Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Death of a salesman as an American success myth
Theme of success and failure in death of a salesman
The great Gatsby novel comparative literature essay to Death of a Salesman by Arthur Miller
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“The Death of A Salesman” by Arthur Miller and “The Great Gatsby” by Francis Scott Fitzgerald are both tragic illustrations of inevitable failures of capitalistic ambition. Though the play and the novel were both produced during times of economic prosperity, one in the Jazz Age of the Roaring 20s and the other in “the Affluent Society” during the post-World War II boom, both relentlessly denounce the vanity in material pursuits. The two pieces demonstrate differently, however, the two distinct stages of achieving ambitions. Although both writers focus on the disasters that can ensue when pursuing the American Dream, the torture of solitude that follows, and the complexity between illusion and reality, Miller primarily criticizes the first stage …show more content…
Bernard’s success as an attorney is a clear demonstration of the cold fact that the American Dream is universally cruel and impartial, due to its lack of tolerance of emotions. Bernard summarizes the Dream for Willy that “it’s better for a man just to walk away.” (page 68) Yet Willy’s mere inability to “walk away” from his role as a father strips him of the freedom that he would otherwise have for himself. The American Dream only offers Willy two choices—maintenance of his personal moral values such as parental duties or ruthless punishment for incapacity, and he chooses the latter. A successful American Dream in this case is depicted as an improbable result that requires not only dedications, but also courage to relinquish moral duties. Further, Biff’s revelations about the failures of the American Dream further expose the deceptive appearance of capitalism. In stealing a fountain pen, Biff realizes that “all I want is out there, waiting for me the minute I say I know who I am.” The pen is a metaphor for the senseless jobs for people at the bottom of the social hierarchy such as Willy. It represents the incompatibility between people’s work and …show more content…
According to Willy’s neighbor, Charley, for instance, capitalism has produced an unhealthy amount of competition based entirely on sales rather than friendship. He directly exposes that “the only thing you got in this world is what you can sell.” (page 70) Miller portrays a disheartening business world devoid of trust, genuine relationships, and humanness. Also, Willy’s experience of becoming obsolete after “naming Howard” leads him to take Charley’s comment literally and conclude that he would “end up worth more dead than alive.” As he produces few values materially, Willy realizes his path to loneliness and gradually becomes worthless. Miller again illustrates Willy’s solitude in the seed-planting scene. Willy protests about his abysmal situation as he complains that “nothing’s planted. I don’t have a thing in the ground.” (page 90) The seeds are a symbol for Willy’s expectations of the future for his sons and himself, and the garden symbolizes the American capitalistic society, which has brought Willy no sense of accomplishment either as a salesman or as a father. Willy’s quest for capitalism has not only denied his light of future, but also instilled in him an inevitable solitude. Similarly, Gatsby has no real friends. His immense wealth eliminates the possibilities of genuine friends. A sharp contrast between the massive parties thrown in his
Throughout the history of literature, a great deal of authors has tried to reveal a clear understanding of the American Dream. Whether it is possible to achieve lies all in the character the author portrays. The Great Gatsby and The Catcher in the Rye stand as prime examples of this. F. Scott Fitzgerald and J.D. Salinger, the authors of these titles, respectively, fashion flawed characters, Jay Gatsby and Holden Caulfield, with one vital desire: the longing to gain what they can’t have; acceptance and the feeling of belonging. Each retaining characteristics that shows their differences and similarities in opinion of the world around them.
He never realizes what he has lost by chasing after inconceivable dreams; however, Wilder’s Emily reflects on her life after she dies and begins to understand that her lack of appreciation for the little moments took away from the fullness of her life. Even though Wilder and Miller tell two unique stories, they use similar methods to show their thoughts on living and essentially convey the same message about how dreams can ruin people and how not appreciating the little things takes away from the quality of life. After seeing both his father and brother find success, Willy attempts to prove himself to his family by chasing after his own version of the American dream. Willy grew up in the “wild prosperity of the 1920’s” when rags-to-riches tales inspired everybody, making them believe that “achieving material success [is] God’s intention for humankind” (Abbotson, Criticism by Bloom).
“Earth provides enough to satisfy every man 's needs, but not every man 's greed.” As humans, we work countless hours in order to have a greater opportunity to succeed in life to fulfill our wants. F Scott Fitzgerald, author of The Great Gatsby, utilizes effective language and punctuation in the text in order to accomplish his purpose: Illustrate what material goods does to a society. From a rhetorical standpoint, examining logos, ethos, and pathos, this novel serves as a social commentary on how pursuing the “The American Dream” causes people in society to transform into greedy and heartless individuals.
However, Fitzgerald does not write Gatsby as a bad person who embodies all that is wrong with western capitalism. Instead, Fitzgerald portrays Gatsby as a good man who was victim of the qualities ingrained in him by an imperfect ideological system. It is this distinction which makes Fitzgerald’s argument all the more potent, and his audience’s ability to mourn Gatsby as a tragic figure all the more important. Whereas Fitzgerald’s opinion of Gatsby may otherwise have been misconstrued as a negative one, the scene of Gatsby’s funeral clearly conveys the character of Gatsby as a tragic and sorrowful one. The character of Gatsby and Fitzgerald’s commentary on the logical fallacies of the American Dream are closely intertwined, which is why Fitzgerald goes to such great lengths to separate the two.
Through the use of symbolism and critique, F. Scott Fitzgerald is able to elucidate the lifestyles and dreams of variously natured people of the 1920s in his novel, The Great Gatsby. He uses specific characters to signify diverse groups of people, each with their own version of the “American Dream.” Mostly all of the poor dream of transforming from “rags to riches”, while some members of the upper class use other people as their motivators. In any case, no matter how obsessed someone may be about their “American Dream”, Fitzgerald reasons that they are all implausible to attain.
... American Dream that was sold in society at the time after World War II can overshadow the actual meaning in real life. The “American Dream” is, in the end, defined as a comfortable living in a happy house. Instead, the materialistic society back then attempted to sell it in terms of appliances and products that were not needed, and unaffordable. They marketed it to the middle-class by attracting them to the aspect of credit, buying it with money that they don’t have. As Willy’s neighbor claimed at his funeral, Willy was merely a victim of his profession, leaving him with an unhealthy obsession with an image that was unrealistic, especially for them. This dissatisfaction with his life, and his misinterpretation of the “American Dream”, led to his downfall as a tragic hero, and a death that went in vain, as his son failed to follow the plan he had laid out for him.
Introduction Death of a Salesman and Glengarry Glen Ross are two plays which attempt to validate the key values that have been strongly advocated for by capitalism. The two plays dwell on somewhat similar themes, but these themes are presented in different styles. Both Miller and Mamet hold a similar interpretation of success in that the success of the main characters in the two plays is measured from a material standpoint. According to Miller and Mamet, these characters will do anything within their reach to stay ahead of other members of the society (the system/principle of capitalism), but as fate would have it, tragedies befall them in the end. Nevertheless, Miller and Mamet interpret these themes from different perspectives.
While everyone has a different interpretation of the "American Dream," some people use it as an excuse to justify their own greed and selfish desires. Two respected works of modern American literature, The Great Gatsby and Death of a Salesman, give us insight into how the individual interpretation and pursuit of the "American Dream" can produce tragic results. Jay Gatsby, from F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby, built his "American Dream" upon the belief that wealth would win him acceptance. In pursuit of his dream, Gatsby spent his life trying to gain wealth and the refinement he assumes it entails. Jay Gatsby, lacking true refinement, reflects the adolescent image of the wealthy, and "[springs] from his Platonic conception of himself" (Fitzgerald 104).
were not of a very high standard. In Act 1 we see him stealing a ball
Since its publication in 1925, The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald has indisputably been one of the most influential and insightful pieces on the corruption and idealism of the American Dream. The American Dream, defined as ‘The belief that anyone, regardless of where they were born or what class they were born into, can attain their own version of success in a society where upward mobility is possible for everyone,’ was a dominant ideal in American society, stemming from an opportunist pioneer mentality. In his book ‘The American Tradition in Literature’, Bradley Sculley praised The Great Gatsby for being ‘perhaps the most striking fictional analysis of the age of gang barons and the social conditions that produced them.’ Over the years, greed and selfishness changed the basic essence of the American Dream, forming firmly integrated social classes and the uncontainable thirst for money and status. The ‘Roaring Twenties’ was a time of ‘sustained increase in national wealth’ , which consequently led to an increase in materialism and a decrease in morality. Moreover, the
In ‘The Great Gatsby’ Fitzgerald criticises the increase of consumerism in the 1920s and the abandonment of the original American Dream , highlighting that the increased focus on wealth and the social class associated with it has negative effects on relationships and the poorest sections of society. The concept of wealth being used as a measure of success and worth is also explored by Plath in ‘The Bell Jar’. Similarly, she draws attention to the superficial nature of this material American Dream which has extended into the 1960s, but highlights that gender determines people’s worth in society as well as class. Fitzgerald uses setting to criticise society’s loss of morality and the growth of consumerism after the Great War. The rise of the stock market in the 1920s enabled business to prosper in America.
Scott Fitzgerald, author of The Great Gatsby, and Arthur Miller, author of Death of a Salesman, both tell the stories of men in the costly pursuit of the American dream. As a result of several conflicts, both external and internal, both characters experience an extinction of the one thing that they have set their sights on.... The American Dream.
Miller’s use of personification and symbolism in the book shows the situational irony that surrounds Willy. This highlights the overall message of blind faith towards the American Dream. The major case of irony in the book is Willy’s blind faith in the American Dream. This belief is that if one is well-liked, they will become successful. The truth is actually completely opposite. The real belief is that if one works hard, with no regard to how well liked they are, they will be successful. This relationship is shown between Willy and his neighbor Charley. While Willy believes likability is the only way to success, Charley works hard and does not care how people think of him. Through his hard work, Charley started his own business, and is now very successful. Willy, however, ends up getti...
Linda, his wife, thought that it was because he did not have enough money to do what he wanted to, but, as Charley stated, “no man only needs a little salary” (Miller 137). Willy needed more than just money to realize his dream. The struggle of human beings to achieve their goals by idealizing an unrealistic goal which is all about the American dream is too far to reach leads to the many downfalls. In conclusion, Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Miller’s Death of a Salesman shows how dreams can be made and destroyed. By having the American Dream dominate one’s way of life, it can lead to death, just like Gatsby’s and Willy’s.
The Great Gatsby is an American novel of hope and longing, and is one of the very few novels in which “American history finds its figurative form (Churchwell 292).” Gatsby’s “greatness” involves his idealism and optimism for the world, making him a dreamer of sorts. Yet, although the foreground of Fitzgerald’s novel is packed with the sophisticated lives of the rich and the vibrant colors of the Jazz Age, the background consists of the Meyer Wolfsheims, the Rosy Rosenthals, the Al Capones, and others in the vicious hunt for money and the easy life. Both worlds share the universal desire for the right “business gonnegtion,” and where the two worlds meet at the borders, these “gonnegtions” are continually negotiated and followed (James E. Miller). Gatsby was a character meant to fall at the hands of the man meant to be a reality check to the disillusions of the era.