Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Compare brave new world and 1984
Compare brave new world and 1984
1984 and a brave new world compare and contrast
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Compare brave new world and 1984
Neil Postman a contemporary social critic made a statement about two novels known as Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and 1984 by George Orwell. Neil Postman’s passage compared the novels to relate them to the year 1985, and Neil stated that Huxley’s Brave New World correlated more to his surroundings than the novel that is written exactly for the time period Postman wrote his passage. Postman’s assertion has been correct throughout time even in 2016. In the twenty first century the human body is not seen as something owned by someone anymore, but as something owned by ourselves. Some people use their bodies in a way that does not correlate to emotion or love, but as something to please basic human instinct, and Aldous Huxley made this statement clear in his book which made this relate to the world in 2016. George Orwell oppressed basic human instinct and created a taboo; even though prostitution is a taboo in the twenty first century, it has always been frowned upon. Orwell also saw the world turned into something that stripped away the freedom of the people, and the people knew that “Big Brother” took it away. Huxley saw the world turned into a place where the people never found out what they missed because they did not want it. Neil Postman’s assertion about contemporary society is supported since Brave New World brings the concept of soma which correlates to ecstasy, the overload of technology and style and …show more content…
how it overrules the lives of the people in “The World State” and people in the twenty first century, and finally the giving of bodies from one person to another has become more common in the new age, since women do not want to be objectified anymore or shamed, and there is no longer a marriage “requirement”. Huxley brought in a happiness drug that shielded the people of The World State from the truth.
They used this drug called “soma” to bring themselves into a happy place and distracts the people to come to a realization that they are being enslaved. This drug correlates a lot to ecstasy which has the effects of feeling content and makes the person taking it feel out of their realm and in a new world. Soma is used to calm down the citizens and to heighten the good moods, which Ecstasy does as well. There are many teens who take MDMA to feel happy and
passive. And if ever, by some unlucky chance, anything unpleasant should somehow happen, why, there's always soma to give you a holiday from the facts. And there's always soma to calm your anger, to reconcile you to your enemies, to make you patient and long-suffering. In the past you could only accomplish these things by making a great effort and after years of hard moral training. Now, you swallow two or three half-gramme tablets, and there you are. Anybody can be virtuous now. You can carry at least half your morality about in a bottle. Christianity without tears—that's what soma is (Huxley 47) . This proves that the people who take soma re not really happy, but just depend on the happiness that the drug brings, just like ecstasy. Most of the people that take ecstasy take it because it brings them joy and when without it, or when the feeling fades away it leaves them back to normal or sad again. In The World State, there is no such thing as families or love, but rather technological growth and how to improve the world by creating something new to get the citizens hooked on. They wanted to further the industry of technology, and grow the economy with it. The whole point of the world is to make it better and how to make the consumer buy. Just like in 2016, clothes are what make a person, and what they wear shows off to the rest of the world. The world judges based off what anyone wear, or how much money a person has spent on their attire. The World State is just like that, and they want to keep making the citizens buy. “‘But old clothes are beastly,’ continued the untiring whisper. ‘We always throw away old clothes. Ending is better than mending, ending is better than mending, ending is better than mending’” (Huxley 54). Along with technology in the twenty first century, there are iPhones, and iPads that keep young children to elderly people entertained. Children used to play with stuffed animals and cars, but now their eyes are glued to the screen of an iPad watching an unintelligent show. People in The World State needed the best technology and once they got it, their whole life centered around it. The human body was once only known for sharing with someone who you married, but as years passed, bodies started to pass around and share with multiple people. Now in 2016, people share a once special moment very casually. In Brave New World sleeping with everyone is a normal thing, and is encouraged so it prevents the feeling of individuality and freedom. “Swallowing half an hour before closing time, that second dose of soma had raised a quite impenetrable wall between the actual universe and their minds. Bottled, they crossed the street; bottled, they took the lift up to Henry's room on the twenty-eighth floor” (Huxley 19-22). It is supposed to be normal and not involve anything having to do with love because love creates a sense of independence, which is why the Controllers make sure it is only surrounded by soma. People in 2016 do not see sleeping with other people as a taboo, but now it is seen as a normal thing between consenting parties, and once they are done, it could happen again with other people just like in Brave New World. The novel Brave New World was ahead of its time to see that the future could possibly be all about lust, drugs, and technology. In the world today, the four factors of The World State are a lot milder but still true. The drugs affect happiness of people and control their mind into thinking that they are actually in a happy place and nothing could go wrong. The lust makes it normal to sleep with anyone and nothing could possibly happen because there are no consequences sleeping with someone who is not your husband or wife. The technology takes over the lives of the citizens in the novel and in real life because everywhere people go there is always some sort of electronic in their hand, no matter what age they are. Neil Postman waited until 1985 to write a passage about the two novels and decide which one could most likely relate more to that date. Even though 1985 was some years ago, the agreement to his assertion has only gotten stronger. Society today does tie in with Huxley’s Brave New World, and even though Orwell’s 1984 did not overtake the future it did make some interesting points on what could have possibly happened.
BNW Literary Lens Essay- Marxist Since the primitive civilizations of Mesopotamia and the classical kingdoms of Greece and Rome, people have always been divided. Up to the status quo, society has naturally categorized people into various ranks and statuses. With the Marxist literary lens, readers can explore this social phenomenon by analyzing depictions of class structure in literature. In Aldous Huxley’s novel Brave New World, readers are introduced to a dystopian society with a distinctive caste system.
As analyzed by social critic Neil Postman, Huxley's vision of the future, portrayed in the novel Brave New World, holds far more relevance to present day society than that of Orwell's classic 1984. Huxley's vision was simple: it was a vision of a trivial society, drowned in a sea of pleasure and ignorant of knowledge and pain, slightly resembling the world of today. In society today, knowledge is no longer appreciated as it has been in past cultures, in turn causing a deficiency in intelligence and will to learn. Also, as envisioned by Huxley, mind altering substances are becoming of greater availability and distribution as technology advances. These drugs allow society to escape from the problems of life instead of dealing with reality. With divorce rates higher than ever in the past few decades, it has become evident that lust has ruined the society's sexual covenants. People are indulging in their sexual motives; lust runs rampant, thus strong, long-lasting relationships are becoming a rarity.
Social stability can be the cause of problems. After reading Brave New World by Aldous Huxley, we are informed that “Bokanovsky’s Process is one of the major instruments of social stability!” Now is it worth it? Is it worth the sacrifice? Questions like those are addressed throughout the book. Huxley wants to warn us of many things, for example the birth control pill, the way that we can colon ourselves and many other things. He wanted us to know that many of the experiments that they do to the caste in Brave New World, we were later going to do investigate more ourselves or start doing them to others. We have all, at a point; come to a point to the question where we ask ourselves “is it worth it? Is it worth the sacrifice?”
In the article excerpt, social critic Neil Postman describes two dystopian novels: George Orwell’s 1984, and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World. Postman compares which novel is more relevant to today’s society, and leans more towards Brave New World. When both novels are compared side by side, it is evident that Huxley’s world is indeed more relative to modern day civilization.
There were quite a few changes made from Aldous Huxley’s, Brave New World to turn it into a “made for TV” movie. The first major change most people noticed was Bernard Marx’s attitude. In the book he was very shy and timid toward the opposite sex, he was also very cynical about their utopian lifestyle. In the movie Bernard was a regular Casanova. He had no shyness towards anyone. A second major deviation the movie made form the book was when Bernard exposed the existing director of Hatcheries and Conditioning, Bernard himself was moved up to this position. In the book the author doesn’t even mention who takes over the position. The biggest change between the two was Lenina, Bernard’s girlfriend becomes pregnant and has the baby. The screenwriters must have made this up because the author doesn’t even mention it. The differences between the book and the movie both helped it and hurt it.
Aldous Huxley’s “Brave New World” highlights the theme of society and individualism. Huxley uses the future world and its inhabitants to represents conflict of how the replacement of stability in place of individualism produces adverse side effects. Each society has individuals ranging from various jobs and occupations and diverse personalities and thoughts. Every member contributes to society in his or her own way. However, when people’s individuality is repressed, the whole concept of humanity is destroyed. In Huxley’s “Brave New World”, the concept of individualism is lost through hyperbolized physical and physiological training, the artificial birth and caste system, and the censorship of religion and literature by a suppressing government.
In Brave New World, Aldous Huxley deftly creates a society that is indeed quite stable. Although they are being mentally manipulated, the members of this world are content with their lives, and the presence of serious conflict is minimal, if not nonexistent. For the most part, the members of this society have complete respect and trust in their superiors, and those who don’t are dealt with in a peaceful manner as to keep both society and the heretic happy. Maintained by cultural values, mental conditioning, and segregation, the idea of social stability as demonstrated in Brave New World is, in my opinion, both insightful and intriguing.
The characters in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World represent certain political and social ideas. Huxley used what he saw in the world in which he lived to form his book. From what he saw, he imagined that life was heading in a direction of a utopian government control. Huxley did not imagine this as a good thing. He uses the characters of Brave New World to express his view of utopia being impossible and detrimental. One such character he uses to represent the idealogy behind this is Bernard Marx.
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World portrays a society in which science has clearly taken over. This was an idea of what the future could hold for humankind. Is it true that Huxley’s prediction may be correct? Although there are many examples of Huxley’s theories in our society, there is reason to believe that his predictions will not hold true for the future of society.
In most countries in our world, society has experienced technological advances to the point of being able to accomplish what Huxley envisioned. In contrast to Huxley’s vision, the moral standards of most nations allow all humans to enjoy basic human rights that embrace family, personal relationships, and individualism. Today’s society is able to comprehend how with the technological advances Huxley’s world could be a reality, but with the privilege of a democratic society, civilization would not allow the medical intervention for reproduction, the conditioning for happiness and consumerism. Work Cited "Brave New World by Aldous Huxley : Barron's Notes" Brave New World by Aldous Huxley: Barron's Notes. N.p., n.d. Web.
Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World is a science fiction book that captures both the benevolent and malevolent sides of cloning and mass production of human embryos through science. Huxley’s book, published in 1932, conveys his well-developed and disturbingly accurate ideas about human behavior in what was then the distant future. Some of Huxley’s predictions have been realized today, some to a greater degree than others. These specific predictions which are closely related to today are; our sexual practices, obsession with youth and beauty, abuse of drug and the declining practice of religion. For the people of the “World State”, life is based on immediate pleasure and constant happiness; lack of religion, fixation on beauty, sex and the use of
In 1932, Aldous Huxley wrote a thrilling dystopia titled Brave New World. Centered on a man struggling in a world where emotions have been forsaken for peace and stability of the entire community, the novel has a shock factor that is quite electric. Though it was popular in the 1950’s with college students because of its portrayal of sex, the true merit of Huxley’s work can be found in its predictions for the future. The practices in the novel are alarming similar to many aspects of today’s society. The approval of drug use to induce happiness, the constant effort to make life better through technology and the everlasting trust in the government are all characteristics shared by our society and that found in Brave New World.
In today’s society a person is shaped by family, friends, and past events, but in Aldous Huxley’s classic novel, Brave New World, there is no such thing as family, history and “true” friends. The government controls every aspect of an individual from their creation in the hatcheries to their conditioning for their thoughts and careers. In this brave new world the ideas of stability and community reign supreme, and the concept of individualism is foreign and suppressed, “Everyone belongs to everyone else, after all,” (47). Huxley perverses contemporary morals and concepts in Brave New World, thus distorting the ideas of materialistic pleasures, savagery versus society, and human relationships. These distortions contribute to the effectiveness of Brave New World, consequently creating a novel that leaves the reader questioning how and why.
Literature is both shaped by our culture and shapes it. Because of this it is an effective representation of the culture of a time. One can tell how people were affected by the events of the times by how it comes through in their writing. Aldous Huxley's Brave New World is a prime example of this. The work was targeted at people in a post WWI world. This is a time between WWI and WWII where the world is still shocked by how rapidly the science of war had advanced. People also continue to be appalled with the mass death of a World War caused by such technology and therefore yearn for a more stable world. Because of this yearning, they attempt to create a more stable environment for themselves. Most people had lost faith in the institutions they came to know because those institutions caused the War. Therefore the League of Nations was founded in 1919 only 13 years before “Brave New World” was published in 1932.
In Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World, the author depicts a collective society in which everyone has the same values and beliefs. From a young age, the people in the World State’s civilization are conditioned to believe in their motto of “Community, Identity, Stability.” Through hypnopaedia, the citizens of the World State learn their morals, values, and beliefs, which stay with them as they age. However, like any society, there are outsiders who alienate themselves from the rest of the population because they have different values and beliefs. Unfortunately, being an outsider in the World State is not ideal, and therefore there are consequences as a result. One such outsider is John. Brought from the Savage Reservation, John is lead to conform to the beliefs of the World State, thus losing his individuality, which ultimately leads him to commit suicide. Through John and the World State populace as an example, Huxley uses his novel to emphasize his disapproval of conformity over individuality.