Similarities Between Bernie Sanders And Karl Marx

515 Words2 Pages

Although they bear some superficial similarities, the differences between Bernie Sanders and Karl Marx are striking. Both men are documented as socialist, however Bernie Sanders is a democratic socialist while Karl Marx is the founder of scientific socialism yet both men strive to create the “perfect society” in which everyone is equal and class struggle is nonexistent.
Since both men believe in socialism they are trying to create a world based on “advocating public ownership of means of production, with work and products shared equally among classes.” This is the basis for all forms of socialism. However to create this “perfect society” they must raise wages, reduce the hours actually worked and build schools, housing, and stores to stabilize the social hierarchy. There was a place called New Harmony in Indiana where these beliefs were practiced. This included breaking society down into phalansteries, or small units based on …show more content…

This includes the fact that scientific socialism is based on the primary ideology of protest and revolution while democratic socialism is based around how to meet public needs and how to not make profits for a few. Bernie Sanders attracts the attention of millennial because there is a difference between his beliefs and “Cold War Socialism”. This democratic socialist has promised free higher education and free health care, however this does not come without a price tag. The tax rate would shoot sky high to cover these costs of “free” amenities. Yet in Karl Marx’s case the scientific socialist believes men are corrupted by artificial institutions. This belief would lead to the development of communism which was founded on the inherent goodness of man. Marx was intending to break humanity’s vicious cycle of class struggle. These forms of socialism both rely on society's ability to accept an equal economy for all rates of

Show More
Related

  • Similarities Between Martin Luther King Jr And Susan B Anthony

    595 Words  | 2 Pages

    The similarity between Susan B. Anthony speech and Martin Luther King Juniors “I Have a Dream” speech is that they are fighting for the equality of America. Susan B. Anthony is fighting for women being able to vote like everyone else. Martin Luther King is fighting for the equality of African Americans. Both just want to see America as an equal place instead of discrimination against others based on race or gender. Even though their message has similarities the way they delivered them was different.

    Read More

  • Obama the Marxist

    987 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marx believed in socialism and that communism would eventually follow. He argued that social theorists and underprivileged people should topple capitalism and bring about socio-economic change. This is the ‘change we can believe in’ touted by Obama.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Karl Marx's Writing Of The Communist Manifesto

    2472 Words  | 5 Pages

    Karl Marx 's writing of ‘The Communist Manifesto’ in 1848 has been documented by a vast number of academics as one of the most influential pieces of political texts written in the modern era. Its ideologically driven ideas formed the solid foundation of the Communist movement throughout the 20th century, offering a greater alternative for those who were rapidly becoming disillusioned and frustrated with the growing wealth and social divisions created by capitalism. A feeling not just felt in by a couple of individuals in one society, but a feeling that was spreading throughout various societies worldwide. As Toma highlights in his work, Marx felt that ‘capitalism would produce a crisis-ridden, polarized society destined to be taken over by

    Read More

  • 1750-1900 Questions

    756 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marxism, Socialism and Communism have the same idea in common, the abolition of private property and Utopian Statism, a Far Left agenda. Marxism theorized that once the workers took over, government would wither away, but it did not. Socialism involves Marxist ideas and radical wealth redistribution and all property is seized by the government, this collectivism would cause multimillion slaughters, such as that of Hitler, Stalin, Zedong. Communism, where government is fully in charge of a new totalitarian state, has everyone working the benefit of everyone and government, almost always at gun point. Of all of these beliefs of equality and getting even with “the man”, all of them result in the abolition of liberty and individualism.

    Read More

  • Anarchism and Marxism: A Comparative Study on Equality

    1496 Words  | 3 Pages

    Both argue that the structures in place that are meant to maintain order, in actuality are not in the general interest and make problems worse. “In bourgeois society, living labor is but a means to increase accumulated labor.”(Marx, 19) The bourgeoisie benefit from the oppression of the proletariat through the means of production. Marx argues that to fix this problem of the proletariat being oppressed would be for the state to own the means of production. “The executive of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.”(Marx, 5) Marx argues that the government in place at that moment was not there to ensure the public interest but the interest of a select

    Read More

  • Communism In The U.S.

    1019 Words  | 3 Pages

    Karl Marx, author of The Communist Manifesto and Das Marx, was the originator of the political and economic theory of Scientific Socialism (modern Communism). Communism, by definition, is the complete control of major resources and the means of production by government, initially in the form of autocracy. In theory, under this system all would be equal; all would share in both work, according to their ability, and profit, according to need. According to Marx, the proletariat, or working class, would revolt against the bourgeoisie, or wealthy capitalist class, because of the stark contrast prevalent between the wealthy and poor. The new economy, run by and for the people, would produce not for profit, but for the needs of the people.

    Read More

  • Research Paper On Bernie Sanders

    1490 Words  | 3 Pages

    Bernie Sanders is the former senator of the state of Vermont and is currently running to be the democratic representative in the 2016 Presidential Election. Bernie Sanders has stated that he is a socialist democrat but it is unclear whether he is either a socialist or a liberal. His statement is unclear because on some topics he takes on more liberal view than a socialist view. Bernie Sanders is known for being a strong believer of the government helping out the economy more and having the wealthy pay more taxes. He wants less poverty in society and help it have a consistent middle class. Two issues that I agree with Bernie on is his views on helping the economy and his views on the war on terror. Bernie Sanders is a strong supporter

    Read More

  • Wealth and Poverty: Karl Marx

    1702 Words  | 4 Pages

    Karl Marx, a German philosopher, saw this inequality growing between what he called "the bourgeoisie" and "the proletariat" classes. The bourgeoisie was the middle/upper class which was growing in due to the industrial revolution, and the proletariats were the working class, the poor. These two classes set themselves apart by many different factors. Marx saw five big problems that set the proletariat and the bourgeoisie aside from each other. These five problems were: The dominance of the bourgeoisie over the proletariat, the ownership of private property, the set-up of the family, the level of education, and their influence in government. Marx, in The Communist Manifesto, exposes these five factors which the bourgeoisie had against the communist, and deals with each one fairly. As for the proletariat class, Marx proposes a different economic system where inequality between social classes would not exist.

    Read More

  • Disagreements On Marxism And Karl Marx's Views On Capitalism

    1337 Words  | 3 Pages

    Karl Marx lived from 1818-1883 and was alive during the Industrial Revolution which was a time that moved Europeans to cities from rural farming.. Marx observed the economy he lived in and saw the huge flaws with capitalism. Poverty, class conflicts and private property were all flaws of capitalism that Marx thought we could avoid if historical change took place. Capitalism according to Marx is an extremely unsatisfactory government system that gives power to the upper class landowners and keeps the proletariat exploited. The proletariat in a Capitalist society are continually exploited for their labor and don’t receive any of the profits for the item they produced for their firm. Shareholders of the firm end up being the ones who reap the rewards from the company even though they have nothing to do with manufacturing the good expect investing money. Marx insists that society would be better off if working class individuals controlled and owned all of the capital in the economy. In a capitalist society the bourgeoisie make huge amounts of money off the proletariat which is something that can’t last forever. Marx argued that as time passes increasing tensions between classes will surface and end capitalism altogether. Essentially, the lower class will revolt and force the government to abolish the capitalist system by putting in place socialism. Socialism doesn’t support alienated labor or employees as commodities for sale. Alienation of labor occurs in a capitalist society according to Ma...

    Read More

  • Marx, Weber, Durkheim, and Simmel: The Relationship between Society and the Individual

    3473 Words  | 7 Pages

    Karl Marx noted that society was highly stratified in that most of the individuals in society, those who worked the hardest, were also the ones who received the least from the benefits of their labor. In reaction to this observation, Karl Marx wrote The Communist Manifesto where he described a new society, a more perfect society, a communist society. Marx envisioned a society, in which all property is held in common, that is a society in which one individual did not receive more than another, but in which all individuals shared in the benefits of collective labor (Marx #11, p. 262). In order to accomplish such a task Marx needed to find a relationship between the individual and society that accounted for social change. For Marx such relationship was from the historical mode of production, through the exploits of wage labor, and thus the individual’s relationship to the mode of production (Marx #11, p. 256).

    Read More

  • Differentiating Marx and Rousseau

    2202 Words  | 5 Pages

    Despite their different approaches, both theories conclude in universal equality, a real equality between humans that has never before been observed in any lasting civilization. While both theories operate on reason and seem to be sound, they remain unproven due to their contingency on various factors of time and place, but mainly on their prerequisite of incorruptibility. Now, while both theories may very well have the odds dramatically stacked against their favor, I believe they must be thoroughly dissected for their content before attempting to condemn them to utopianism. In his Manifesto of the Communist Party Karl Marx created a radical theory revolving not around the man-made institution of government itself, but around the ever present guiding vice of man that is materialism and the economic classes that stemmed from it. By unfolding the relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat, Marx is able to outline a repeating variable....

    Read More

  • Karl Marx And The Communist Manifesto

    1347 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...nt the works of Marx. The result became a system where emotion triumphed over practicality, and the central message was blurred by the overthrow of the old regime. Thus, Lenin followed Marx in the general ideas of socialism, where everyone was equal under the law, and worked for each other and the common good. While Lenin’s system did manage to create a proletariat class, it also evoked the formation of the corrupt and power hungry Bolshevik Party. With regard to the Populists and Anarchists, Lenin was transformed into a revolutionary who would not stop at anything in the pursuit of Communism. Furthermore, Lenin followed to a lesser extent the Social Democrats and their views on the threat of the peasantry if they were not properly maintained. It is clearly evident that in following other philosophies, Lenin mutated Communism into a form unrecognizable to true Marxism

    Read More

  • The Sociological Contribution of Karl Marx to an Understanding of Contemporary Society

    909 Words  | 2 Pages

    Karl Marx was a philosopher, a social scientist, and also a historian. He is also known as a revolutionary whose ideas and theories are known as scientific socialism or Marxism? Marxism helps us to understand society and the way in which individuals within society behave and the reasoning behind this. behaviour. The adage is a sham.

    Read More

  • The Political Philosophy of Karl Marx

    2291 Words  | 5 Pages

    Karl Marx was a German philosopher and political theorist. He developed the socio-political theory of Marxism. One of his most famous works is The Communist Manifesto that he co-wrote with Friedrich Engels. In The Communist Manifesto, Marx discusses his theories on society, economics and politics. He believed that “all societies progress through the dialectic of class struggle”. He criticized capitalism, and referred to it as the "dictatorship of the bourgeoisie". Marx believed that capitalism was unfair because the rich middle and upper class people manipulated the system and used it for their own benefit while we get the short end of the stick. We, being average Americans— like myself— who go to college full-time, juggle a job, and yet are constantly struggling just to make ends meet: the unappreciated, exploited and underpaid every day h...

    Read More

  • A Good Society Essay

    884 Words  | 2 Pages

    Marx thought of a society that would create equality and bring power to the people. He didn 't expect society to be totally equal but a society with distributed justice. According to Marx, a good society is when there is no exploitation. To get rid of exploitation, we have to get rid of surplus values and make everyone equal. But Marx also knows that no good society can exist as long as exploitation is allowed. That is why some societies will want a Marx type of living and some will not. A society that has used and embodied the Marxist tradition is Russia. They have used Marx ideas and lived by the communist manifesto. This way of life worked for many years and to the people of Russia, it made a good society. But to people outside of Russia, people who lived in a democratic state or country, they looked at it as a failed society. A type of society that should not be allowed to exist in the world of democracy. But like Marx said, some societies will be able to live in a Marxist environment and some won’t. Marx also states, “ In a communist society, the working class will be more important than the capital class”(M 10-25-2016). By having everyone equal, this allows for class conflict to be no more and exploitation not exist. Marx knows there can be no good society but a Marxist society will do its best to form a ideal

    Read More

More about Similarities Between Bernie Sanders And Karl Marx

Open Document