Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Objectives of the recruitment process
Determinants of organizational culture
Recruitment and selection practices
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Objectives of the recruitment process
Socialization and Attraction & Socialization and Mentoring According to Jex and Britt (2014), the first of stage of the attraction process in an organization is recruiting, which is to choose the most qualified applicants who is going to be successful in their job and remaining with the organization for a long time. From an organizational perspective, the first sept in the recruitment process is recruitment planning. When developing a recruitment plan, an organization should consider its strategic planning, succession planning, the skills and abilities of current employees, and the assessment of the supply of labor in the labor market. Then, an organization should decide recruiting methods that will implement the plan, such as internal vs. …show more content…
Organizational socialization does not mean a one-time activity, rather it means a long-term process of learning. New employees learn the culture of an organization and task-related and social knowledge. According to Chao et al. (1994), organizational socialization consists of six dimensions: history, language, politics (unwritten rules), people, organizational goals and values, and performance proficiency. In the socialization process, organizations focus on socialization stages and tactics. Stages of socialization go through anticipatory socialization, encounter, change and acquisition, behavioral outcomes, and affective outcomes stages. Socialization tactics also can be explained in six dimensions: collective vs. individual, formal vs. informal, sequential vs. random, fixed vs. variable, serial vs. disjunctive, and investiture vs. divestiture. On the other hand, new employees also gather and handle information about their new organizations, and organizational psychologist explains this process as information-seeking tactics (Miller and Jablin, 1991). Gathered information, in turn, can affect job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover, etc. The recent research trend in socialization is having an integrated perspective between organizational tactics and the …show more content…
Both socialization and mentoring were developed in the last decades because of the increasing number of women workforce, economic and organizational structural changes, and globalization. The authors introduced the history of organizational socialization, but many parts were overlapped with Jex and Britt (2014)’s book. The history of research on mentoring started from Levinson (1978) and Kram (1985). Kram defined two types of support behaviors in mentoring (career-related support and psychological support). However, the first published study on mentoring in JAP was in 1990 by Dreher and Ash, demonstrating that extensive mentoring support increased employee performance and satisfaction with their pay and benefits. Moreover, research on diverse mentoring relationship has been one of the major topics from the 1990s to the present. Integrative, comprehensive reviews of mentoring and learning within mentoring are another prevalent topic in these
According to Pascale, socialization is essential to the integration of new members into an organization (P 27). However, it is up to the organization to create an environment that offers both new and established members order and consistency through explicit procedures and implicit social controls (P 34). Furthermore, by providing organizational members with continuity and clarity, the firm is able to establish a strong cohesive culture that empowers its employees so that they may develop the social currency they need to implement change and execute tasks efficiently (P 35). It is this strong cohesive culture that has sustained some organizations over numerous generations (P 29); and it is this culture that Pascale’s seven step model of socialization is intended to cultivate (P 34).
There is little scientific knowledge when it comes to mentoring effects on future outcomes; in addition posing confusion as to how these programs continue to emerge. A major component in regards to program effectiveness is in measurement or evaluation of its structure (Deutsch, N., & Spencer, R., 2009). This is done by conducting surveys, focus groups, and interviews (Deutsch, N., & Spencer, R. (2009); Karcher, M., & Nakkula, M. (2010); Diehl, D. C., Howse, R. B., & Trivette, C. M. (2011); Osgood, 2012; Williams, 2011). Studies gives the researcher insight into knowledge that otherwise wouldn’t be known, in order to understand mentoring reactions and relationship styles better (Karcher, M., & Nakkula, M. (2010); Christens, B. D., & Peterson, N. A. (2012); Diehl et al., 2011; Leyton‐Armakan, J., Lawrence, E., Deutsch, N., Lee Williams, J., & Henneberger, A. (2012); Meyer, K. C., & Bouchey, H. A. (2010).
Socialization is a process in which a newcomer adapts the behaviour pattern of the organizations surrounding culture and acquires knowledge and attitudes needed to become an effective insider to an organization (Van Maanen and Schein, 1979)
Henry, S., & Charles, M. (1982). Social Learning Theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 3 (4), 55-62.
In addition, for some mentors, mentoring was a burden or workload issue that often went unnoticed by others. Mentees, too, were concerned by a lack of mentor interest and training and a host of problematic mentor attributes and behaviors (e.g. critical or defensive behaviors). Professional or personal incompatibility or incompatibility based on other factors such as race or gender was also seen by both mentors and mentees as impediments to the success of the relationship. Organizations, too, were confronted with difficulties arising from mentoring programs. Lack of commitment from the organization, lack of partnership and funding problems were reported in some studies, while in others, cultural or gender biases meant that some mentees’ experiences were not
He says that mentoring is something that leaders should do throughout their career since it is not only beneficial to themselves, but it is also beneficial to the person they are mentoring. It is important to identify and groom key players and use aggressive mentoring to not only lift up your employee, but it also improves the skills of the mentor. In today’s society, he has found that it is important to spend at least one day a month mentoring your key players including people who are showing great potential. Mentoring should be done at all levels of leadership, including junior managers. Mentoring is important at all levels of management in order to develop future leaders (Flaum,
Institutionalization is embedding change processes brought on by effective interventions to an organization’s functioning for a prescribed period of time. Moreover the process of institutionalization consists of socialization, commitment, reward allocation, diffusion, and sensing and calibration. They are the by-products of two dimensions: organization characteristics (such as congruence and unionization) and intervention characteristics (goal specificity and programmability).
Traditional organizational approaches to organizational development emerged from behavioral research undertaken after World War II. That research led to the development in the late 1940’s and 1950’s of behavioral development strategies such as sensitivity training, survey feedback, socio-technical systems, and quality management.
A good mentor cans a new job applicant up to speed quicker and helps with answers to questions that may arise. Another sign of a good mentorship program that both parties involved can learn from each other. An organization having a mentorship program can assist with employee retention because it will foster employees feeling valued by the company and this in return develops employee loyalty to the organization (Mathis & Jackson, 2017). This can be a win-win situation for the company because employees who feel they are valued tend to take pride in their work and increase
Pegg, M. (1999) The Art of Mentoring: How You Can Be a Superb Mentor. Chalford: Management Books.
Mentoring: Presentations of mentoring have become increasingly popular in large public sector organizations as a resources of employee induction, management development and on occasions executive development. Mentoring is linked with overtly developing the capability and proficiency in an individual in the situation of a one-on-one relationship, where the mentor has a depth of know-how and familiarity in particular areas. The personal growth and development of the person being mentored is tracked in the context of an ongoing relationship with a more skilled and experienced person.
Gendered stereotypes and norms were invading into the mentoring/sponsoring relationships. Women were being labeled as less ‘sponsorship worthy’, acquiring less sponsorship and endorsement, deemed not ready for the next role, and being encouraged to change to better fit current leadership norms. This article spotlights the way in which mentors through their sponsorship proceedings may be (unknowingly) strengthen gendered norms of leadership and unintentionally duplicating the status quo as they sponsor men and mentor women. Differentiating between the role and procedures of mentoring and sponsorship is important. Putting a separate interest on the significance of sponsorship highlights the need to further analyze the role sponsorship plays in
Mentoring program becomes instrumental and breakdown barriers as employees are interacting and carrying out the organization’s vision. This allows employees to interact with employees of different cultures and backgrounds with the goal that one will learn more about the individual.
Many women explain how mentoring relationships have helped them understand themselves, their preferred styles of operating, and ways they might need to change as they move up the leadership pipeline.” (Ibarra). This statement shows that both appreciate the mentoring they receive; however, males receive promotional advancement over women. Women also must struggle with being viewed as ready for their next career move because their mentor view them as not being ready for the position and the responsibilities that come with it. This is because most women have families at home and therefore, have other responsibilities to tend to than men.
Organizational learning is learning about learning. The outcome will be a renewed connection between employees and their work, which will spur the organization to create a future for itself (Braham 1996)