Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Roles of social media in political movement
The Political Power of Social Media
Roles of social media in political movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Roles of social media in political movement
Social Media manipulation has a beneficial impact on the 2016 election due to increasing participation in the 2016 election. Much of the news related to presidential candidate was learned about there social media. The three social media sites that manipulated the presidential election were the following: Facebook, Twitter, and Snapchat. Facebook, according to direction Katie Harbath, plays the following role: “"And the campaigns seeing the greatest success on the platform are those that are really taking advantage of that by reaching out and having an actual, two-way dialogue with voters” (SOURCE). The conversation is happing on Facebook: this social media site is being used by presidential candidates to actively engage with the public to get …show more content…
Social media has a different structure than previous media outlets used during political elections, and anything content that is posted on these sites is not directly filtered or fact-checked to see if they information its completely accurate. This could lead to fake news, defined as, “to be news articles that are intentionally and verifiably false, and could mislead readers” (SOURCE). Fake news can have polticial implications, and these implications were seen during the 2016 US presidential election. Recent evidence that was published in Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzhow’s journal article shows that, “1) 62 percent of US adults get news on social media (Gottfried and Shearer 2016); 2) the most popular fake news stories were more widely shared on Facebook than the most popular mainstream news stories (Silverman 2016); 3) many people who see fake news stories report that they believe them (Silverman and Singer-Vine 2016)” (SOURCE). The circulation of fake news on social media impacted now only they way social media conveyed information, but it impacted what people believed in. This study shows that fake news did play a factor in manipulating people during this 2016 presidential election since the majority of people who read this news believed what they were reading. In these …show more content…
Fake news on social media was on these sites, and determining how much fake news was there with respect to how much it was read will help one conclude the influence fake news had on people. Allcott and Gentzhow conducted a survey and concluded the following results, “After weighting for national representativeness, 15 percent of survey respondents recalled seeing the Fake stories, and 8 percent both recalled seeing the story and said they believed it” (SOURCE). Having this high of a percentage believing fake news stories shows that social media was not used banefully to convey the right information to the public. When citizens are exposed to this information, it would have been used to sway their political behaviors and opinions about a particular candidates. The survey conducted by Allcott and Gentzhow also found that, “Given that the Fake articles in our database had 38 million Facebook shares, this implies that the average adult saw and remembered 0.03/million × 38 million ≈ 1.14 fake news articles from our fake news database” (SOURCE). Not only were there over millions of shares on Facebook publicizing this fake news, people on these sites, on average would read at least one fake news article before voting in the 2016 US
In Nicholas Carr’s article “How Social Media Is Ruining Politics”, Carr writes about the effects that social media has on politics. In his article, Carr focuses more on the negative effect that social media has when it comes to politics. Some points that he makes about social media include specific examples like the recent presidential campaigns, how other technological advances over the years have effected politics, and the effectiveness that social media has on politics
In the current time, it seems like one cannot go a day without using at least one social media website. This might be especially true among groups of teenagers and young adults. Social media became a vital part of daily life that feeds people with several types of information constantly. Political news is a type of information that can reach the people through the means of social media. Since presidents are constantly seeking new strategies to increase their communication with the public in order to spread their political message, they utilize the different social media websites. Hence, social media became a platform to spread political message. It is not surprising that now the majority of political officials and candidates have social media accounts more than ever before, such as a Twitter account.
The researchers present findings that indicate that a politician’s popularity in the voting booth may be related to the frequency with which the candidate is talked about on social media. The researchers goes on to discuss how further research may conclude that social media has a bigger impact on voting outcomes than traditional forms of media, and how that could potentially shape the future of voting.
The news media and social media affect and influence the political world. The political arena can now be easily accessed through every citizen’s smartphone screens and tablet screens. For instance, Barack Obama became the country’s most Instagrammer-in-Chief (Carr). Obama utilized social media to promote his climate agenda while on his trip to Alaska. He would snap pictures of the landscape and share the pictures on his social media accounts which earned him more than thousands of likes. The media and its political connections play a huge scene in this topic of influence. Since the election of 2008, Obama utilized Facebook to connect with the public (Carr). This year’s 2016 Presidential candidates have been using social media to connect with the public. The media interprets and impact discussions made by the public and its candidates, as well as polling and voting. Obama has paved the path since 2008 in using social media to connect with the public, and Obama has been a pacesetting in this year’s presidential candidates. For example, Senator Ted Cruz often appears on Periscope, Marco Rubio snap videos and pictures on Snapchat at stops along his
Laura Spinney uses a variety of persuasive components and techniques in the article, “How Facebook, fake news and friends are warping your memory”. She uses Ethos, Pathos, Logos, and a variety of arguments to get her point across. Persuasive components have different effects on different people and require skill to use effectively. Laura Spinney’s use of these components is fairly effective at convincing the reader that fake news and misinformation lead to altered memories that affect how people view the past and the future. Spinney uses a wide variety of evidence in a way that convinces readers to change their perspectives in a somewhat successful way. In this essay, I will critique Laura Spinney’s
Thesis: With the recent emergence of social media into the mainstream, corruption within government functions has never been more manipulative of citizens. This is also clearly linked to the paralleled popularity of abbreviations and emojis when communicating, instead of using traditional English language. In the case of American politics, no one party or person can maintain (checked and balanced) control of the country for over eight years, so the 1984 concept of the government controlling the way citizens think is honestly ridiculous. What is very much possible, as seen in this past U.S. election, is the misuse of data to psychologically influence prospective voters to not vote because of their probable candidate preference.
Social media is a revolutionary way to connect with friends and family through a single app, much like Facebook. Also allowing the public to be more informed on current events, whether that is an issue in today’s society, all the way to a heartwarming story or a funny video. This sounds amazing and the fact that this type of news outlet is practically new. An issue arises that involves “fake news” and with that comes many opinions on what to do about it. I believe that people browsing these platforms should have a little bit of skepticism behind each story and if the topic truly intrigues someone then they should look into the topic on a reliable resource before passing on the authors misinformation.
In Cooke’s (2017) article, she discusses the Internet’s saturation of information. Cooke (2017) claims that we live in a post-truth era: “in which audiences are more likely to believe information that appeals to emotions or existing personal beliefs” than credible and objective information. She argues that social media causes the “rapidity of dissemination of information” (Cooke 2017) and facilitates filter bubbles in which confirmation bias, selective exposure, and selective information seeking is prominent. In short, Cooke (2017) attributes satisficing, spin, counterknowledge, misinformation, disinformation, and encompassing information behavior to the spread and consumption of fabricated news. Cooke (2017) offers a solution: “be open minded,
In an age where TV views is decreasing and people not reading the newspaper, most of the population now gets their news from a different source the internet. In more specific terms Social Media, there are many social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat. Most of the population uses these social media platforms for work or for entertainment, but the matter of the problem is that since it is easy for news to get spread around in social media so would fake news. Fake news has been around for what it seems like forever. Social Media helps fake news spread because of how any user of a platform can just upload and share a fake news article without having any real source of material or having no type of credibility.
The 2016 election is a perfect example of fake news impacting people's opinions which had a great impact on our country. The 2016 election was an odd one, instead of people talking about each other political campaigns they would talk about each other's, looks, and actions which cause many people to take advantage of that and start to spread false information about them. People tried to say that Hillary Clinton had to pay Jay Z and Beyonce 62 million dollars to perform at a rally in Cleveland, this was proven false by multiple sources many people still believed it and thought she was fake. People also stated that they did not vote for Hillary Clinton because of stories that she had got an abortion at a younger age and that she was involved in the killing of an FBI agent which have also both been “While established media outlets are brands built on accuracy, rogue websites, some masquerading as legitimate, are reporting misinformation and it’s spreading like wildfire online. Even President Obama urged common sense during a press conference two weeks ago in Germany “If we can’t discriminate between serious arguments and propaganda, then we have problems,” he said” (chang, lefferman, pederson & martz).
Social media over the years has changed greatly due to the advancements in technology. In past years, news was only made by a selected few organizations, but nowadays news can be shared by anyone at any time. Fake news has been becoming more popular by the day, and many people even gain profit by posting these articles. Most people get their news from online media sites, and some sites even post fake news articles that can be difficult to pinpoint. False news is beginning to become pervasive in social media sites, causing these media platforms to struggle to get rid of these articles.
The purpose of this essay is to develop a further understanding of the impacts of social media in regards to the political debate. By looking at the topic of social media and the use rhetoric in response to politics in the 21st century, a deeper understanding of the issue can be established. Social media has become a primary source for the discussion of politics by the average citizen; whether through the sharing of articles, “memes”, advertisements or personal expository statements. As a result, large sums of information and ideas are spread rapidly to a wide variety of subjects. However, much of this information may not be accurate and could be misinterpreted. Consequently potentially misinformed citizens may not be able to make a properly
Social media including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube, Flicker, internet websites, and blogs are becoming mainstream attracting a younger more technology savvy voter. Many candidates in the last elections learned to use these mediums so not to overlook tech savvy voters and learned how to use these to their advantage. Candidates took to the internet to raise awareness, state views, and even successfully raised donations. Social media was able to provide instant feedback on the standing of a candidate often days or weeks sooner than a more traditional poll.
William Pollard once said that information is a source of learning. But unless it is organized, processed, and available to the right people in a format for decision making, it is a burden, not a benefit. From this quote we can say that information contains power but once information is fabricated it can be used to manipulate and cause havoc within a small group of people or even the whole world. Fake news has been around for generations in the form of gossips and rumors. Recently it has become increasingly commonplace due to the extensive use of social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter.
The introduction of the internet to modern society has brought about a new age of information relation. Since there is no longer a need to wait until the next print day, news from all over the world is available at a person’s fingertips within hours or even minutes of the event. With this advent of such easily accessible information, new problems for the news media have also arisen. Aside from potentially losing good economic standing because newspapers are no longer being purchased in the quantities they used to be, the credibility of the information itself is also put into question. No one would argue that credibility of news sources is unimportant, but there is a discrepancy in what takes precedence; economy and speed or getting the information out correctly at the first publishing by taking the time to make sure all facts are checked. The importance of having a system of checks on all information submitted is paramount. People trust what they read and believe it to be so without always questioning. If all information were to not be checked thoroughly, there would be instances where people read an article only for information included to be wrong and they go on believing such information. This can be very dangerous as misinformed people make misinformed decisions. With an increase in errors being made by citizen bloggers and even major publications, many are worried that journalistic ethics and credibility in the news media are being sacrificed in order to maintain swiftness in the news circuit and to retain personal profits. Though getting information to the masses quickly is a major part of the media’s importance, this should not mean that the credibility of that information being presented should be sacrificed for it...