Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction to racial profiling essay
Introduction to racial profiling essay
Introduction on racial profiling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Introduction to racial profiling essay
Labeling theory essentially focuses on the reputations you build in society. We label individuals by how they talk, walk, how they handle an interaction, so on and so forth. If you were to stand up in front of a crowd of thousands of people and tell them your opinion on a matter, they are going to label you based on what they think of you. There is a Primary Deviance, also called the confirmation of deviance, and the secondary deviance, which is also known as the presumption or assumption of deviance. Someone doing something brings on primary deviance; it is the action in which gets an individual a label. Say your friends decide it would be cool to take a few comic books from the local bookstore. As you are leaving, the clerk stops you and …show more content…
asks you to empty your pockets. When you do you hand him the comic books you had taken. He calls the cops, and they call your parents.
You are now not only labeled deviant by the clerk, but also by the police and your parents. Secondary deviance is gaining a label because of someone else or for no reason at all. If the kid from the comic book store brought a friend to that same store with him, who had no involvement with the theft, his friend would still be considered deviant by the clerk as he is with the kid who stole previously. He gained the deviant label just by walking in the store with his friend. It also pertains to racial profiling. If an African American man is walking down the street and he is arrested without reason or means because a robbery four blocks down the road had taken place, this is racial profiling. There are also three variables or factors in the process of labeling in particular that sociologists talk about. One is importance of the violated norm. This is basically explaining which kind of deviance gets the most negative label. If you forget to shut the lights off in your house as you are walking around, the sanction for that is not going to be very harsh. Someone might just ask you to shut the lights off; it is a folkway. If a person commits murder, it is considered a more and is sanctioned severely, and obviously labeled with extreme
negativity. Number two is social identity of the individual. It signifies a person’s status or position in society. Some people such as actors, actresses, politicians, professional athletes have bigger labels. If they step out of line, or make a comment that people do not like it is much more likely to be heard around the world than if the average Joe makes a statement. Third is social context of the deviance. This is essentially where the deviance has taken place. What is normal in one location may not be for another. If wrestling students learn new moves on the mat at practice that is just fine, but if they go to a local club and try and use those moves it is deviant behavior.
Labels don't tell the truth to who people are. We have all heard gossip about someone and immediately jumped to conclusions about them. Because of this, we can miss out on friendships, connections, beneficial conversations and positive interactions. And yes, sometimes the hallway gossip can be true, but you shouldn't judge someone based on one mistake they made, you should get to know them first. Labels are created for everyone. They can be positive, but most of the time, the ones we hear and spread are negative. In the book "The Outsiders" by S.E Hinton, there are a few characters who are constantly misunderstood and labeled by other characters. The ones who stood out to me are Dally, Randy and Darry.
Bohm and Brenda L. Vogel, the Labeling theory is used to explain why people commit crimes and conceive themselves as criminals. Overall the Labeling theory consists of social groups creating rules and then applying those rules to particular people and labeling them as outsiders. This theory is split into two types of deviances: primary deviance and secondary deviance. Primary deviance is the initial criminal act, for example, a man robs a bank. A secondary deviance is committing a crime after the first criminal act and accepting the label of a criminal. Following the previous example, after the man robs the bank, he decides to do it again because he now sees himself as a criminal bank robber and wants to continue doing it and is okay with being seen that
Labeling theory of deviance suggests that when one is labeled constantly on the basis of any minority it gives rise to deviant behavior in order to prove the strength of the minority. The minority has been labeled so by people for a long time. They have been labeled because of their race. The gang is labeled anti-social because of their criminal behavior which turns them further to deviance. The use of the labeling theory can be seen being implemented very judiciously
As mentioned in lecture, labeling theory asks two critical questions: what is crime, and who is criminal? This is the central tenet of labeling theory because the focus is on what activities constitute criminal behaviour within the context. This means that over time, the general perspective changes in regards to what can be labeled 'crime.' For instance, society is known to react negatively towards prostitution in the past; whereas the contemporary reaction is primarily to legalize it.
Deviance is the behavior and the standards of expectations of a group or society. It is also behavior that is considered dangerous, threatening or offensive. The people that are deviant are often labeled to be weirdos, oddballs, or creeps. In the United States, people with tattoos, drug addicts, alcoholics, and compulsive gamblers are all considered deviant. Sociologists believe that everybody is deviant from time to time. They believe each person will violate a social norm in certain situations. People are considered deviant if they don't stand for the national anthem at a sports event, dress casually to a fancy restaurant, or skip classes. One category of deviance is Crime. Crime is a violation of norms that have been formally enacted into a law. Another category of deviance is humorous. Deviance is relative, what is deviant in one group or society may not be deviant in another group or society.
Label theory is based in the idea that behaviors are irregular when the society labels them as irregular. The label theory implies that a person commits a crime in some time of a life, but that person is not seen as deviant, while other people are deviant. Label theory explains how a behavior of a person conflicts with the norms of the society. For example, A black young men, who lives in a neighborhood controlled by gangs may be labeled as a gang member. In consequence, that young man can start to act as gang member or became one. He incorporates the label that was given to him.
Social learning theory is one of the most known theories and has been studied by many. Social learning theory programs that are available are mainly crime control programs. This program involves people to think about what they have truly done and to change the negative into positive behavior. Labeling theory does not offer any real programs but as society learns more about these specific theories so has our treatment of others. Since labeling theory can occur anywhere it is believed that society give the person a different outcome. So instead of shaming a person you should use it as a learning tool not to commit the act again. This will be a way for the person to change their label and be more open to changing their outlook.
Deviance has been primarily studied as a disorder of the individual from a medical and psychological standpoint. In assessing deviance as a fundamental component of the human condition, it becomes clear how external social forces and circumstances can increase the likelihood of behavior that does not conform to established social norms. There are four theories that seek to explain the causation of deviance through social forces: strain theory, control theory, social learning theory, and labeling theory. According to strain theory, deviance thrives in the gap between emphasized goals and prescribed methods. People have been socialized to accept key values; However, they do not have access to the approved means of realizing those values,
The Labeling Theory is the view that labels people are given affect their own and others’ perception of them, thus channeling their behavior either into deviance or into conformity. Labels can be positive and/or negative, but I’ll focus on the negative aspects of labeling in high school. Everybody has a label in high school whether it is the “slut”, “pothead”, “freak” or the “jock”; it is one of the most apparent time periods in which individuals get labeled. Students have the mentality that whatever label is placed on them is going to be stuck with them forever, which then leads into a self-fulfilling prophecy. This, I feel, is a fear of being a “loser” that has been instilled throughout years by the principals, teachers, etc. An example of this is the pressure students are given to get a good grade. In order to get into an honors class they need to pass a certain test, should they not get into honors class the following year, then all throughout the rest of their remaining school life, they’ll never be able to be in honors class. They’ll then no longer be seen as the “smart” students they were “before”(even though they still are), they’ll now be labeled as “dumb” and eventually start to believe, and become their label. Another example of this is being labeled a “slut”. When a girl has been labeled a slut, early or in the middle of her school life, the label sticks with her all throughout her remaining school years. At first, she could reject this label, and try to “change”...
Deviance is defined as actions or behaviors that violate socials norms. In turn the concept of deviance is dependent on the social observation and perception. “By it’s very nature, the constructionism through which people define and interpret actions or appearances is always “social.” ”(Henry, 2009 , p. 6) One’s perception of a situation may be completely different from another depending on cultural and social factors. The way someone talks, walks, dresses, and holds themselves are all factors that attribute to how someone perceives another. In some cases what is socially or normally acceptable to one person is deviant in another’s eyes. For this reason there is a lot of gray area involving the topic of deviance because actions and behaviors are so diversely interpreted.
Labeling theory looks at why this person continued to commit crime or was more prone to do so and then come to be defined as deviant, while others do not. Labeling theory is also interested in the effects of labeling on individuals. Labeling theorists note that most people commit crimes at some time in their lives but not everyone becomes defined as a deviant or a criminal. Deviant behavior usually means behavior that isn’t normal for the person, or just very out of character.
The theoretical study of societal reaction to deviance has been carried out under different names, such as, labelling theory, interactionist perspective, and the social constructionist perspective. In the sociology of deviance, the labelling theory of deviant behaviour is often used interchangeably with the societal reaction theory of deviancy. As a matter of fact, both phrases point equally to the fact that sociological explanations of deviance function as a product of social control rather than a product of psychology or genetic inheritance. Some sociologists would explain deviance by accepting without question definitions of deviance and concerning themselves with primary aetiology. However, labelling theorists stress the point of seeing deviance from the viewpoint of the deviant individual. They claim that when a person becomes known as a deviant, and is ascribed deviant behaviour patterns, it is as much, if not more, to do with the way they have been stigmatized, then the deviant act they are said to have committed. In addition, Howard S. Becker (1963), one of the earlier interaction theorists, claimed that, "social groups create deviance by making the rules whose infraction constitute deviance, and by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders". Furthermore, the labelling theoretical approach to deviance concentrates on the social reaction to deviance committed by individuals, as well as, the interaction processes leading up to the labelling.
The labelling theory was first discovered by Howard Becker in 1963. The labelling theory is a label applied to an individual based on their gender, ethnicity, age, religion, class ,etc . The labelling is done by individuals and social groups but then acquires its own reality , we generate images of others for which we act and satisfy expectations. The deviation is not a quality of his act but the consequence of the application of the label for part of others of rules and sanctions. The target is someone who has been labelled successfully ; deviant behaviour is behaviour from the label applied. There are two types of labels; primary and secondary. Primary labels are a label that barely causes a reaction from others and it doesn 't affect
Labelling theory outlines the sociological approach towards labelling within societies and in the development of crime and deviance (Gunnar Bernburg, and D. Krohn et al., 2014, pp. 69-71). The theory purposes that, when an individual is given a negative label (that is deviant), then the individual pursues their new (deviant) label / identity and acts in a manner that is expected from him/her with his/ her new label (Asencio and Burke, 2011, pp. 163-182).
Labelling theory holds deviance results not so much from the actions of deviant, as from response to others labelled rule breaker deviant (Brym and Lie 2015: 101). There are many stories of students being labelled in the past by teachers. Students; however, have labelled teachers, but labelling a student and not understanding what has influenced this behavior is being judgmental. There have been incidents where a teacher had labelled a child in front of the classroom, is that right? Without understanding the behavior of a child this could be preparing them to reject teachers in the fear of being labelled again, and being powerless. In “Reconstructing the ‘Monsters’ and the ‘Failures’: Concerns and Issues for Professionals” by Jill E. Gelormino