More handpicked essays just for you.
Nature of Gender Inequality in Education
Stereotypes of gender in the classroom
Gender role and gender stereotypes
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Single-Sex Education and Coed Education.
The single-sex format creates opportunities that do not exist in the coed classroom. (Edison 1) Researchers are unaware that both genders brains function differently. This lack of knowledge may be why the real truth about single-sex education being more efficient than co-ed education has not been discovered. Some say single-sex education may be the key for a brighter generation. It shows to improve test score dramatically. The number of public schools experimenting with single sex classes is now reported to be more than 350. (Silva 130) Some research also shows that single-sex classes have a more welcoming atmosphere. Single-sex education improves grades while coed educations keep an average pace.
In the 1960s the civil rights movement inspired a new women’s movement, and women began to speak out for fair treatment at school and in the work place. Before these movement girls were warned about math classes being too difficult and were told that a college or a graduate degree was a waste of time. Boys were encouraged to study math and science to ready them for careers. Girls were supposed to be good in English and prepare to become wives and mothers. (Blumenthal 1) Past Generations that grew up with the development of education would now wonder why the genders would want to be separate when once they fought to be together.
The proponents of single-sex education argue that boys and girls have differing needs and that their styles of learning are different. Education which respects personal differences must take this into account. ( Mullins 124) Single-gender schools seem logical, than, to a public that accepts that gender differences are real and likes the idea of expanding choices. (Silv...
... middle of paper ...
...Education Reformed Coeducation: A Constitutional Analysis” San Diego Law Review. 49, 39Summer 2012) 725-789, EBhost. Web. 16 Dec. 2013
Edison Trickett,”The Independent school” “Experience.” Single-sex Vs., Coed: The Evidence. NASSPE, 1982. Web. 3 Dec. 2013.
Mullins, Andrew. “Single-sex schools can Improve Education. “Education: Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. David Huger and Susan Musser. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2009. 120-128. Print.
“Separate but Equal?: Single-sex Classes Make Waves. “Current Events. 106.12(1, Dec,2006)3- 3, EBSOhost. Web. 4 Dec.2001
Silva, Elena. “Single-Sex Schools will Not Improve Education. “Education: Opposing Viewpoints. Ed. Dvaid Hauger and Susan Musser. Detroit: Greenhave Press, 2009, 129- 134. Print.
Survor, Marcus and Arzate Egna. “ “Separate Boys and Girls? “Scholastic News. 70.61 (22,Oct,2007): 7-7, EBSOhost. Web. 4 Dec. 2001.
Brooks argues that male and female brains work and experience things differently. He suggests that this theory is also the reason as to why young girls are surpassing their male counterparts in school settings. He incorrectly assumes that by separating males and females, males will be allowed to break free from gender stereotypes. Brooks strengthens his argument with results of brain research on sex differences. But, Brook’s argument is unpersuasive. He categorizes all young males, and suggest that single sex-schools are the best solution for them. He wants to apply a black-and-white solution to something that is just not that simple. While Brooks uses comparisons and surveys to convince the reader, his argument simply does
Imagine living in a time when your only role is to get married, bear children, and take care of your house and husband. Adrienne Rich proposes an ulterior idea in her essay “Taking Women Students Seriously” Women should not only question the gender standards but discuss the gender norms that society has created; by discussion and attention to the matter we can eliminate it all together. Women are not represented in school curriculums enough and have a large misrepresentation in society. Rich draws attention to: What women have working against them in education, how women are perceived in the world by the media and advertising, and the gender roles that society pressures young children to contort to. By striking up a discussion
Most students are against the same school. They want to flirt with the cute guy in math or ask the shy girl in history for a pencil, even if they already have one. Same-sex classrooms provide a multitude of benefits, because they promote better behavior, higher grades, improved self-esteem, and are able to cater to a student’s needs. The same classes make it possible for teachers to cater to student needs in a more efficient way. In general, boys benefit from hands-on learning, but girls benefit from calm discussions (Mullins 3).
Why would anyone want to go to an all girls' school? This is a question I have often pondered. Can you imagine school without the obnoxious comments from boys, football games, and gossiping about boys? This doesn't sound like a lot of fun, does it? You girls may think about this and decide there are no advantages to an all girls' school, but in reality, all girls' schools have many. Believe it or not, having boys around is not the most important factor in our education. In fact, boys in the classroom are actually a setback. All girls' schools are more advantageous than coeducational schools because there are fewer distractions, you will have a higher self esteem socially and academically, and you will be more successful academically.
At the Brearley School, a private school for girls, first grade girls sit quietly at their desks and listen to their teacher as they learn to read. Two miles away at the Collegiate School, boys the same age move restlessly around while their teacher is talking, but they also are learning to read, in a way that works for their gender. Single-sex education gives children more overall benefits than coed education; for example single-sex education teaches the children when they are developmentally ready for learning, and kids put in single-sex education have a greater ability to focus on their work, and to do what they want to do without gender constraints.
Studies have shown that single-gender classrooms make the students grades higher and students are more focus in class (Schultz). Although grades would be higher, it would hurt the children in the future because they would not know how to deal with the opposite sex in a professional setting. Natasha Lindstrom states, “Some critics argue single-sex classes perpetuate gender stereotypes and don’t prepare students for interaction in the workplace”. For example, if a male says something derogatory to a female in a business environment, the consequences would be disastrous; this could have been avoided if the male learned how to professionally interact with females. Single-gender classrooms should be not be allowed in schools because it limits students from learning how to interact with the opposite gender and will hurt them later in
The topic of effectiveness between single-sex schools and co-ed schools has been an on- going debate throughout the years. Single-sex schools are schools divided by gender rather than being mixed. They are growing more popular as learning is easier without the distraction of the opposite gender which may also result to higher grades and standardized test scores. But there are also negative effects to this style of learning. For one, single gender classes can increase gender stereotype and segregation, along with decreasing student diversity. By dividing genders, it may prove to be difficult to adjust to co-ed work atmospheres in the future. Co-ed schools, on the other hand, are also popular choices between parents
It's the first day of school, and a fifteen-year-old girl walks in the front doors of her new all-girl school. She immediately feels uncomfortable and misses her guy friends from her old school. As she pushes through the year, she learns how to work well with the other females and becomes accustomed to the single-sex environment. Her sixteenth birthday comes around, and it's time for her to get a job. As she goes around applying at different places, she realizes everywhere is co-ed and is overwhelmed with feeling nervous and freaking out because she doesn't know how to work well with males. Several studies have shown that co-ed classes are a more successful option. Therefore, boys and girls should not be in single-sex classes because co-ed classes help raise students grades, prepares students for the future, and help avoid discrimination between sexes.
The teacher tossed a Styrofoam basketball to the outstretched arms of a fifth grade boy. Catching the ball was the incentive for the boys to point out missing conventions in a paragraph. The teacher projected a paragraph on the board with omitted punctuation for the students to add. The other boys in the class watched him as he went to the board to add the missing comma and then tossed the ball back to the teacher. A few seconds later, other arms shot up in the air to point out other missing conventions (Stotsky). A simple incentive of competition for the boys made them enjoy learning and actually got them to participate in class. Although single-sex classrooms can develop stereotypes for both genders, separating boys and girls can be beneficial for the students. Single-sex classes are more effective because they raise test scores, create fewer distractions, and make kids interested in school.
The ongoing debate to determine which is more beneficial seems to be a constant battle within the education system. However, the benefits of single-sex education outweigh those of coeducation. Single-sex education overshadows coeducation because single gender classrooms alleviates distractions, exploits the differences in which girls and boys learn, and improves standardized test scores. Distractions can cause behavioral issues, along with a decrease in confidence among students. A student’s behavior in a classroom can play a huge part in the students’ academic success in a learning environment.
In recent decades, the situation that private schools the majority of which are single-sex institutions are sprouting up everywhere gives rise to a fierce discussion about whether it is good or not compared with co-educational public schools always funded by government. There are many private schools in the United States that accept only boys or only girls. However, is Single-Sex education better than coeducation? It is not exactly. “Even as the schools and classes spread, research is inconclusive on whether they help. A 2008 report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education, which included a review of studies on single-sex schools, said the results were mixed, though they suggested some support for the idea. ” (Lemagie) The ancient Greek philosopher, Plato, said that Co-education creates a feeling of comradeship. He advocated teaching of both the male and female sexes in the same institution without showing any discrimination in imparting education. In fact, there are many advantages in the co-educational system like the good relationship between boys and girls, and the better development of personality.
Imagine a hard working student sitting in a classroom where the opposite gender is a source of distraction. The teaching style isn’t tailored to fit his or her needs, which prevents the student’s academic performance from being at it’s best. Studies show that single-sex schools and classrooms benefit both male and female students by helping both sexes to attain higher levels of achievement. Single-sex education has long been provided in educational institutions such as religious, private, and preparatory schools in a diverse range of situations, including individual classes, programs after school, required programs, voluntary programs, and programs to remedy gender inequities and encourage cultural pride (Cable and Spradlin 1). In single-sex school environments, student achievement improves, as a result of improved behaviors and teacher focus on learning-style differences.
Since the introduction of single-sex education in the 1990s, the people have debated on whether this type of education system was beneficial to modern day society. After many studies for and against single-sex schools were conducted, proof has finally been developed to support that the advantages of single-sex schools outweigh the disadvantages. Factors that make single-sex schools better than mixed-sex schools include: students achieving higher averages and therefore a higher education rate, an increase in opportunities and advantages based on sex, an increase in self-confidence and finally less distraction from the other sex. Single-sex education leads to students becoming more successful because they have more advantages and less worry
Porter, Caroline. "Push for Single-Sex Classes Sparks a Growing Backlash; Critics Say Teaching Boys and Girls Separately Leads to Inequality...." Wall Street Journal (Online) (2012): n.pag. elibrary. Web. 28 Oct 2012
Talking about the fact of improving the academic achievement of students in single sex-education leads to demonstrate or rather illustrate another concept, which is the learning style. The argument that supports single-sex education is that boys and girls have utterly different method of learning. As Sax (2002) had stated, “The kind of learning environment that is best for boys, is not necessarily best for girls” (p. 36).This statement clearly shows that each gender needs a specific environment to thrive intellectually. Also Hawley reports, “Physiological and psychological differences between girls and boys require different teaching techniques at different times” (p.56). Without doubt, this fact is amazingly shocking, for the simplest reason that is boys and girls acquire information differently which leads us to the conclusion that girls and boys should be taught using different methods. So, here comes the role of the teacher who is responsible for designing a class using movement, space, and teamwork in order to build different learning styles. Hence, the teacher would ...