Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of the ebola virus
The effects of the ebola virus
The effects of the ebola virus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of the ebola virus
One of the big topics in the news right now is ebola, and making sure that the patients, people returning from certain spots of Africa, and anyone showing symptoms should be quarantined. I will be explaining the view of an individual and how she was dealt with in the matter as well as what I think about the way her situation is being handled. I will also explain my views on weather quarantine is morally good or unjust and how it ties into the things I have learned in this course. Are the governors placing the returning nurses and doctors using Utilitarianism approach or the Kantianism approach? Are they placing people under quarantine because they are worried and don’t really care about the people that have to suffer from the quarantine? These are some of the questions that I will be answering throughout this paper. Ask yourself throughout the paper how you would handle the situation and think about how the lady in the article may feel, despite the …show more content…
Which in this case would allow nurses and doctors to go home after coming back from Africa and assisting in stopping ebola. They would have to stay at their homes, but they would be receiving compensation for missing work” (Ehrenfreund, Max). As the article goes on, I wanted to point out that even the government was to see something different to happen. “A couple of weeks of paid time off might not sound so bad for some returning from the hot zone, but from a court’s point of view, a quarantine is still a quarantine” (Ehrenfreund, Max). With this info being one of the last things talked about on the article, it looks like that there is going to be more thought from the governors point of view as to where the doctors and nurses will be quarantined, which if they hopefully go through with them going home and staying, like the White House is urging to happen; the doctors and nurses would be able to stay in the comforts of their own
Many states and colonies across the globe issued detailed sets of directives to their residents on what exactly they should do if they come into contact with the illness. One such example is the directive issued by T.W.H. Holmes, the Secretary of the Victoria Board of Public Health in Australia. The directive details the symptoms, complications, treatment, and prevention of the disease. Something very common during the outbreak of any pandemic is the use of quarantines to separate the sick and the healthy. In fact, that is the first order for prevention of disease in T.W.H. Holme...
During a pandemic in India, a doctor did exploits and was praised by other team members as Fink narrates: “Colleagues credited her quick thinking with saving lives” (p.472). The respect for the person and his or her dignity is at the core of the nursing practice. The registered nurse, as a member of the discipline of nursing should always remember before any action, this strong ethical piece: First, do no harm.
The viruses are spread in many different ways in the novel, but all are due to human mistakes. One of the most common forms of errors found in the medical field is the recycling of soiled equipment. The repeated use of dirty medical equipment is found commonly in the poor regions of the world where resources are limited and fundings are bound. This is an example of the errors the human race performs that lead to disaster.
After reading The Panic Virus, it became evident that this book can in fact be extremely useful. Perhaps people prefer not to educate themselves about vaccination on the grounds that medical language can be dry, confusing, and uninteresting. Perhaps they don’t wish to listen to medical professionals due to the fact that they feel that they have an agenda to protect themselves. Whatever the reason, the need for Mnookin’s The Panic Virus is to provide a strong argument for pro-vaccination that is given by a member of the reader’s peers. Mnookin is not a medical professional, and has no personal gain from defending the medical field; therefore, his argument is ‘by the people, for the people’. Mnookin’s tone throughout the novel also makes The Panic Virus a page-turner. Mnookin uses a tone that is at times formal and factual and at other times snide and informal, engaging the reader with every
In this paper we will be look at the book called “Lying on the Couch”. I will be going over what I saw as the biggest ethical issues that I read about in this book, I will also go over my thoughts on this book and the ethical problems that I saw for Dr. Lash, Carol and Marshal Streider. I will explain my personal opinion regarding self-care and my reasoning as to why it is so important to maintaining clear boundaries.
One of the many problems that we seem to be having is the amount of No Kill Shelters in America. No kill Shelters are shelters in which the animals there are not treated like the “pound” or “dog house.” These shelters do not kill healthy or treatable animals and even if they are not treatable they reserve euthanasia for them as the last resort to trying to save the animals. However, many understand that these some of these dogs can be a menace to society, but every single animal should be able to live. We do not have many of these in this country or if we do we are use the animals for the testing of some of our products. One of the many benefits of No Kill Shelters is the promotion of adopting dogs. Many people do not adopt dogs but they go to breeders which is not a bad idea, but we have many dogs that get killed in pounds every day. Why do we Americans have the say so in when an animals wants to die? With everything there are pros and cons and some of these cons can be the overpopulation of animals , but we do not kill humans if one race/gender is becoming overpopulated. The
National Institute of Medicine (2007) Ethical and legal considerations in mitigating pandemic disease Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54163/
This respect gives the individual in question the right to essentially make their own decision in any given situation. Unfortunately not all individuals have the correct information or education on the topic to make the appropriate choice. The other issue with autonomy in regards to quarantine is that the individual is only thinking of themselves and not the people around them and how the decision they make may or may not affect them. In the film, The most dangerous woman in america, Mary Mallon was given a few opportunities to play a part in her initial testing and plan of care. Even in the end when respectively entrusted by the Commissioner of Health for New York City to change occupations and avoid spreading typhoid fever she made the decision that best suited
What started as a problem with a horrific disease, lead to isolation of leprosy patients. It was hard for these patients to settle and make homes; communities feared the spreading of illness. The government took an old plantation to create a hospital for the leprosy patients. The old plantation was called hospital #66 or better known as Carville. “Over a long time period, the disease can be disfiguring, and societies have stigmatized victims of the disease. This attribute is deeply discrediting since the stigmatized individual is disqualified from full social acceptance. Leprosy was thus dreaded, not because it killed, but because it left one alive with no hope”. (P1. And 2, Sato, H., & Frantz, J. (2005). Termination of the leprosy isolation policy in the US and japan: Science, policy changes, and the garbage can model.) People deemed with this Disease were brought to Carville mandatory to be quarantined; some patients were brought in shackles against there will. Patients were forced to leave everything they knew and loved behind, including friends, family and children.
Resources have always been inadequate for food, economics and healthcare and all scarce resources are rationed in one way or another. Healthcare resources can be in the forms of medicine, machinery, expensive treatment and organ transplantation. For decades, allocation of healthcare resources in an equitable manner has always been the subject of debate, concern and analysis, yet the issue has persistently resisted resolution. Scarcity of resources for healthcare and issue of allocation is permanent and inescapable (Harris, “Deciding between Patients”). Scarcity can be defined in general, in emergency and in crises as well as shortage of certain kind of treatment, medicine or organs. As a result of scarcity of resources, and some people may be left untreated or die when certain patients are prioritized and intention of is that everyone will ultimately be treated (Harris, 2009: 335). Allocation of limited resources is an ethical issue since it is vital to address the question of justice and making fair decisions. Ethical judgments and concerns are part of daily choice in allocation of health resources and also to ensure these resources are allocated in a fair and just way. This paper will explore how QALYs, ageism and responsibility in particular influence the allocation of healthcare resources in general through the lens of justice, equity, social worth, fairness, and deservingness.
The author also paints a picture of situations in which a lack of proper medical equipment leads to the spread of diseases. When describing Mr. Yu. G, the first known person with Ebola Sudan, who´s chain of infection traveled throughout south Sudan into a hospital in the town of Maridi, he writes, ¨Apparently the medical staff had been giving patients injections with dirty needles¨(98). This is a prime example of how the error of medical staff can manage to worsen a disaster. Rather than transmitting from person
The writer of the paper cannot agree more with this. Overall, the United States is doing its part in stopping the Ebola virus. West Africa is getting better at dealing with the virus and with our help, they have a chance of eliminating the virus. Technology is improving, treatment for patients is growing, and the world is becoming more aware of the situation. The Ebola virus will be taken down and conquered.
Capital punishment is a difficult subject for a lot of people because many question whether or not it is ethical to kill a convicted criminal. In order to critically analyze whether or not it is ethical, I will look at the issue using a utilitarianism approach because in order to get a good grasp of this topic we need to look at how the decision will impact us in the future. The utilitarianism approach will help us to examine this issue and see what some of the consequences are with this topic of capital punishment. For years, capital punishment has been used against criminals and continues to be used today, but lately this type of punishment has come into question because of the ethical question.
“Life is precious” is a common quote that has been used throughout the ages. In the medical world of today, we do all we can to preserve life. We go to such lengths that some wonder where we would stop. If you could save hundreds, or even millions of lives, by taking the lives of a few, would it be right? In the book titled “Never Let Me Go” by Kazuo Ishiguro this question is explored in more depth. Using Ishiguro’s fictional book, along with historical documents of actual human experiment cases, we will explore the moral and ethical dilemma of sacrificing the lives of some in order to further medicine treatment of many.
I believe that under certain circumstances that capital punishment should be allowed because if someone is going to commit mass murder they should pay with the ultimate human right which is of their life. This topic has been widely thought of in the world with a few philosophers really encompassing my views. Those are the views of Ernest Van Den Haag and Bruce Fein. Philosophers who oppose our views are such like Justice William Brennan and Hugo Adam Bedau. I will prove my point using the ideas of deterrence and morality of the issue of capital punishment. If the government would show that if you kill someone there will be a consequence for their actions and that the consequence would be equal to what they have done. The population will see that it isn’t worth taking another humans life. If we were to kill people that are committing these mass killings of innocent people there would not be as many criminals around. Therefore the streets would be a place people wouldn’t be afraid of anymore.