Similarities Between Communism And Eugenics

520 Words2 Pages

Similarities Between Communism and Eugenics

The goals of Communism and Eugenics are similar. One example of this would be the fact that they diminish the societal norm of having more than one class which results in one social class. Not only is the final goal for there to be one social class, but for there to be change in society. Society needs to be fixed and Communism and Eugenics are two ideas that were created to help reach the reform that the nation needs.
Natural selection is a process that eliminates the weak so that only the strong survive. According to Francis Galton, “What nature does blindly, slowly, and ruthlessly, man may do providently, quickly, and kindly.” Why wait for something that is bound to happen, when man can speed up natural selection by getting rid of of the weak so that only the strong survive creating a solitary race resulting in the reproduction of exceptional offspring. On top of the strong and weak social classes, society has …show more content…

Marx and Engels wanted reform. According to them “...the first step in the revolution by the working class is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class to win the battle of democracy.” The underlying message being written by Marx and Engels is that in order to create a societal revolution, the poor needs to overpower the rich and put the government in charge. That would ensure that the rich and poor would be equal, henceforth creating one class which would theoretically decrease the chances of disagreement and social inequality. Eugenics is similar by the fact that the ultimate goal is to create a single perfect race. Galton stated that “EUGENICS is the science which deals with all influences that improve the inborn qualities of a race.” The purpose of Eugenics is to fix the imperfections of subordinate races and get rid of the inferior so that the the strong is the only remaining

Show More
Related

  • The Eugenics Movement for Criminality

    569 Words  | 2 Pages

    The eugenics movement started in the early 1900s and was adopted by doctors and the general public during the 1920s. The movement aimed to create a better society through the monitoring of genetic traits through selective heredity. Over time, eugenics took on two different views. Supporters of positive eugenics believed in promoting childbearing by a class who was “genetically superior.” On the contrary, proponents of negative eugenics tried to monitor society’s flaws through the sterilization of the “inferior.”

    Read More

  • Summary Of The American Eugenics Movement

    1071 Words  | 3 Pages

    The American Eugenics Movement was led by Charles Davenport and was a social agenda to breed out undesirable traits with an aim of racial purification. Eugenics was a used to breed out the worst and weakest to improve the genetic composition of the human race, and advocated for selective breeding to achieve this. The science of eugenics rested on simple mendelian genetics, which was a mistake because they were assuming complex behaviors could be reduced to simple mendelian genes. After Nazi Germany adopted the ideas behind the American eugenics movement to promote the Aryan race, the eugenics movement was completely discredited.

    Read More

  • Eugenics In Dorothy Roberts's Killing The Black Body

    1108 Words  | 3 Pages

    The practice of eugenics was instituted in the late nineteenth century. Its objective was to apply the rearing practices and procedures utilized as a part of plants and creatures to human procreation. Francis Galton expressed in his Essays in Eugenics that he wished to impact "the useful classes" in the public arena to put a greater amount of their DNA in the gene pool. The objective was to gather records of families who were effective by virtue of having three or more grown-up male kids who had better positions than their associates. His perspective on eugenics can best be expressed by the accompanying section:

    Read More

  • Daniel Dennett's Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life

    1006 Words  | 3 Pages

    This is the main point commonly used to dispel notions of Social Darwinism. But it, in my mind, is not sufficient. A few people are doing better in the world than others, and it is not because they are better than the others, or that the others are inferior, it just happened that way because of social circumstances. It has nothing to do with biology. So what! Science here offers no ethical insight; it only prompts indifference. Even if Darwinism is no justification for social injustice, it does nothing to suggest that there is an urgent need for social change. At worst, if one does not take away from this a w...

    Read More

  • Social Darwinism and Social Welfare in the United States

    1245 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to comprehend the present state of these two forces, it is necessary to analyze more completely the meanings of Social Darwinism and Social Welfare. Every since Charles Darwin published the Origin of the Species in 1859, social scientists have attempted to explain human behavior as a product of natural selection. In the 19th century, Social Darwinism held that history was about the "survival of the fittest" and "superior" social groups were evolutionary more fit to rule the world. Social Darwinism was at the heart of many pernicious theories of the past century, including scientific racism and eugenics (Goldfield, et al, 1998, p. 721).

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Eugenics

    702 Words  | 2 Pages

    The eugenics movement was a period of time when it was believe that the genes of your father and mother gave rise to any and all traits, whether it be physical, mental, emotional, behavioral, and moral. Essentially, eugenics established that all of a persons appearance, skill, and potential was rooted in your genes.

    Read More

  • Social Morwinism: The Theory Of Social Darwinism

    757 Words  | 2 Pages

    The theory of Social Darwinism stems from the idea that the human species can progress by following the principal of Charles Darwin’s natural selection, in which he states that plants and animals that can adapt to changes in their environment are able to survive and reproduce, while those that cannot adapt will die. Social Darwinists applied this biological concept to social, political and economic issues, which created the “survival of the fittest” attitude, as well as competition and inequality between social groups. This paper will discuss some of the proponents of this theory, the results of their interpretation and application of the theory, and why this theory no longer holds a prominent position in Anthropological theory.

    Read More

  • The American Eugenics Movement

    1421 Words  | 3 Pages

    The idea of eugenics was first introduced by Sir Francis Galton, who believed that the breeding of two wealthy and successful members of society would produce a child superior to that of two members of the lower class. This assumption was based on the idea that genes for success or particular excellence were present in our DNA, which is passed from parent to child. Despite the blatant lack of research, two men, Georges Vacher de Lapouge and Jon Alfred Mjoen, played to the white supremacists’ desires and claimed that white genes were inherently superior to other races, and with this base formed the first eugenics society. The American Eugenics Movement attempted to unethically obliterate the rising tide of lower classes by immorally mandating organized sterilization and race based experimentation.

    Read More

  • Social Darwinism and Race Superiority In The West

    2028 Words  | 5 Pages

    Most people believe that Social Darwinism is a term that can only be applied to people’s race, and for most well known social Darwinism theories this is true. The basis of these theories is always revolved around the term survival of the fittest. Darwin works where to do with animals and how animal species have ada...

    Read More

  • The Eugenics Movement

    1539 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the 1920s, a company in New York started a movement known as “The Eugenics Movement.” The idea of eugenics was eventually picked up by Germany, China, Peru, India and Bangladesh. The movement is still in effect till this day; however, it is not as prevalent as it once was.

    Read More

  • Atrocities Associated with the Eugenics Movement

    1243 Words  | 3 Pages

    In order to accomplish its goal of producing healthier people, eugenics embraced two goals. First, it attempted to improve certain heritable qualities with the human species through selective breeding. Second, it prevented other "undesirable" qualities from recurring by either restricting reproduction or through direct removal from the gene pool.

    Read More

  • Eugenics: An Excuse To Be A Racist Or A Means To A Better Tomorrow?

    1102 Words  | 3 Pages

    The term eugenics was coined in the late 19th century. Its goal was to apply the breeding practices and techniques used in plants and animals to human reproduction. Francis Galton stated in his Essays in Eugenics that he wished to influence "the useful classes" in society to put more of their DNA in the gene pool. The goal was to collect records of families who were successful by virtue of having three or more adult male children who have gain superior positions to their peers. His view on eugenics can best be summarized by the following passage:

    Read More

  • Social Darwinism, the Gospel of Wealth, and the Gilded Age

    649 Words  | 2 Pages

    Social Darwinism is a late 19th century term used to describe the application of British naturalist Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection to social and political conditions. Late 19th century sociologist Herbert Spencer tried to capture the essence of social Darwinism with his phrase “survival of the fittest”. This essentially meant that the strong would rise to the top while the weak simply died out. Social Darwinists eschew social responsibility and compassion, instead believing that some people are more fit to survive than others. Many social Darwinists advocated that the government should maintain a laissez-faire, or hands off, approach when it came to regulating economic competition and alleviating social inequalities. Social Darwinism was used to justify the consolidation of the majority of wealth by a minority of Americans. The term allowed people to rationalize capitalism, imperialism, racism, and even eugenics. The wealthy believed in social Darwinism because it allowed them to justify their oppressive business tactics and low wages for their labor force. Politicians believed in it because it allowed them to justify imperialism, or expansion of the nation. Affluent Anglo-Saxons believed in social Darwinism, believing themselves to be the superior race, and used it to justify ...

    Read More

  • Essay On Marx And Engels

    2511 Words  | 6 Pages

    Society became divided into different social classes. The two biggest, the proletariat and the bourgeoisie were in conflict with each other. The bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, which were the tools and capital needed to create a successful economy. The proletariat owned nothing. All they could do was work in their difficult factory jobs. Marx and Engels believed that the struggle between the controlling and the non-controlling classes had been taking place throughout all of human history. The goals of communism were mainly about class structure. Marx and Engels wanted to end class conflict, especially between the proletariat and the...

    Read More

  • The Process of Evolution

    980 Words  | 2 Pages

    Natural selection is based on the concept “survival of the fittest” where the most favourable individual best suited in the environment survive and pass on their genes for the next generation. Those individual who are less suited to the environment will die.

    Read More

More about Similarities Between Communism And Eugenics

Open Document