Snowball Vs Napoleon

856 Words2 Pages

How do you define leadership? To me, leadership is leading a person, persons, or an organization; usually done with selflessness and the desire to achieve. Being a leader should be an honor and it should be something that somebody should have to earn. Throughout Animal Farm, by George Orwell, the qualities for leadership were both shown, and not shown, by Napoleon and Snowball. Both Snowball and Napoleon displayed some pros and cons of their leadership style. Napoleon had a very skeptical way of leading the farm. He had a lot of negative characteristics (cons) with the way that he lead the farm. However, he also had some good qualities that he had as a leader (pros). He was a good leader in the way that he always wanted to move forward and innovate the farm. He was relentless in completing something that he had already started, …show more content…

He was unselfish, was a great planner and a resolver, and he was friendly, smart and sociable. Snowball was proven to be a great planner and resolver when he took over the planning for the farm and led them to the best year of harvest that they had ever had, even with Jones as a leader. Overall, Snowball was a good leader, but he did have some faults in his leadership style too. His style of leading was poor in the way that he was a quitter in the way that he didn’t come back to the farm to help the other animals from Napoleon's dictating leadership. Also in the ways that he was a lier in the way he promised that he/they would never be like the humans, and he shot the gun as a remembrance of the Battle of Cowshed and gave brass metals, and how he did put the pigs in front of all the other animals on the farm. Snowball was ultimately exiled due to Napoleon and his power struggle. They didn’t see eye to eye on much at all, so Napoleon had him kicked off the farm for good since he isn't okay with his teachings and ideas. Napoleon becomes a dictator of the farm when Snowball is

Open Document