix the problems in the after life. I agree with Socrates
...ns. Why would he do this if he did not see the laws of Athens as just? In order to fulfill the agreement he has made with Athenian law, Socrates must accept the punishment he is given, though he feels that his being punished is Athens wronging him. It would be wrong, by his view, to escape from prison, though he would not be pursued, because he would be breaking his agreement to obey Athenian law. Since he and Crito previously agreed that one must never do wrong, he simply must stay in jail until his death. This is merely one example of the way in which Socrates uses a method of logical dialogue in order to make his point. He appears to be unmatched in his skills of deduction and consistently demonstrates his love of knowledge and truth. Socrates exemplifies all that is philosophy, both as a student and a teacher, because of his constant, active pursuit of wisdom.
When Socrates was brought to trial for the corruption of the city’s youth he knew he had done nothing wrong. He had lived his life as it should be lead, and did what he ne...