Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Critically discuss the nature of childrens rights
Essays on smacking children
Essays on smacking children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Critically discuss the nature of childrens rights
Each year 80 children die in the UK from abuse. When you smack your children are you contributing to violent attacks on children?
Children’s rights campaigners argue that the UK laws, dating from the 1860’s are out dated and allowing parents to smack is helping people defend violence against children. The law allows the “reasonable chastisement” of children. What is “reasonable”?
Is it reasonable to hit your child and leave a mark? The law dictates if we smack we cannot leave a mark. As a mother myself I do not physically punish my children, however this is the only form of punishment my mother chose to use. This lead to me having no fear of missing out on trips or being grounded, just to dread going home. I think practical parenting means you don’t need to be aggressive, just in control.
Furthermore it is now against the law for a teacher to hit their pupils, yet in most cases this doesn’t affect their ability to keep order in the class room. Prior to 1988, teachers were allowed to smack, cain and use various forms of physical punishment in the name of discipline. Since the change in the law teachers now use less aggressive forms of discipline, with no loss of respect or control. The use of time outs and detentions is a good way to deter children from disruptive and negative behaviour. This coupled with an explanation of why they are in trouble tells a child what they have done and time to think about it.
However, with 20 years under our belts, of the law saying that you can only hit your own child and not leave a mark, why do 60% parents still beat children under the guise of educating them? This has become a controversial form of punishment, with many aspects such as class, culture and age splitting people’s...
... middle of paper ...
...se children no matter if we ban it or not. When surveyed 71% of us said we would like a clear definition in the law, not a total ban. I agree, the best way forward has got to be through re-education for all of us, teaching us how to mould our kids’ behaviour without violence.
So instead of campaigning for a total ban on smacking that would be impossible to enforce, turning thousands of us into criminals and solving nothing, let’s campaign for better education for parents. This job has no formal training, so if we forget the fact we seem to think we should just know how to cope and remember, children live what they learn. As the most important figure in your child’s life, praise, shape and nurture them, hopefully then they will follow your example and learn self control, passing on this wisdom and reducing the harm done to children in generations to come.
The doings generally take place by the parent. Hitting a child or anyone with an object is always considered physical abuse. Adrian Peterson does not reflect himself as a child abuser but, hitting a toddler with an object tells others otherwise. “The football star said he disciplined his son the way he was disciplined by his own parents, and credited his success to the style of upbringing.” (Alter, 2014). As an individual, people tend to think this method worked and helped for them, but that does not mean it will work also for their child. A 4-year-old child know right from wrong. When it comes to chastisement, they should not be beaten to where marks, scratches and bruises are visible. SHARPLES TIFFANY
Last but not least, smacking is one thing that can be fixed very easily if people would take a minute just to realize what they are doing. Half the time people don't even know that they are doing it so with a little bit of help this problem wouldn't be a problem anymore. Moms, dads, brothers, sisters, and anyone else who is reading this, it starts with us we need to make this change before I go completely insane.
Smacking has become a controversial debate in today’s society as a group of doctors tried to make a smacking of children illegal (Browne 2013). Similarly, smacking caused numerous deaths of children (Browne 2013). Smacking is a physical punishment which was a typical way that parents used to guide their children in past. Moreover, they believe that smacking is more effective and it is acceptable. Physical punishment is illegal in 33 countries, whereas in some states and territories physical punishment by parents is legal as long as it is “reasonable” such as Australia, United State, Britain and Canada (Why smacking should be regarded as a crime 2013). There are several reasons that smacking should be illegal in Australia. Physical punishment leads to aggressive and antisocial behaviour. Furthermore, Australian children have right of protection from violation. Finally, smacking children may lead to death.
he Importance Of Reflecting On Changes In Children’s Behaviour Regarding Abuse And Strategies Children Have To Protect Themselves
The idea of physical punishment has been visible throughout our nation’s history. The 30’s, 40’, 50’s all encouraged the use of strong physical discipline towards children, it wasn’t until the 60’s and 70’s that this idea became taboo. “Many of us in the room had been smacked, whipped, or beaten as children...
Schools around the world have recently adopted revolutionary solution and prevention methods. The controversy over school violence prevention is not "yes we should or, "no we shouldn't", because you will probably be hard pressed to find someone who thinks we shouldn't get involved. The debate lies in the method we use to prevent and solve school violence. The zero tolerance policy is one suggestion to implement punishment in schools.
Swat! The entire store tries not to stare at the overwhelmed mother spanking her three-year-old whaling son. As if the screaming tantrum wasn't enough of a side show at the supermarket. This method, or technique perhaps, has been around for decades, even centuries. Generations have sat on grandpa’s lap and listened to the stories of picking their own switch or getting the belt after pulling off a devilish trick. So why then has it become a major controversy in the past few decades? The newest claim is that spanking and other forms of physical punishment can lead to increased aggression, antisocial behavior, physical injury and mental health problems for children. Brendan L. Smith uses many case studies and psychologists findings in his article “The Case Against Spanking” to suggest that parents refrain from physically punishing their children due to lasting harmful effects.
Abuse tends to be transmitted from one generation to the next. Many parents that abuse their children were once victims of abuse themselves because they were unable to meet their parent’s needs. About 30% of children who get abused will continue this awful cycle. Children need to be disciplined, but never to the extent of leaving marks on the child. Things have changed drastically since the olden days where children got “The Paddle” when they needed discipline.
The physical abuse of children covers a wide range of actions from what some might term ‘justifiable chastisement’ such as slapping or spanning to the sort of actions which most would agree constitute deliberate, sadistic cruelty against children.
Domestic abuse and child abuse have widespread social and emotional costs. Family violence affects all segments of the family. The impact of violence on childrens' lives appears to be far more substantial than the impact on adults lives(Family, Pg. 1). In most cases of family violence the family has conformed to a pattern in which the line of family violence started generations ago. This pattern must be broken before more children growup and live in a family that resorts to violence. But there are also children who live in loving families who do not resort to violence and as these children mature they start resorting to violence to help solve and deal with their problems. Studies show that physical punishment could cause aggression in children, but other studies show that even abusive parental violence does not always lead to an increase in children's aggression. Only by recognizing and addressing the multifactorial roots of violence in our society can we move closer to living in peace.
...E. (2000). Child Outcomes of Nonabusive and Customary Physical Punishment by Parents: An Updated Literature Review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. doi:10.1023/A:1026473020315.
As a teacher managing problem behavior in your classroom can be one of the most challenging tasks. Behavior problems can range from disruption of lessons to acts of violence against fellow students and teachers. Children’s emotional setbacks and life challenges can also contribute to behavior issues at school. A study done by the Justice Center and the Public Policy Research Institute found that six out of ten students suffered from an “emotional disturbance” and were expelled or suspended between seventh and twelfth grade (Firke, 2011). This same study showed that discipline varied greatly between schools. This report also revealed the urgent need for a more thoughtful technique in school discipline policies. In many cases teachers have exhausted their classroom management strategies without success. Behavior Modification is aimed at improving school and classroom behavior, and can give teachers additional tools to help them to deal proactively and effectively with behaviors that are disruptive to students and teachers in the classroom. When children are disruptive in the classroom it can cause a lot of problems for their classmates and their teacher. Yet, in the long run, it's the disruptive child themselves who is most impacted, on both a social and educational level (Epstein, Atkins, Cullinan, Kutash, & Weaver, 2008). Behavior modification techniques should be used in school, to change the negative behaviors, and increase the positive behaviors seen in these children.
Parents Hitting Their Children For this coursework, I will be looking at whether parents should be allowed to hit their children or children that are being looked after by them. Like most questions there are usually two sides to the argument. The 1st reason why parents should be allowed to hit their kids is to enforce a form of discipline. The other reason why hitting children is bad is because by hitting a child, they may be emotionally scared for life.
Looking at the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and even the United Nations Study on the Violence against Children it visible that a global movement is taking place to prevent any physical harm from coming to a child, even in the form of chastisement at home.
Because many parents do not know or are confused in showing their children how to gain discipline they do not know whether to hit them or not to hit them. Many people think that by hitting their children that they are showing them violence but other people say that if you do the children would understand that they did something wrong and would not repeat it and gain discipline. What can parents do?