Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social process theories:socializtion and society
Criminological process theories
Summary of social control
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social process theories:socializtion and society
First lets aim in on the 3 main Social Process theories, learned, control and labeling. Learned Theory is learning deviant behavior and the process of learning conventional behavior is one in the same process. Neither criminals nor typical members of society are raised to be completely good or completely bad, neither completely deviant, or completely conforming; therefore criminals are not born and breed they are more like cultivated. Social control theory proposes that people's relationships, commitments, values and beliefs encourage them not to break the law. If moral codes are integrated into the individuals’ life, and they have a stake in their wider community, they will voluntarily limit their probability to commit deviant acts or crime. The theory seeks to understand the ways in which it is possible to reduce the likelihood of criminality developing in individuals. Finally the labeling theory “labels” the deviant acts or crimes. Socially these gives the crime or act a face which makes the offender recognizable by his other act rather than the content of their character prior to the deviant act.
Learning theory has been widely discussed in my forums, being taught to be a deviant is the basis of a criminal at its purest form. It views people's interactions with various organizations, institutions, and processes in society; people in all walks of life have the potential to become criminals if they maintain destructive social relationships. This describes organized crime, crime families, and even singular crimes. These are taught to you at an early age or when you interact with the neighborhood thug. If you never saw a criminal you would less likely become a criminal. Dr. C.R Jeffery suggests (Jeffery, 1965) “the case of crimi...
... middle of paper ...
...hat is a choice he/she makes with the help of environment or people.” The Labeling theory is greatly debated; the offender can change if given the opportunity. It has to start after the first crime is committed. (Willam R. Downs, 1997)”Control theory implies that social services will decrease levels of deviant behavior by strengthening the bond between the adolescent and society. Labeling theory implies the reverse, that the process of formal adjudication through the juvenile court will first stabilize and then increase levels of deviant behavior. “Labeling is not the end all be all.
In conclusion the Social Process Theories are all just theories, each one has its pros and cons but each individual opinion on where crime derives from and how it continues to manifest and multiply in our lives. If you would like more information on this subject see reference material.
Social behavior responds to a complicated network of rewards and punishments. The more a behavior is rewarded, the more likely it is to continue. On the flip side of this, the more a behavior is met with negative consequences, the more it is likely to stop. In any given social situation, whether someone commits a crime is largely dependent on his past behavior, or whether someone has received a positive reinforcement to a that crime. According to Social Learning Theory, crime is a direct response to this reinforcement. So in other words, if rewards are greater than punishments, the crime will be committed. Social Learning Theory is meant to operate as a general theory of crime.
First and foremost, the theory states that criminal behavior is learned, meaning that the behaviors of an individual are influenced and shaped by those they associate with (Clinard & Meier, 2015). The primary reference point here is the nuclear family. Parents teach their children how to walk and talk, who grow up with siblings or in some cases, elderly relatives. With good reason, it is widely held that these interactions create the foundation of the individual’s conception of societal norms and values. That being said, if the individual is capable of assessing proper behavior in society, they are also capable of learning what is considered
Tannenbaum describes the process of defining deviant behavior as different among juvenile delinquents and conventional society, causing a "tagging" of juveniles as delinquent by mainstream society (www.d.umn.edu ). The stigma that accompanies the deviant "tag" causes a person fall into deeper nonconformity (Pfohl 1994). Although Lemert discounts the influence of Tannenbaum on the development of labeling theory (www.sonoma.edu ), Tannenbaum's approach is incorporated in many societal reaction theories. Social Pathology (1951) outlines Edwin Lemert's approach to what many consider the original version of labeling theory. Lemert, unhappy with theories that take the concep...
In today’s society the theory known as social control theory was a theory that most individuals could have found themselves relating to. Theorists that helped in the development of the social control theory did not ask the one major question of what made an individual a criminal or act in a deviant way, these theorists shared a thought that deviant behavior was to be expected. This theory did not end up becoming popular till the mid 1970’s and the theory really blossomed into three distinct trends (Williams &McShane, 2014). The first trend that was in the social control theory was the reaction to the labeling and conflict orientation and return to the examination of criminal behavior of a deviant individual (Williams &McShane, 2014). The second trend in the social control theory was the rise in the study criminal justice as a discipline helped move criminology in a system orientated direction. Lastly social control theories were linked with a new research technique that was used for finding delinquent behavior which were called the self-report survey, which became very popular. In the social control theory what must have been explained is why individuals made the decision to obey the rules that were made for the individuals, not what made them act in a deviant way. Some theorists in the social control theory demonstrated the view of human nature which reflected the beliefs of the theorist Thomas Hobbes an English philosopher who was convinced that human nature was just an evil thing. The modern versions of social control theory were the reactions to strain theories (Williams &McShane, 2014). The theories in the Chicago school also played a critical in the development of the social control theory; the ideas of the Chicago school c...
What are theories of crime? Why are they important? In this paper, will discuss two crime theories. Social learning theory and the labeling theory. We will compare both crime theories. It will also explain how these theories are related to specific crimes. The two theories discussed will also explain the policy implications. Finally, we will address what types of programs can be created to mitigate specific crimes related to the causation theories.
The labelling theory became dominant within society during the 1940’s and 1950’s, when a group of graduate students from the Chicago school tried a different approach to applying theory to deviant behaviour. Within this group was a highly influential young man, Howard S.Becker who became the person most recognised for his work with the labelling of crime (Williams.F. McShaneM. 2010.p110). Becker argued that labels could be applied through the social reaction of others when a deviant or criminal act had been committed he stated that “Labelling is the process of identifying, categorising and stereotyping social categories such as delinquents” (Davies.M.et.al.2010.p30). When an individual becomes labelled a criminal, people do not consider all the praiseworthy things they may have done previously, they just see that they have committed some form of deviance and are now judged within societ...
Theories of criminal behavior are to have their strengths and weaknesses to their explanations about what they are to mean. A list of criminal behavior theories are; consensus theory, conflict theory, rational choice theory, psychological theories, social theories, learning theories and critical theories. For a better understanding of these theories, they will need to be briefly explained.
Some of the explanations of delinquency insinuates that education, politics, social factors, family issues among others are the main causes of delinquency (Rutter, 2013).Just as these were some of the factors in “There Are No Children Here”. In addition, criminal investigators formulated several theories which explain causes of delinquency. Among them are social factors which are explained through several theories which include Social Reaction Theory also referred to as Labeling theory and Power control
Social Control Theory presumes that people will naturally commit crime if there were left to their own devices (i.e. no laws in society) and people do not commit crimes because of certain controlling forces, such as social bonds that hold individuals back partaking on their anti social behavior (Bell, 2011). Examples of controlling forces are family, school, peers, and the law. Young people who are t... ... middle of paper ... ... nd delinquent are more likely to partake in committing criminal behavior (Shaefer and Haaland, 2011, p.155-156).
In the end, the Social Process Theory shows a relationship of deviant behavior and how this behavior is learned. It also shows how people react to social norms in a community. Then people are labeled and respond to those labels if they cannot rise above them.
People also were tired of criminals trying to blame the society and not taking their punishments for committing the crimes. The Social Process Theory also explains how a person can get involved in crimes from their surroundings. Being social is great, but sometimes the wrong company can cause a lot of problems. Not all the time a person is involved in a crime because of their social life. Committing a crime is by choice; no one can make a person do anything
In today’s society, one will find that there are many different factors that go into the development of a criminal mind, and it is impossible to single out one particular cause of criminal behavior. Criminal behavior often stems from both biological and environmental factors. In many cases criminals share similar physical traits which the general population do not usually have. For example criminals have smaller brains than properly adjusted individuals. However biological reasons cannot solely be the cause of criminal behavior. Therefore, one must look to other sources as to how a criminal mind is developed. Social and environmental factors also are at fault for developing a person to the point at which they are lead to committing a criminal act. Often, someone who has committed a violent crime shows evidence of a poorly developed childhood, or the unsuitable current conditions in which the subject lives. In addition if one studies victimology which is the role that the victim plays in the crime, it is apparent that there are many different causes for criminal behavior. Through the examination of biological factors, in addition to the social and environmental factors which make up a criminal mind, one can conclude that a criminal often is born with traits common to those of criminals, it is the environment that exist around them that brings out the criminal within them to commit indecent acts of crime.
Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).
Labeling Theory is how society labels an individual’s self-identity and behavior that may be influenced or dictated by the words to define or stigmatize them. The concept of this theory is associated with the perception of self-fulfilling insight and stereotyping. Labeling Theory indicates delinquency is not classifiable to act, but concentrates on the disposition of labeling minorities or individuals seen as deviant from cultural norms. An adolescent may stigmatize themselves, altering he or she’s self-image and feel obligated to act out similar roles corresponded by their status as a delinquent.
Different schools of thought propose varying theoretical models of criminality. It is agreeable that criminal behaviour is deep rooted in societies and screams for attention. Biological, Social ecological and psychological model theories are key to helping researchers gain deeper comprehension of criminal behaviour and ways to avert them before they become a menace to society. All these theories put forward a multitude of factors on the outlooks on crime. All these theories have valid relevancy to continuous research on criminal behaviour.