Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Theory of capitalism karl marx
Social inequality within the us
Theory of capitalism karl marx
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Theory of capitalism karl marx
while average American chief executive officer earned 42 times as much as the low-level employees, currently the top managers make 531 times higher than the average workers. The class struggles that Marx described in his economic theories played a critical role in widening the income gap (Royce, 2015). The existing economic policies such as free trade mean that the high class can quickly supply their products throughout the world. On the other hand, the low-income households mainly benefit from the increased competition that forces the local firms to reduce the prices for their products. However, such advantages do not impact directly on the disadvantaged families’ wealth stators.
Solutions to the Social Challenges facing the Middle and Low-Income Classes
Marx believed that strategies such as progressive taxes, public education and comprehensive economic policies can reduce the social injustices (Martin and Pimentel, 2014). The U.S. policy makers also apply similar measures to curb various challenges facing its disadvantaged populations. For example, it introduced social security and anti-poverty programs that include tax refunds, food stamps, unemployment payments and other financial support services. According to CBPP (2016) policies such as earned income tax credit and child, tax enables more than 27 million low-income families to access food, adequate housing facilities, and high-quality education and health care. The economic incentives further encourage the low paid workers to enroll in higher education programs that in turn increase their chances of rising to higher economic and social positions.
However, various dysfunctions and inefficiencies characterizing the American economic systems result in the embezzlement of the...
... middle of paper ...
...inues to grow not only because of the poor corporate governance styles but also due to the concerned authorities’ reluctance to solve the crisis. The elite families have created strong networks with influential personalities from across the world. This form of modern slavery means the underprivileged families cannot compete favorably with the elite families for the limited economic and social opportunities. Like the proletariat of the 19th century, the modern low-income American families lack capital, land and adequate entrepreneurial skills to start their businesses. As a result, most of these bottom 25% of the income distribution are always willing to accept the low paying jobs. Whereas the chief executive officers, managing directors and major shareholders create policies that allow them to gain lucrative compensation packages, dividends and other profit shares.
In Confronting Inequality, Paul Krugman discusses the cost of inequality and possible solutions. Krugman argues to say that it is a fantasy to believe the rich live just like the middle class. Then, he goes into detail about how middle class families struggle to try to give their children a better life and how education plays a factor in children’s future lives. For example, children’s ability to move into higher education could be affected by their parents economic status. Also, He discusses how politicians play a role in the inequality, because most of politicians are in the upper economic class. Finally, Krugman says how we could possibly have solutions to these various inequalities, but how America won’t get
According to Gregory Mantsios many American people believed that the classes in the United States were irrelevant, that we equally reside(ed) in a middle class nation, that we were all getting richer, and that everyone has an opportunity to succeed in life. But what many believed, was far from the truth. In reality the middle class of the United States receives a very small amount of the nation's wealth, and sixty percent of America's population receives less than 6 percent of the nation's wealth, while the top 1 percent of the American population receives 34 percent of the total national wealth. In the article Class in America ( 2009), written by Gregory Mantsios informs us that there are some huge differences that exist between the classes of America, especially the wealthy and the poor. After
...elp the working middle class from falling into poverty or to help the working poor rise out of poverty. Furthermore the working poor themselves lack the knowledge and power to demand reform. David Shipler says it best when he writes, “Relief will come, if at all, in an amalgam that recognizes both the society’s obligation through government and business, and the individual’s obligation through labor and family —and the commitment of both society and individual.” (Shipler 5786-5788) It is time for America to open its eyes and see the invisible working poor.
Time and time again we hear politicians and office holders preach the need for a powerful middle-class. You may then be surprised to hear that “about 82% of America’s net worth belongs to the top 20%, the next 80% of people only own about 18% of America’s wealth” (UCSC). Some may argue that this disproportion is the beauty of capitalism, the chance to create an empire. I argue that the proportions are simply unfair. Why is it that “ the average CEO makes 350X as much as his/her employee” (UCSC)?
Since the rise of capitalism was underway, everything was being mass produced for a affordable price. This new abundance made the imbalance in economic classes significantly worse. Only big business manufacturers and merchants, lawyers, successful farmers, and other professionals dominated the locus of production, which lead to the decline of household needs as a source of production. Clothing was no longer being made at home, and food was being mass produced and sent to small shops. While this made some things easier for the average household, it took away much of the lower class’s means of
With each class comes a certain level in financial standing, the lower class having the lowest income and the upper class having the highest income. According to Mantsios’ “Class in America” the wealthiest one percent of the American population hold thirty-four percent of the total national wealth and while this is going on nearly thirty-seven million Americans across the nation live in unrelenting poverty (Mantsios 284-6). There is a clear difference in the way that these two groups of people live, one is extreme poverty and the other extremely
In the United States there are four social classes : the upper class, the middle class, the working class, and the lower class. Of these four classes the most inequality exists between the upper class and the lower class. This inequality can be seen in the incomes that the two classes earn. During the period 1979 through the present , the growth in income has disproportionately grown.The bottom sixty percent of the US population actually saw their real income decrease in 1990 dollars. The next 20% saw medium gains. The top twenty percent saw their income increase 18%. The wealthiest one percent saw their incomes rise drastically over 80%. As reported in the 1997 Center on Budget's analysis , the wealthiest one percent of Americans ( 2.6 million people) received as much after-tax income in 1994 as the bottom 35 percent of the population combined (88 million people). But in 1977 the bottom 35 percent had about twice as much after tax income as the top one percent. These statistics further show the disproportional income growth among the social classes. The gr...
In the late 1800’s after the Civil war the United States begins to industrialize. With America’s cities growing, so does business. At the head of major business are the massive business leaders, and investors, such as Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.P Morgan who built major cities with their steel, oil, and electricity respectively. This sets America into the future. However although these leaders in industry pave the way to the future, they do so by stealing, and taking advantage of many. By taking advantage of the poor workers, monopolizing resources, and crushing small businesses, as well as paying lots of money to bribe many
The richest people who seem to keep getting richer have been walking into their wealth since the day they have been born. It has been proven by how the companies have been popping up around the world, how the companies are being bribed by governors trying to make their state seem more economically powerful. “Philips, Sony, and Toyota factories are popping up all over—to the self congratulatory applause of the nation’s governors and mayors, who have lured them with promises of tax abatements and new sewers, among other amenities.” (Paragraph 17) People are born into their jobs, and are doomed for their economic boats. IN other countries such as China, it has been proven that the families with the moneys are the ones with the money, are the ones with the economic power. “Many wealthy Chinese and western residents moved their money abroad and some actually left the colony. By 1971, the Cultural Revolution in China had ended in failure and conditions in Hong Kong calmed,” (Lannom) such as Gloria Lannom states, yet it took a while for Hong Kong to rebuild its economic standings because of this
According to Schwartz-Nobel, America will lose as much as 130 billion in future productive capacity for every year that 14.5 American children continue to live in poverty (Koppelman and Goodhart, 2007). Sadly the seriousness of poverty is still often clouded by myths and misunderstandings by society at large. This essay studies the issue of poverty and classism in today's society.
America’s upper class has been getting richer since the past three decades, and we have still not found a way to stop this. We have been unable to find a way to distribute America’s wealth equally, so we can have a decent lower class and a good middle class. Inequality has caused many people to struggle in various ways, but their is alway another side to the story.
Surviving in America has become increasingly more difficult due to the Government’s lack of oversight which causes the income gap to increase and the middle class to disappear. Due to an extreme gap of income between the wealthiest 1% and the remaining 99% in America, the middle class is dissipating to nothing because of unequal distribution of wealth. Poverty in America is a major issue that can and should be addressed as soon as possible because unequal distribution of wealth is causing greed, controversy and hate among millions of citizens. Although an income gap can be very inherent in capitalism, the Government should do more to help combat income inequality and unequal distribution of wealth because it takes advantage of the public and completely dissolving the middle class.
Income inequality continues to increase in today’s world, especially in the United States. Income inequality means the unequal distribution between individuals’ assets, wealth, or income. In the Twilight of the Elites, Christopher Hayes, a liberal journalist, states the inequality gap between the rich and the poor are increasing widening, and there need to have things done - tax the rich, provide better education - in order to shortening the inequality gap. America is a meritocratic country, which means that everybody has equal opportunity to be successful regardless of their class privileges or wealth. However, equality of opportunity does not equal equality of outcomes. People are having more opportunities to find a better job, but their incomes are a lot less compared to the top ten percent rich people. In this way, the poor people will never climb up the ladder to high status and become millionaires. Therefore, the government needs to increase all the tax rates on rich people in order to reduce income inequality.
Income inequality has been on the rise since the 1970s, however, it is a more pertinent problem now than it has been ever before. Despite evidence that cutting income inequality would improve the efficiency of the economy, the government shows a lack of understanding of that and continues to allow that inequality to increase. The disparity in income has become so pronounced that the top ten percent of Americans make more than nine times the income than the bottom 90 percent. This statistic has compounded over the years, and shows no signs of slowing down. The article posits that without reforms and changes, there won’t be lasting solutions for the middle and lower classes to rise above their current means.
Social issues are problems in the society today that are described as wrong, widespread and changeable. A category of conditions that people believe need to be changed. Poverty is a serious social issue in the society today. According to Peilin (2012), poverty brings hardships to families and individuals as well as political thereby negatively affecting the social stability and social development and posing a severe threat to human security (p. 243). This paper focuses on poverty as a social issue in today’s society. First, it gives a succinct introduction of the social issue, and then describes how it fits into the field of sociology. It also evaluates the sociological theories and terminology that relate to the social issue. The section that follows evaluates what is known and unknown about the particular social issue. This is followed by a discussion regarding the value of sociological research into the issue determining the available or possible practical implications of the sociological inquiry. The information presented here is strongly supported by the concepts and theories derived from reliable sources.