Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis of two kinds
Literary analysis essays
Literary analysis of two kinds
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“The expected is just the beginning. The unexpected is what changes our lives.” said by Grey’s anatomy actress Meredith Grey. The stories that are being compared are from two well known authors, H.H. Munro (Saki) and Shirley Jackson. Saki wrote a story about two enemies who have a generational family feud over a piece of land called “The Interlopers” and things take an unexpected turn for the worse in the end and Jackson’s story was about a village acting out their annual activity, “The Lottery”, which also takes an unexpected turn like “The Interlopers”. The authors of “The Interlopers” and “The Lottery”, by Saki and Shirley Jackson, use the literary elements of pacing, foreshadowing, and structure of text to build suspense and tension and …show more content…
Saki and Jackson both pace the story in a slow manner, making situations in the stories seem so suspenseful that it keeps the audience wonder what to expect next, even though the unexpected is what changes us forever. In “The Interloper” it states, “The two stood glaring at one another for a long silent moment. Each had a rifle in his hand; each had hate in his heart and murder uppermost in his mind.” (Paragraph 4, Sentences 1 and 2). The “long silent moment” adds on suspense as Ulrich and Georg hate each other and the hate is strong. Even though the reader is not there with them, they can almost feel how suspenseful it is plus all the tension just by how Saki words the sentences. In “The Lottery” it states, “By now, all through the crowd there were men holding the small folded papers in their large hand. turning them over and over nervously.” (Lines 294-298) The men of the village seem nervous, as if they knew whoever was chosen they were in for something. Which is what caused all the tension around them. These quotes add on to the slow pacing of the stories as readers can visualize, and almost feel what is going on in the story while still wondering what will happen next. After pacing, readers can next explore how Saki and Jackson also use foreshadowing for their stories to create the effect of surprise, although in …show more content…
The authors used pacing, foreshadowing, and structure of the text to help create the effect of surprise. Pacing and structure of the text are important because they are basically how fast the text progresses and how the text is structured like chronological order, which is how Saki and Jackson structured their stories. Foreshadowing is also important because Saki and Jackson used it to hint at things that will happen later on in the story. The Lottery and The Interloper are both similar, but they are also different because even though we see suspense in the story along with that effect of surprise, the literary elements are used in different ways since the author’s have different techniques and skills. The unexpected is what keeps life going, and the unexpected is what we see in “The Interlopers” and “The Lottery”, expect the unexpected is what people will say but in truth everything isn’t like
Throughout history people have been following the crowd without knowing what they are accomplishing by doing so. During “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, a small town conducts a traditional lottery every year which involves stoning someone to death. Half-heartedly listening to the directions and losing most of the process over time, the villagers conduct this lottery each year, killing off their friends, because the majority is doing so too. A large amount of participants does not mean it is the right thing to do. “First They Came,” is a poem written by a German Anti-Nazi, Martin Niemoller. At first he supported Hitler, he was too late to realize he was supporting the wrong side he had no one left to speak out for him. The majority of the people around him were following the Nazis but that does not justify siding with the wrong cause. Following the crowd can lead to disastrous consequences, like losing a friend or being chased by the Nazis with no one on your side left to help.
People within communities have a large responsibility to one another. Sometimes, however, that responsibility and respect seem to fade, as in “The Lottery”, Shirley Jackson, and “The Masque of the Red Death”, Edgar Allan Poe. Both of these stories describe settings in which communities fell apart either briefly or all together.
Several generations have gone through some type of an unfair law that they had to obey, for example, in past generations African Americans were enslaved, but more presently the lack of rights the LGBT members have with marriage. This can relate to the stories “Antigone” and “The Lottery” because the characters in each story went through unfair tragedies. The laws in each of these stories are different, but actually very similar as shown by the end result.
A common phrase used in courts is that someone is “innocent until proven guilty.” Through the plot’s of “The Lottery” and The Crucible, this idea of people being innocent until guilty is shown, however, the part of this phrase about proving that guilt is conveniently left out. Of course, both stories took place in a time in which the villagers felt no need for there to be any kind of trial or reasoning for someone’s death. Rather, the persecutions that occured in these stories took place to ensure that barbaric tendencies did not spread among the people within their villages. This idea of keeping people from being barbaric or evil enforces the idea that perhaps people truly think that the people who choose the marked paper are really deserving
...re the reader is not able to make any solid connection with any of these characters. It is arguably only through the stories foreshadowing where both authors prepare us with little details like the mileage of the car written down by the grandmother in O’Connor’s story likewise the boys preparation of the stones in Jackson’s Lottery that would inevitably help the reader to comprehend how both these author’s reached the horrifically shocking climatic endings in both short stories. I believe the authors similar use of these three variables help the reader to understand the message being delivered through these stories of the human condition and its effects on a society that only embraces its traditional moral beliefs and values.
“The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “The Yellow Wallpaper” by Charlotte Perkins Gilman are two very meaningful and fascinating stories. These stories share similarities in symbols and themes but they do not share the same plot which makes it different from one another. Furthermore, “The lottery” was held in New England village where 300 people were living in that village. This event took place every once a year. Besides, the story begins where on one beautiful morning, everyone in that village gathered to celebrate the lottery. The surroundings were such that children were gathering stones while adults were chatting with each other. It was compulsory for every head of family or house to draw a slip of paper out of the box. In addition to that, the family that draws the slip in the black do will have to re draw in order to see who will win the lottery. Therefore, the winner of the lottery will be stoned to death. This is very shocking because in today’s lottery events, the winner will be awarded cash.
Though there are some noticeable differences between Shirley Jackson’s “The Lottery” and Ursula Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas”, however the similarities in the two stories are clear. The themes of both short stories are centered on tradition and the sacrifice of one individual for the good all. In the “The Lottery” someone is stoned to death in order for the village to be prosper. While in the “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas” the cities happiness solely depends on the suffering of a child whom has done nothing wrong. The point that both authors are trying to convey to the audience is; at what point do we as a society begin to question a way of doing things, question a tradition that has no real truth or reason behind
Although people can fear an outcome of telling the truth or standing up for what they believe is right, being a bystander in a poor situation doesn’t exempt someone from innocence. Whether it involves a murder or telling the truth, if someone knows it is wrong and does nothing to take part in what’s going on they are no better than the ones involved in the conflict. In To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee and The Lottery by Shirley Jackson, both stories involve bystanders. A bystander is not innocent when they do nothing about the problem going on around them.
“The Lottery,” written by Shirley Jackson in 1948, is a provoking piece of literature about a town that continues a tradition of stoning, despite not know why the ritual started in the first place. As Jackson sets the scene, the villagers seem ordinary; but seeing that winning the lottery is fatal, the villagers are then viewed as murders by the reader. Disagreeing with the results of the lottery, Tessie Hutchinson is exposed to an external conflict between herself and the town. Annually on June 27th, the villagers gather to participate in the lottery. Every head of household, archetypally male, draws for the fate of their family, but Tessie protests as she receives her prize of a stoning after winning the lottery. Jackson uses different symbols – symbolic characters, symbolic acts, and allegories – to develop a central theme: the
The stories, “The Things they Carried” by Tim O’Brien and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, have some similar characteristics and others are different. Keeping a tradition, however, in “The Things they Carried” the main character actually wakes up and changes how he is and becomes more realistic. Unlike “The lottery” where everyone is participating in a murder but not noticing what they are actually doing; to them it is a tradition. The settings are quite the opposite in these stories and also how the characters act. The theme of these stories are the same, however there are other elements that are different in these stories, such as their settings and characters.
In stories that both end with innocent people being brutally murdered for the sake of upholding a tradition, there are bound to be similarities. The Hunger Games, directed by Gary Ross, is the story of a girl who is chosen as a sacrifice in the annual Hunger Games, forced to fight and kill tributes from other districts to survive. The Lottery, by Shirley Jackson, is the story of a woman who is chosen as a sacrifice in the annual lottery, stoned to death by the people in her village. The Hunger Games and The Lottery have similar symbols, characters, and settings.
actually consists of in this short story. At the onset of the story, Jackson uses the peaceful setting to confuse the reader as to the violent event that occurs. She continues to obscure what is actually going on in each character’s mind by writing in the third person with an objective view. The rising action that develops throughout the story continues to confuse the reader until which point the shocking ending is revealed. The unexpected harsh stoning of the winner in this short story is not what one expects when they begin to read “The Lottery”.
These two are short fiction stories by American writers of the 20th century with both having a common social and religious setup. ‘The Lottery’ by Shirley Jackson is based on a small American town described by an annual ritual they refer to as the lottery in which through a lottery game a member of the society selected is stoned to death. The lottery is based on the families and with the argument that it’s with this tradition, they get a good harvest, Warner quotes, “Lottery in June, corn be heavy soon (Jackson, 25).” On the other hand, ‘The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas,’ describes the communal setup of the imagined city of Omelas, a city of delight and unbelievable happiness. The story presents the summer festival celebrated in Omelas which is very vibrant and glorious. Though the writer does not give an account of the social, political and economic setup of omegas. On the contrary, the state of happiness and splendor
Death can come in many ways. It can be sudden, or over a strenuous period of time. It can seem random, but sometimes is planned and thought out. There are just about as many ways to deal with death, as there are ways to die. While both The lottery and The Story of an Hour explore the theme of death and grief, The lottery tells a tale of the sacrificial death for a community (necessary, no grief) while The Story of an Hour depicts the natural death of a loved one (grief, but, later, revelation) and how we eventually come to terms with it.
“The lottery” and “first they came” both have the same theme of killing people whether its tradition or just killing people in general you’re still following the same theme however the two story’s use different text structures to convey the message to the reader.