Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What makes a successful social movement
What makes a successful social movement
The influence of social movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What makes a successful social movement
Thesis: How do social movements find their first (and subsequent) follower(s) after a leader has risen?
For this paper, we define a social movement as a community of individuals that are passionate and interested in furthering a common interest or cause generally addressing an inequality or a social injustice. (Snow, Soule 2010) defines a social movement as “collective acting with some degree of organization and continuity, partly outside institutional or organizational channels, for the purpose of challenging extant systems of authority or resisting change in such systems in the organization, society, culture or world system in which they are embedded.” The civil rights movement clearly identified the need to challenge the segregation laws
…show more content…
When individuals are passionate about an issue or an injustice they see needs to be changed—they find something collectively that they want to join—something with a shared common interest. Joining a movement gives individuals an opportunity to share their passion with others. The sheer strength (Donovan, 1996) of [a movement’s leaders'] power often lies in their ability to influence, convince and perhaps even to manipulate others to support their agendas. President Harry S. Truman acknowledged both the motivational and influential elements of leadership. He defined a leader as “a man or woman who can persuade people to do what they ought to do … without being persuaded. They must also have the ability to persuade people to do what they do not want to do and like …show more content…
Gladwell explains that Connectors are the rare people who have incredibly widespread networks of people and organizations. They often play an integral role within a movement—most recognized as the movement’s leader. With their wide reaching networks of people and organizations, connectors can use their influence to spread a message rapidly to its first followers. Gladwell defines Mavens as people who yearn to share their knowledge, but more importantly, feel a need to learn more about the movement’s issue or cause. A strong strategy for any movement leader to garner followers. Gladwell’s third Law of the Few, Salesmen are possibly the most easily identifiable group in a movement. These individuals uses the art of persuasion to gain further followers of the movement. Can Gladwell’s Law of the Few be a strategy to grow a movement? If so, are mavens considered the first followers in a movement? What characteristics does a leader have to have to be successful in securing followers such as
Existing within the movement must be a leader or leaders, as well as a large number of committed followers or members. Additionally, social movements have “organizations or coalitions” working as a guiding backbone for collectivity and regulation (Stewart,
The “Movements” strategies of Disruption and Non-Violent Direct Action were successful; Jim Crow and Segregation were abolished via Political Concessions. Adaptive Counter tactics against the “Movement” from Economic and Political Elites, and the (1965 Urban Riots, which saw the beginning of the Black Power Movement), all left the “Movement” with no viable or new protest strategies or tactics, and leaving the Civil Rights Movement “Impotent”
Connectors, mavens, and salesmen, personalities that are part of the “Law of the Few”, are essential for a social epidemic or revolution to begin. Gladwell describes connectors as “…people whose social circle is four or five times the size of other people’s. Sprinkled among every walk of life… are people with an extraordinary knack of making friends and acquaintances. They are connectors” (Gladwell 41). Paul Revere, a gregarious individual who was a member of several social clubs, unknowingly used his powers as a connector to invoke a social epidemic during his “midnight ride”.
Between 1865 and 1970 leadership; motivating, persuading, encouraging and inspiring the masses to engage with a vision was vital to the progression of the African-American civil rights movement. It is a common notion that individual leaders held dominant roles within the movement and used the power from this to lead the grassroots and make decisions on behalf of organisations. Additionally, it is believed that leaders were the strategists who shaped the methods of the movement; allowing them to win the nation’s allegiance and convince them to make sacrifices for racial justice. However, this traditionalist perspective ignores much of the conditional causes that in fact triggered outstanding leadership accomplishments. More recent historians
The movements that emerged after 1955 were church-based, cross-class movements that stressed legalistic civil rights. This was the era of effective leaders like Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. whom acknowledged the failure of the movement to address the persistent realities of poverty and economic discrimination. This movement dismantled segregation eliminated racism in southern politics empowered black officeholders and changed the day to day interactions between the races. Movements to obtain civil rights for black Americans have had a special historical significance. It has endured challenges not only by white supremacist groups but that of new black militant organizations (Black Panther Party) that rallied for violence. In spite of agitations/obstacles this movement has broken many race barriers and allowed for accommodations for blacks. Sit- in and non-violent boycott movements have been effective techniques used to break segregation barriers. Such
On December 1st, 1955 in Montgomery, Alabama, Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat in the front of a bus to a white man. It was this simple act of defiance that, arguably, began the Civil Rights movement which lasted from 1955 through the 1960’s and altered the face of our nation forever. Following the arrest of Rosa Parks for her simple denial, African Americans in Montgomery began boycotting the bus system, one of the first major stands against racism in the 1950’s. On the heels of the Brown v. Board of Education segregation trial which had ruled in favor of school integration, this boycott, which proved successful after the seat separation was removed, effectively began the civil rights movement with which we are now so familiar with. The civil rights movement in America aimed to gain civil liberties and rights which were guaranteed by law but withheld from them in society. While the movement lasted from about 1954 to 1968, it was not until the 1960’s that other minorities such as American Indians and women began to join the fight. The Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s was possibly the most important domestic social movement of the twentieth century. At the very least, it was the most important social confrontation to grip America since the Civil War.
If you grew up in the 60s’, it was a time where major protest groups began to appear all over the place with one protest or another against things like the war, women’s rights, school protests, etc. But in the 60s, there was one of these groups that want to fight for equity and that group was the civil rights group. Therefore, even though the civil rights group began in the 50’s it did not really come into the forefront until the 1960s, where they emerged and greatly expanded in the 1960s. This group was the first movement group of the 1960s-era social movements. This movement was also responsible for producing one of the most significant American social activists every of the 20th century, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The Progressive Era was the period of reform and social activism from 1895 to 1920, it was an attempt to get rid of all the ills that had penetrated American society during the Gilded age. The Progressives were people who tried to make the life of the average American better, they believed in the ability of humans to create a better world. Industrial capitalism, burgeoning cities, the influx of immigrants, and the depression of the 1890s were some of the sources of the reform impulse of the era. The Progressives were primarily middle class citizens such as doctors, lawyers, engineers, teachers, businessmen, etc. Many of them were part of the Republican and Democratic parties. They were greatly influenced by the Europeans.The Progressives believed
The movements discussed in this paper represent the power of what can happen when a nation is united. The Reconstruction Era paved the way for the Civil Rights Movement. If one element of the Reconstruction Era was missing from the history of America the Civil Rights Movement may have not been possible. To evaluate each event on an individual basis, the Reconstruction Era is a representation of a developing country deciding how to move forward with the situations that were present at the time. Reconstruction was necessary in order to save the country and to integrate black Americans into an evolving nation. The Civil Rights Movement on the other hand symbolized a vision that was created during the Reconstruction Era, but was not fulfilled until this point. As a nation that was a trailblazer in the form of democracy, we had failed the black community in equality. The only problem with both of these movements is the fact that they should have not needed to occur in the first place, in a theoretical world were racism does not exist. Along side with how long it took for change to occur in the country are the only real negative representations behind each of these movements. Thousands of black Americans died simply to have the same rights as white Americans. The future of this nation cannot advance without knowing the legacy of each of these
The True Believer is a manuscript that attempts to grant justification as to why people would be drawn to a mass movement. A mass movement is a form of social, economic, or religious movement where a large group of people attempt to rise up and evoke a change away from the status quo. "This book deals with some peculiarities common to all mass movements, be they religious movements, social revolutions or nationalist movements."
Polletta, F., & Jasper, J. M. (2001). Collective identity and social movements. Annual review of Sociology, 283-305.
(Turner and Killian 1987) cited in (Diani 1992, p. 4) define social movements as a “collectivity acting with some continuity to promote or resist a change in the society or organisation of which it is part. As a collectivity a movement is a group with indefinite and shifting membership and with leadership whose position is determined more by informal response of adherents than by formal procedures for legitimizing authority”. Turner and Killian regard a social movement as a peculiar kind of collective behavior that is contrasted to regularity and institutional behavior. Additionally, Turner believes that social movements do not necessarily coincide with movement organisations, although these organisations can carry out a large part of the movement tasks and it is often help to control and speak for movements (Diani 1992).
Persuading others of your vision requires knowledge and a clear strategy (Business Dictionary). Leadership is a natural quality that comes up as responsibility in exchange of having followers with, in return, the followers creating a leader. Concluding that leadership in general cannot be taught, as per the Trait Theory, we argue that it is different characteristics in different situations that result in good leadership. The Trait Theory points out that there is a certain type of person making a good leader, with the decisive factor being: having or not having distinctive qualities of being a leader. Despite that, being an effective leader still can be trained. External and internal influences impact the effectiveness and must be considered in order to succeed. Which leads us to the Behavioural Theory, thinking of what a good leader actually does. Kurt Lewin developed three leadership types such as the autocratic leader who is a maker, someone who makes decisions without consultation with others. Contrasting, the democratic leader who consults with others (a team, for example) before making a decision. Laissez-faire leaders, as the name already indicates, occasionally lets other people make decisions, doesn’t
Another aspect of this principle is applied to the persuasion which is developed through companies who develop relationships with customers. This is certainly something which is developed over a long period of time. This could, for example, be used to develop a
Massive protests against racial segregation and discrimination broke out in the southern United States that came to national attention during the middle of the 1950’s. This movement started in centuries-long attempts by African slaves to resist slavery. After the Civil War American slaves were given basic civil rights. However, even though these rights were guaranteed under the Fourteenth Amendment they were not federally enforced. The struggle these African-Americans faced to have their rights ...