Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strain Theory
Strain Theory
Differential association theory weaknesses
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
According to Hirschi (1969) control theories assumes that all humans as a part of their nature are naturally prone to break the law. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) control and bond theories state that humans are free to commit crimes if their social ties are weak or broken. Hirschi (1969) stated an interesting premise about human nature when he stated that all human beings are innately selfish and will pursue crime as a means to secure self gratification. According to Hirschi (1969) control theories created a new chapter in criminology, and began to ask “why do some people not commit crime?,” instead of continuing to ask “why do they commit crime?”. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) Travis Hirschi control theory differed from previous theories such as differential association theory and strain theory. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) differential association theory focused on the role that peers and social groups played on the development of delinquent behaviors. According to Cullen and Agnew (2011) the differential association theory as like other learning theories believed that the motivation to commit crime was the result of social interaction with deviant sub groups in which an individual learned to positively value committing criminal behavior. Furthermore, Cullen and Agnew (2011) stated that strain theory placed an individual’s motivation to commit crime with an individuals strained relationship, and experience with society that led people to commit crime in order to relieve the strain. According to Gottredson and Hirschi (1990) people develop strain which eventually lead to crime causing frustration based on lack of means to satisfy their human needs, and desires which leads to crime.
Cullen and Agnew (2011)...
... middle of paper ...
...iminology, Lecture notes 4/2/2014 and 4/9/2014.
Gottfredson, M .R., Hirschi, T. (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford: California:
Stanford University Press. ( Chapter 5).
Gottfredson, M .R., Hirschi, T. (1990) “A General Theory of Crime”. Pp 224-236 in
Criminological Theory: Past to Present, edited by Cullen, T.F., Agnew, R. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hirschi, T. (1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkley, California: University of California Press.
(Chapter 2).
Hirschi, T. (1969) “Social Bond Theory”. Pp 215-223 in
Criminological Theory: Past to Present, edited by Cullen, T.F., Agnew, R. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sampson R.J., Laub, J.H. (1993) “An Age-Graded Theory of Informal Social Control”. Pp 241-
253 in Varieties of Control Theory, edited by Sampson R.J., Laub, J.H.. Massachusetts,
Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Criminology. The. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012. Print. The. Shakur, Sanyika.
Lilly, Robert J., Francis T. Cullen, and Richard A. Ball. 2011. Criminological Theory: Context And Consequences. 5th ed. California: SAGE.
The two theories I have decided to merge are Agnew’s General Strain Theory and Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory. I picked General Strain Theory because it does a good job at discussing some of the things that can trigger the release of a person’s negative emotions which in turn may lead to deviant behavior. I also decided to write about Social Bond Theory because it describes some of the factors that keep people from committing crime. Both of the theories have strengths and weaknesses individually, but when merged they help fill in each other’s gaps. (Agnew, 2011; Hirschi, 2011) +1 (888) 295-7904
Hickey, T. J. (2010). Taking Sides: Clashing Views in Crime and Criminology, 9th Edition. New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
During the 1970’s to the early 1990’s there had emerged two new approaches to the study of crime and deviance. The discipline of criminology had expanded further introducing right and left realism, both believe in different areas and came together in order to try and get a better understanding on crime and prevention. There were many theorists that had influenced the realism approaches such as; Jock Young (Left Wing) and James Wilson (Right Wing).
Akers, R, & Sellers, C. (2009). Criminological theories: introduction, evaluation, and application. New York: Oxford University Press, USA.
Young, J. (1981). Thinking seriously about crime: Some models of criminology. In M. Fitzgerald, G. McLennan, & J. Pawson (Eds.), Crime and society: Readings in history and society (pp. 248-309). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Winslow, R. W., & Zhang, S. (2008). Contemporary Theories of Crime. Criminology: a global perspective (). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Although we have a general definitions of crime, some criminologists argue that crimes is better placed within the concept of social harm, Stuart Henry and Mark Lanier (1998) as quoted in Muncie, Talbot and Walters (2010). pp 16-17 were leading authors who done just that. Criminologists such as “Tifft, 1995 an...
An integrated theory is a combination of 2 or 3 theories that offers many explanations on why crime is occurring, compared to a traditional criminal theory that just focus on one type of aspect (Lilly et al.2010). The purpose of integrated theories is to help explain many aspects into what causes criminal behavior and why one becomes delinquent. From this an argument arises can integrated theories be used to explain all criminal behavior. Integrated theories are successful in explaining certain aspects of crime on what causes one to become deviant; however one theory alone cannot explain why an individual engages in crime. This paper will examine three integrated theories and look in-depth how these theories can explain different aspects on why criminal behavior occurs and the weakness of each theory. The three integrated theories that will be discussed in this paper are Cloward and Ohlin Differential Opportunity theory, Robert Agnew General Strain theory, and lastly Travis Hirschi’s Social Bond theory.
Maguire, M., Morgan, R., and Reiner, R. (2012) The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. 5th ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Social Control Theory presumes that people will naturally commit crime if there were left to their own devices (i.e. no laws in society) and people do not commit crimes because of certain controlling forces, such as social bonds that hold individuals back partaking on their anti social behavior (Bell, 2011). Examples of controlling forces are family, school, peers, and the law. Young people who are t... ... middle of paper ... ... nd delinquent are more likely to partake in committing criminal behavior (Shaefer and Haaland, 2011, p.155-156).
When delving into the various theories under the umbrella of criminology, one must research and gain knowledge about each idea to understand how it stands alone and among all of the theories. These should be compared against each other to determine what similarities they may have, which overlap and strengthen the foundations of understanding criminal behavior. Then they shall be examined for contrasting points, which distinguish and possibly prove weaknesses within the theories. Doing so can help criminologists determine the accuracy and credibility of the theories and help achieve a deeper knowledge of criminals and antisocial behaviors.
Williams, F., & McShane, M. (2010). Criminological Theory, (5th Edition). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Morgan, R., Maguire, M. And Reiner, R. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Criminology. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.