Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of crimes among youth
Juvenile vs adult prisons
The impact of crimes among youth
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The impact of crimes among youth
The results show clearly that there are huge fluctuations between different age groups, making it difficult to give a clear answer to the question of teenage culpability. The findings suggest, that teenagers cannot be held responsible for their crimes, due to immaturity, without giving a definite answer. However, due to a too small sample and the lack of an adult comparison group, this study can only be seen as a good first approach to finding a final answer, even though, it shows the importance of this kind of research. Teenagers shouldn’t be held responsible for the crimes that they commit because of their diminished decision-making capacity and psychosocial immaturity. There is a clear categorical distinction between adult and juvenile criminals. However, it does not mean that all teenagers are less mature than adults in their decision-making capacity. Some show a mature judgment when they are very young and their habits continue to develop into a durable pattern of criminal behaviors which shape their personal identity. Adult punishment of …show more content…
As a child enters into the adolescent years, a common change in behaviour occurs in where they actively seek new/ unusual experiences, display an increase in desire to take risks and become more accustomed to developing strong bonds with people to which they are not related (increased social behaviours). Interestingly, this change in behaviour can be seen across all social mammal species, likely due to the evolutionary need for adolescents to gain and develop the skills they require to exist independently, to become - in the case of humans - a self-sufficient member of the adult
Paul Thompson in the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains”, claims that the youth thinks differently, especially when it comes to them facing criminal charges. Thompson supports his claims by first citing an example of a real case involving a minor. He then cites research from reliable sources as evidence to back up his claim. Lastly, the author investigates the law system’s way of handling the case mentioned previously in the article as a way to leave options open for the viewer. Thompson’s purpose is to convince the audience that though the research given shows that youth suffer brain tissue loss in their teen years, it gives them no excuse for violent behavior so that he can possibly give a well informed side of the argument. The
People have, not too long ago, realized that youth and adults are very diverse and should not be treated the same. They gave no time for children to develop the “meins reis”, therefore, they were not given the opportunity to learn. People were not aware that the brain of the youth were not fully developed and were not given the chance of change. They thought that once guilty you shall remain guilty. For that reason they were considered adults, when in reality, adult criminals will only continue to infatuate their mind with evil. The new Youth Criminal Justice Act focuses on change and reintegration with society. We have learned that the youth have not fully developed and do not have the full ability to comprehend such judgements.
It is expected that at a young age, children are taught the difference between what is right and what is wrong in all types of situations. The majority of Supreme Court Justices abolished mandatory life in prison for juveniles that commit heinous crimes, argued this with the consideration of age immaturity, impetuosity, and also negative family and home environments. These violent crimes can be defined as murder, rape, armed robbery, aggravated assault and the like depending on state law. With these monstrous acts in mind the supreme court justices argument could be proven otherwise through capability and accountability, the underdevelopment of the teenage brain and the severity of the crime. Juveniles commit heinous crimes just like adults
Similarly, going along with the prior rebuttal of the importance of differentiating juvenile’s characteristics and actions of that of an adult, science is compiling more evidence of its vitality. Many adults can look back and reminisce about an action he or she did when younger and say, “Wow I cannot believe I did that.” Science has proven the reason behind that is because an adolescent’s brain has not yet fully matured. Tsui states “Studies conclusively established that the brain of an adolescent is not fully developed, particularly in the area of the prefrontal cortex, which is critical to higher order cognitive functioning and impulse control” (645). The facts of scientific research need to be taken into consideration when distinguishing
The overwhelming majority of juveniles are involved in impulsive or risky, even delinquent behaviors during their teenage years. However, the majority go on to become very productive citizens who do not commit crimes. In order for this to continue the government established the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) which gives young offenders a chance to better themselves, and. By doing so, the YCJA helps teach youth that their actions are unacceptable and the punishments imposed are lesser then an adult. Through the analysis of their unacceptable actions, lesser punishments and a better future, it is clear that YCJA is highly effective at giving youth a better chance in society.
There has always been controversies as to whether juvenile criminals should be tried as adults or not. Over the years more and more teenagers have been involved in committing crimes. In some cases the juries have been too rough on the teens. Trying teens as adults can have a both positive and negative views. For example, teens that are detained can provide information about other crimes, can have an impact in social conditions, and serve as experience; however, it can be negative because teens are still not mature enough for that experience, they are exposed to adult criminals; and they will lose out on getting an education.
developing mentally and emotionally. This can lead to poor decision-making and impulsive behavior. Additionally, studies have shown that juveniles are more likely to be influenced by peer pressure and external factors, which can lead to criminal behavior. Therefore, it is important to consider the age and developmental stage of the offender when determining the appropriate punishment. Instead of the death penalty, alternative forms of punishment such as rehabilitation and counseling should be considered for juvenile offenders.
“Our youths now love luxury, they have bad manners, they have disrespect for authority, disrespect for older people…” Ancient Greek philosopher Socrates acknowledges the escalation of delinquency among youth in the early age’s .The rise of young offenders furthers the Canadian government to record juvenile offenders, in addition, devise an act to better control the epidemic of young delinquents. The topic of proposal is the effectiveness of the youth justice system in its response to crime. Firstly, in order to determine the effectiveness of the youth justice system, one must grasp the premise that is a delinquency, in particular a young delinquents.
How immature juveniles are not known. But what we do know that they are indeed immature, and cannot control their actions at times. Teens do not think at times as Marjie Lundstrom says in her article Kids Are Kids-Until They Commit Crimes from the Sacramento Bee, published March 1, 2001 “...Tate supposedl...
Much controversy exists on the question of whether a juvenile criminal should be punished to the same extent as an adult. Those who commit capitol crimes, including adolescents, should be penalized according to the law. Age should not be a factor in the case of serious crimes. Many people claim that the child did not know any better, or that he was brought up with the conception that this behavior is acceptable. Although there is some truth to these allegations, the reality of this social issue is far more complex. Therefore we ask the question, "Should childhood offenders of capitols crimes be treated as adults?"
The article ‘Kids Are Kids Until They Commit Crime’ by “Hey, they’re only kids.That is, until they foul up. Until they commit crimes. And the bigger the crime, the more eager we are to call them adults.” We are eager to prosecute juveniles as adults because it's quick and easy. Just because it's fast and easy doesnt mean its the right thing to do. “We’ve created this image that teenagers are something to be feared,’ said Dan Macallair of the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice in San Francisco.” Teenagers are always made out to be viewed as villains. But they aren't, they are just moody beings that are going through a lot of
While many argue that juveniles who commit serious crimes, such as murder, should be treated as adults, the fact is, juveniles under the age of eighteen, are not adults, and should not be treated as such. Juveniles are not mature enough or developed psychologically, and, therefore, do not consider the consequences of their actions. In the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” by Thompson, the writer argues that juveniles are not adults. Their brains develop at different stages and they learn skills that they need to learn at a certain time.
Punishing youth offenders as adults can rewire their brain to become harsher criminals than before incarceration. Trying Juvenile Criminals as Adults Throughout adolescence many physical, cognitive, and socioemotional changes occur. This time is a transition from
As a parent, I have spent a great deal of time observing the behavior, motivation, and thought processes of my children. As they mature these processes have changed, and it has been fascinating to watch. I have learned a great deal on the limits of self control in the adolescent mind during this time, and I believe that families should be held responsible for crimes committed by their teenagers.
In which society assumes that if a child performs a crime hence, it is insignificant. No matter what the criminal’s identity is, the act of the crime however is still there. For the most part, children committing crimes led to the existence of juvenile courts. On the contrary, juvenile courts are not putting an end to such crimes, in which they are too forgiving. As a result, children are not afraid of the consequences they will face after committing a crime.