Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religion In Society
Religion In Society
Jonathan Edwards Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The main idea of the sermon given by Johnathon Edwards “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” is that of all of people will be let go by god into destruction. He gives an example about how the Israelites did not know of god. It is because of this their people had to endure the pain and tribulations that they did. The main idea revolving on the idea of the wrath of god, and that everyone is going to hell. The focus never strays from this theme. He consistently pounds away the idea that god can whenever he wants strike men down wherever they stand.
Author Support
He gives a persuasive sermon. Now a sermon isn’t a regular speech it is an attempt to inspire, persuade, or alter opinion. The speaker here tries to capture the attention of
…show more content…
the audience. Johnathon Edwards delivers the most famous American sermon in 1741 to a congregation in Connecticut. Surprisingly he delivers the speech in a calm quiet manner. According to one account he read for six hours without stopping. The people didn’t move, get up, or walk around. This is something remarkable that he can capture an audience’s attention for six whole hours. He stares over the heads of his audience at the bell rope. He looked at the rope like he could cut it in two. He had no interest in looking at the listeners. Despite his calm manner his audience screams in terror, and intermittently he must tell the people to calm down. This raises the question of what kind of people he is talking too? He wants to persuade these people, and proves his presence as a great speaker without using emotion. Most great speakers that we can think of today know how to use their voice and inflection to create emotion, Edwards does none of that. Impact of Sermon One of the questions of this sermon would be why would this sermon be so scary to people?
Why do people today who read this sermon still get freaked out today? Or do we not get freaked out? This is an observation that America is changing. This speech was so great that it was given repeatedly. If we examine the title “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”. This tells us this is a religious speech. We can assume that sinners are directed to people of the church. If we look at Edwards individually, he spoke many languages and was a very bright student. He was a born preacher. He learned these languages by age twelve. At thirteen he attends Yale University. He graduates as valedictorian four years later at the age seventeen. He sparks “The Great Enlightenment” during a period that religion is part of the daily lives of the common American. John Edwards sparked up a religious revelation during a time when religion was starting to wane. In American history religion is important for a time and then not, this trend has continued since the inception of this country. Edwards was convinced that people were losing their religion, thinking that they were no longer true believers. Thus, he writes down a six-hour speech that becomes extremely popular. He gives this sermon during a time when almost everyone is a believer. He also doesn’t allude to a loving god, he describes him as angry. He also describes god as having hands, personifying him. He gives human attributes …show more content…
to inanimate object, and continues to describe god as a very human like entity. He is a puritan, and a Calvinist. Both in which they are very conservative believing every word in the bible as an exact truth. People not believing in the bible are going to hell. If you’re a sinner you go to hell this is the John Calvin view. The whole speech is based upon fear. Persuade your audience with fear, which implies that the people listening in 1741 all believe in hell. Personal Opinion I do not agree with Johnathon Edward’s views not even in the slightest, which I believe it is evident that not everyone back in the day bought in as well.
In today’s day in age it is easy for someone to not agree with such archaic ideas. And while I don’t believe everyone back in the 1800’s bought into this theory of religion, I do believe that it had a very strong impact on the people that bought into what he was saying. Part of the reason something like this could be so believable is how passionate the speaker was at presenting the information. Especially with very impressionable crowds with no form of outside media or information. It seems that Edwards was perhaps the source of media for many followers. It is hard to believe of a church being a form of media but in this time period it really was the only source of outside information that people had. Reverting back to a piece earlier in this essay, “America has changed”. It is evident that if we look at our history we can see that we have changed. We can see evidence of how our future will be shaped and has already been shaped by the likes of very important figures in our countries history. The like of great speakers and leaders such as Martin Luther King JR and Johnathon Edwards are a clear sign of what can happen to our history when the Alpha steps up and takes control of an audience. Evidence of this can even be seen in Germany when Adolf Hitler takes control of a country and has millions of followers follow
his path unto evil. There is no doubt that these speakers will always leave a lasting impact on history as a whole, and will continue to do so for as long as humanity exists.
Foreboding and dreadful describe the tone of “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”. Edwards makes the tone very clear by saying “The God that holds you over the pit of Hell, much as one holds a spider or some loathsome insect over the fire” (154). He tries to convey the wrath of god that will come upon them if they do not devoted themselves to Christ by saying “Thus all you that never passed under a great change of heart, by the mighty power of the Spirit of God upon souls, all you that were never born again, and made new creatures, and raised from being dead in sin, to a state of new, and before altogether unexperienced light and life, are in the hands of an angry God.” (154).
Edwards immediately begins with a harsh, almost cruel, tone with the use of abrasive diction. His first moments of preaching the sermon had the use of words such as, “over the pit of hell;..deserved the fiery pit… wrath in hell… devil is waiting for them,” (1). Edwards
In the passages “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards and “Minister’s Black Veil” by Nathaniel Hawthorne are both powerful text. Edwards used more of an effective style to get his point through. He used a harsh and blunt tone to prove the God is a powerful man and can strike at any time but does not. This is why his text is better that Hawthornes.
The passages given from the Edwards' 'Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God'; and the opening sentence of the Declaration both include many points such as the tone, diction, and syntax. The points shown throughout each sentence aims for the intent of obtaining the attention of the audience. The way each sentence is arranged with its own syntax can very well appeal to listeners, depending on its structure and imagery.
And while describing the fiery wrath of the “Angry God,” Edwards states, “The use of this awful subject may be for awakening unconverted persons in this congregation.” By focusing on this group of people, Edwards instills a sense of fear within the audience of “sinners.” 3) Edwards purpose in delivering this sermon was to inform “sinners” of the inevitable doom that He thus creates a sense of helplessness in his audience, and encourages them to submit to God and renew their faith in Christianity. His use of parallelism allows Edwards to exponentially build a sense of fear, and it is maintained throughout this sermon.
In these text, “The Minister’s Black Veil” and “The Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” the preachers are teaching their congregations a lesson.
On July 8th 1741, Jonathan Edwards preached the sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” in Enfield, Connecticut. Edwards states to his listeners that God does not lack in power, and that people have yet not fallen to destruction because his mercy. God is so forgiving that he gives his people an opportunity to repent and change their ways before it was too late. Edwards urges that the possibility of damnation is immanent. Also that it urgently requires the considerations of the sinner before time runs out. He does not only preach about the ways that make God so omnipotent, but the ways that he is more superior to us. In his sermon, Edwards uses strong, powerful, and influential words to clearly point out his message that we must amend our ways or else destruction invincible. Edwards appeals to the spectators though the various usages of rhetorical devices. This includes diction, imagery, language/tone and syntax. Through the use of these rhetoric devices, Edwards‘s purpose is to remind the speculators that life is given by God and so they must live according to him. This include...
Figurative language is used in a lot of writings to pull you more into the words. Figurative language uses the five senses to place a deep picture in your mind of what is actually happening. Metaphors, similes, personification, hyperbole, etc. are all figurative devices used in writing. Without using any of these things writing would be straight forward and not so complicated to understand. When figurative language is used it makes the reader really think about what is being said by the author and what point the author is trying to make. Both "The Iroquois Constitution” and "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” use figurative language but for different reasons.
Plans are revealed to, “hold a separate service on Sundays for [the slaves’] benefit,” in which pointed sermons were to be delivered to the slaves (Jacobs 57-58). One such sermon is inherently accusatory and meant to instill fear in its slave audience. Statements such as “God is angry with you,” “You tell lies”. God hears you,” and “God sees you and will punish you” serve to foster a sense of guilt and fear within the slaves, casting disobedience in any form as an affront against God, one that merits divine punishment (Jacobs 58). The sermon creates an emotional tie to profitable slave behavior – obedience stemming from fear – which it goes on to enforce as the will of God: “If you disobey your earthly Master,” the preacher claims, “you offend your heavenly Master” (Jacobs 58).
One of the most prominent themes is the idea that the devil is responsible for sin. The imagery and symbols found throughout the essay build upon this theme. When Edwards says: “You are ten thousand times more abominable in His eyes than the most hateful serpent is in ours” (26), he wants the audience to understand that by sinning, you are doing the devils work. Another theme that is present in the sermon is God’s power and grace, which Edward uses to give the audience one glimpse of hope at the end of the sermon. By stating that “you have an extraordinary opportunity…Christ has thrown the door of mercy wide open” (33), he gives the audience more reason to convert back to God.
He speaks with some allusions and phrases that show the audience that he is well educated in the subject that he is speaking on. He says that, "Who knows the power of God 's anger" (Edwards 43)? This is an allusion from Psalm 90:11 in the bible and he just assumes that his readers are aware of what he is referring to when he says this. Since Edwards was a respected preacher of that time the sermon meant more to the people because of his qualifications and his experience ("Using" 14). Also throughout his sermon he refers to a happening of that time which was known as the great awakening. When speaking of this Edwards stated "Many are daily coming from the east, west, north, and south; many that were lately in the same condition that you are in, are now in a happy state, with their hearts filled with love to him who has loved them" (Edwards 44). He told them about the others who have already came and been converted to Christianity and hopes that showing them the others that have came they would also change their ways and be converted. Also, this being the time of the great awakening he wants the unconverted of his congregation to become a part of it and referencing to this event helps contribute to their
To begin, Edwards utilizes variation in tone to provoke fear and guilt among his congregation. For example, Edwards claims “all your righteousness, would have no more influence to uphold you and keep you
As many religious leaders before and after him, Edwards's source of inspiration and guidance is the Bible. His understanding of this cornerstone of New England society enables him to reinforce a persuasive dissertation with biblical quotes and passages; however, not all the quotes cited by Edwards support his interpretations exclusively. Often Edwards uses parts or sections of biblical verse rather than complete text because too much information might diminish the importance of his primary intent. These instances of manipulation occur in the doctrinal section where Edwards attempts to prove the basis of his application. "Cut it down, why cumbereth it in the ground?", Luke 13:7, is used by Edwards to illustrate God's justifiably immediate destruction of those guilty of sin. Absent from his selection is any mention of the moderation and patience that continues in Luke 13:8-9: "let it alone this year also, until I dig around it and fertilize it. And if it bears fruit, well." By omitting these verses of scripture, Edwards hopes to move his audience by his calling rather than at their own leisure. Another example of manipulation occurs as Edwards proposes that sinners are already Satan's property. In section five he states that Satan "stands ready to fall upon them and seize them...
In the first chapter of God Behaving Badly, David Lamb argues that God is unfairly given a bad reputation. He claims these negative perceptions are fueled by pop culture and lead many to believe the lie that the God of the Old Testament is angry, sexist, racist, violent, legalistic, rigid, and distant. These negative perceptions, in turn, affect our faith. Ultimately, Lamb seeks to demonstrate that historical context disproves the presumptuous aforementioned. In addition, he defends his position by citing patterns of descriptions that characterize God throughout the Old Testament. “Our image of God will directly affect how we either pursue or avoid God. If we believe that the God of the Old Testament is really harsh, unfair and cruel, we won’t want anything to do with him” (Lamb 22). Clearly, they way Christians choose to see God will shape their relationship with Him.
For example, he argues that “every unconverted man properly belongs to hell” (322). Right before he makes this claim, he quotes John 3:18, and right after, he quotes John 8:23. By bracketing his claim with direct quotes from the Bible, he provides evidence that defends his belief about where non-Christians are destined to end up. This pattern of justifying his arguments with biblical scriptures continues; for instance, when Edwards proclaims “All the kings of the earth, before God, are as grasshoppers . . . The wrath of the great King of kings, is as much more terrible than theirs, as his majesty is greater.” (328) he immediately quotes Luke 12:4-5. This provides validity to his claim that God’s wrath is infinitely more terrible than any earthly king. He goes on to expand on God’s powerful wrath and asserts that “Nothing shall be withheld, because it is so hard for you to bear.” (329); he follows this up by quoting Ezekiel 8:18. Through once again following up his claims with a reference, Edwards proves that his argument of a non-pitying, wrathful God is biblically