Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on corruption in Africa
Corruption in Africa Essay
Analsis of corruption in africa
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on corruption in Africa
Social change and the law are codependent. If one wishes to see progress in the world, a world crippled with corruption, ignorance, fear, and hate amongst other injustices, he or she must acknowledge the relationship that law and social change have on one another. Social change requires a shift in the mindset of a collective body. It requires the norms of a culture to gradually change and progress with the values of the evolving society in order for change to happen. Laws change over time as the society’s values evolve. Thus, new laws come about when values change and conversely, laws change or progress when values change or progress. Laws create social change as social change creates law. The relationship is cyclical. Cyclical relationships involve a process of steps that can exist to help or hurt a society. When laws change, we want to assume that they are progressing with society for beneficial purposes. We want to believe that social change is change for the greater good of the society and that the law is just …show more content…
When individuals, especially individuals who are more akin to be allies and not enemies, fight for the sole purpose of collecting captives to sell as if they were objects to the true enemy, the Europeans, shows just how society can be easily deceived for corruption (Rodney 79). The Europeans, who should have been the outliers in the African community, ended up with the power, since the African leaders exploited their own people in favor of their own economic interests, allowed the Europeans to further their slave trade since money and objects seemed to be more valuable than human lives (Rodney 79). The European’s power increased because within the African community the differences of the enemies were further divided instead of uniting the community on their similarities, it was
4. In what way is the battle for the freedom of the kidnapped Africans a microcosm of the growing sectional conflict in
John Barbot describes how many Africans would kidnap and trade their countrymen to Europeans. “Those sold by the Blacks are for the most part prisoners of war… others stolen away by their own countrymen; and some there are, who will sell their
King’s Leopold’s Ghost, Belgium is known as the strongest country in search of a colony (Congo) for its own exploitation. Professor Landstreet defines forced labor as the most extreme form of slavery, work that people are compelled to do against their will and subjected to physical punishment if they don’t perform their work. In the following essay, I will be discussing the social structure, ideologies and power relations in context with forced labor. The scramble for Africa started in the 1800s to the start of the First World War (1914). Prior to the 19th century, the rest of the world knew very little about Africa, the Dark Continent.
With Europe in control, “the policies of the governing powers redirected all African trade to the international export market. Thus today, there is little in the way of inter-African trade, and the pattern of economic dependence continues.” Europeans exported most of the resources in Africa cheaply and sold them costly, which benefited them, but many Africans worked overtime and were not treated with care.
During the 17th century, slavery was a widely used commodity with the Europeans, little do people know however that African kings also had and accepted slavery in their own nations. King Nzinga Mbemba of Congo and the King of Ouidah had similarities on the issue of slavery; they tolerated the use of slaves. Congo’s king had no contingency with slavery; in fact, he had slaves in his country. When the Portuguese were purchasing goods in Congo, the king had men “investigate if the mentioned goods are captives or free men” (NZ, 622). The fact that the king differentiates the men between ‘free’ and ‘captives’ illustrates that not all people in Congo are free. Whether these captives are from the country of Congo or not, they are still caught and held all across the nation against their will. King Mbemba kept slaves because the population of Congo was vastly declining due to the slave trade. In his letter, he pleads with the king of Portug...
In every society around the world, the law is affecting everyone since it shapes the behavior and sense of right and wrong for every citizen in society. Laws are meant to control a society’s behavior by outlining the accepted forms of conduct. The law is designed as a neutral aspect existent to solve society’s problems, a system specially designed to provide people with peace and order. The legal system runs more efficiently when people understand the laws they are intended to follow along with their legal rights and responsibilities.
The changes needed for the Australian society to be adequately addressed is not the law itself but the consequences in regarding the law because if they were effective than there would be less violence happening but that is not the case.
MacCormick’s institutional theory advances from Kelsen’s pure theory of law which considers politics and morality to be impurities. Whilst politics involves the process of law-making, MacCormick dismisses it from the institutional theory as it concerns the exercise of power to act in a certain way rather than according to the normative order. It is argued that the law is not coercive but normative in power as legislation has the power to alter practice without the need to provide direct orders to agencies. Nevertheless, this argument has limitations as the law can also be deemed as coercive due to the sanctions that the judiciary can impose on individuals. Furthermore, legal positivists argue that moral norms are distinct from legal norms and therefore prefer to exclude it from the institutional law theory. MacCormick argues that not all legal rules contain a moral element. This is a limitation of the theory as the law can only maintain the normative order in the “legal sense.” Different people have different views on what is morally correct and if this is not embodied in the law then it is difficult for the normative order to be upheld as there would be a conflict in the decision of what ought to be done in the circumstances. Moreover, this theory is based on democratic law which is not universal and therefore rejects the
Therefore, for the development of the society, a legal, formal and universal system has to be established, that can deal with subjects, that cannot be resolved or addressed through natural, customary or religious law. Thus over time, the law scholars and sociologists started to understand the complexity and interrelationship between law and society.
This class was filled with riveting topics that all had positive and negative impacts on Africa. As in most of the world, slavery, or involuntary human servitude, was practiced across Africa from prehistoric times to the modern era (Wright, 2000). The transatlantic slave trade was beneficial for the Elite Africans that sold the slaves to the Western Europeans because their economy predominantly depended on it. However, this trade left a mark on Africans that no one will ever be able to erase. For many Africans, just remembering that their ancestors were once slaves to another human, is something humiliating and shameful.
Africa’s struggle to maintain their sovereignty amidst the encroaching Europeans is as much a psychological battle as it is an economic and political one. The spillover effects the system of racial superiority had on the African continent fractured ...
Order and stability are the two themes that societies or groups of people desire to achieve. No matter whether people are being hurt or certain types of people are negatively affected, society wants to keeps itself how it is. Change, whether good or bad, is a force that is dreaded by groups of people. Change destroys order and brings about new ideas and practices that a society will have to learn and adapt to. However, bringing about that change is a very difficult task. Masses of similar people, including cultures, will try their best to resist change and eliminate its source. Unconsciously, individual people will also turn away from any initial change or deviance. However, when the source of that change becomes powerful enough, nothing will
Why is the concept of the rule of law an important aspect within society to have an integral understanding of? The rule of law is a facet of our society that affects and serves our lives on a daily basis because rules and laws dictate the underlying basis of our social interactions. One basic understanding of the idea of the rule of law is that society should be ruled by law, and not by men. At perhaps the most rudimentary level, the rule of law has been used to explain a type of governance that is founded upon universal and neutral rules. Endicott argues that communities can never adequately achieve the rule of law because “it requires, among other things, that government officials conform to the law. But they may not do so, and presumably there is no large community in which they always do so” (Endicott, 1999, p.1). Consequently, an area of rule of law is explored by Aristotle’s critique of Plato’s philosopher-rulers theory and his defence and understanding of the rule of law.
Law is the foundation of central structures of social life on which society’s integrity depends, which is why Petrazycki, Ehrlich and Habermas perceive it to be a key steering mechanism in society,
In conclusion it is clear there is a relationship between law and morality and there will always be a debate on the extent to which morals effect laws and how laws influence the morals of society. Morals and laws constantly change with political, economical, and social influences and will therefore always have the opportunity to be affected by each other but the extent of which cannot be predicted.