Social Work

1101 Words3 Pages

To better understand countertransference, it is crucial to address transference first. The term transference was coined by Sigmund Freud to denominate the way clients “transfer” feeling from important persons in their early lives, onto the therapist. Greenson (1965) defined transference as “the experiencing of feelings, drives, attitudes, fantasies, and defenses toward a person in the present, which are inappropriate to the person and are a repetition, a displacement of reactions originating in regard to significant persons of early childhood” (p. 156). Assumptions from the clients’ are based on the client’s experiences with, assumptions regarding and other important relationships, such as childhood relations with parents. Countertransference on the other hand is the response that is elicited in the therapist by the patient’s unconscious transference communications. Very often, it includes both feelings and associated thoughts. According to Gabbard (2004), it is most widely used to refer to the therapist’s cognitive-affective responses to the client (as cited in Cartwright, 2011). Freud conceptualized “countertransference” as arising from the client’s influence on the psychoanalyst’s unconscious feelings, a manifestation of the psychoanalyst’s unresolved issues, and a potential impediment to treatment (Storr, 1989). Countertransference can serve as a sensitive interpersonal barometer, a finely tuned instrument in the field of social interaction. For a therapist who feels irritated by a patient for no clear reason may eventually uncover subtle unconscious provocations by the patient that irritate and repel others, and thereby keep the patient unwittingly lonely and isolated. In countertransference, a therapist must take into consi... ... middle of paper ... ...d on saying that self-disclosure from the therapist may allow the client to be more in touch with their experiences and thus self-closing even more. I think after disclosing this information, the conversation started flowing in and the client would often call to remind me of our weekly appointment. Furthermore, Jampel (2010) explained that after disclosing her hearing impairment to her clients, she developed better relationship in the process. For her, not being able to hear allowed some clients to feel that she was a better listener and relate to her. I think I could relate to that statement because my client was able to move past the religion barriers and we were able to move towards our goals. She did acknowledged not hearing back from some of her clients after disclosing her impairment, because those clients didn’t feel like she will be able to understand them.

Open Document