Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social Exchange Theory to interpersonal relationships
Social Exchange Theory to interpersonal relationships
Social Exchange Theory to interpersonal relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
My opinion is that the Social Exchange Theory is the best relationship formation shown in the film. Marty, the main character, has low self-esteem because he has been dumped before. His brother is married and people are pressuring him to get married. He did not believe he was attractive enough to find a girl that will find him interesting. However, at a dance he met this woman who was being dumped. I think that Marty decided to get to know that woman because they both share that similarity. Also he saw that she is a reserved woman that may end up linking him too. As a result, he saw benefits of where that relationship would lead to. He thought that there was a common personality between them two that they could built a relationship from that. …show more content…
The ducks stages in the film are presented in different scenarios.
The first one is the sociological or incidental cues. When Marty is talking to his mother about going to the dance and being rejected, he thinks that if he goes again, he will be rejected again. Therefore, when he goes to the dance, at first, he does not want to talk to women, he is just standing there thinking this was going nowhere. At that moment, he thinks he has no future with any women in that dance. Then, the second filter is called, pre-interaction. The pre-interaction was evident when Marty looked at the woman who was dump by her blind-date. He was standing there looking at her, one may argue that he was looking at her beauty and physical appearance in order to see if she is approachable or not. He was judging if there would be any potential for them to get together. Thirdly we have, the interaction cue. After Marty approaches the woman, she cried and hug him because she was dumped. After that incident, both of them danced and talked. They were looking at each other eyes while a conversation developed. Fourthly we have cognitives cues. Marty also sees that the woman he is dancing with is a person who has experience the same issues he has. Both of them feel like outsiders when it comes to dating and meeting new people. She is also very soft spoken and reserved just like Marty, and he can see that
too. The submissive symmetry is what we are able to see from Marty character. A specific example from the film is when Marty’s mother is telling him to go to the dance and meet a lady. His response was no, he did not wanted to be rejected once more. However, he did what he was told. He went to the dance to please his mother’s wishes. It that moment we can see that Marty did not really wanted to go to the dance but he went anyway for his mother. Another example is when Marty’s mother asked if aunt Katerina can come to his house and he said yes. An example of test of trust in the film is when Marty is talking and dancing with that woman. He is expressing his idea of marriage; he thinks that for a long marriage you need more than just looks, you need to be a nice person. When he is talking about what marriage should be about, she confesses her age. Then both confessed their ages and they know that their ages are old for women and men to be single. This type of sharing intimate information shows that they built a trust from the beginning and that their relationship may have some type of future.
Much of the relationship of When Harry Met Sally stems from the Attractive Theory. In this theory, it explains “the three primary forces that draw people together to form a relationship” which are based on proximity, attractiveness, and similarity (Alberts, Nakayama, and Martin 219). Although, Sally and Harry personality and lifestyles reflected different attitudes and values still they shared similarities in common friends, social group, and University. In addition to these similarities, the two simultaneously experienced a break up with their long-term partners, Joe and Helen. While each
I have learned that, interpersonal relationships are difficult to maintain. I often ask myself why, relationships require so much work. Why do I, stay in a relationship where the bad outweighs the good? The social exchange perspective argues, according to Monge & Contractor, as cited by West & Turner that “People calculate the overall worth of a particular relationship by subtracting its cost from the rewards it provides.”
"Interpersonal attraction refers to positive feelings about another person. It can take many forms, including liking, love, friendship, lust, and admiration" (spark notes). Sometimes these kinds of relationships can happen between individuals that people meet throughout their daily lives. For any relationship to exist or last,last there has to be effective communication. Communication is a major factor used to either build up or tear down interpersonal relationships. Also, having effective listening skills helps the relationship become stronger. In the movie, 50 First Dates, there are many instances where interpersonal relationships are illustrated. This paper will discuss the different types of interpersonal relationships that are found in the movie, as well as how important communication is in a relationship to keep that bond strong and last.
The first concept we choose to write on is initiating. According to the book Looking Out Looking In, initiating is the first stage of a relationship, and it means to show interest in another person and to give signals that shows interest building up some kind of relationship. (Alder, 2012) In the movie one of the scenes where the concept of initiating is displayed is when Brooke is staring at a baseball game and Gary was sitting near her. Suddenly Gary offers Brooke a hot dog, after insisting several times she finally gets the hot dog. After the baseball game Gary invites Brooke to a date.
generalizable to the population because the social bonds solely emphasized on typical white families. However, the psychodynamic theory managed to address the weaknesses of the social bond theory because it’s generalizable towards the population to a greater extent. For instance, psychodynamic theory interventions were tested on the African population in Nigeria who were adolescents from the lower class as these psychodynamic interventions were easy to conduct among populations in order to draw inferences (Taiwo & Osinowo, 2011, pp. 627-629).
The theory I originally chose to critique was the Social Exchange and Rational Choice framework from our class book. I chose this theory because when we talked about it in class it made a lot of sense to me. Its propositions and foundations are very applicable to many situations, and I felt like I had a good grasp of its concepts and structure. However, in doing research for this paper, I discovered that contrary to what our book led me to believe, Social Exchange is a theory entirely separate from Rational Choice theory. So, in keeping with this discovery and despite my better judgment, I will do my best to relay and critique the information I find on either one or both theories and then compare only Social Exchange theory to the Symbolic Interaction framework. Although I will try to get the same information for both theories, there are not many resources which describe Social Exchange theory, and there are far more for Rational Choice theory, so the critique and discussion may be a little lopsided.
In, Body Work by Sara Paretsky, the Guaman family’s homophobia damages their family by causing both Allie’s rape and death, and the covering up of them. Homophobia manages to cause all of this damage because it is a powerful social control mechanism, meaning it leads individuals towards conformity, and shames and or ostracizes those who don’t conform to the societal norm. In this case, the societal norm is heterosexuality, and homosexuals are shamed and ostracized for deviating from that norm. Allie is ashamed of being a lesbian and decides to serve in Iraq in the hope that she can repent for her “sins,” and her family is so ashamed of her homosexuality that they must deny it, which allows Tintrey to cover up the truth behind Allie’s death.
Travis Hirschi presented a social bonding theory in 1969. The main idea of the social bonding theory is that each and every individual has a drive to act in selfish and even aggressive ways that might possibly lead to criminal behavior. Social bonding theory is somewhat have similarities with the Durkheim theory that “we are all animals, and thus naturally capable of committing criminal acts” (Tibbetts, 2012, p. 162). However, the stronger a person is bonded to the conventional society, for example, family, schools, communities, the less prone a person is to be involved in criminal activity. The great example of this would be the serial killer Nannie Doss. Since early age she did not have any bonds either to her family with an abusive father or to community she lived in. Most of the time during her childhood she was isolated from any social interactions with her schoolmates or friends.
First, the movie “Marty” gives insight into the various types of relationships that can develop between people. For example, the relationship between Marty and Claire started because of one reason: they are in parallel situations with each other. In other words, they started their relationship based on the Attraction Theory, which explains that people start relationships and continue them because they are attracted to each other through the other person having great qualities and similar traits, whether physical or not. In the movie, Marty is attracted to Claire when she starts crying because her date left her at the party. In fact, when Marty is comforting Claire, she tells him that she does not have much luck with men and she has had heartbreak in the past with other relationships.... ...
In this beautiful thing called life are a mixture of all kinds of nationality of people, adults, elderly, and youths. As a nation of humans, people have their own personalities and behave a certain way for a reason. In fact, there are some juveniles that misbehave just as the adults do and that is where the problem may or may not stand. As a result of this, comes the questions of how or what may or may not influence delinquency? Could it be that the social process of from where a person resides? People may pounder um why a person behavior can become delinquent, no one is born to be delinquent. This paper will go over, one or more aspects of how my life relate to social learning theory, social control theory, and social bonds. Discuss how those
The central concepts following social psychology is that which dares to explain what makes people do what they do. Social psychology is the scientific analysis of how someone influences another’s thoughts, feelings, and behavior. Though considered to be a fairly young science, social psychology has endeavored to examine particular theories, concepts, and phenomenon that has shaped our society. As the centuries roll on, technology alongside social media, has evolved into something more sophisticated and has developed into a mechanism in which to entice and challenge social norms.
...; With the use of applying this theory to an episode as a demonstration, an application, and then an explanation, it is easy to see how the Social Exchange theory is related to everyday situations. Not only can the theory be applied to amorous relationships, but to that of friendships. The utility of the theory is seen in just about every type of interaction and is key to better understanding why relationships, friendships, or any mutual interaction, for that matter, turn out being costly or rewarding.
In 1969, Travis Hirschi developed what is known as Social Bond Theory. Hirschi built on the work of other social control theorists and was able to provide a better picture of what social bond is. In Social Bond Theory there are four basic elements that make up social bonds. They are attachment, involvement, commitment, and belief. It is these four bonds that all humans hold and ultimately determine conformity or deviant behavior(Agnew, 1985).
Relationships play an important role in everyday life. It is essential for the positive, social and mental development of the people required in the relationship. It starts off with infatuation and goes through several stages. Somewhere along the way the relationship can take a toll and will take the brunt of the fall. It’s a theory that describes how relationships and relational partners change over time. This communication theory research paper will identify the theorist, his educational and professional background, along with other contributions that he has made. It will define the theory and explain it using tangible examples. Finally, I will describe what I have learned from my research.
Social Exchange theory was created by George Homans in 1958. Since its publication as “Social Behavior as Exchange”, several other theorists like Peter Blau, Richard Emerson, John Thibaut, and Harold Kelley have contributed to the theory. Before diving into the biggest concepts of this theory, two main properties need to be discussed. This theory is all about social exchanges, which are essentially reactions and decisions in relationships. The two properties are self-interest and interdependence. They are the two fundamental interactions between two individuals who each have something of value to the other. When an individual is looking out for their own self-interest, they are looking out for their own economic and psychological needs which can result in things like greed and competition. However, self-interest is not seen as a negative thing; in fact, it can result in both parties achieving their own interests. Interdependence, on the other hand, is harder to study but it is the combination of the two using both their efforts to gain something. Interdependence has higher social implications. Homans, as the founder of the theory, had it say that the theory consists of a social exchange with rewards and costs between at least two people. Rewards are defined as objects that have a positive value and are sought out by individuals. Costs are defined as objects that have a negative value and are avoided by individuals. Rewards in regards to relationships are things like support, friendship, and acceptance, while costs are things like energy spent, time, and money. Essentially this theory states that every individual is trying to maximize their wins or their worth and end up with something that is more positive than negative. Worth equ...