Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary comparison essay
Compare and contrast literary essay examples
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
At first glance, many would not imagine comparing the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley to the novella Ourika by Claire De Duras. However when analyzed closely, the similarities and differences between Ourika and the creature, prompts many readers to compare the novel and the novella. Both the creature and Ourika fulfill the idea of outcasts, while containing significant amount of differences. Whereas the creature’s anguish stems from society’s rejection of him and the creature pinning his suffering on society, Ourika’s misery on the other hand, arises from her own self-animosity and refusing to accept society’s shortcomings.
Both the creature from Frankenstein and Ourika from Ourika, demonstrate how dangerous society’s superficial view
…show more content…
can be on the individual. Both the creature and Ourika are rejected from their cultures solely based on their looks. Although the creature contains the ideal personality of a human, society still forbids his entry into civilization. The cottagers receiving aid from the creature exhibit how a society cherishes looks more than personality when the creature recounts, “who could have describe their horror and consternation on beholding me” (Shelley pg. 94). The cottagers don’t question the creature, also their supporter, when confronting them; instead they cower in fear from the hideousness of the creature. Society’s tendency to overlook personality for looks serves as the main source of agony for Ourika. Ourika realizes that she is bound for a life away from society when Mme de B admits, “I see the poor girl alone, always alone in the world” (Duras pg. 12). Mme de B clarifies to the readers that because of Ourika’s skin color, society will not accept her as French. The quote specifically impacts Ourika, since her own benefactor claims that Ourika will forever remain an outcast. The two texts ask the reader to reconsider their thoughts on society and culture, and contemplate the criteria to feel “belonged.” However, the interesting part does not come from comparing the creature’s and Ourika’s similarities, rather how their conceptualization of their position impacts on how they view society. Throughout the novella, Ourika slowly reasons that her skin color is the cause of her hardship, instead of realizing that her pain arrives from society’s rejection of her. Ourika quickly understands that the French culture will no longer accept her as a member of the French community when Mme de B’s friend the marquise exclaims, “What kind of man would marry a negress? Even supposing you can bribe some fellow to father mulatto children, he could only be of low birth. She can only want the kind of husband who would never look at her” (Duras pg13). Regardless of Ourika’s social class, the marquise reveals that Ourika could only marry a husband of a lower lifestyle because of her skin color. Ourika recognizes that the French culture overlooks her social class and focuses rather on the color of her skin. Unlike the creature in Frankenstein that is born without the feeling of belonging, Ourika is painfully removed from the culture in which she was raised. Moreover, Ourika herself begins to loath her skin because of its alienation when she claims, “Till then I had regretted belonging to a race of outcasts. Now I had the shame of belonging to a race of barbarous murderers” (Duras pg.21). Ourika automatically connects the color of her skin to a “race of outcasts.” Through Ourika’s use of negative diction, she supports the idea that the culture is not at fault for her suffering; instead she considers her skin is the root of her isolation. Ourika desperately desires resume her position in a society that superficially outcasts her. Although the creature’s original intention is to seek acceptance and love from society, he ultimately shifts to craving revenge against his creator.
At the beginning of his life, the creature does not seek to harm the human race, instead wishing to join them. The creature demonstrates his desires when he reveals to Frankenstein that, “I longed to join them, but dared not. I remembered to well the treatment I had suffered the night before” (Shelly pg76). Regardless of his previously interactions with violent humans, he continues to desire the feeling of belonging to a group or family. Like Ourika, once the creature realizes that society will not accept him, he wishes for an interpersonal relationship with a significant other. The creature reveals to Frankenstein that, “I demand a creature of another sex, but as hideous as myself: the gratification is small, but it is all I can receive, and it shall content me” (Shelly pg102). The creature understands that the love he will receive from a female creature will not completely fill the gap of belonging; nonetheless he comprehends that some small feeling of attachment and love is enough to make him happy. Although the creature begins as kind-hearted character desiring companionship, the creature ultimately desires revenge against Frankenstein throughout volume three. The psyche of the creature evolves from one of innocent child looking at the world for the first time, to a vile human wishing to act upon his anger. Importantly, the …show more content…
novel asks the reader to consider the reasons behind the personality change of the creature. The creature’s use of violence towards the end of the novel is not a result of his natural violent urges, but as the result of the influence of society.
The creature’s unhappiness at the end of the novel is not from the result of his own self-hate like Ourika, rather he believes that society is the cause of his suffering. During the time when the creature is outside the influences of society, he is free from hate and misery. The creature expresses his gentle nature when he admires cottagers stating, “ I admired virtue and good feelings, and loved the gentle manners and amiable qualities of my cottagers, but I was shut out from the intercourse” (Shelly pg84). At this point of the novel, the creature only had minimal contact with society evident from the seclusion from the cottagers; therefore he still views humans as amiable creatures. However as the creature continues to encounter other humans, he begins to develop a hateful attitude towards them. At the end of the novel, the creature reveals to Walton, “I cannot believe I am he whose thoughts were once filled with sublime and transcendent visions of beauty… the fallen angel becomes a malignant devil” (Shelly pg160). The creature understands that murder is considered reprobate, however he is shocked that he managed to carry perform all the murders. Since the creature experienced violence whenever he approach any of the humans, the creature slowly began adopting violence as a sort of way to communicate with other vicious
humans. The creature’s sublime thoughts were slowly replaced with thoughts of evil and murder. These thoughts seeped into the creature’s mind, because humans like Frankenstein constantly refused the creature’s simplest of desires. Ultimately Ourika finally accepts the inherent “ugliness” of her skin and even acknowledges the thought that her suffering was not a product of society, rather from her own self-induced misery. Ourika consistently insults herself because of her skin color revealing, “I exaggerated my ugliness to myself, and this skin color of mine seemed to me like the brand of shame” (Duras pg16). Ourika does not view herself as ugly, however she dislikes the idea that her dark skin represents a visible token of shame. Whereas the creature accepts his hideous looks, Ourika has trouble in coming to terms with accepting the meaning of her skin. Ourika focuses on the pain her skin caused her, rather than reasoning that society dealt her a great injustice. During the conversation between Ourika and the marquise, Ourika gloomily expresses, “nothing has purpose in my life. Not even my unhappiness” (Duras pg41). Ourika uses the combination of her social situation and her missed opportunity with Charles to constantly condemn herself. Ourika believes that her misery is from her forbidden love with Charles, however she continues to overlook society’s enforcing restriction on love. Ultimately Ourika finally finds peace in her life when she claims at the end of the novella, “I had chased after the pleasure of life and neglected true happiness…perhaps God, in casting me into this alien land, wished to bring me to Him” (Duras pg43). Ourika explains that her attempt to renter society or “chasing after pleasures,” led to her immense suffering. Only through her acceptance of God, does Ourika finally find solace with the meaning of her skin color. Ourika realizes that pursuing acceptance in an “alien land” only leads to misery; rather she finds peace when she believes that God accepts her regardless of her imperfections. When Ourika realizes that society was the cause of her pain, she is capable of moving away from it and accepting peace. Ourika and the creature both view the idea of outcasts differently. While the creature attempts to integrate itself into society and ultimately finds society guilty of his miseries, Ourika on the other hand, views her different color skin as the problem of her issues, regardless of her inability to directly blame society. The idea of outcasts is determined by society; therefore humanity used the idea of looks to pass judgment on both the creature and the Ourika.
In most novel and movies monsters are known to be evil, committing numerous crimes against humanity and are normally the ones that we don’t sympathize with. However, this novel carefully shows the reader that monsters can be good creatures, with a decent heart and act based on the actions of others. The novel shows how the monster should be pitied, rather than criticised. Mary Shelley's “Frankenstein” manages to create sympathy for the creature through speech, actions and mistreatment the creature suffers.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is ‘one of the pioneering works of modern science fiction’, and is also a frightening story that speaks to the ‘mysterious fears of our nature’. Mary Shelley mocks the idea of “playing God”, the idea that came from the Greek myth of Prometheus, of the Greek titan who stole Zeus’ gift of life. Both the story of Frankenstein and Prometheus reveal the dark side of human nature and the dangerous effects of creating artificial life. Frankenstein reveals the shocking reality of the consequences to prejudging someone. The creature’s first-person narration reveals to us his humanity, and his want to be accepted by others even though he is different. We are shown that this ‘monster’ is a ‘creature’ and more of a human than we think.
During his abandonment, he wanders in the forest and learns social aspects from the DeLacey family. His request to Frankenstein is inspired by the relationship between Felix and Safie. When he saw the passion between them, the monster said that their love, “...expressed joy”(Shelley 83). Therefore, the monster learns that humans, essentially men, need women to eliminate such depressed feelings. When the monster demands a female creature, Frankenstein agrees to his request as he was threatened about the death of Elizabeth Lavenza. However, as he is working on his creation, he considers the possible consequences that this might bring because the monster, “had sworn to quit the neighbourhood…; but the female monster had not; and the female monster, who in all probability to become a thinking and reasoning animal” (Shelley 120). Frankenstein decides to discontinue the female creation which delivers a message that women can have a mind of their own. He believes that the female creature can decide whether or not to be a companion for the monster. If she were to choose not to, she would have the power to do so despite having destruction as a possible outcome.. Therefore, signifying that women have the potential to have agency and make decisions of their
The fact that Frankenstein’s creation turns on him and murders innocent people is never overlooked; it has been the subject of virtually every popularization of the novel. What is not often acknowledged is the fact that Frankenstein himself embodies some of the worst traits of humankind. He is self-centered, with little real love for those who care about him; he is prejudiced, inflexible and cannot forgive, even in death. While some of these traits could be forgivable, to own and flaunt them all should be enough to remind a careful reader that there are two "monsters" in Frankenstein.
Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is impressive, entertaining, and fascinating so is it no surprise there have been so many films and artworks influenced by her novel. Many of which have put their own spin to the horror novel, especially the character of the creature that remains one of the most recognized icons in horror fiction. However, there have been critics whom argue modern versions and variations have lost the horror and passion that is an essential to the creature. The start of the Creature is bound to one book. However, public impression of the Creature has changed severely since the publication of the original novel, leading to diverse styles and plot lines in its diverse film adaptations. People’s impression of the Creature have become so twisted and turned by time and decades of false film posters and article titles that most use the name “Frankenstein” to refer to the Creature itself, rather than the scientist who created him! It’s a shame! An understanding of literary history is a necessity to comprehend the truth of the Creature’s tragic history and how decades of film adaptations changed him into the hulking beast most people know him as today.
But the monster seems strongly anchored into his determination to give the relationship with mankind another chance. He admires the qualities of humans, but yet he wanders how is it possible that there are so many contradictory attributes gathered in a single human being: "Was man, indeed, at once so powerful, so virtuous, and magnificent, and yet so vicious and base ?" (Shelley 147). Two more unpleasant events shutter his belief in ever establishing a connection with mankind. When he attempts to make contact with the people who have unwillingly constituted his adopting family, he is rejected on basis of physical appearance.
Tragedy shows no discrimination and often strikes down on those undeserving of such turmoil. In Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a creature more repulsive than one can imagine is brought to life by a young scientist. Although this creature is horrifying in sight, he is gentle by nature. Unfortunately, the softer side of the creature is repeatedly overlooked and the so called “monster” is driven to a breaking point. Even though the Creature committed many crimes, Mary Shelley’s Creature was the tragic hero of this story because of his efforts rescue the life of a young girl and helping destitute cottagers.
The creature never had an inclination to be murderous, and “becomes violent only after he is repeatedly rejected by society” (Nocks). Failing to win companionship by attempting to understand people and learning their language, he turns to his creator. The monster explains that he is just like the people who hate him, with the same desires and emotions. After developing all these ideas of society and emotions, he learns that there is no way for him to express them. Following his many attempts to fit into the world, he realizes that he will never be accepted by humans, and vows to destroy all of mankind. Society and its mistreatment of the monster causes it to become barbaric. He states, “My protectors had departed, and had broken the only link that held me to the world” (Shelley 134). The creature speaks of how his protectors had essentially cut him off from society, which would lead him to act out against all of mankind. The incorporation of the three books also develop the creature, and may have provided him with false perceptions about human interaction and the world in general. Lack of human interaction can greatly affect one’s decisions and can cause one to have a bad a reaction to their
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a nineteenth century literary work that delves into the world of science and the plausible outcomes of morally insensitive technological research. Although the novel brings to the forefront several issues about knowledge and sublime nature, the novel mostly explores the psychological and physical journey of two complex characters. While each character exhibits several interesting traits that range from passive and contemplative to rash and impulsive, their most attractive quality is their monstrosity. Their monstrosities, however, differ in the way each of the character’s act and respond to their environment.
Since its publication in 1818, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein has grown to become a name associated with horror and science fiction. To fully understand the importance and origin of this novel, we must look at both the tragedies of Mary Shelley's background and her own origins. Only then can we begin to examine what the icon "Frankenstein" has become in today's society.
Peter Brooks' essay "What Is a Monster" tackles many complex ideas within Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, and the main concept that is the title of the essay itself. What is the definition of a monster, or to be monstrous? Is a monster the classic representation we know, green skin, neck bolts, grunting and groaning? A cartoon wishing to deliver sugary cereal? or someone we dislike so greatly their qualities invade our language and affect our interpretation of their image and physical being? Brooks' essay approaches this question by using Shelley's narrative structure to examine how language, not nature, is mainly accountable for creating the idea of the monstrous body.
There are many varied interpretations of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein in the study of literature. In fact, most critics have, if not opposing, somewhat contrasted views on the novel. However, a popular perception of the novel seems to be one in which Shelley is said to be representing her own views through the voice of the monster created by Victor Frankenstein. But what exactly are Shelley’s views? So many have taken apart this novel, analyzing it beyond all bounds, and yet it still remains a puzzle to most, as to what message Shelley tries to give to the reader. Perhaps this quandary is the direct result of this over-analysis. What if we are looking too carefully? If we were to take a step back, we should see that Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is nothing more than the not uncommon story of the average teenager.
Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein expresses human nature specifically through the character of the “Creature” and his development. The Creature has an opportunity to explore his surroundings, and in doing so he learns that human nature is to run away from something so catastrophic in looks. The Creature discovers that he must limit himself in what he does due to the response of humans because of his deformities. I feel that Mary Shelley tries to depict human nature to running away from the abnormal, which results in alienation of the “abnormal.” Even today, people have a prejudice against someone or something that is abnormal, and these people will act differently towards this abnormality that is put in front of them. In the novel, Shelley seems to suggest a conception of humanity that is deeply influe...
Although the monster is constructed out of human parts, he is disfigured, “unnaturally hideous,” and deemed society’s “chief object of horror” (Shelley 112). He is instantly labeled as an evil and destructive creature, overshadowing any sort of goodness he may possess. However, the monster is vulnerable and highly sensitive similar to a human baby, but physically continues to be humanity's “chief object of horror.” While the monster reads the journal written by his creator, he is horrified by what he reads: “‘Hateful day when I received life!' I exclaimed in agony. `Accursed creator! Why did you form a monster so hideous that even you turned from me in disgust?’” (Shelley 111). The monster is shocked that his sole purpose was to bring glory to Frankenstein, but now his creator considers him to be a regretful mistake. Like being abandoned by a parent, he is filled with rage and dejection after hearing how his creator wishes to have nothing to do with him. After hearing it was a “hateful day” when he “received life,” the monster goes on to question his worth and reason for existing. By thinking about his place in the world and the emotions from his experiences, he ultimately tries to understand his human
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein or; The Modern Prometheus, published in 1818, is a product of its time. Written in a world of social, political, scientific and economic upheaval it highlights human desire to uncover the scientific secrets of our universe, yet also confirms the importance of emotions and individual relationships that define us as human, in contrast to the monstrous. Here we question what is meant by the terms ‘human’ and ‘monstrous’ as defined by the novel. Yet to fully understand how Frankenstein defines these terms we must look to the etymology of them. The novel however, defines the terms through its main characters, through the themes of language, nature versus nurture, forbidden knowledge, and the doppelganger motif. Shelley also shows us, in Frankenstein, that although juxtaposing terms, the monstrous being everything human is not, they are also intertwined, in that you can not have one without the other. There is also an overwhelming desire to know the monstrous, if only temporarily and this calls into question the influence the monstrous has on the human definition.