Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis jane austen
Pride and prejudice jane austen character analysis
Pride and prejudice jane austen character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Literary analysis jane austen
Values are standards of behaviour and include what society considers being acceptable and what is not.
Jane Austen’s prose novel ‘Emma’ and Amy Heckerling’s contemporised version ‘Clueless’, share common values although they are reflected in changing contexts.
Throughout Austen’s novel, Emma demonstrates different qualities that her particular society valued. These include morality and charity, as well as marriage.
Marriage is central to most of Jane Austen’s novels as she sees that it is the foundation of a stable continuum. Emma is no different, as it too involves young people in pursuit of a life partner.
In Austen’s society, marriage was a way to secure property, wealth and class, yet Emma is one of the few, lucky enough to be free of
…show more content…
financial concerns, unlike most of Austen’s other heroines and supporting female characters in the novels that, to a certain degree, need marriage to survive. Miss Bates, Jane Fairfax and Harriet Smith all highlight the difficulties facing women without financial independence. Emma however expresses no interest or desire to marry early in the novel as her fortune assures her of independence and security and she has a somewhat naive view of the idea of marriage and love. It is only at the end of the novel that Emma becomes a more romantic heroine as she realises her feelings for Mr Knightley, who is a convenient suit considering their equal social class. Emma’s newfound love will also not interfere with her independence. Clueless also explores the value of marriage, however due to a more modernised context, marriage does not have the same position in society as it once did.
As context has shifted, due to women's liberation movements, marriage is no longer a necessity, but fundamentally still remains a desirable construct for women. This shift has also caused a slight alter in the values being represented in the two texts. Instead of simply focusing on marriage, Heckerling focuses on dating, sex and relationships in Clueless. While women in Emma search for marriage that will provide them with social stability, women in clueless instead search for the sexual connection that will provide equivalent social …show more content…
stability. Virginity assumes a new importance in the modern context. Like Emma, Cher is a virgin. Contrasting Emma, however Cher’s virginity is not taken for granted. Due to her appearance one would presume the opposite. Therefore, Cher explicitly proclaims her virginity in order to inform the audience of her position: "I’m just not interested in doing it until I find the right person. You see how picky I am about my shoes - and they only go on my feet!" Cher who starts out to be naive about relationships and love, just like Emma, eventually realises that she is in love with Josh, Mr Knightley’s counterpart. And just like Emma, Cher’s newfound love has matured her opinion of relationships without interfering with her independence. The values of charity and morality are used both in Emma and Clueless.
These concepts show just how lucky Emma and Cher are to be wealthy and the moral responsibility that those with money, status and time have. Both protagonists perform charitable deeds, however for the most part, they do them for the self-satisfaction. Emma visits the poor and sick, yet this was part of a plan to walk past Elton’s house. Mr Knightley on the other hand simply loves to help others and doesn’t expect gratitude in return for his good deeds. This distinction between the two characters is also clear in Cher and Josh’s relationship. Emma gives away clothes that she no longer likes and it is apparent that she does not have a clear idea on the concept of charity for the benefit of others. Josh, like Mr Knightley, genuinely wants to help others and claims that he would die of shock if he ever ‘saw Cher doing something that wasn't ninety percent
selfish.’ Both Emma and Cher become more mature and charitable. Emma offers Jane Fairfax goods and a ride in her carriage and Cher actively assists with the Primo Beach Disaster. This change from the snobbishness that started out with initially reflects the effect that finding love has on their attitudes and morals. Heckerling’s use of modern techniques to reshape the story of Emma through a different medium meant that a change in values was necessary. This is because for the same meaning to be conveyed in Clueless as in Emma, the values had to be contemporised to be relevant for modern audiences. Such alterations include the change of focus on marriage. Marriage is the centre point in Emma, however this value had to be changed in Clueless to focus on dating, sex and relationships, which are things the audience could relate to more and conveys the equivalent message of love that marriage did in Austen’s times. The values morality and charity have also been altered and modernised, although not quite as much. For example, offering someone a ride in their carriage does not fit charity in the context of Clueless just like overseas aid would not have been possible in Emma’s time as technology was not yet advanced enough. Even though the values in the original text have been transformed in the modern, the audience can see that both Austen’s and Heckerling’s heroines share the common values of marriage, charity and morality.
In just a mere 97 minutes, Amy Heckerling manages to cleverly raise and interpret the themes within the 495 page book by Jane Austen. She manages to convey the themes of social class and wealth, marriage and self development for a modern audience to recognize and relate to. The transformation of the movie stays steadfast to the novel with the addition of witty and humourous characters and contemporary issues that deal with twentieth century teenagers. Heckerling saw the same issues discussed in Emma, present in modern day society and decided to translate them in altered medium of film to present them which worked effectively as the precise components of the book emerged through the performances.
Personality is influenced by one's social position. Emma, being a bildungsroman, traces the moral development of the protagonist, Emma Woodhouse, as she confronts social dilemmas. It is set in the European high society of Highbury. The novel opens with a marriage and ends with more marriages, a romantic convention appealing to a female audience. During the early 19th century, mainly women from the middle to upper classes could read. The setting and form target a certain audience, allowing Austen to effectively challenge the preconceptions of higher class women.
Emma and Cher both abuse the power of wealth and become spoiled, socially dominating, and overly confident with themselves. However, they both feel very comfortable in this lifestyle because of their possessions and social status. Jane Austen secures Emma in the very first paragraph of her novel. She states, "Emma Woodhouse, handsome, clever, and rich, with a comfortable home and happy disposition, seemed to unite some of the best blessings of existence; and had lived nearly twenty-one years in the world with very little to vex her" (Austen 1). Cher has everything a teenager could possibly want: her own jeep, an endless wardrobe, and amounts of money that seems to be collected from a money tree outside the backdoor.
The narrator says, “The real evils indeed of Emma's situation were the power of having rather too much her own way, and a disposition to think a little too well of herself” (Austen 8). Emma is initially portrayed as someone who thinks that only her opinion matters. In his literary criticism, “Personal Virtues in the Context of Class in Jane Austen’s Emma”, Philip Gerebring describes how “Emma has had quite a privileged upbringing [...] which impacts her actions and the way she views other people” (Gerebring). Emma’s decision not to marry at first is directly related to her privilege and wealth. Her high opinion of herself affects her belief that she is “better” than others. In her literary analysis, “The Dilemma of Emma: Moral, Ethical, and Spiritual Values”, Karin Jackson says that “Emma is so engrossed in herself that [...] her fancy, her imagination, and her manipulation of people’s lives are all based on a false perception of reality, despite her grandiose trust in her own judgment” (Jackson). Although this quote can be seen as accurate, it is incorrect because Austen is not criticizing Emma directly, but rather society as a whole and is actually praising Emma’s rebellion against
The opening scene of each film directly corresponds to the first chapter of Austen's novel. In the text this chapter describes Emma Woodhouse as spoiled and self-willed, convinced she knows what is right for other people particularly when it comes to affairs...
The process of transformation of Jane Austen’s nineteenth century novel Emma to Amy Heckerling’s film Clueless has been sensational yet it retained the essential contexts of the original text. This means that while the original plot of Emma has been altered the themes in Clueless remain the same. Relationships and the significance of social structure are still palpable in both texts albeit some differences due to the time periods they were set in. Heckerling’s characters may use the language and slang of the 1990s and have modern-day hobbies and occupations, but they portray similar types of people with a semblance of Austen’s characters: they express egotism, vanity and practice deception, but also demonstrate bildungsroman and perceptive
... But in fact her powers and beauty cannot change the foundation of her society. Emma’s circumscription within the boundaries of her class kept her world under control. This prevents her from considering another society beyond her existence. The confusion from her failed attempts with Harriet due to her guidance, allows her to embrace reality. Jane Austen uses Emma’s character to reveal the quality in the structures of the nineteenth century society. Based on the conclusion of the novel, when Emma is forced to look beyond the limited power and beauty she has and acknowledge the existing order and structure of the early nineteenth century English society.
Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is well noted for its ability to question social norms. Most importantly, Austen explores the institution of marriage, as it was in her time, a time where many married for security rather than love. Her characters Elizabeth and Charlotte are renowned even more for their outspoken nature and different views on marriage. Though both Elizabeth and Charlotte yearn for a happy marriage, Charlotte has a more pragmatic and mundane approach while Elizabeth is more romantic and daring with her actions. Through the romantic involvements of both Elizabeth and Charlotte, Austen shows that happiness in marriage is not entirely a matter of chance, but is instead contingent on an accurate evaluation of self and others
married. However, “for pragmatic reasons, the author’s conclusions favor marriage as the ultimate solution, but her pairings predict happiness” (“Austen, Jane”). Als...
In Jane Austen’s Emma, an emphasis is placed on the importance of female friendships. In particular, Austen places a great deal of emphasis on how Emma treats the women she calls her friends. In many ways, Emma manipulates the people in her life to fit her specific expectations for them. This can be seen in her matchmaking, especially Harriet’s relationship with Mr. Martin. Emma’s manipulation of various relationships serves as a way to control the friendships she has with the women in her life. By matching her friends with the men she has chosen for them, Emma can not only elevate their status but also keep these women in her life as well. It is only when her friendships are affected by marriage that Emma re-evaluates the role of marriage in her own life.
The theme of social status and society is prevalent in the novel of Emma, through the characters Emma, Mr. Knightley, Mr. Churchill, and their situations and perspectives on life. Austen describes Emma as, “handsome, clever, and rich, with a comfortable home and happy disposition, seemed to unite some of the best blessings of existence; and had lived nearly twenty-one years in the world with very little to distress or vex her” makes her outlook disparate from characters such as Harriet (Austen, Emma 3). Immediately through her description, Austen indicates Emma’s haughty perspective on society through her referencing her friends as “first set” and “second set.” Through Emma’s classification of her friends by their social status and importance, first set being the superior and second set being the inferior and locum, the reader is able to have a glimpse of Emma’s outlook on society and it’s classes. Knowledge Notes -.
“ It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.” This sentence, the first of the novel Pride and Prejudice is the statement of one of the major themes in the book. Within this novel there are seven different marriages that exist, and Austen uses each one to represent different attitudes that people have towards marriage in the society in which she lived. In addition, her ultimate goal was to show the reader the marriage that she believes to be the most idealistic one.
In Jane Austen’s social class and coming of age novel, Emma, the relationships between irony, insight and education are based upon the premise of the character of Emma Woodhouse herself. The persona of Emma is portrayed through her ironic and naive tone as she is perceived as a character that seems to know everything, which brings out the comedic disparities of ironies within the narrative. Emma is seen as a little fish in a larger pond, a subject of manipulating people in order to reflect her own perceptions and judgments. Her education is her moral recognition to love outside her own sheltered fancies and her understandings of her society as a whole.
This source is an updated study of the prevailing notion of Jane Austen, at a time in which the paradigms of classical literature were being challenged. This work points out the so-called bravado of Emma, and questions whether Austen intended to position Emma as likeable character or merely a strong and impressive character. The essay borders on Emma's apparent vindictiveness that brings into question key decisions and relationships which Emma displays in the book, all the while intonating that the fascination of Emma is not with who she is, but how she acts towards others. The question of whether Emma is virtuous and true to herself is raised, with a skeptic's eye that points out her frailties as a true heroine.
...Emma’s voice in order to relate the inside ideology, while simultaneously using a somewhat ironic third-person narrative voice in order to provide critical social commentary on the social attitudes of the Highbury society depicted in Emma. Emma’s voice allows the reader to gain an unadultered insight into the lives of the people of Highbury, providing the narrative with a Austen uses a somewhat similar dichotomous technique in Persuasion, in which she splits the novel into two halves -- one in which advocates for the traditional system of formality, and another that works to eradicate the very same system that she extolled so highly in the first half. Under the deceptive guise of “political inaction,” Austen actually provides commentary on the underlying social and political issues that pervade the novel through the literary technique of heteroglossia (Parker 359).