Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strategies to use to reduce crime
Social factors that contribute to criminal behavior
Crime as a social phenomenon
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strategies to use to reduce crime
Crime is a thing we could never avoid in this society. Every day there are thousands of crimes being committed, some not even realized. There is no easy way to reduce crime, especially with all the resources criminals have today, but there are always ways to help prevent it. Many of those ways are not cheap and is taking extra money, but saves in the long run. The best way to help prevent crime in my opinion is the involvement of others into one’s life. If someone is not going to change for their selves, they might for someone they care about. The most cost efficient and deterring way to prevent crime is with social interaction. Humans live to please others. The theories I have chosen to use to incorporate into my policy focus on how criminal …show more content…
(Akers, 1998) Thus, criminals learn the ways they commit crime through the people closest to them. These people can be their peers, family, members of groups they are involved in, etc. Any social relationship a person has can provide the motivation to commit crime. It would make the most sense that people hang around others who they want to be like. This can influence many behaviors on to a person. Social learning theory is a refinement of differential association theory. They share many of the same assumptions, such as criminal behavior is learned and criminals are not fundamentally different from noncriminals. (Dickinson, Chapter 7) Social learning theory has four parts included in it; differential association, definitions, imitation, and differential reinforcement. Definition is a component of this theory. Definitions are the attitude one has about a behavior, is it acceptable or unacceptable? Definitions can be general or specific. A general definition involves religion, morals, and other conventional values and norms that can either favor or …show more content…
This include programs in schools or a place to gather within neighborhoods for different age groups. A section for the youth, the young adults, the middle-age, and the elderly. Since people of all ages commit crimes, there will need to be an age bracket for all. These centers will have games and ways to socialize with others to build relationships and social skills. They will have workers to help with mental health problems, and if serious enough, refer to another organization. There will be spaces somewhere in the center to house people for a few days who need to get back on their feet. Counseling will be offered to anyone who comes in to the center. These centers are not only aimed at helping troubled people, but the family or friends of these troubled people too. Counseling could also be provided for the ones close to the individual. Any family or friend could join in on activities and help mend bonds there as well. These centers will be free and a person in trouble can come seek help of be referred as part of a probation requirement. To be involved with these centers, there will be mandatory random drug testing and every person will have a file with their information. Everyone will be monitored because it will not be allowed to be on drugs, have warrants, or any other outstanding reasons to not be around the other people. For social learning theory to relate to this
The two theories that are being analyzed in this paper are Ronald Akers’ Social Learning Theory and Travis Hirschi’s Social Bonding Theory. Hirschi's social bonding theory is one of many control theories which all take on the task of explaining the core cause of crime; however, this particular theory seems to be the most popular and able to stand the test of time. The Social Bond theory contains four elements that explain what criminals lack that causes them to be more prone to illegal activity, these elements are attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief. On the other end of the spectrum is Akers’ Social Learning Theory, which attempts to explain the correlation between and individual's social environment and their behavior depending on what is praised or punished in an individual's specific social organization. (Walsh & Hemmens)
The center combines a safe housing environment with structured educational programs that incorporate the philosophies of Alcoholics Anonymous and Narcotics Anonymous. Alcoholics Anonymous is the original self help group founded on principles that provide support and encouragement for recovering alcoholics. New members are encouraged to work with a spon...
There are many different views on the origins of criminal behaviors within societies. One possible reason for why people commit crimes could be because they learned it from others. Edwin Sutherland works to explain this tactic through his theory of differential association. His theory states that criminal behavior is learned in interaction with others in intimate, personal groups. The learning of criminal behavior depends on the strength of the relationship with those who commit deviant actions. This learning also depends on their definitions of legal codes. For example, some people in society rationalize traffic speeding if it is only a couple miles over the speed limit while others are strongly against speeding at any degree. When a person’s
Situational crime prevention is an idea criminologists use in order to reduce the chances of crime initially taking place. This theory does not aim to punish criminals after the crime has taken place like the criminal justice system does, but however the opposite, it aims to reduce the chances of the crime taking place to start with. Ron Clarke (2005) describes this theory as an approach that aims to reduce the opportunities out there for crime, involving rational choice theory. Clark focuses on three methods within this theory, directing at specific crimes, altering the environment we live in and aiming to reduce the benefits of committing crimes.
indirect association and identification with more distant reference groups” (Social Learning theory, 2016). Any human being that an individual has direct or indirect contact with, has the ability to influence social learning. These influences can be positive or negative and have a direct correlation with criminal and non-criminal behaviour. There are two major forms of association, primary and secondary (Cochran & Sellers, 2017). Family and friends are considered primary associations, and other individuals such as neighbors, teachers and church groups are considered secondary associations (Social Learning theory, 2016). Studies show that learning criminal behavior occurs mostly within the primary groups, but may also be influenced by secondary associations. Akers also recognizes that the timing, length, frequency and nature of the contact influence behaviour (Social Learning theory, 2016). For example, if a child spends a large portion of each day with friends who misbehave, the child has a greater chance of misbehaving as
However this theory was not entirely constructed by the mind of Akers, as he used a variety of other sources including Sutherland’s Differential Association Theory to orchestrate certain concepts of his theory. With the combined assistance of Robert Burgess, the two theorist were able to refigure the theory and retain the ideologies of the Differential Association Theory. Akers branched off certain principles that are used in the behavior learning theory, adding them to his Social learning Theory. The principle of “differential reinforcement”, where the intended actions of the individual is acclimatized or conformed through chastisements or
Through Social Learning Theory, an individual can be studied based on the behavior acquired by a role model. Verbal conditioning procedures and observation influences the response to an individual’s personality. Environment factors contribute to the Social Learning Theory. Antisocial model is a major contribute to crime, which influences negative characteristics. The Social Leaning Theory has three core social concepts the must be followed: observational learning, intrinsic reinforcement and modeling process.
In addition to biological and psychological elements, there are the social factors that can influence people to engage in criminal activity. As a matter of fact, social and economic pressures play a major role in the cause of crime, since people are more likely to break the law when they have nothing else to lose. Therefore, the biological, psychological, and social factors should all be considered when trying to establish a reason for every crime. Word Count = 1,378
Adolescent criminal acts, which include but are not limited to murder, rape, armed robbery, violent assault, mugging, arson, vandalism and robbery are a large portion of the crimes represented in the media. Alternative options to throwing these kids in juvenile detention centers is a rehabilitative boot camp where they have no control over even their own bodies or programs similar to scared straight where they see possible consequences to their actions. The importance of the success or failure of these programs is important because right now it is the popular solution. If these programs are going nowhere, time should be invested in creating new ideas and methods to treat these children before they become adults in the prison system.
High crime rates are an ongoing issue through the United States, however the motivation and the cause of crime has yet to be entirely identified. Ronald Akers would say that criminality is a behavior that is learned based on what an individual sees and observes others doing. When an individual commits a crime, he or she is acting on impulse based on actions that they have seen others engage in. Initially during childhood, individuals learn actions and behavior by watching and listening to others, and out of impulse they mimic the behavior that is observed. Theorist Ronald Akers extended Sutherland’s differential association theory with a modern viewpoint known as the social learning theory. The social learning theory states that individuals commit crime through their association with or exposure to others. According to Akers, people learn how to be offenders based on their observations around them and their association with peers. Theorist Akers states that for one, “people can become involved in crime through imitation—that is by modeling criminal conduct. Second, and most significant, Akers contended that definition and imitation are most instrumental in determining initial forays into crime” (Lilly, Cullen, and Ball 2011:57). Although Akers’ theory has been linked to juvenile delinquency in the past, it has also been tested as a possible cause of crime overall. Individuals learn from observation that criminal behavior is justifiable in certain circumstances. In connection with juvenile delinquency and crime, peers and intimate groups have the most effect on individuals when associated with criminal behavior. One is more likely to mimic the behavior of someone who they have close ties with, whether the behavior is justifiable or...
Social learning theory is the theory that people learn from other people. That people will learn by what they see, imitate, and model after. For example, if a person who sees drug dealers their entire life will more than likely be a drug dealer themselves. Labeling theory differs in that people are labeled or stereotyped as a deviant person and therefore engage
Throughout the years criminologists have tried to come up with explanations for what makes individuals more prone to engage in criminal activity. The explanations can range from labels given to individuals to the bonds individuals have with others. Over the years, the theories have been tweaked and integrated to help gain a better understanding of why individuals commit crimes. Some theories also call for explanation on how to reduce crime in the future as well. Everything in society is caused by something, which produces the effect. The cause is generally what goes unknown most of the time. This paper will analyze Labeling Theory and Social Bond Theory. First I will clearly describe
Ronald V Clarke originally developed the idea of situational crime prevention in the 1980’s (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). This particular crime prevention theory addresses techniques that increase the effort required to commit the crime, increase the risks involved with committing the crime, reducing the reward gained by the offender after committing the crime, reducing the provocation between the offender and others and remove excuses (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). Majority of crime is believed to be committed because there are no high risks of being caught and the rewards outweigh the risks (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). Increasing the effort by controlling access to locations and target hardening can deflect many offenders, as more effort is needed to commit the crime (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005). Another main technique would be to increase the risks; this may be achieved by extending guardianship, creating natural surveillance or artificial surveillance such as CCTV (Brantingham & Brantingham 2005).
The question “how do we reduce crime” has been asked for many years. Numerous amount of research has been done on this topic to see if there are other ways to reduce crime. Reducing crime has been a heated debate for many years and continues to be an important topic to study. People often wonder if the policies that are currently in place even work to reduce crime. Statistics have shown for years now that the current techniques being used by police are not as effective as the some people might think there are.
Social harmony has become a powerful and popular indicator to asset a population’s quality of life. So much so, people’s attitude toward crime rates has shifted from a lukewarm state to a profoundly sensitive level. Accordingly, the public’s increasing fears have translated into more and more restrictive policies to punish crimes. Therefore, crime prevention is considered as a strategic approach to lessen the probability of criminal behaviors in a political community, and to maintain social-control following the heated debates on civilians’ safety.