Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role and task of women in the military
Women in the military present and past essays
Womens role in wwii
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role and task of women in the military
Michael Vidal
3/8/2017
Ms. Oharriz
Pre AICE Global Perspective
Period 2
Should Women be Allowed to Fight in Combat?
People tend to associate action orientated jobs with men. Yet women, can do all the same jobs that men can. But women can not serve in the military. If women can do all the same things that men can, they should also be able to serve in the military. Women should be able to serve their country proudly. Women have always been less equal to men. Women were not allowed to work. Women were not allowed to go to school. They could not vote either. Women were less powerful than men. But today, a woman can nearly do anything a man can. They can do anything and everything, but fight in combat. Women make up about 14 percent
…show more content…
According to Fox News, “The Marine Corps said that having about 200 women moving into combat jobs each year would mean that they would make up less than 2 percent of the Marines in those occupations. The Corps would use what it called a "teaming concept" that would try to assign two or more junior enlisted women to the same unit.”
Global Perspective
The world has many different perspectives on different subjects, topics, and ideas. Women fighting in combat positions is one of these matters. Some may agree and others will not.
The United Kingdom has recently lifted their ban on female soldiers fighting in combat positions. The prime minister gave an order following a recommendation from the chief of the general staff, Gen Sir Nick Carter, that the ban on women serving in close combat roles should be lifted. Speaking at a Nato summit in Warsaw, Cameron said: “It is vital that our armed forces are world class and reflect the society we live in. Lifting this ban is a major step. It will ensure the armed forces can make the most of all their talent and increase opportunities for women to serve in the full range of roles.” The prime minister’s spokesman said the government will be encouraging women to apply for these roles, but it expected low number to apply at
…show more content…
At the time women made up about 14 percent of the military's 1.4 million active members. More than 280,000 of them have done tours of duty in Iraq, Afghanistan or overseas bases where they helped support the US war effort in those countries. 152 women have been killed in the conflicts
This move could now open about 230,000 new roles to women meeting requirements for any post. President Barack Obama issued this statement welcoming the decision, "Today every American can be proud that our military will grow even stronger, with our mothers, wives, sisters and daughters playing a greater role in protecting this country we love.”
Pressure in allowing women to serve in combat positions has been building up over the past couple years in America . In November 2012, four female soldiers stated that they were going to sue the Department of Defense with the assistance from the American Civil Liberties Union, over its restrictions on women serving in frontline warfare.
Women are now able to fight for the country they take pride in. They have been restricted of many rights in the past but the world is changing and so are our beliefs. Allowing women to fight in the military is a big step for America. It is great that America is expanding on women’s rights and as will our
The military is trying to find new ways to recognize the fact that women now fight in the country’s wars. In 2011 the Military Leadership Diversity Commission recommended that the Department of Defense remove all combat restrictions on women. Although many jobs have been opened for women in the military, there is still 7.3 percent of jobs that are closed to them. On February 9, 2012, George Little announced that the Department of Defense would continue to reduce the restrictions that were put on women’s roles. The argument that “women are not physically fit for combat” is the most common and well-researched justification for their exclusion from fighting units. It has been proven if women go through proper training and necessary adaptations, they can complete the same physical tasks as any man. Though there seem to be many reasons from the exclusion of women in the military, the main ones have appeared to be that they do not have the strength to go through combat, would be a distraction to the men, and that they would interrupt male bonding and group
This is because women have proved themselves to be of equal capability as men, and they have already been serving in combat positions alongside men, though not legally. Fortunately, the Pentagon was able to see this and on December 3, 2015 Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter announced that they would be officially allowing women to serve in all combat positions in the U.S. armed forces. This change in military policy will allow more representation for women in the armed forces but it also represents a major leap towards gender equality, further closing the gap between men and
Men have always been looked upon as the leading sex. Looking back through history women have been the ones who take care of the home and children, while men are the ones who work and go to war. However in recent years there’s no doubt that women have become much more equal in the work force. Nevertheless men are still the ones who are forced to fight our wars when the time calls for it. Many think that women should be entirely equal to men having their choice to be drafted taken away but the fact is that they are physically at a disadvantage, too emotionally oriented, and the increase of female presence would have a more negative impact in the military in the way of social interactions.
The most recent debate questions a women’s engagement in combat. What distinguishes some positions as being acceptable while others are not? Who has the authority to approve exceptions, and what exceptions have been made? On May 13, 2011, a bill placed before the House of Representatives addressed the issues to “repeal the ground combat exclusion policy for female members” (HR 1928).
However, women do deserve it because many women have taken these criticisms in stride and have proven that they do belong. The numbers alone of women in the Navy is solid evidence of this. As of December 27th2013 the number of active duty women in the Navy was 53,385 which accounts for 16.4% of the branch. The only branch of the military which beats that is the Air Force with 63,552 active duty women which accounts for 19.1% of the branch. The sheer numbers ...
When it comes to combat assignments and the needs of the military, men take precedence over all other considerations, including career prospects of female service members. Female military members have been encouraged to pursue opportunities and career enhancement within the armed forces, which limit them only to the needs and good of the service due to women being not as “similarly situated” as their male counterparts when it comes to strength or aggressiveness, and are not able to handle combat situations.
Since the creation of the Selective Service Act of 1917, the role of a woman has evolved from the common role of a housewife, teacher or nurse. Now women have access to and are equally able to join many different career fields that were once gender based. The case Rostker v Goldberg 1981 debated whether or not women should be excluded from the Selective Service Act. Congress came to determine that “since women are excluded from combat roles in the Armed Forces, then they are not similarly situated for the purpose of the draft (Rostker, 1981)”. According to the Army Times in 2012, “The Army will start placing women in as many as 14,000 combat related jobs (Tan, 2012)”. So now, women are able to pursue combative careers in the military.
Many agree, that in certain military occupations, women can function at the same level as men. The controversy about having women fighting with men in wars is the fact that they have a different physical structure, deal with stress and emotions differently , are more susceptible to injury and just don't have the killer instinct necessary to get the job done. Although the last statement might appear to be a stereotype, most women would not be capable of supporting the demanding rigors of war-like situations. It would be a great mistake to allow women in these stressful and dangerous situations.
The story of America’s military woman can be traced to the birth of our nation. During the American Revolutionary War, the 18th and 19th centuries, where women served informally as nurses, seamstresses, cooks, and even as spies and were subject to Army’s rules of Conduct. Though not in uniform, these women shared soldier’s hardships including inadequate housing and little compensation. Women have formally been part of the U.S Armed Forces since the Inception of the Army Nurse Corps in 1901. In 1973 the transition to the All-Volunteer Force marked a dramatic increase in the opportunities available for women to serve in the military. As of September 30, 2009, the total number of active duty women in the U.S was 203, 375, and women made up 14.3 percent of the U.s armed forces (Robinson). Women are a crucial role in c...
Woman in Combat Arms On December 3, 2015, Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter ordered the military to open all combat jobs to women with no exceptions. The historic change will pave the way for women to serve alongside men in combat arms units. "The important factor in making my decision was to have access to every American who could add strength to the joint force," said Mr. Carter .This decision will open up about 220,000 jobs for women in the military, or about 10 percent of the entire active and reserve force. Most of those jobs are in Army and Marine Corps infantry and armor units.
Across the history, women Suffer from luck of their right. Culture and civilization was not respect women and put them in the lower layer in their social pyramid. Kill them were they alive, while other give them a life with a lot of misery and obstacle, which is the same thing or killing them better than these life . At the few previous centuries, the world growth and become more opening. people understanding that they are needing women in a lot of job outside their home as men. Sadly, when we came to combat sector, we stop thinking logically. It is men major one hundred percent . If we look to the book (1001 things everyone should know about women's history) which written by Constance Jones (2000) we can find that only 88013 women among history had the ability to take part in military by give a variety of services. Some country actually these day try to make it happen. For instance the first country was allowed women in military was Norway around 1985. Then, it followed by thirteen other countries. It still small percentage compared with the world. It is the right of women to join army and take part in combat, because they are capable as men in adapting with situation. Also, they have equally amount in cerebration and they have the right to decide their own destiny.
The U.S Military forces have revealed that women can currently now eligible for all combat jobs in each branch of the armed forces. This ruling comes, amid years, barring such practices, wherein women were initially only allowed to serve within the U.S. Military as nurses. President Barack Obama has called the move a "historic step forward," saying it would "make our military even stronger." He also added that "Our armed forces will draw on an even wider pool of talent.
To start off, citizens believe that having women in our Armed Forces creates an even better force. Having women does not only give more help to the forces but it also gives better talent and an even stronger army. In the article, “Get Women Ready for Combat” by CNN it summarizes how women will make the forces stronger and essentially many women have applied as a total of 205,000 women are occupied in the army today. Even if people don’t women in harm’s way they are still pertaining or having a harm introduced to them either way in the military. Secretary Ash Carter has also already directed the military to open
Having women in combat has been a controversial topic for many decades. For years, women have been serving in the military, but in 1994, an official ban was placed on women being in combat. On January 24, 2013 secretary of defense Leon Panetta removed the ban. Although women are considered physically weaker than men because most of them have lower stamina and strength, they are still eligible for combat. This is to thank and acknowledge all they have done in combat and the military in the past.
Amid burning trucks, exploding grenades and piercing sound of the machine guns women are making history in combat roles that describes the word feminism of defending equal rights for women. Every woman that shares a common goal in their life in society is seeking the equal opportunities as an example serving in a military organization. Many military commander want to ban opening position to all women because the leadership role in combat should be given by a “man's job” according to their physical strength. Women are capable of serving in military just as well as men standards in combat and allowed to be in combat.