Should There Be Stricter Laws Essay

1449 Words3 Pages

Abstract
There are numerous consequences of driving under the influence. Including: fines up to $2,000, up to 2 year license suspension, annual surcharges to keep license, jail time, etc. Despite all of these harsh consequences some still believe there should be stricter legislation laws on those convicted of a DUI. To be more exact on the consequences can receive up to 180 days in jail, and have to pay up to a $2,000 surcharge every year, license suspension for up to 2 years, and that’s only the first offense!The hypothesis stated in this research paper is that there should be stricter legislation laws set on DUI offenders.The problem with DUI offenders is that people put not only at risk but innocent bystanders. The key findings are that 31% of traffic-related deaths happen because of a drunk driver, 9,967 people died from drunk driving in 2014 alone. The conclusions that stemmed from these findings is that there needs to be stricter laws set so none of this happens.

Introduction
Should stricter legislation laws be made to prohibit DUI’s. In the U.S 28 people die a day involved in car/motorcycle crash that were alcohol impaired. That’s 10,220 people a year! If stricter legislation laws were set to prohibit drinking and driving most of this …show more content…

New York, was the first state to pass DUI laws. That was in 1910, other states soon followed. The laws back then highlighted only that were not to drive under the influence. Surprisingly, never specified how much under the influence actually was. The first legal limit for intoxication was set in the 1930’s and that limit was 0.15. Different groups soon emerged fighting against drinking and driving like MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) and SADD (Students Against Drunk Driving) when these groups surfaced is when DUI laws got more strict. A huge impact in today’s drinking laws such as the most notable one, the legal drinking age of 21 years

Open Document