Every second of everyday people talk. When people talk they spread their owns beliefs and most of the time they don't usually match up. People interact with others whom they disagree with often, reacting in different ways that are shown in literature. More specifically, To Kill A Mockingbird a novel by Harper Lee, Twelve Angry Men a play written by Reginald Rose, and Ronald J. Allen’s “American Flag Stands For Tolerance” which is his response to the Supreme Court's decision to consider flag burning an act of freedom of expression. All of these pieces of literature show how people act when faced with others whom they disagree with. Most people either accept or reject others with whom they disagree, whereas some are undecided. The decisions …show more content…
are based on the person’s character traits: people who accept are respectful and understanding, people who reject are close minded, and people who are undecided do not fully understand the situation. People accept others whom they disagree with because they are considerate. When responding to the Supreme Court decision about the Texas Vs. Johnson case, Ronald J. Allen speaks of the flag symbolizing tolerance. He states his opinion about the flag, showing his acceptance towards the decision even though he was against the flag burning. His opinion is shown when he states, “More than anything else, the flag stands for the free expression of ideas, no matter how distasteful”. Allen understands that a core value of the flag is freedom of expression, regardless of how much he disagrees with the content. Even though he thinks flag burning is horrible, he respects the Supreme Court Decision because he is considerate of the others point of view. People tend to accept those whom they disagree with because they are an understanding person. Another source that supports this claims is To Kill A Mockingbird. After Mrs. Dubose, a neighbor that Jem did not like died, Atticus talks to Jem about her. He mentions how even though he and Mrs. Dubose disagreed he still accepts her. Atticus shows his acception when he says, “ ‘She had her own views about things, a lot different from mine… She was the bravest person I ever knew’ ” (Lee 149). Atticus accepts Mrs. Dubose despite the fact that she has certain views he disagrees with. Atticus is a considerate man which is why he accepts Mrs. Dubose. He looks past their disagreements and chooses to see the good, respecting Mrs. Dubose by calling her courageous. Humans who are respectful are able to accept those with whom they have a disagreement with. When faced with someone whom they disagree, people who are tactful still accept them. People who are stubborn reject those whom they disagree with because they believe they are infallible.
Francis speaks of Atticus in a condescending way to Scout. He insults Atticus because he heard Aunt Alexandra disagrees and does not support Atticus’s trail case. He then builds off what he hears and forms his own opinion, taunting Scout, which results in her objecting his claim. He shows his opinion to Scout when he says, “ ‘He’s nothin’ but a nigger-lover,” Scout opposes saying, ‘He is not!’ ” (Lee 110). Francis dislikes Atticus because of what he heard from Aunt Alexandra. He is unwilling to open his mind and take different ideas in. He does not think his opinion could be wrong, which is why he rejects Scout when she disagrees with him. Others who are close minded are rejecting of others’ input with whom they disagree with since they do not believe they can be wrong. An additional source is Twelve Angry Men. When the evidence for the trail was being sifted through by the jurors, a lot of jurors put in new ideas that proved the defendant to be not guilty. Jurior #3 did not take into consideration of any of the other jurors’ input and rejected them all. His rejection is shown when he states, “I’m ready to walk into court right now and declare a hung jury” (Rose 246). Juror #3 was so set on his own opinion that he rejected all of the other jurors’ input, ready to end it all by proclaiming a hung jury. He is close minded and believes that it is impossible for his judgement to be wrong, which is why he rejects any ideas that contradict his stance on the defendant being guilty. Stubborn people who think their reasoning is flawless, reject everyone else who disagrees with them. Narrow minded people are rejecting of those whom they disagree with since they believe their own thought are
impeccable. People are undecided about others who disagree with them because they don’t fully comprehend their own opinions. Aunt Alexandra comes to live with Scout to influence her more to be a lady. She disagrees with Scouts ways, but is undecided about Scout as a whole, because she is trying to accept her. Aunt Alexandra shows her indecisiveness when Scout states, “When I appeared in the doorway, Aunty would look as if she regretted her request” (Lee 176). Aunt Alexandra gives the effort to call Scout to join her, but then is starts to regret her decision once Scout fulfills her request. She is undecided about Scout because she doesn’t understand how she feels about Scout. She doesn’t understand her own stance because sometimes she is accepting but other times she is not. The reason people are undecided about others they disagree with because they are confused about their own stance. Furthermore, Jem is also undecided about Scout. As he matures his views are changing, he finds himself starting to reject Scout when they get into a disagreement, when he use to accept her. His rejection is shown towards Scout when he says, “ ‘I declare to the Lord you’re gettin’ more like a girl every day!’ ” (Lee 69). Jem is started to see Scout in a different light and is insulting her by calling her a girl when he disagrees with her, but he still hang around her and plays with her. Jem does not understand his own opinion about Scout anymore because he is being pulled in two different directions whenever he interacts with her. He does not know how he truly feels about Scout after his disagreement. Humans that are not able to fully grasp how they feel are undecided about others with sime they have a disagreement. When people do not fully understand their own beliefs they are undecided towards other who they disagree with. In general, people either are accepting, rejecting, or undecided about others who they disagree with because of their personality traits. People that accept others are understanding and respectful, people who reject are small minded, and people that are undecided do not know what they truly believe. Every person reacts and handles themselves differently when faced with those whom they have a conflict with. These different reactions are what give humans individuality. It differentiates any two people, making every person unique.
“[T]here is one way in this country in which all men are created equal- there is one human institution that makes a pauper the equal of a Rockefeller; the stupid man the equal of an Einstein, and the ignorant man the equal of any college president. That institution, gentlemen, is a court” (Lee 233). These are the words uttered by Atticus Finch, an important character in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. Atticus is a lawyer, and at this point in the novel, he is trying to defend Tom Robinson, a black man who was accused of raping a white woman. This reflects upon how society was in the 1930’s, when the color of your skin affected your chances of winning a trial. In fact, it is speculated that To Kill a Mockingbird is loosely based off of the trials of the Scottsboro Boys, a famous case from this time period. Most of the main characters associated with both trials share similar traits, experiences, and backgrounds.
In this scene, a Mad Rabid dog, named Tim Johnson, comes through the streets of a the town of Maycomb.
The Scottsboro Trial and the Tom Robinson Trial are almost identical in the forms of racism and prejudice shown and the the actual trial and the trials outcome. The racism and prejudice is clear and is a key factor throughout both cases, which took place in the same time period. Both trials are very common when it came to the time period, the time the trials have taken place in, those who were persecuted and lastly, why they were persecuted in the first place. “All blacks were liars, and always was not to be trusted was a major part of all of these trails” was the thought during this time. Someone that was white was believed no matter what when it came to a black mans word. Both trials were perfect examples of how the white people of Alabama were above the law. They showed that they could do whatever they wanted to the black people and get away with it. Examples in To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee, Portrayed similar factual evidence that the Tom Robinson trial and the Scottsboro Trial are similar.
In real life there are many different types of people, some of them are similar
As Atticus is wrapping up his speech, he addresses the courtroom about court. “‘A court is only as sound as its jury, and a jury is only as sound as the men that make it up’” (Lee 274), is an appeal to logos because a court is only fair if the people of the jury are fair. Singling out the jury puts more pressure on them to make the transparent decision that Tom Robinson is not
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is one of the most successful works of fiction in American Literature. Although To Kill a Mockingbird is classified as a work of fiction, there is evidence to support the claim that To Kill a Mockingbird was modeled after the Scottsboro Trials of 1931. There are many parallels between the trial of Tom Robinson and the Scottsboro Trials. The Scottsboro Boys were nine, young, African American men who were falsely accused of raping two white women while illegally riding a train in Alabama. Harper Lee was also about six years old when these trials took place. This is the reason why Harper Lee chose to write her novel through the eyes of a six year old. The trials inspired her to write To Kill a Mockingbird. Harper
Atticus criticizes, “...-the evil assumption-that all Negroes lie, that all Negroes are basically immoral beings, that all Negroes are not to be trusted around our women, an assumption that one associates with minds of their calibre.” Atticus denounces all those that associate evilness with being a Negro. Atticus is proving that a majority of the people in the courtroom associate Negroes with lies or cruel deeds, and they are under an evil assumption. Atticus evokes this feeling from the jury in order to demonstrate that anyone can lie, be immortal, or untrustworthy, not just Negroes. Atticus wants the jury to understand that we should not identify a Negro as being bad simply because of their shade of their skin. Atticus is challenging everyone, the jury in particular, to analyze individuals by their actions rather than by
In his introduction, Atticus cautions the jury to be objective in their verdict, reminding them the doctrine of presumed innocence. He explains, “Gentlemen, I shall be brief, but I would like to use my remaining time with you to remind you that this case is not a difficult one, it requires no minute sifting of complicated facts, but it does require you to be sure beyond reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant.” His use of the word “but” is cautionary, warning the jurors that there is no place for personal bias in the court and highlighting their legal obligation. Additionally, he employs an impassioned voice in his emotional appeal, drawing attention to the ethical question of the trial. When he states, “This case is as simple as black and white,” he acknowledges the ideological nature of it, expressing distaste for the racial prejudice that brought Tom Robinson under the court’s gaze.
To Kill a Mockingbird is a phenomenal book that portrays life in the South during the 1930’s. This poverty stricken time, in which many struggled to get through, seemed to never grow dull by the means of the Finch family. Harper Lee’s award winning book was captured in a film containing the same title. Although the movie was in black and white and average in length, it lived up to the vivid story depicted within many pages. This worldwide hit reached many minds, but it is up to the people to decide which one is better: the book or the movie.
As most everyone knows, there are differences between a book and it’s movie adaptation. This is applicable to the book and it’s movie counterpart To Kill a Mockingbird, as well. But aside from the differences, there are also similarities between these two.
The text To kill a mockingbird (TKAM) written by harper Lee depicts the story of life in the south of America in the 1930’s as seen through a young girl, Scout Finch. Although a coming of age story TKAM also concentrates very heavily on prejudice. This include racial, social and gender prejudicial attitudes. This is where TKAM connects to Reginald Rose’s play twelve angry men (TAM) where social, racial and personal prejudice attitudes begin to effect the results of a court case. The two texts differ however, as the prejudice in TAM was able to be overcome by the men, where as in TKAM readers were instead shown what happens when people’s prejudicial views cannot be battled, and this resulted in two very different outcomes
This quote shows how fair Atticus is, he’s trying to understand other people in different situations. His advice is very true and is valid throughout the entire book, it could even be considered a theme on it’s own. Atticus’ quality of respect is very high and continues on into the trial further into the book which helps him during the case and helps Lee build to the theme: “‘Gentleman,’ he was saying ‘I shall be brief, but I would like to use my remaining time with you to remind you that this case is not a difficult one, it requires no minute sifting of complicated facts, but it does require you to be sure beyond all reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the defendant. To begin with, this case should never have come to trial. This case is as simple as black and white,” Lee 271 Atticus voices in his final words at the trial.
A Time to Kill and To Kill a Mockingbird both have a number of similarities to be compared and contrasted. Both stories can be compared in their themes about justice and racial prejudice. However, this is where the similarities end. The themes and ideas in both novels are vastly different in shape and scope. In A Time to Kill justice is the main theme and most of the ideas are focused on justice and the gray in between the lines of black and white set by the law, racial prejudice is also touched upon very frequently in the comparisons between Jake Brigance and Carl Lee Hailey and how he wouldn't even have had to face trial if he was a white man. In To Kill a Mockingbird justice is a theme which is not expanded upon or explained in nearly as much detail as it is in A Time to Kill. To Kill a Mockingbird also has a much larger variety in it's themes, ranging from the themes of justice to the exploration of a child's way of perceiving right and wrong as well as the idea of coming of age. These stories are honestly and objectively far more different than they are alike.
Atticus, he does not sway away from his righteous morals. Judge Taylor appoints Atticus to take the Tom Robinson case because he knows Atticus is the only one who will defend Tom. Along with the townspeople, Atticus’ family criticizes and insults him. Francis
Harper Lee addresses prejudice, tolerance, and the courage it takes to make a societal change. For instance, Harper grew up hearing the reactions and suffrage taking place during the Scottsboro trial. She takes inspiration for her novel by including an all white jury, rushed trials, and an attempted lynching in her retelling. Both the Tom Robinson trial and the Scottsboro