Social Class And Life Chances Analysis

1219 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Max Weber's theory of social class

The concept of life chances was developed by Max Weber, a German philosopher and sociologist, in the early 1900s. Weber believed that a person’s life chances is heavily determined by their social stratification, built upon a measure of power, prestige and property. Life chances is defined by the things a person can achieve or opportunities that are offered by society, essentially, Weber considered a change in outcome that could result in a move of social class, a life chance. Risk and resilience are the two main components of life chances, therefore, certain outcomes can either improve or worsen an individual’s life chances (Bendix, 1978). For example, a person with low income will have low life chances, as their standard of education may not …show more content…

Life chances describes the resources available to an individual depending on their specific layer of stratification. Social class systems are defined by ascribed or acquired status; ascribed status is attained from birth, whilst acquired status has been earnt by an individual’s achievements. Capitalism impacts a person’s life chances both positively and negatively, according to Heath (2013), “thanks to capitalism, globalisation, technology and a reduced tolerance for violence, humanity has never had it so good”. On the contrary, Herman and Chomsky (1988), believed that capitalism is the central drive “of modern industrialized civilization has been individual material gain”. Different viewpoints of capitalism’s impact of a person’s life chances has been presented, helping determine the whether capitalism overall improves people’s life …show more content…

Capitalism allows people to have rights to own assets, causing companies to respond to these demands and immediately produce products for consumers. As this demand increases, more businesses join the market to compete against each other for all the consumer’s money. This competition between businesses is beneficial for people as companies will require more workers and inevitably pay them a sustainable wage. As a result of competition being the underlying function of capitalism, companies are required to produce goods that consumers will invest in (Spark, 2018). Therefore, products are only made if they provide any form of benefit or interest to the consumers, otherwise the product won’t sell, and no profit will be made. Weber believes that capitalism improves a person’s life chances as it allows different layers of stratification to be accessed and achieved. For example, with economic growth and increase drive of innovation, real GDP is increased and improves peoples living standards (WSM, 2018). Consequently, with an increase of wealth, the majority benefit and a ‘trickle-down effect’ from the wealthy to the poor occurs (Pettinger, 2013). Thus, it can be argued that a person’s life chances can significantly improve as through competing for prestige and power, the individual’s social position and opportunities offered will be increased. Having this central

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of Class In America By Gregory Mantsios

    580 Words  | 2 Pages

    and it manifests itself in a multitude of cultural and social ways.” The author discussed the problems that occur from economic and social classes. The purpose of this argument is to debate on what kind of people will be successful in life. Everyone has a shot at being successful, and that they do with it is

    Read More

  • Unregulated Capitalism Undermines the Legitimacy of Liberal Democracy

    2371 Words  | 5 Pages

    In a capitalist system, businesses compete with one another to produce the most innovative merchandise at the most competitive prices; in turn, consumers freely select the most desirable products. According to Adam Smith, this competition, when left unregulated, fosters maximum wealth and the common good (Economist 2-3). Indeed, unmanaged competition may ensure prices are affordable for consumers (2). However, in a global free market that exploits cheap labour; market demand dwindles, resulting in excessive credit lending and debt crises (Li 295-6). In this way, capitalism’s efficiency and promotion of the common good is questionable.

    Read More

  • Analysis and Commentary on Bill Gate´s Article: How to Fix Capitalism

    1141 Words  | 3 Pages

    The richest of humanity see the most of improvements, and the poorest of humanity see the least of these improvements. Through capitalism the world has changed tremendously in a short amount of time. A host of new technology has been innovated, especially in the last 100 years. Humanity as a whole is much better off than it was before. As an example, most of us are able to take an airplane to travel from one country to another in one day or have fairly easy access to advanced health care. In a word, like Bill Gates said in his article “How to Fix Capitalism”, “Capitalism has improved the lives of billions of people- something that’s easy to forget”(Gates). But, it is not getting better fast enough, and it is not getting better for everyone. A multitude of people live on less than a dollar a day and it can be extremely hard for a person in such a situation to drag themselves out of poverty without help from others. Capitalism has the ability to harness self-interest in a helpful and sustainable way but only on beh...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of People Like Us: Social Class In America

    1655 Words  | 4 Pages

    Diversity is part of the American lifestyle. America is a country built on capitalistic principles, where a countries’ economy is controlled by a small number of people. People who tend to have power in the society tend to separate themselves from the rest. Looking back at different time period of American history diversity has shaped up the lives we live as Americans, whether it is because of gender, sexual orientation, race, religion, socioeconomic background, and capabilities/ disabilities, there is always diversity in society. Although, diversity is increasingly being viewed positively, and as much as people are proud of their differences. There will always be a way for human beings to diversify themselves into groups in which share similar interests.

    Read More

  • Analyzing Views on Social Inequality: A Comparative Study

    1054 Words  | 3 Pages

    Social inequality is characterized by the existence of unequal opportunity for various social positions or statuses within a given group or society. It is a phenomenon that has a long history as social inequalities has a wide range of varieties. From economic, gender, racial, status, and prestige, social inequality is a topic often disputed by classical theorists. Sociologists Karl Marx, Max Weber, W.I. Thomas, and Frederic M. Thrasher have formed varying thoughts on this recurring phenomenon. Marx believed that social inequality synthesized through conflicts within classes and in modern society those two classes were the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. In contrast, Weber disputes Marx’s simplistic view of the conflict and theorizes that social

    Read More

  • How Does Socioeconomic Status Influence Success?

    1445 Words  | 3 Pages

    Recently, the recession has increased the wealth gap resulting in the rich getting richer and the poor to get poorer. This is an important issue facing society. As the poor and the middle class struggle for financial stability and wealth the top 1% of the rich continue to grow their assets. What is the reality of this issue? Is society’s perception of this issue accurate? How does one’s socioeconomic status influence success? There are many perspectives to this provocative topic and can vary when looking at them through an economical or a political lens. Often times, the wealthy are privileged with an unfair advantage over the poor.

    Read More

  • Economic Class And Max Weber's Concept Of Socioeconomic Class

    1166 Words  | 3 Pages

    Despite the typically imaged definition of socioeconomic class being based entirely on the wealth of the individual, there are many complex social factors at play as well. Not only does it stem from Max Weber’s concept of Socioeconomic class (wealth, status, and power), there is a mobility to it as well. Anyone can permanently or temporarily

    Read More

  • Is Capitalism Justified Essay

    1587 Words  | 4 Pages

    Our belief states are determined by the external factors, for example, perceived complexity and priming ethics is an interesting subject and everyone lives by their thoughts and their ways. Everyone lives by a different code. In this paper I will argue against capitalism, because capitalism in the long run is morally unjustified. I will start off by explaining what capitalism is, and then I will explain how capitalism affects us and lastly I will conclude why capitalism is not morally justifiable. Morality is about primary making the right choices. Now the key word here is, right. We have to make sure if the system is the right system for all of us as a whole and not only if it benefits only some.

    Read More

  • is equailty possible in socity

    1844 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...ows how difficult it is for every person to survive is when Max Weber talks about the different classes getting into conflict with each other or one another. One example that shows this is when Weber says, “In any case, a class does not in itself constitute a community. To treat ‘class ‘ conceptually as having the same value as ‘community’ leads to distortion” (Weber Max, 1922 Pg. 207). Weber wants people to know that a class does not always mean that a community will come from it. The richest people in the world will form their own group to make sure they keep their power. While in the middle class, and the lowest class are left to defend for them selves. Weber wants people to know that not everyone has the same opportunity to survive but should receive the same chance. One of these ways is to join a community where everyone is strong and can support each other.

    Read More

  • Jonah Goldberg's Capitalism Has Lifted Billions Out Of Poverty

    718 Words  | 2 Pages

    Capitalism has widely been regarded as one of the most advanced intellectual achievements of the past few centuries. However, a system which is largely credited for alleviating “human misery” is actually perpetuating it (Goldberg, 6). Capitalism inherently fuels inequality leading to poverty among the powerless. Jonah Goldberg in his article, Capitalism Has Lifted Billions Out of Poverty, attributed the economic theory to ending poverty, but failed to recognize that capitalism’s lofty goals are merely fulfilled on paper. Equal opportunity must exist for capitalism to end human misery, however the stratification of society ensures that no individual has equal access to the keys of capitalist success.

    Read More

  • Karl Marx Father Of Capitalism

    1172 Words  | 3 Pages

    Marx is able to demonstrate the consequences that result from transforming values into productions suited for profit, as he writes, “This boundless greed after riches, this passionate chase after exchange-value is common to the capitalist and the miser; but while the miser is merely a capitalist gone mad, the capitalist is a rational miser” (Marx 63). There is no sense of abhorrence for a particular individual in Marx’s interpretation of capitalism and instead focuses on the capitalistic economic structure. However, it is through this quote that a sense of inequality starts to emerge. As a result, a hierarchy is produced, creating an enduring structure of capitalism, where those who control the circulation of money are granted unlimited power. This has become evident in recent years, as in 2008, a social power analysis by Dr. John S. Atlee and Tom Atlee was published. In “Democracy: A Social Power Analysis” Altlee describes the power of money and status as he states, “People with lots of money, muscle, status, intelligence, etc., can usually successfully influence other people. In most (but, significantly, not all) circumstances, they have more social power” (Atlee). Economic power is proven to be pivotal in attaining another individual’s attention and status of capability. Thus, the capitalist is free to develop their own sense of

    Read More

  • Karl Marx and a Capitalist Society

    754 Words  | 2 Pages

    Through out history money, wealth and capital have dictated a way of life to the masses. Wealth dictated the lives that the rich lived and the lives of the poor that worked for and surrounded them. In some cultures your class could never be escaped in life, you had to wait for your next incarnation, while in other cultures the idea of wealth transcended a life and allowed for growth from one class to another. This is the reality of a capitalist society that was first discussed by Karl Marx in the 19th century.

    Read More

  • The Iron Cage and Max Weber

    582 Words  | 2 Pages

    Once capitalism came about, it was like a machine that you were being pulled into without an alternative option. Currently, whether we agree or disagree, for example if you want to survive you need to have a job and you need to make money. Weber believed that social actions were becoming based on efficiency instead of the old types of social actions, which were based on lineage or kinship. Behavior had become dominated by goal-oriented rationality and less by tradition and values. According to Web...

    Read More

  • Karl Marx and Capitalism

    893 Words  | 2 Pages

    Capitalism dominates the world today. Known as a system to create wealth, capitalism’s main purpose is to increase profits through land, labor and free market. It is a replacement of feudalism and slavery. It promises to provide equality and increases living standards through equal exchanges, technological innovations and mass productions. However, taking a look at the global economy today, one can clearly see the disparity between developed and developing countries, and the persistence of poverty throughout the world despite the existence of abundant wealth. This modern issue was predicted and explained a hundred and fifty years ago in Karl Marx’s Capital.

    Read More

  • Capitalism and Merit, Ability and Achievement

    1280 Words  | 3 Pages

    The world’s economies continue to be divided on by whom their means of production benefit, supply, enrich, and protect. Many debates and altercations have been a result of disagreements between capitalists and socialists. Socialists believe the government is essential in providing equality for all and the allocation of capital goods. But the strength of capitalism can be attributed to an incentive structure based upon the three P’s: (1) prices determined by market forces, (2) a profit-and-loss system of accounting and (3) private property rights. The failure of socialism can be traced to its neglect of these three incentive-enhancing components. (Perry) Socialism gives power to the government to regulate the goods produced, the amount of goods produced, where the goods are distributed, and the price of the goods. This command system does not allow for the creativity, wealth, and freedom that capitalism supplies the citizens. Capitalism provides a market system that permits companies to regulate the economies themselves. Capitalism offers the world’s economy the freedom to manage itself, diversify, prosper, fail, and freedom from regulation in order to supply the world based on demand and creativity. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards merit, ability and achievement, regardless of one’s birth or station in life. Capitalism is the only social system that rewards virtue and punishes vice. This applies to both the business executive and the carpenter, the lawyer, and the factory worker. (Thomson) Capitalism is the world’s dominant economic system. Within it, the means of production and distribution are owned by individuals: private ownership and free enterprise are believed to lead to more efficiency, lower prices, be...

    Read More

More about Social Class And Life Chances Analysis

Open Document