Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of immigration on American culture
Influence of immigration in America on 20th century culture
Essay on John F. Kennedy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of immigration on American culture
In the excerpts entitled “A Quilt of a Country” by Anna Quindlen and “The Immigrant Contribution” by John F. Kennedy, Throughout both it was brought to my attention that these two excerpts have some similarities in them as well as their many differences. A topic that both covered was how America wouldn’t be America without immigrants. One concept about immigrants that we need to understand is that we are all different and all share our own different story/background. One Similarity between “A Quilt of a Country” and “The Immigrant Contribution” is how they both talk about how we are all different. “America is an improbable idea. A mongrel nation built of every changing disparate parts, it is held together by a notion, the notion that all men are created equal, though everyone knows that most men consider themselves better than someone(Quindlen, 13).” In this quote Quindlen refers to America as a mongrel nation while Kennedy refers to America as a melting pot. The idea of …show more content…
a mongrel nation and a melting pot are a part of the same idea, just different wording. “The ideal of the “melting pot” symbolized the process of blending many strains into a single nationality, and we have come to realize in modern times that the the “melting pot” need not mean the end of particular ethnic identities or traditions (Kennedy, 27).” These two authors, Quindlen and Kennedy, both believe that Americans come from all different backgrounds. Even though Quindlen and Kennedy had a few similarities, they also had a few differences.
“Historians today bemoan the ascendancy of a kind of prideful apartheid in America, saying that the clinging to ethnicity, in background and custom, has undermined the concept of unity. These historians must have forgotten the past, or have gilded it (Quindlen, 14).” The understanding of this quote is that we have forgotten the concept of unity because of our different backgrounds. Quindlen’s essay is stating that we have forgot about unity but Kennedy states how immigrants have added truementisally to our country but we still have our unity. “Perhaps the most pervasive influence of immigration is to be found in the innumerable details of life and the customs and habits brought by millions of people who never became famous. This impact was felt from the bottom up,and these contributions to American institutes may be the ones which most intimately affect the lives of all Americans
(Kennedy,26).”
This week I enjoyed reading Lauren Berlant’s reading, “Citizenship” and one section that stood out to me what on the U.S. Naturalization Act of 1790. This section of her article made me think about/understand through different ways the role that immigrants have had in the U.S. For instance, Berlant points out that the U.S. Naturalization Act of 1790 essentially excluded some groups of immigrants from become citizens because the requirements were freedom and whiteness. Therefore, African slaves did not have the chance of becoming citizens because they could not sell their own labor and they were not white. In addition, other immigrants who could sell their labor, but if they were not white, they could not have full rights of citizenship (e.g.
The ability for people to look at a situation from a different perspective is vital in today’s globalized society. Diversity is the most important core attribute we share that gives us a new perspective to assess situations differently through our diverse backgrounds and upbringings. Unlike Patrick J. Buchanan’s argument in his essay titled “Deconstructing America,” diversity is not a burden, but rather a necessity in America’s culture. Conversely, Fredrickson 's essay titled, “Models of American Ethnic Relations: A Historical Perspective,” illustrated a more precise version of American history that disproves Buchanan’s ethnocentric ideologies. Buchanan speaks of diversity as a narrow, one-way street. The imprecise interpretations of history
Moving from the unpleasant life in the old country to America is a glorious moment for an immigrant family that is highlighted and told by many personal accounts over the course of history. Many people write about the long boat ride, seeing The Statue of Liberty and the “golden” lined streets of New York City and how it brought them hope and comfort that they too could be successful in American and make it their home. Few authors tend to highlight the social and political developments that they encountered in the new world and how it affected people’s identity and the community that they lived in. Authors from the literature that we read in class highlight these developments in the world around them, more particularly the struggles of assimilating
Quilt of a Country by Anna Quindlen and Making the Future Better Together by Eboo Patel are two different books that overlap with each other multiple times. Eboo Patel focuses mainly on the future of our youth, while Anna Quindlen writes about our patchwork nation. In both essays you see talk of diversity and unity. Anna Quindlen focuses on how different our nation is. She talks about how big issues the United States used to face, such as when the Irish and Italians of Boston feuded years ago.
When the class was first asked to think of a topic for our reflective paper, this scenario was one that I could vividly remember as if it had just occurred yesterday. After I read Jose Antonio Vargas’s “Life as an Undocumented Immigrant” and Amy Tan’s “Mother Tongue”, I noticed a common theme across these two pieces that I could very much relate to. Jose Antonio Vargas’s mother reminded him to fit into the American way of living by saying “If anyone asked why I was coming to America, I should say I was
Following the 1890’s, the world began to undergo the first stages of globalization. Countries and peoples, who, until now, were barely connected, now found themselves neighbors in a planet vastly resembling a global village. Despite the idealized image of camaraderie and brotherhood this may seem to suggest, the reality was only discrimination and distrust. Immigration to new lands became a far more difficult affair, as emigrants from different nations came to be viewed as increasingly foreign. In the white-dominated society of the United States during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the only way to truly count oneself as American was to become “white”. For this reason, the idea of race, a socially constructed issue with no real physical basis, has become one of the most defining factors which shape immigration and assimilation in the United States.
Some would say, quotes John F. Kennedy, “Everywhere immigrants have enriched and strengthened the fabric of American life.” Thus, in today’s society, we can say that immigrants are what made America possible—economically and socially. We are in a melting pot era where the impossible was made possible. From the time John F. Kennedy was elected in 1960, making a promise to change the national origins system to unite the nations of all countries equally. Hence, in 1965, under Lyndon Johnson’s administration, Kennedy’s promise came into light, amending the INS—favoring unification of families, not national origins. Although, the unification was made possible, the peacefulness never lasted.
In both of these stories they talked about the contributions that immigrants made to America. “Nearly all shared two great hopes: personal freedom and hope for economic opportunity.” Kennedy said. Kennedy also states, “Every aspect of the American economy has profited from the contributions of immigrants.” Both people agree that every ethnic minority helped strengthened the fabric of liberty in American life. In both stories American’s found ways to bridge
Diversity is what built America. This is supported by John F. Kennedy’s “ The Immigrant Contribution from A Nation of Immigrants” and Anna Quindlen’s “A quilt of a Country” essay dictons. Both of Quindlen’s diction characteristics are abstract and sophisticated, while John F. Kenney’s diction characteristics are concrete and abstract.
The. Kessner, Thomas and Betty Boyd Caroli, “Today’s Immigrants, Their Stories.” Kiniry and Rose, 343-346. Print. The. Portes, Alejandro and Ruben G. Rumbaut, “Immigrant America: A Portrait.” Kiniry and Rose, 336-337.
America is sometimes referred to as a "nation of immigrants" because of our largely open-door policy toward accepting foreigners pursuing their vision of the American Dream. Recently, there has been a clamor by some politicians and citizens toward creating a predominantly closed-door policy on immigration, arguing that immigrants "threaten" American life by creating unemployment by taking jobs from American workers, using much-needed social services, and encroaching on the "American way of life." While these arguments may seem valid to many, they are almost overwhelmingly false, and more than likely confused with the subject of illegal immigration. In fact, immigrants actually enhance American life by creating, not taking jobs, bolster social service funds through tax payments, and bring valuable technical knowledge and skills to our country. If we are to continue to excel as a nation, the traditionalists who fear an encroachment of foreign-born Americans must learn to accept that we achieved our greatness as a result of being "a nation of immigrants."
A Different Mirror by Ronald Takaki provides an insight of America’s multicultural nation. He shares the history of the non-European minorities who have settled and contributed to the growth in America. However, many do not view them as Americans today because they still follow the Master Narrative. This teaching only focuses on the European settlement and their history in America, therefore, causing no acknowledgement to the minorities. Takaki challenges the Master Narrative as an incorrect teaching because it does not reflect America’s full history. America has always been racially and ethnically diverse. Thus, he hopes to move them away from the Master Narrative and learn from his teachings that non-Europeans are Americans despite their
The main purpose of the two essays, Quindlen’s A Quilt of a Country and Kennedy’s The Immigrant Contribution is to inform the reader about how the immigrants offered many ideas and talents to the development of the United States. The two writers explained how the immigrants made different contributions to the development of the United States by using different types of diction and by appealing to your emotions or adding different kinds of fact and making to paper more informational. A Quilt of a Country appeals more to your emotion and how you feel about the immigrants, while The Immigrant Contribution adds more facts and gives you proof of how immigrants helped develop the country. There are two main differences in how the two authors explains their ideas whether it is emotional or informational.
This quote is symbolic of the expressed opinions and ideology of the founding fathers of America. History, especially the history of the American educational system, paints a contradictory portrait. Idealistic visions of equity and cultural integration are constantly bantered about; however, they are rarely implemented and materialized. All men are indeed created equal, but not all men are treated equally. For years, educators and society as a whole have performed a great disservice to minorities in the public school sector. If each student is of equal value, worth, and merit, then each student should have equal access and exposure to culturally reflective learning opportunities. In the past, minorities have had a muted voice because of the attitude of the majority. Maxine Greene summarizes a scene from E.L. Doctorow’s Ragtime, after which she poses questions that many minorities have no doubt asked silently or loud. “Why is he unseen? Why were there no Negroes, no immigrants? More than likely because of the condition of the minds of those in power, minds that bestowed upon many others the same invisibility that Ellison’s narrator encounters” (Greene,1995, p. 159). Multicultural education is needed because it seeks to eradicate “invisibility” and give voice, power, and validation to the contributions and achievements of people with varied hues, backgrounds, and experiences.
“We are here because we were there.” These are not merely words that bleed ink onto a page. But, it is a collection of the voices of immigrants from across the world who took a chance on America. The United States is to be this land of supposed freedom, great opportunity, and undefined possibility which is seductive and alluring to eyes of those not in the U.S. The uniqueness of our world as it clashes with the various distinctive idiosyncratic humanities of others is a place with flaws and room to grow. Moreover, it too is a symbol of chao and hope to the immigrants whom not only came to explore promises of a better tomorrow but, to struggle a little less than yesterday.