Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Changing roles of women in societies
Changing roles of women in societies
Role gender plays in society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Changing roles of women in societies
Order and stability are the two themes that societies or groups of people desire to achieve. No matter whether people are being hurt or certain types of people are negatively affected, society wants to keeps itself how it is. Change, whether good or bad, is a force that is dreaded by groups of people. Change destroys order and brings about new ideas and practices that a society will have to learn and adapt to. However, bringing about that change is a very difficult task. Masses of similar people, including cultures, will try their best to resist change and eliminate its source. Unconsciously, individual people will also turn away from any initial change or deviance. However, when the source of that change becomes powerful enough, nothing will …show more content…
be able to stop society from being changed. New traditions will emerge, new opinions will be believed, and new customs will be put into effect. This resisted yet potential change is demonstrated in three certain essays. In Susan Faludi’s “The Naked Citadel”, a woman arises to challenge the strongly held misogynistic attitudes of the men of a military school, the Citadel. In Malcolm Gladwell’s “The Power of Context”, small changes to New York’s train stations unite against the horrific crime-filled city. In Ethan Watters’ “The Mega-Marketing of Depression in Japan”, clever marketing techniques and strategies combine to alter the views of an entire culture. An individual, specifically someone or something that brings about a change into a group of people, will be, by all means, resisted and put down by a society or culture unless the power of that change is so strong that a society or culture will, at the end, have to accept and adapt to that certain revolution. In the beginning, all change will be resisted. Society will do its best to not only lessen the spread of any change but also eliminate the source of where the change is emerging from. In all three texts, a new change created by an individual is fought against by its society or culture. In Faludi’s “The Naked Citadel”, the admission of a woman is intensely fought and opposed by not only the administration of the military school but also by every male student: “The Citadel’s administration has fought the female hunter with a legal arsenal of nearly a million dollars” (Faludi 78). This female student represents a change that the school has not seen before. In order to maintain its stability, the Citadel employs every technique to force her out from the school. Initially, the school tries to win the battle in the court; however, it fails to succeed. Afterwards, the administration does not show approval of the female student by excluding her from certain events. Finally, and most importantly when all else fails, the students not only threaten her with hateful words, but also vandalize the surrounding area where she lives in order to force her into depression. Trying their best to remove any new changes arising, the Citadel and its inhabitants unsuccessfully were able to remove a determined woman like Shannon Faulkner from the school. In Gladwell’s “The Power of Context”, the small changes in the environment placed by officials are initially greatly opposed by most people in the New York society. Criminals still tried their best to overcome the new policies enforced. Even though lots of them were getting arrested, the point where the change would be realized had not yet come. Criminals did fear the new policies, but their fears were not yet strong enough. In Ethan Watters’ “The Mega-Marketing of Depression in Japan”, the company GlaxoSmithKline tries to implant a new point of view towards depression in a highly-resistant Japanese culture: “…a multinational pharmaceutical corporations working hard to redefine narratives about mental health” (Watters 519). In the beginning, however, Japanese people did not take the new views of depression described by the company too seriously. The idea of depression not only was not thought of a malicious disease, but also it was actually looked up to. The Japanese people believed that depression was a way for a person to be more thoughtful of his or her surrounding and environment. The entire culture would not change its beliefs because one individual, or in this case a company, views a certain idea differently. In all three texts, any idea of change is strongly opposed by the majority. However, only when the strength of an idea of change gains enough potential energy, a society or culture will finally be forced to accept that idea or view. Only when an idea gains enough support or is believed in by a lot of people can that idea of change finally be activated. Only after this tipping point will people actually start supporting or believing in the change that was originally being resisted. In Watters’ “The Mega-Marketing of Depression in Japan”, only after lots of advertising and marketing the company GlaxoSmithKline was able to finally change people’s definition of depression: “These advertisements…both featured the brand name of the drug and promoted the idea of depression as a common ailment” (Watters 524). When people finally believed the theory of depression placed by GlaxoSmithKline, many things started to change in Japan gradually. More and more people changed their views and started to support the idea that depression is harmful and needs to be treated. In Gladwell’s “The Power of Context”, only after many incidents of enforcing the change the officials placed into the New York society did New Yorkers finally understand that things are now different: “The team would nab fare-beaters one by one, handcuff them, and leave them standing…until they had a full catch” (Gladwell 154). Once people, specifically criminals, understood that their crimes would not be tolerated, only then did they finally change their attitudes and start adapting to the new changes placed into their society. In Susan Faludi’s “The Naked Citadel”, there are points in specific periods of time when schools that were not co-ed began opening their doors to the other gender: “There was also the fact that female students made up seventy-seven percent of the enrollment of the evening school” (Faludi 74). In the Citadel itself, only after much force for change did the school finally start allowing women to be part of the night school. Even though this institution was very firm in its belief that no women would be admitted, in the end the school finally did open its doors to women. In all three texts, only after a tipping point or certain type of climax is reached does a change or new idea finally becomes accepted by a society of culture. Once that tipping point is reached, the new change in that specific society or group of people will automatically be practiced and supported by the majority of its inhabitants. After the idea of change is finally accepted in a society or group of people, the majority of its inhabitants will quickly adapt to the new changes instantly.
In Susan Faludi’s “The Naked Citadel”, an example of how an all-male school finally opened all of its door to women is mentioned: “At Norwich University…voluntarily opened its barracks to women” (Faludi 79). This school, once a conservative male school, allows all females join. This school is an example of what the future looks like for the Citadel. Before the Citadel allowed women into its night school, then the school was forced to take in a female into its day program, finally, maybe in the future, the school would finally convert to a modern co-ed school. In Gladwell’s “The Power of Context”, after people finally accepted that their crimes will not be tolerated anymore, both criminals and innocent people were able to accept that their society is a new place: “In New York the decline was anything but gradual” (Gladwell 152). With justice finally enforced, not only did the crime rates drastically dropped, but also people were able to completely change their attitudes on what the society of New York offered them. In Watters’ “The Mega-Marketing of Depression in Japan”, once people understood depression was a harmful disease, the company GlaxoSmithKline was able to make billions of dollars by selling their drug to Japanese people: “In the end, however, the coherence of these various messages [about the science of the drug] took second place to their effectiveness” (Watters 527). GlaxoSmithKline was now able to successfully use the brainwashed minds of the Japanese people and make tons of profit. In all three texts, after a certain idea of change is finally accepted in a society of culture, that change is able to spread like a disease to every single inhabitant of that
society. If change acted as a stone thrown into a lake, the body of water, representing society or a group of people, will do its best to diminish and eliminate the ripples caused by that stone; however, if the energy or intensity of that stone is so great, the entire lake will succumb to the after-effects created by the stone. Change acts in a very similar way. The individual, including something as big as a company, who places or creates a change is always viewed negatively by his or her or its society. Only after much convincing will the group of people finally accept any new changes. And right after that change has been accepted, it will be difficult to realize that that society or group of people was the same as the one before that change had been implemented.
In The Samurai’s Garden by Gail Tsukiyama, a young man is thrown from his established world, left in a new, confusing realm that holds more than meets the eye. In the midst of a violent and ferocious war between the Chinese and Japanese in mid 1937, this young man, Stephen, contracts tuberculosis, and is sent to his family’s summer house in Japan. There he meets the house’s caretaker, Matsu, a simple and reserved man who holds back all but the most necessary speech. This meeting will come to define many of Stephen’s interactions with others throughout the novel: reserved and limited. In this odd land filled with subtle secrets and unspoken uncomfortability, Stephen is prepared for a very quiet and restful period, marked with healing and growth.
People in the modern society we live in today are the ones that are shaped by society. Say there is a new trend, that trend can change people
In Susan Faludi’s “The Naked Citadel”, she analyzes the homosocial nature of men as she tries to discover the causes behind sexism and to find out “why men who oppose women’s progress are so angry” (Faludi, 72). The main subject of her reading is the all boys college named the Citadel and its vehement opposition to admitting a female into its ranks. The boys become aggressive and angry about the thought of an independent and unique woman becoming a part of their student body. The thought of it threatens the gendering society established within the Citadel where the boys rely on each other to establish their own gender identities. Gender identities rely a lot upon the shaky foundation of the social dominance of one sex over the other. In today’s
The Last Samurai is a film that is often used to teach history in classes. The last Samurai represents the end of an era. The film does a good job of teaching many parts of Japanese History. This movie teaches us about the way of the Samurai, and their beliefs and traditions. The movie also expresses what life was like during the Meiji Restoration. You can see in the movie that technology started to advance, gradually decreasing the amount of Samurais. The Satsuma Rebellion, which lasted for 6 months, was shown in the movie as a battle between tradition and modernisation. Even though this film is not entirely accurate, it has some key historical events which are good for learning about this historic period.
Throughout history our understanding of the world has been manufactured through the judgment of human beings. The overall change and shift in paradigms can be explained by social construction theory. An article written by Carole S. Vance discusses the topic of social construction theory and illustrates how it impacts gender roles. Social construction can be defined as: a critical subject of reality that analyzes the ideas of a particular group or culture based on society and the aspects of society (education, religion, government etc.) Another article “Feminist Critiques of the Public/Private Dichotomy” written by Carole Pateman explains how men had placed women in a hypothetical bubble that is dominated by men. Men have always been looked
Change is good." We hear the catchy phrase everywhere. From company slogans to motivational speeches, our world seems to impose this idea that change is always a good thing. Assuming that the change is for the better, it is probably a true statement in most cases. The root of this idea seems to come from the notion that we are dissatisfied with the state that we are in, so, in order to create a more enjoyable surrounding, we adjust. Others, however, stray from this practice, and instead of trying to adapt to the people around them, they try and change others.
The once male dominated, corporate, "white collar" America has seen a phenomenal influx of women within the last thirty years. Although a female lawyer, physician, or CEO is no longer considered a rarity in our times, women still face quite a deal of oppression in comparison to their male counterparts. In retrospect, some professions have always been controlled by women, and men have not made a noticeable advance in these fields. In 1970, finding a female lawyer to represent you would be a difficult task, since less than five percent of the profession were women. Today, that number has risen to almost thirty percent. The percentage of female doctors has almost tripled in the course of thirty years. African Americans have not made such a conspicuous progression within the last fifty years, while women have made a tremendous impact on the corporate world. One may wonder, how did women make these extraordinary advances? For the most part, it is due to the education they receive. At the present time young girls are encouraged to enroll in classes dealing with math and science, rather than home economics and typing. As pointed out by Nanette Asimov, in her essay "Fewer Teen Girls Enrolling in Technology Classes", school officials are advocating the necessity of advanced placement, and honor classes for teenage girls, in both the arts and sciences. This support and reassurance than carries over onto college, and finds a permanent fixture in a woman’s life. While women are continuing their success in once exclusively male oriented professions, they are still lacking the respect and equality from their peers, coworkers, and society. The average male lawyer, and doctor make twenty-five percent more money than their female equivalent. Women have always lived with the reputation of being intellectually inferior to, and physically submissive to men. This medieval, ignorant notion is far fetched from the truth. In 1999, high school men and women posted similar SAT scores, being separated by a only a few points. In addition to posting similar scores on the SAT, the average males score was a mere two-tenths of a point higher than an average females score on the ACT. Even though a woman maybe as qualified as a male for a certain occupation , women receive unwanted harassment, and are under strict scrutiny. A good illustration of this would be the women represented in "Two Women Cadets Leave the Citadel.
For many, change is a cause for ignorance. Most of us fear the idea of change. When one is faced to deal with c...
The world is changing at this very moment, as it has been for thousands of years. Life today is not the same as it was yesterday, nor will it be identical to tomorrow. Lives are changing, but this change does not affect merely the lives of individuals. Society as a whole is constantly undergoing modifications and other changes, both beneficially and unfavorably. People do not always readily accept this change. For ages, writers and great philosophers have been trying to discover the reasons that society makes an effort to resist this change, which comes through innovators and their new ideas. One piece of literature that attempts to solve the issue of societies resisting change is the essay “Individual Liberty and Public Control” by Bertrand Russell. He makes several points as to why societies resist change. Russell narrows the points down to three main reasons, being an “instinct of conventionality”, “feeling of insecurity”, and “vested interests” (Russell 1). These reasons can be applied to other works of literature, such as William Shakespeare’s drama The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, in which people resist changes and the opinions of various innovators. While it is true that the characters and events of Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar manifest Russell’s reasons why society resists change, the underlying motive for each of these reasons in the Julius Caesar is the human nature’s selfish ambition and desire for personal gain.
Bad tidings are what are to expect for the people that try to annihilate change. Some deviations are favourable for the society, but the society does not use it, they are not sure if their crops and livestock are going to be permissible to the society, so there long hours of labour might not pay off, and their enemies always causing harm to them for they, the norms, the society also will not accept the Fringes people’s differences. They chase deviations and they fail, also norms that go against change and depressingly and the society ravage themselves trying to exterminate the blasphemies. Change is the essence of life; if you stop change then you stop life.
Have you ever wanted to know why people change? If they change for the good? If they do it for a special reason? Well there is always a change for people in their life. Although, there are two main reasons for the change of a human. Fear and the desire for acceptance has the ability to change a human’s morals.
...ny one individual. You might ask three people what their personal definition of change is and receive three different answers. Some people offer very little resistance to change, they consider it the spice of life; it prevents stagnancy and maintains excitement through diversity. Some people view change like the U.S. viewed Russia during the cold war, as an inevitable threat that we must constantly monitor and prepare for. Other people react to change like an ostrich reacts to danger. They just stick their head in a hole and pretend it doesn't exist. Change is constantly happening all the time to everyone in someway or another. Whether or not change is accepted does not alter the fact that it exists however the way you accept change can alter the way you exist.
The first all female schools began in the early 1800’s. These academies favored more traditional gender roles, women being the home makers and the men being the bread winners. The first generation of educated women was the result of single-sex colleges in 1873. Wendy Kaminer, an investigative journalist, states that “single-sex education was not exactly a choice; it was a cultural mandate at a time when sexual segregation was considered only natural” (1). Women of this time were technically not allowed to attend school with males. Feminists of this time worked hard to integrate the school system and by the early 1900’s, single sex classrooms were a thing of the past. In 1910, twenty-seven percent of colleges were for men only, fifteen percent were for women only and the remainders were coed. Today, women outnumber men among college graduates (Kaminer 1). After all the hard work of early feminists, there are thousands of people today who advocate bringing back the single sex classroom.
Climates change, soil erodes, lakes and rivers dry up. Deforestation results in land erosion and reduces rainfall. Natural disasters cause a sudden and huge change. Isolation and contact is another force. Societies that are in contact with other societies are more likely to change more rapidly. Isolated societies are more stable and resistant to change. Social structure also plays a role in change. A tightly structured society where every person's roles, duties, privileges and obligations are precisely and rigidly defined is less given to changes than a more loosely structured society where roles, lines of authority, privileges and obligations are more open to individual
Everyone in this world have their own culture and ideas of how the world should be. They have things that have been in their customs for years or even thousands of years. These things are supposed to “keep us united.”(Bansal) But what happens when our own cultures and ideas get challenged by new things that represent change. People start to get chaotic and immediately start to reject something that they do not want to give it a try or does not seem right to them. Modernism is “a rational interpretation of religious, social and economic institutions and phenomena.” (Singh) Meaning, giving it the chance to thrive in a society where the culture and in the beliefs are different. But were there’s change, people are always going to oppose it and will cause an argument, leading to disputes, debates or even wars. But can change be bad or good in the lives of people. How come change has become a symbol of chaos? Why are people scared by change?