Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of social media on social relationships
Impact of social media on social relationships
Impact of social media on social relationships
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of social media on social relationships
Discuss the role social capital in health Social capital is inevitable in our day to day functioning, with the relationships we have with our family, friends, and the socialisation between neighbours and strangers. Consequently, these interactions affect our lives in a variety of ways. In this essay, these effects will be explored focusing on the role social capital plays in our health. In addition, the term social capital will be broken down into its 2 main subsections, providing specific examples of how it impacts our health and overall well-being. Social capital is the structure of social relationships amongst people who live and work in a community, enabling that community to function effectively. These interactions increase economic …show more content…
There are two main types of social capital; bonding social capital, which describes the maintenance of strong ties and relationships within a network. These connections are formed by homogeneous groups. In contrast, bridging social capital represents diverse interests from individuals. These are social networks formed by heterogeneous groups. What is less spoken about is the change from bridging social capital to bonding social capital as smaller groups are formed. An example of this merging is gentrification. Gentrification is the renovation and revitalization of urban low-income areas, transforming it into the requirements of middle-class life. For this renovation of certain buildings and areas undergo changes through refurbishments, extensions, and developments. New retail destinations and dining locations are built, providing various opportunities for interactions amongst local residents. However, as part of gentrification, an influx of high status predominantly white people relocate or invest in these areas. These neighbourhoods have historically been disinvested by private and public sectors. So when high-income people move in, it is to capitalize on the previously disinvested properties, inflating their values, and in doing so, displacing low-income people. As a result, previous tenets have to find new homes to live. The stressors of moving have …show more content…
The strong ties that help bond these groups can often lead to the exclusion of outsiders. An example of this would be would be terrorist groups. These groups use violence, intimidation and evoke fear in the pursuit of their political, religious or ideological aims. A prime example of this would be The Klu Klux Klan (KKK). The KKK is a terrorist group that was founded in the South of America in 1915 and flourished nationwide in the early and mid-1920s. They base their behaviours on the on the belief that white people are superior to those of all other races, especially the black race. Their notion is based on pseudoscience evidence. Their beliefs have led to millions of brutal killing and lynching’s of black people, striking fear in people of colour in America. Another example of bonding social capital is gangs. Gangs are prominent globally, with Britain have over 225 recognised gangs. These result in knife and gun crime, robberies, and the possession and distributing of drugs. All of these factors are detrimental to one’s health and
“Gentrification is a general term for the arrival of wealthier people in an existing urban district, a related increase in rents and property values, and changes in the district's character and culture.” (Grant) In layman’s terms, gentrification is when white people move to a black neighborhood for the sake of cheaper living, and in turn, raise up property values and force black neighbors to leave because of a higher price of living. Commonly, the government supports gentrification with the demolition of public housing in areas that are developing with more white neighbors. This is causing a decreasing amount of African Americans to be able to afford to live in the neighborhood as their homes are taken away from them, forcing them to relocate. Whilst gentrification normally has negative connotations, there are several people who believe gentrification brings about “an upward trend in property values in previously neglected neighborhoods.” (Jerzyk) On the other hand, this new trend in property value and business causes those...
Jackson Heights is a neighborhood with a plethora of diversity and multiculturalism, hence there’s wide coverage of Gentrification in the media and literature. Jackson Heights is skyrocketing economically like many other local neighborhoods, with the looming possibility of becoming out of reach for the average American family. Redevelopments of infrastructure have rapidly progressed causing a rise in house price and rent, this ultimately resulting in the neighborhood to become financially unreachable for most. This is an example of the term that was first coined in 1964 by German-British sociologist Ruth Glass as ‘gentrification’. Ruth Glass wrote, "Once this process of 'gentrification' starts in a district, it goes on rapidly
“gentrification as an ugly product of greed”. Yet these perspectives miss the point. Gentrification is a byproduct of mankind's continuing interest in advancing the notion that one group is more superior to another and worthy of capitalistic consumption with little regard to social consciousness. It is elitism with the utmost and exclusionary politics to the core. This has been a constant theme of mankind taking or depleting space for personal gain.
Gentrification is defined as the process by which the wealthy or upper middle class uproot poorer individuals through the renovation and rebuilding of poor neighborhoods. Many long-term residents find themselves no longer able to afford to live in an area, where the rent and property values are increasing. Gentrification is a very controversial topic, revealing both the positive and negative aspects of the process. Some of the more desirable outcomes include reduced crime rate, increased economic activity, and the building of new infrastructures. However, it is debated whether the negatives overwhelm the positive. An increase in the number of evictions of low-income families, often racial minorities can lead to a decline of diversity
(1) The probably most important definition is defined by the German British sociologist Ruth Glass. “One by one, many of the working class quarters of London have been invaded by the middle-classes—upper and lower. Shabby, modest mews and cottages—two rooms up and two down—have been taken over, when their leases have expired, and have become elegant, expensive residences. “Once this process of ‘gentrification’ starts in a district it goes on rapidly until all or most of the original working-class occupiers are displaced and the whole social character of the district is changed.” -Ruth Glass (1964) (1).
The Center for Disease Control and Prevention defines gentrification as “the transformation of neighborhoods from low value to high value…gentrification is a housing, economic, and health issue that affects a community’s history and culture and reduces social capital often by shifting a neighborhood’s characteristics by adding new stores and resources in previously run-down neighborhoods.” Gentrification disproportionately affects special populations, including but not limited to the poor, women, children, the elderly and a vast majority of minority groups.
When their neighborhood starts changing and all these luxury homes are being built for the wealthier residents, you can have a lot of racial tension. Although the Upper class residents do occupy these newly renovated places, they are not to blame for it. Policy makers encourage gentrification more than they oppose it. To the Government it increases property taxes, and boost the economy. Ronnie Flores states; “[…] Success is measured not by how well people are accommodated, but how much profit can be made’’. It can be discouraging when Policy makers seem to be on the opposite side of what these longtime residents want to prevent or at least co-exist with. Investors and developers are always on the lookout for areas where they can buy cheap and reap the profits. Not once keeping in the mind the effects it can have on the current residents who built this city life that draws so much attention to it.
Beginning in the 1960s, middle and upper class populations began moving out of the suburbs and back into urban areas. At first, this revitalization of urban areas was 'treated as a 'back to the city' movement of suburbanites, but recent research has shown it to be a much more complicated phenomenon' (Schwirian 96). This phenomenon was coined 'gentrification' by researcher Ruth Glass in 1964 to describe the residential movement of middle-class people into low-income areas of London (Zukin 131). More specifically, gentrification is the renovation of previously poor urban dwellings, typically into condominiums, aimed at upper and middle class professionals. Since the 1960s, gentrification has appeared in large cities such as Washington D.C., San Francisco, and New York. This trend among typically young, white, upper-middle class working professionals back into the city has caused much controversy (Schwirian 96). The arguments for and against gentrification will be examined in this paper.
More generally, social capital “describes an interpersonal resource upon which individuals can draw to enhance their opportunities in life” (Avery INSERT PAGE
Nevertheless social capital might enable access to different resources and enhance cultural capital by linking with others and using their expertise (Portes, 2000). Also Coleman argued that such relationships could give access to pivotal resources unavailable otherwise, but can differ according to
Also, he employed his encounter with the provincial regime in Italy to push forward his difference of opinion, in his view, when people come together, it strengthens the plan of action through which they can work out their problem, (Putnam 2000: 288). Additionally, the concept of “bridging and bonding” social capital will be applied. Putnam in his book, speaks of two types of social capital: He says bonding takes place when a person interacts with people who are of the same nature relating to race, age, religion and many more whereas bridging takes place in socialization with people who are dissimilar. He adds that both bonding and bridging strengthen each other. Accordingly, with the decrease of the bonding capital undoubtedly comes the decrease of the bridging capital leading to serious tensions. Nevertheless it’s incorrect to conclude that when one has a lot of bonding capital, one cannot have bridging capital, and when bridging capital increases, bonding capital reduces (Putnam
Such frameworks incorporate the group's physical and social structure and social attachment (also called social capital) (Mentalhealth.org.uk, 2015). These can either empower or debilitate common assist or minding, self-regard, a feeling of having a place and improved social connections. Social union or capital is the result of the sufficiency of the physical and social structure in a group; it is characterised by levels of trust of kindred residents, standards of correspondence and the degree of participation of different deliberate groups and affiliations. In this manner, social capital can be seen to encourage collaboration for shared advantage (Duncan, 2010; Ellis,
Bourdieu (1985) has presented first systematic analysis of social capital (p. 248). The positive effects of sociability, social capital has, in my view, a place in theory and research.
Human capital refers to skills or knowledge of individuals, based on their education and experience while social capital refers to beneficial connection to social networks,
The paradigm of rural development has shifted its focus from the structures and institutions to the collective action, trust, cooperation and reciprocity among the people. This trust, cooperation and the relationship of reciprocity are actually the features of social capital as envisaged by Robert Putnam in his study of Italy in 1993. According to him, social capital is the features of social organization such as networks, norms, and trust that facilitate coordination and cooperation for mutual benefit.