Similarities Between Nat Turner And John Brown

538 Words2 Pages

I would consider both Nat Turner and John Brown to be madmen. Though they both intended well with their actions, they executed their plans very poorly. Their violence led to many vices, like deaths and restrictions on slaves. Nat Turner, was a self-proclaimed prophet, who alleged that he could speak with God. Turner was a slave who escaped to freedom, only to return, causing chaos. With his return, Turner hoped that he could end the suffering of those who were under the chains of slavery (Nat Turner & The Rebellion That Shook The South). This meant that Turner hoped to positively impact the slave community with his actions. At the age of twenty seven, Turner claimed that he received a vision from God, revealing that it was time for those who …show more content…

What followed was the gruesome murder of Turner’s slave owner, Joseph Travis, his wife, and son, in their sleep. But Turner did not stop there, he, along with his followers, also killed a hired worker and Joseph Travis’ infant. This proves that Turner acted immorally and ruthlessly, just like a madman. Turner defends his actions by stating that he was not acting in anger, instead it was “holy retribution” (Nat Turner & The Rebellion That Shook The South). But, the killing of more than sixty white men, says otherwise. Although Turner’s actions were said to be in good faith, his actions did cause many white males to feel outraged and vengeful, which later led to the murder of over two-hundred innocent African Americans. Consequently, these actions led to harsher conditions for African Americans. In Virginia, for example, teaching an African American how to read was now prohibited. Similar to Turner, abolitionist John Brown also took the lives of many in the name of ending slavery and became infamous for his methods. Brown was very religious, just like Turner, and shared a common hatred for slavery. Furthermore, Brown assisted more than two-thousand-five-hundred slaves at his

Open Document