Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of social media on cyber crime essays
The role of social media with reference to crime
The role of social media in promoting cybercrime
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of social media on cyber crime essays
Social media has become a popular tool for both criminals and law enforcement. There are a lot of different perspectives about how social media is instrumental to crime and solving crimes. On one hand, law enforcement can use social media websites such as Facebook and Twitter to find evidence about specific crimes. On the other hand, digital villains can use social media to break the law. This could include crimes as small as illegally downloading music, anywhere upwards to broadcasting the selling of drugs. Social media has also bred a new type of crime. Online money scams are a rising issue in Canada as the social media demographic expands. Another popular topic in social media crime is the use of vigilantes. With the use of computers, smartphones and tablets, law enforcement has such a wide spectrum of users to ask for aid in crime solving. It is also important to consider ethical considerations of using social media information. It is possible to infringe on users rights when deriving information and evidence. All of these different aspects establish how social media is both a barrier and benefit to crime in Canada.
Any site that allows people to post updates on their whereabouts, and daily activities are all potentials for police officers and investigators to gain evidence, or make charges on specific crimes. Kate Knibbs of digitaltrends.com states that “Facebook is now one of the most fertile sources of criminal evidence” (Knibbs, 2013). The website goes on to say that it started as small as underage drinking, and has evolved into helping to identify gang members. There are different ways that law enforcement can use social media to gain evidence. One way is the practice of creating fake online profiles. “Police officers c...
... middle of paper ...
...e crowd in order to help police in ways they would not be able to without social media. When you share an Amber Alert, you are exerting some sort of internet vigilance. It is also important to be wary of misguided and damaging internet vigilance, which imposes on impartiality and justice. As well as the internet has the ability to help fight crime, the internet has the ability to add to crime through phishing, hacking and social media scams. It is imperative to be aware of the evolution of online crime, in order to avoid it. Lastly, protecting your privacy on the internet is feasible if there is an understanding of the privacy and security of individual social media sites, as well as who has access to your profile. There will always be benefits to using social media to solve crimes, as there will always be deterrents to protecting your own social safety online.
In 2012, LexisNexis, surveyed some 1,200 law enforcement agencies that focused on the impact of social media on law enforcement in criminal investigations and found four out five respondents use social media platforms to assist in investigations . The research also found that “identifying people and locations; discovering criminal activity and locations; and gathering evidence are the top activities, while Facebook and YouTube are the most widely used platforms” . In fact, once found on social media, “87% of the time, search warrants utilizing social media to establish probable cause hold up in court when challenged, according to respondents” . Not only, this, while the majority of people who want to help don’t come forward in criminal investigations, many feel free to speak and post information on social media accounts.
Social Media: Establishing Criteria for Law Enforcement Use by Robert D. Stuart is an informative article that discusses the use of social media over the past decade involving law enforcement. The article talks about how there is a fine line between having social media in one's personal life and their work life. In an officer's personal life they have the ability to share whatever it is that they please, as most social media apps ask you quite personal questions such as your name, hobbies, birth-dates, etcetera. Now as for your work life, that is a whole different situation. Sure, social media can help law enforcement solve investigations or help them with crimes, but Stuart(2013) states, “Mixing their personal and social lives with their professional ones can bring
To better understand how new media such as Facebook, Instagram, and Youtube post videos and pictures or acts of crime that affect our society and the criminal justice system, we must first look at the history of media and their relationship with the criminal justice system. Media is broken up in four parts which are: print, sound, visual, and new media. Most people don’t think about the fact that there was a part of media that was there before print media. Strained (n.d) stated that the making of the alphabet was the foundation of the media we have today, which was invented in BCE. “Communication had evolved from verbal, to visual, and idea 's could now be recorded for future generations to observe. Without the alphabet media would not be
A spokesperson for the Department of Justice says, “We will continue to use publicly available information individuals post online about their illegal activities or false statements to law enforcement officials in our investigations” (Ellis 2010). As a method for their social media investigations, law enforcements go undercover on social media to communicate with the suspects and gain their personal information. In order to do so, they must gain consent and cooperation from the media sites. MySpace has created a 24/7 hotline and e-mail account to assist police investigations. A MySpace representative says that they are “making sure law enforcement gets the information they need in a way that complies with all laws in order to be admissible in court and protecting the privacy of users from unauthorized exposure” (Ellis 2010). Facebook, on the other hand, has a stricter policy on providing them with information as they created an emergency policy for providing a user’s personal information. A Facebook spokesman says that “One hypothetical is a kidnapped child where every minute counts. It is in this type of instance where we have verified an emergency that we feel a responsibility to quickly share information that could save someone's life" (Ellis 2010). Yet, even in this case, Facebook would only share the minimum amount of information to ensure the user’s privacy is
Technology has opened new encounters and opportunities for the criminal justice system. There are so many new practices of criminal activity, such as computer crimes. There are different types of computer crimes that many people become victims of every day. Computer crime is any crime that involves a computer and a network. The computer may have been used in the commission of a crime, or it may be the target ("Computer Crime: Chapter 2: What Are the Crimes?", n.d.). Crimes such as data diddling, pump and dump, social engineering and spoofing are computer crimes. Even though these crimes are difficult by privacy issues, the new technology has made investigations and prosecutions well organized and effective. Though views are different on the pros and cons of specific technological changes in the criminal justice system, there is an agreement the system has changed affectedly ("Effects of Technology in Criminal Justice | eHow", n.d.).
Social medias have become a big part of our society now, they are being used in all aspects of our life. We are connected twenty-four hours a day, at work, school, home, shopping etc. There is a necessity, a need to be connected to these social media’s, to feel like you are a part of society. With these growing numbers in being connected to social media’s on the web, there comes a growing desire for privacy and safety. In this paper I will discuss and analyze the social media’s themselves, the dangers that arise from them, and how all these correlate to privacy.
It has shown great potential in tracking and capturing criminals. However, criminals also find technology useful. Cybercrime is a relatively new arena in criminal law. Despite future laws for a changing society and decriminalization to accommodate expanding social norms, criminal law will continue to adapt “to reflect social values and contemporary issues and problems”. (Siegel, 2015)
In the 21st century, digital media has gain popularity from young adults. There are over 1 billion users solely registered on Facebook (Solberg, 2014). However, issues of privacy and publicity are being brought to attention, though it has been used in problematic ways such as academic research, personal reputation, or policing. The faulty policies of social media websites like Facebook are potentially putting users at risk and are outweighing the benefits, which in turn can negatively impact their social perceptions.
In the midst of the post digital era the growing popularity of cyber-crime have posed as a challenge to legislators in Canada as there are very few legal consequences to e-crimes as in the past where they were not actively practised. Cyber-crime has gained massive popularity in the twenty first century due to its perceived rewards outweighing the potential risks, anonymity, ease and thrill. A common theme that most cyber-crimes seem to have is the violation of privacy especially sexually explicit offences. While the term cyber-crime is often associated with fraud, theft, piracy and cyber bullying. a sexually exploiting act known as ‘revenge porn’ has seen a dangerous growth in popularity over the past few years.
The article “What makes cybercrime laws so difficult to enforce” discusses the various difficulties encountered by authority powers attempting to track down criminals that use the internet to carry out immoral actions. Shinder (2011) highlights the naivety of legislators and their inability to foresee what the increased availability of internet access would mean for policing agencies. Unfamiliar and therefore unopposed forms of crime were developed much more rapidly than could be anticipated and handled. The need for and effective system of cybercrime policing swiftly became apparent. Unfortunately, as Shinder (2011) points out, identifying the need for an effective form of cyber policing is only a small step in a series of considerable leaps necessary for the actual establishment of such a system. Jurisdictional issues as well as the problem of pinpointing the name and location of offenders can get in the way of such a system (Shinder, 2011). Even if policing forces get passed these obstacles there is still of controversy resulting from the unique quality of digital evidence (Shinder, 2011).
The reason is that potential targets put a lot more information voluntarily online because they think law enforcement are not apart social media the way they are. All that does is help police officers paint more of a vivid picture of what individuals are doing. For example, there can be applicable information that has been obtained from a suspect who is in a drug organization that attended a family gathering and posted it on their Facebook page. That can help police officers and investigators build an “association web” of that individual. As far as certain areas, street names and people that individual associates with.
Throughout the years, technology has been increasing in both good and bad ways. Technology is now being used to contact people through social media, link people together through group chats, and also spy on people. Although connecting with people instantly on social media is the upside to technology usage, people often tend to share private information that can be used in the wrong way which is the downside of technology. As both technology and crime increases, technology usage is now being increased to help solve crimes. Many years ago, without the usage of technology, many aspects of a crime was not questioned or the resources to uncover certain evidence were both time consuming and/or expensive. The Police Chief Magazine list many technological improvements that have been put in place to
The 90's internet boom gave rise to new ways of writing in through access to cyberspace. What used to be printed or handwritten on physical surfaces such as paper, cardboard, or bulletin boards has changed to 0's and 1's, bits and bytes of digitized information that can be displayed thru the projections of computer screens. Moreover, the internet has made the process of publishing one's works, writing letters, or chatting with one another much easier and convenient for everyone around the globe. The internet became a universal tool, giving much freedom and flexibility to the users; it gave them opportunity to deliver their thoughts with little or no restrictions. Since it's impossible to regulate all cyber-activities, internet users are often unrestricted by the normal laws or authorities that would set boundaries around the various online transactions. More importantly, the fact that a net user can take on different identities in cyberspace brings about several ethical and social issues. These anonymous and unrestrictive characteristics of cyberspace often permite abusive users to easily involve themselves in serious cybercrimes such as cyberstalking, cyber-rape, and cyber-harassment through chatting services, emails, cyber communities, and other online communication.
While some observers see these developments as signs of the impending ‘end of privacy’ and the rise of ‘surveillance society’ (Castells, 2001; Lyon, 2001), others point to the insufficiency and, ultimately, the futility of governmental interference in cyberspace. The Internet has, right from the beginning, challenged conventional notions of policing and sovereignty which are inevitably linked with territoriality; also this challenge is coming from multiple directions, most important from transnational organized crime. The problem of governing a global space is magnified in cyberspace because, here, social interaction is free from the constrictions of physical space. As illustrated by the case of child pornography, the victim and the offender may be located in different countries. Unlike most ‘real world’ crimes, cybercrime does not require physical proximity between the victim and the offender. The lack of ‘physical’ evidence and the lack of spatial connections make these types of crimes especially difficult to investigate (Brenner, 2007). Policing of the Internet marks an important shift from the policing of territory to the ‘policing of suspect populations’ (Sheptycki, 2002a). Information and communication technologies fundamentally transform the very way in which policing is practiced. Policing cyberspace not only demands inter-governmental intervention, but also needs to organize a number of responsibilization policies on the part of the users of Internet and the service providers. The idea of ‘plural policing’ and the diffusion of regulatory tasks is therefore one of the hallmarks of cyber-governance (Jewkes, 2003).
Although social media has provided todays society with instant forms of communication and ways to connect, it also created a new standard for living and has caused problems for many groups of citizens in all walks of life and has caused society to re-think its usage. There are two views about social media, either. It is a positive addition to society and its benefits outweigh the risks, or that social media causes more harm than good and it’s usage should be limited. Some of the ideas that are central to the idea that social media is a benefit to today’s society are that social media encourages increased communication with friends and family, provides fast access to breaking news and other information, and helps businesses attract new business and correspond more quickly with their existing customers.