Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Self reliance essay by emerson
Self reliance essay by emerson
Self reliance essay by emerson
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Self reliance essay by emerson
Greatest Thinkers of The 19th Century
“ In the mid-19th Century, Concord- about 19 miles west of Boston- was home to writers, scholars, policy makers, and abolitionist- among them Alcott- her father, philosopher Bronson Alcott, and the likes of Ralph Waldo Emerson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, and Henry David Thoreau” (Jones). All of the aforementioned, accomplished writers were friends. Initially, because of Emerson’s presence, Concord was a significant cultural center. "The Brook Farm experiment (1841-1846) was one of the most famous experiments in Utopian Socialism in America” (Brozeck). The “Brook Farm” is where Emerson, Hawthorne, and Thoreau met. They attained their writing ability and style here. However, we can draw similarities and
…show more content…
differences from all three writers. We look at their similarities as being members of the “Brook Farm”.
The Brook Farm was a society of Transcendentalist, which according to Brozeck, “They blamed the social evils of the world on the lust of accumulation of personal objects and that the only way these 'ills' could be cured is by withdrawing from a competitive institutional society and setting up a new community, free of competition and desire for accumulation” (Brozeck). Thoreau lived with Emerson’s family and they shared common beliefs. Emerson and Thoreau believed, basically, that we were born good and that society and government brought out the basic evil in us. These two authors wrote a plethora about self-discovery and about government influence. All three wrote about the human condition. They believed that humans were capable of good and evil. The similarities between Emerson and Thoreau were great. However, there were also differences in their beliefs as well. The differences in convictions between Hawthorne and these two were even …show more content…
greater. The main difference between Emerson and Thoreau were how they presented their stories.
Let’s look at some passages and analyze their styles of writing and content. Emerson wrote in “Self Reliance”, “Man is his own star; and the soul that can render an honest and perfect man” (Norton). Thoreau wrote in “Walden Pond”, “I went to the woods because I wished to live deliberately, to front only the essential facts of life, and see if I could not learn what it had to teach, and not, when I came to die, discover that I had not lived” (Norton). Emerson was more philosophical and presented his writings as more of a lecture. Thoreau's writings were more intimate and personal in style. He was the central character of his stories. Thoreau lived on Walden Pond and actually lived what he wrote about. Hawthorne was completely opposite of Emerson and Thoreau. He was an “Anti-transcendentalist” which believed, “man is born with the strain of original sin, man is the most destructive force in nature, one can only find good through good works and life experiences” (Brozeck). Hawthorne was more dark in his writing as is evident in a passage from the “Scarlett Letter”. “The founders of the new colony, whatever Utopia of human virtue and happiness they might originally project, have invariably recognized it among their earliest practical necessities to allot a portion of the virgin soil as a cemetery, and another portion as the site of a prison” (Hawthorne). From this passage, it is
noticeable he uses objects or symbols to get his meaning across. Emerson and Thoreau were rather similar as it seemed Thoreau looked up to Emerson. Emerson welcomed Thoreau to his property. Hawthorne did attempt to become a “Transcendentalists”. However, his beliefs that humans were born evil and that their evil was not a product of societal influence, drastically influenced the way he wrote and put him at odds with the beliefs of the "Transcendentalists". All three writers that lived in Concord, Massachusetts fed off each other’s concepts and ideas. Each author influenced the others. If we were all alike in our beliefs, our style of thinking, and the way our thoughts affect our actions, our country would not be as strong. It is these very differences that make us who we are and make this country the greatest on Earth.
Jonathan Edwards, the author of “Sinners in the hands of an angry God” cunningly made his style more effective than Nathaniel Hawthorne's style in “The Ministers of the Black Veil.” Edwards used more of an aggressive style which worked better than Hawthorne’s sad and laid back style.
Thoreau and Emerson were considered as transcendentalists and their tones are most similar to one other. Thoreau and Emerson both used religion in their writing, knew about people, loved nature and were introspective. Nathaniel Hawthorne took a more humorous side than the others. His work, Dr. Heidegger's Experiment, was an ironic story that showed his dissatisfaction with people's actions and society's values. He was also more pessimistic than Emerson and Thoreau had been.
Few, if any, writers of the American Renaissance period had as great an influence on contemporaries as did Ralph Waldo Emerson. He was insistent that America put its mark on the literary world with its own, genuine American literature, and he launched the movement with his own works (Bode 574). Frederick Douglass was a slave of the American south when Emerson was starting out and moving up in his profession. Eventually, Douglass became Emersonâs fellow writer and lecturer. Douglass was present and was asked to speak for the Womenâs Anti-Slavery Society in August 1844, in Concord, where Emerson was the keynote speaker. The two men shared common ideas, as we shall see as the literary works and lives of the two men are examined. To some extent Emerson had an influence on Douglassâs expressed views, but on the other hand, some of Douglassâs views were a product of his own natural inclination.
Transcendentalists Thoreau and Emerson conveyed strong, specific viewpoints on the world through their writing. The transcendentalist ideals differ vastly with the lives lived by most of the modern world today. Firstly, the two differ on views of self-reliance. Secondly, they have different outlooks on the government and organized groups. Lastly, transcendentalist and modern American views vary by the way they view nature. These differences between transcendentalism and life today are essential in understanding life then, as well as life now.
After learning and reading about Kate Chopin and Nathaniel Hawthorne, one can recognize how their life experiences and era shape the message of their literary works. These two writers, born almost fifty years apart, had a completely different family setting, thus their writings differ and so does their morals. In literature, personal experiences in the writers’ lives have a great significance in their writing style, theme, and symbolism.
In Thoreau’s excerpt of “Walden”, he writes about moving to the forest to live in a cabin. He gets away from the busy world around him and secludes himself to nature. While living out in the forest, Thoreau would take the time to enjoy the beauty of nature and come back to the cabin and write about it. In Emerson’s excerpt of “Nature”, he writes about the relationship of humans and nature.
Edgar Allan Poe and Nathaniel Hawthorne are considered two of the most influential writers in American history. ¨Although they never met face-to-face the two writers are inseparably linked because of the style of their works.¨(Velella) Their unique style was different then a lot of other writers which separated them from the rest. While Longfellow and many others wrote about happiness and spiritual connection with nature Poe and Hawthorne wrote about darkness and how they thought humanity was evil creation.
In any novel worth reading there is use of basic rhetorical devices like symbolism, allusions, etc. Nathaniel Hawthorne viewed strongly abroad as excellent author for many reasons but none as prevalent as his use of symbolism. Hawthorne uses repetition, motifs and symbolism to poetically approximate allusions almost within every word of his book “The Scarlet Letter”. Symbolism is the adhesive in “The Scarlet Letter”, other than maintaining the reader’s interest, it also makes allusions to other famous works such as the bible, and he uses it to transition the exposition throughout the book. A white man standing next to an Indian was wearing “… clad in a strange disarray of civilized and savage costume” (45) symbolizing the linimal position of the character in the story and in life. Although this symbol has one clear layer it also has a bi-layer to represent a different meaning. The matter that Hawthorne forms epic amounts of symbol s would have formed a problem if he hadn’t made it easy to depict the differences between his concrete symbols and his abstract symbols through repetit...
Nathaniel Hawthorns short stories, such as, Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment, Rappaccini’s Daughter and The Birthmark all have an underlying meaning and demonstrate a similar recurring theme. Hawthorne uses his stories to clarify his beliefs on the competition between nature, religion, and science in everyday life. In all three of his short stories he refuses the concept of science coming before religion or nature. Hawthorne clearly thought if nature or religion was tampered with using science it could only end badly, but more specifically with death. In each of his stories there is a scientific experiment that defies both nature and religion ending harmfully. Nathaniel Hawthorne’s beliefs conclude that God and nature to ultimately be more powerful then science.
Henry David Thoreau and Nathaniel Hawthorne are different and alike in many ways. Thoreau was a man that never married and believes each man should "march to his own drum" or go his own pace. Nathaniel Hawthorne on the other hand, was married very quickly. Thoreau was described "as ugly as sin with a long nose and queer mouth." Hawthorne was handsome on the outside, but depressed on the inside. Hawthorne was a Dark Romantic, while Thoreau was a Transcendentalist.
The similarities and differences between Poe and Hawthorne both show a dynamic and intriguing method that has lasted through the times. They both show an inner personal look through their writing about their loved ones. The dynamic writing between both writers depict the idea that no matter how morbid the writing love can shine through any view. With both writers there is a vision of morbid curiosity along with a romantic nature for the audience; by depicting death of a loved one to show a sense of connection with the audience. Although both are gothic romantic writers you can easily see that both have a different sense of life and death, and to which one holds more value.
While Emerson and Thoreau certainly have difference of opinions, they recognize the need for public discussion and discourse. Emerson declares “a foolish consistency” to be “the hobgoblin of little minds” (Emerson 367). This is shown in their essays “Self-Reliance” and “Civil Disobedience” in which they support individuality and personal expression. Despite their contrasting views of society and government, the two most prominent transcendentalists in literary history share a passionate belief in the necessity that every American must exercise their constitutional rights and make known their views even and especially if it challenges the status quo.
John Winthrop and Ralph Waldo Emerson were two prominent figures in the literature and the political scene of the American history. Winthrop (1588-1649) was a governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. He left England, along with a group of entrepreneurs in search of economic opportunities in the new world. Winthrop grew to become a strong puritan believer and possibly the pioneer of the Puritan faith. He believed that the English church was corrupted by its selfish leaders. Winthrop envisioned an idealized community in which all citizens would offer their lives to the service of God. On the other hand, Emerson (1803 –1882) was an American essayist, lecturer, thinker, philosopher, and poet. He was the leader of the Transcendentalist movement in the mid-19th century. He was regarded as a champion of individualism and a leader of the march against the pressure of society. His work and beliefs were documented in his published essays and lectures. Emerson gradually changed his views regarding religion and society. In the process, he developed his own way of thinking which revolved around the principles of transcendentalism and individualism. Winthrop and Emerson ideas of a utopia might have flourished from religious roots. However, their principals of Puritanism and transcendentalism were completely incongruent.
During the nineteenth century, some of the most renowned classics of contemporary American literature were written by history’s most cherished writers, one of them being Nathaniel Hawthorne. Hawthorne was a dark romantic writer who spent a great deal of time in the company of several other influential writers of his time, many of whom were transcendentalists. Although Hawthorne himself was not a transcendentalist, he lived in community with several of them, including Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, and the Alcott family in Concord, Massachusetts (“Nathaniel”). However, Hawthorne was exposed to transcendentalist views even before this. For six months in 1841, he was a resident at the experimental utopian community of Brook Farm, which
Insanity can be a dark descent into the strange, nightmarish unknown realms of the mind unable to return to the known world of reason. This is a major theme in literature, and is particularly evident in the works of Nathaniel Hawthorne and Herman Melville. The nightmarish undertones are one of the main similarities in Hawthorne's and Melville's works. Another similarity is writing style. Both men write very descriptively, and their writing is based more in intellect than emotion. Also both men write about the nightmarish descent into madness.