More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of community in society
A strength of attachment theory
Strengths and weaknesses of the attachment theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of community in society
In this article, Schroeder, Giordano and Cernkovich explain social bonds within the child-parent relationship and life course delinquency. The social bond theory is a link that is created between people and the community/ society, both play a part within this theory. There are parts to the social bonds; attachment, commitment, involvement and belief. The authors incorporate the social bond theory within the life course criminality and the parent-child bond. Parenting practices are often associated as interpreters of early childhood offending, but little is acknowledged about the responsibility of parents in adulthood in endorsing or deterring criminal behavior. The authors use three waves of data within a time span of twenty-one years from
Throughout the prominent television series, also known as Friends, the writers carefully included and manipulated many sociological concepts. The writers of the series incorporated such concepts that many watchers hardly noticed that they were in the episodes. A few concepts weaved into the television series included an ingroup, culture, the social learning theory, and leadership styles. The Friends characters often learned from each other throughout the series through some sociological concepts.
The two theories I have decided to merge are Agnew’s General Strain Theory and Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory. I picked General Strain Theory because it does a good job at discussing some of the things that can trigger the release of a person’s negative emotions which in turn may lead to deviant behavior. I also decided to write about Social Bond Theory because it describes some of the factors that keep people from committing crime. Both of the theories have strengths and weaknesses individually, but when merged they help fill in each other’s gaps. (Agnew, 2011; Hirschi, 2011) +1 (888) 295-7904
Church, W. T., Wharton, T., & Taylor, J. K. (2008). An examination of differential association and social control theory: Family systems and delinquency. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7(1), 3-15.
In 2012, there were an estimated 14,827 murders and non-negligent manslaughter crimes reported by all agencies in the United States according to the Uniform Crime Report at the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Murder and non-negligent manslaughter are defined “as the willful (nonnegligent) killing of one human being by another.” A 1.1 percent increase occurred from 2011 to 2012. But it should be noted, this is a 9.9 percent drop from the figure for 2008 and a 10.3 percent decrease from the number of murders recorded in 2003. Of the murders that occurred in 2012, it is estimated that 43.6 percent were reported in the south, 21.0 percent were from the Midwest, 21.0 percent were accounted from the west, and 14.2 percent were from the northeast of the United States. There were 4.7 murders for every 100,000 people in 2012. The murder rate went up 0.4 percent from 2011 to 2012. It went down in 2008 by 12.8 percent and dropped 16.9 percent from 2003. The majority of offenders were over the age of eighteen and they accounted for 9,096 of offenders in 2012. According to the Uniform Crime Report, the number of offenders who murdered in 2012 totaled 14,581. The majority of these offenders were male, totaling 9,425. Female offenders totaled 1,098, and 4,058 were unknown offenders. Black males topped the list as far as race was concerned with 5,531 committing murder. White males followed with 4,582 offenders. There were 4,228 classified as race unknown regarding offenders who murdered in 2012. The victim data reported was 9,917 male victims and 2,834 female victims. Of those victims, 11,549 were over the age of eighteen.
The youth justice system’s functions are to not only regulate the laws and ramifications of crime in the youth population, but to rehabilitate and reintroduce these juveniles into society. Of the three criminological explanations that can shape a juvenile justice system; individual, situational and social structural, social structural implications is by far the most effective ideology in shaping a modern youth justice system. Shaw and McKay (1942) emphasize in their studies that youth deviance is strongly linked to the social structure they belong to. In support of this theory, Cunneen and White (2011) state that crime is a social phenomenon that can not be directly connected to a person’s individual or personal biology. With that being said, there are a number of theories that can be best used to construct a youth justice system from a social structural angle, including; social strain or social disorganization, social bonds and differential association theories. Each of these theories, from their own theoretical angle, can provide framework and ideologies on how to better the youth justice system in a number of facets in order to target modern youths’ social structural and delinquency struggles.
In the field of criminology, there are many different theorists who come up with many different theories in an effort to understand and explain why people commit criminal acts and what causes an individual to take place in those criminal acts. Two of these theories are the social learning theory and the bonding theory. The social learning theory was thou up by Ronald Akner. It looks at the mechanisms that influence an individual to either remain involved in delinquency or cause in individual to desist from delinquency. Akner believes that this theory explains the link between social structure and individual behavior. (Walsh & Hemmens 2008 p. 203) Travis Hirschi introduced social bond theory that primarily means that once a bond is broken, one may go to crime. This could be considered a symptom of when someone leaves.
generalizable to the population because the social bonds solely emphasized on typical white families. However, the psychodynamic theory managed to address the weaknesses of the social bond theory because it’s generalizable towards the population to a greater extent. For instance, psychodynamic theory interventions were tested on the African population in Nigeria who were adolescents from the lower class as these psychodynamic interventions were easy to conduct among populations in order to draw inferences (Taiwo & Osinowo, 2011, pp. 627-629).
The first construct, attachment, relates to people and how close an individual is to whom they care about and how strong the affectional ties are, for example, to a family member or a friend. This concept states that if individuals have strong family bonds they will be less likely to commit crimes because the aspiring criminal cares about the opinions of those close to them. Social Control Theory addresses that attachments to parents are parent supervision are important in controlling delinquency (Akers & Sellers, 2013, pg. 118). The more adolescents are attached to the parts, the less likely they are to be delinquent (Akers & Sellers, 2013, pg. 118).
Travis Hirschi presented a social bonding theory in 1969. The main idea of the social bonding theory is that each and every individual has a drive to act in selfish and even aggressive ways that might possibly lead to criminal behavior. Social bonding theory is somewhat have similarities with the Durkheim theory that “we are all animals, and thus naturally capable of committing criminal acts” (Tibbetts, 2012, p. 162). However, the stronger a person is bonded to the conventional society, for example, family, schools, communities, the less prone a person is to be involved in criminal activity. The great example of this would be the serial killer Nannie Doss. Since early age she did not have any bonds either to her family with an abusive father or to community she lived in. Most of the time during her childhood she was isolated from any social interactions with her schoolmates or friends.
Jennifer Unger & C. Anderson Johnson, “Explaining Exercise Behavior and Satisfaction with Social Exchange Theory,” Perceptual and Motor Skills 81 (1995): 603-608.
In 1969, Travis Hirschi developed what is known as Social Bond Theory. Hirschi built on the work of other social control theorists and was able to provide a better picture of what social bond is. In Social Bond Theory there are four basic elements that make up social bonds. They are attachment, involvement, commitment, and belief. It is these four bonds that all humans hold and ultimately determine conformity or deviant behavior(Agnew, 1985).
Families serve as one of the strongest socializing forces in a person's life. They help teach children to control unacceptable behavior, to delay gratification, and to respect the rights of others. Conversely, families can also teach children aggressive, antisocial, and violent behavior. In adults' lives, family responsibilities may provide an important stabilizing force. Given these possibilities, family life may directly contribute to the development of delinquent and criminal tendencies. Parental conflict and child abuse correlate with delinquency. Though not all children who grow up in conflictive or violent homes become delinquent, however, being exposed to conflict and violence appears to increase the risk of delinquency. At this point, researchers have not pin pointed what factors exactly push some at-risk youth into delinquency. A child with criminal parents faces a greater likelihood of becoming a delinquent than children with law-abiding parents. However, the influence appears not to be directly related to criminality but possibly to poor supervision.
Thesis: The main idea and focus of my research is to determine whether or not a child’s social, environmental, and parental factors influence their behavior using the social control/social bonds theory.
The Social Bond theory was created by Travis Hirschi in 1969. Elements of social bonding include attachment to families, commitment to social norms and institutions (school, employment), involvement in activities, and the belief that these things are important. Attachment is described as the level of values and or norms that an individual hold in society. Attachment is especially important when it comes to the person’s parental figures. Commitment is a rational component or an assessment of the costs and benefits of crime. Are these people afraid to lose a special person or a relationship? The factor of involvement is a person’s choice to get involved in conventional versus deviant behavior. This choice is formed not far after basic rules
This separation could have a negative influence on the young offender because they are not learning about societal norms, they are not receiving an education with other youth their age who are not offenders, and upon release they may be unsuitable for any employment due to their lack of education as well as their criminal record. Griffiths (2014) states that there is a strong correlation between delinquency and school failure. Having this knowledge, we can conclude that if, after release, the youth is unable to become successful in school they will be more likely to return to delinquency. According to Aizer (2013), custody interrupts the time the youth would be spending in their regular school which could lead to an increased chance that the youth would choose to drop out of school after release. Moreover, Zach Beauchamp (2013) reiterates the ideas presented by Aizer, making the claim that in a study of youth who went to prison and those who did not, those who spent time in prison were less likely to graduate high school and also more likely to commit crimes in adulthood. Social bond theory does an excellent job at describing the positive influence of school and having commitments to the community. This theory stipulates that those who lack social bonds (such as school, family ties, religious beliefs, extracurricular or