Social Media Argument Paper

482 Words1 Page

It’s always safe to monitor what you put on your personal social media accounts. In the past, some colleges or companies hiring have found information that the employees may have not wanted them to see. Employees should start to monitor what they are putting on their media because in the long run, it can affect them and not always in a good way. It is stated in an article that Walmart employees have their social media account monitored occasionally because of reputation. According to a 2013 survey on CareerBuilder, it states that 39% of employees look at candidate’s social media accounts, 43% of them said they found something that made them a bad candidate, such as posting inappropriate photos or talking trash about a former boss. One positive …show more content…

Recently, a hospital employee was fired because a supervisor at the hospital looked at her social media account and saw that the nurse was discussing patients on Facebook. This not only violated the hospital policy, but also the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. The backside to looking at accounts before hiring is that companies could discriminate against religious beliefs, ethnicity or sexual preference. Lewis Maltby argues that social media searches like that are considered “fishing expeditions” and that the company shouldn’t be concerned about what he/she does outside of work, as long as they are performing well at their job, they should be good to go. But it is simply not that, many bosses are concerned that their home life may be brought into their job and wish to monitor to check on the employee’s well being. As an example, if hiring a police officer and look on their Facebook only to find that they belong to a lot of racist groups, it wouldn’t be good. Usually when companies are looking at social media accounts, they look at legitimate business reasons for rejecting the

Open Document