Social Labeling Theory

521 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The consequences of labelling theory

Labeling theory was created by a small group of researchers in the 1960s. This theory considers that people commit crimes when they labeled as criminal and take this label as their personal identity. Main approaches of this theory are primary and secondary deviance, labeling and being stigmatized. Primary deviance refers to experiences of deviant behavior that the people associate with. Secondary deviance is when someone makes a profit from that deviant behavior society gives him/her a negative social label, and this label changes the person’s social identity. This negative label is called as “stigma”. For example, a teenager who lives in an urban area as known as gangs neighborhood may be labeled as a gang member. As a result, , the …show more content…

People behave toward things according to their meanings for them. The capability of humans to pinpoint something to themselves in their vicinity guides the achievability of meaning. People in any status are confined by infinite characteristics of their vicinity, but just some of these characteristics are meaningful. The things differentiate from the surrounding may be material things or sounds or gestures or smells .The people notes these and improve and understanding of them and decides how to proceed. So, basically, the individual define these things as symbols with meanings and uses them to act. b. The meaning of things proceed with social interaction with one’s friend/companion. Things do not have hereditary meanings within themselves, the meaning is socially developed, with experiences with the one’s interactions with other people in society. For example, if a person does not know a specific language, the sounds of this language does not have any meaning for the individual, they are just sounds. There may be two issues arise.First, it may be difficult for person as part of the society in which the symbols were created and used to understand them. Second, even though the meaning of the symbol is likely to be created based on common understandings, there may not be general approval regarding to the aim of the

Show More
Related

  • Labeling Theory: African Racism

    1290 Words  | 3 Pages

    Labeling theory has its intellectual foundation in the symbolic interactionist perspective. According to labeling theory, no act is deviant. An act becomes deviant only after being defined as such. In other words, deviance is a relative concept since what is defined as deviant by one society may not be similarly defined by another society. Moreover, as evidenced by self-report studies of deviance, virtually everyone at some time has violated society norms or, to use the terminology of labeling theory, participated in primary deviance. Most primary deviants, however, do not come to see themselves, or to become seen by society, as deviants by society. Power is an important ingredient in the ability to ascribe a negative label to others. Because power is differentially distributed in American society, labeling theory assets that offender characteristics, such as race, age, and social class. Given that African American tend to have little power in society, their ability to successfully rebut accusations of illegal conduct is considerably weaker than that of non-minorities. Hence, labeling theory predicts that

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory And Social Control Theory

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    The labeling theory is based off of the view that people will become criminals when labeled as such and when they accept that label as their personal identity. The labeling theory can be used to explain why a particular behavior is considered to be negatively deviant to some people, groups, and

    Read More

  • Criminological Analysis Of The Film Minority Report: Labeling Theory Lead To Criminal Behavior

    1685 Words  | 4 Pages

    Additionally, Jung explains that labeling theory subscribes to the labeling process; a process involving four stages that may end with individuals internalizing their given identity by those in power(2018).Regarding criminological study; the labeling process describes how individuals that go into the criminal justice system for an act and, then later are stigmatized as deviant thus leading to them to internalize the label which makes them become what others consider them.(Jung, 2018) Additionally, the theory suggests that crime is not permanent(Jung, 2018). By stating that crime is not fixated, it implies that there is no scientific or foolproof way to measure or detect crime (Jung,

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory

    573 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Labeling Theory is the view that labels people are given affect their own and others’ perception of them, thus channeling their behavior either into deviance or into conformity. Labels can be positive and/or negative, but I’ll focus on the negative aspects of labeling in high school. Everybody has a label in high school whether it is the “slut”, “pothead”, “freak” or the “jock”; it is one of the most apparent time periods in which individuals get labeled. Students have the mentality that whatever label is placed on them is going to be stuck with them forever, which then leads into a self-fulfilling prophecy. This, I feel, is a fear of being a “loser” that has been instilled throughout years by the principals, teachers, etc. An example of this is the pressure students are given to get a good grade. In order to get into an honors class they need to pass a certain test, should they not get into honors class the following year, then all throughout the rest of their remaining school life, they’ll never be able to be in honors class. They’ll then no longer be seen as the “smart” students they were “before”(even though they still are), they’ll now be labeled as “dumb” and eventually start to believe, and become their label. Another example of this is being labeled a “slut”. When a girl has been labeled a slut, early or in the middle of her school life, the label sticks with her all throughout her remaining school years. At first, she could reject this label, and try to “change”...

    Read More

  • Defiance

    703 Words  | 2 Pages

    Primary theory is when someone does something deviant but still identifies themselves for who they are. For example, if I was to get really drunk at a college party at the end of it all I would admit I was drunk but I would not call my self an alcoholic. Secondary deviance is when I start to identify my self as what I am being labeled. I'll keep using the first example to show secondary deviance. So let's say that that party that I got drunk there were people who saw me and after that event they begin to call me an alcoholic. Then they stop inviting me to the parties and I begin to drink more alcohol. Which then would lead to people still labeling me as an alcoholic to the point where I begin to identify myself as an alcoholic and actually become one. Bas...

    Read More

  • Social Phenomena

    1105 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...uing questions and insights for the future. Our interactions with others play a large role in developing our society. The symbolic perspective does not believe in reality as we believe it; rather we create our own values through interaction with others. It also helps shed light on how new cultures and customs become accepted into a society. For instance, the piñata was once used in China, and it is now something used during celebrations in various cultures (Kendall, 85). This shows how one society can adopt the symbols of another and take them as their own. When we combine these perspectives and focus on our interactions with one another, what function we each play in the society, and take into account the power struggles that occur, we gain a better understanding of society as a whole. Each of these theories helps explain different aspects of our social reality.

    Read More

  • White Supremacism In Beowulf

    600 Words  | 2 Pages

    By misinterpreting these symbols, people tend to go against their arguments thus, resulting in their cause being seen as faulty. If these symbols had been used correctly and they had a better understanding of what they represent, their cause would not be the same and would fight for the union and equality of all peoples instead of the division and hierarchy system of certain people based upon their religion or skin

    Read More

  • Socioctionalism, Conflict Theory, And Social Subactionism

    870 Words  | 2 Pages

    This theory observes how people interact with each other and consider symbols and details of daily life. Theorists of this perspective support the idea that people associate symbols with a subjective meaning. Different people who see the same symbol will interpret it differently thus peoples perceived realities are different.

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory

    3342 Words  | 7 Pages

    The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.

    Read More

  • The Implications of Labelling Theory and how It Affects Individuals

    1254 Words  | 3 Pages

    Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).

    Read More

  • Labeling In Today's Society

    408 Words  | 1 Pages

    In today’s society many people are labeled and judged including myself. Everyone is labeled in some sort of category. Personally, I feel like I don’t fit into one specific category. I can be labeled as a cheerleader because I used to be one. Most people probably don’t look at me and automatically think I’m a cheerleader though. I can sometimes maybe be labeled as stuck-up, which I’m not at all. People may think this about me because I’m quiet and shy around people that I don’t know really well. I’m not a huge talker and I don’t talk to people easily. The fact that I don’t talk to everyone could make it look like I think I’m too good for them, which isn’t the case at all.

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory: A Case Study

    840 Words  | 2 Pages

    Criminological Theory is noteworthy on the grounds that the vast majority of what is done in the territory of criminal equity depends on criminological speculations (Bohm and Haley, 2002, p. 70). In any case, I think labeling Theory is the most legitimate clarification of criminal conduct. As characterized, Labeling Theory expresses the individuals who take after the naming hypothesis of criminology ascribe to the way that an individual will progress toward becoming what he is marked or what other anticipate that him will end up being; the peril originates from calling a wrongdoing a wrongdoing and criminal a criminal.

    Read More

  • The Labeling Theory In The United States

    311 Words  | 1 Pages

    The labeling theory was first developed in the early 1960s. Interaction is when a person does an activity that isn’t normal. It involves more than persons act. Positivist sociologists tend to focus on a deviant person a lot and that is not the right thing to do. Sometimes the labeling starts off because of law enforcement. When ever someone does something bad police officers label them as deviants.

    Read More

  • Labeling Theory Research Paper

    515 Words  | 2 Pages

    You are now not only labeled deviant by the clerk, but also by the police and your parents. Secondary deviance is gaining a label because of someone else or for no reason at all. If the kid from the comic book store brought a friend to that same store with him, who had no involvement with the theft, his friend would still be considered deviant by the clerk as he is with the kid who stole previously. He gained the deviant label just by walking in the store with his friend. It also pertains to racial profiling. If an African American man is walking down the street and he is arrested without reason or means because a robbery four blocks down the road had taken place, this is racial profiling. There are also three variables or factors in the process of labeling in particular that sociologists talk about. One is importance of the violated norm. This is basically explaining which kind of deviance gets the most negative label. If you forget to shut the lights off in your house as you are walking around, the sanction for that is not going to be very harsh. Someone might just ask you to shut the lights off; it is a folkway. If a person commits murder, it is considered a more and is sanctioned severely, and obviously labeled with extreme

    Read More

  • Difference Between Criminal Behavior And Deviant Behavior

    876 Words  | 2 Pages

    Deviant behavior is a behavior that does not approve of social norms and values. Deviant behavior most of the time causes a negative response to individuals. But, this behavior can be formal or informal, voluntary or involuntary. This difference between involuntary deviance and voluntary is the involuntary is a much greater offensive than a voluntary violation of a formal norm. An example of deviant behavior informal is if someone is belching loudly or picking their nose when they are around their peers. Deviant acts will be easier and more rewarding according to Osgood (Wayne, 1996) because the lack of police lowers the potential for social control responses to deviance (Wayne,1996).

    Read More

More about Social Labeling Theory

Open Document