Silence Is a Woman's Glory

1092 Words3 Pages

"Silence is a woman's glory." Although this may have held true during the times of ancient Greeks, and although the un-silence of a woman is her glory today, one finds within Greek political theory, a critique of the idea. Regardless of that the ancient code for how women should be, especially exemplified in Athenian culture, philosophers, especially Euripides have questioned this idea in relation to the idea of Athenian democracy. I will use Aristotle's Politics, Suppliant Women and Children of Heracles by Euripides to show that although women weren't technically "citizens", they spoke and acted as if they were. Euripides's plays portray women who have the abilities to act politically.

In the Politics, Aristotle had definite criteria of what a citizen is, what they embodied, and why women couldn't be considered citizens. Determination of citizenship was a screening process for the soul in which only freemen would be able to succeed for slaves didn't have the qualities and the women were politically repressed: "Although the parts of the soul are present in all of them, they are present in different degrees. For the slave has no deliberative faculty at all; the women has, but it is without authority."(Pg. 4)

A citizen was also someone that took part in the democratic process for definition of being a citizen was one "who holds a judicial or legislative office" (Pg. 6). I interpret this as Aristotle stating that if women had authority to serve the public they would have been able to become citizens granted that they were inferiors. "It is clear that the rule of the soul over the body, and of the mind and the rational element over the passionate, is natural and expedient; whereas the equality of the two or the rul...

... middle of paper ...

...omen were politically powerless not because they wanted it that way but because it was men's power that made women powerless. These men did not advocate a democracy that included women. Women were told to "bear pain" which had multiple meaning behind the phrase. It was supposed to be bearing pain of childhood, bearing the pain within their life, to grieve, and to bear or "delight" their husband.

So how would the democracy be like if women were considered as citizens? Euripides took that under consideration and he wrote plays like Suppliant Women and Children of Heracles that showed women making crucial decisions and acting "like men." Perhaps his plays were written in vain and most men saw it as entertainment or perhaps it made the male citizens of Athens wonder how life would be if their mother, sister, or wife were able to help them in the public realm.

Open Document