Should People Regulate Net Neutrality?

521 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Internet technology and privacy

Net Neutrality has been a rising topic of debate in recent months, and many people still have no idea what it is exactly. Net Neutrality is the idea that ISP’s- or Internet service providers, Should make it so people have access to all data on the internet without any discrimination or interference. That everyone should be created equal.

There are supporters both for and against Net Neutrality. Those who support Net Neutrality are the common internet users. They agree that their internet should be free and equal and no-one should be regulating it. The companies that will be affected by not having Net Neutrality are also big supporters, such as Netflix and other bandwidth hungry video streaming services. The people against Net Neutrality tend …show more content…

Websites that millions of people use such as Netflix, Youtube and Twitch.tv, would have to pay ISP’s more money for a “fast lane”. This fast lane would allow the ISP’s to allocate more data to more bandwidth hungry websites. However by making these websites pay more, the ISP’s are in turn forcing these websites to increase their cost. Right now Netflix streaming service costs $8 a month. If these fast lanes are put in place Netflix might have to increase their subscription to 10 dollars or 12 dollars. Big companies are not the only ones being affected, Smaller startups that could not afford to pay for a fast lane would be at a severe disadvantage to bigger more successful companies. Their website would load much slower than the competitions, almost guaranteeing the startups failure. Like I said already Large corporations with alot of money would have to increase the price of their products while these large wealthy internet service provider companies are getting more money in their pockets. In the end it all comes back down to affecting the consumers. Whether ISP’s decide to charge internet users more directly or asking these websites to pay more, in the end the consumer ends up paying more. Consumers also get the short end of the stick, because websites not in the fast lane would load slower than those in the fast

Show More
Related

  • Rhetorical Analysis: Internet Tolls And The Case For Net Neutrality

    1510 Words  | 4 Pages

    When we think of those skilled in the art of rhetoric, we often jump to those we know are trying to convince us of something, like politicians, salesmen, lawyers, etc. We do not always consider corporate CEOs part of that group though Netflix CEO, Reed Hastings, would have us believing another thing. On March 20th, 2014, Hastings published an article titled “Internet Tolls And The Case For Strong Net Neutrality” on Netflix’s official blog. Just under a month before the blog was posted, Netflix settled a deal paying Comcast, America’s largest cable and Internet service provider (ISP), for faster and more reliable service to Comcast’s subscribers (Cohen and Wyatt). These “internet tolls” go against the culture of net neutrality in America, which in its essence is when no piece of information is prioritized over another on broadband networks. Hastings took to their blog to advocate for net neutrality and against abusive ISPs. Whether he was conscious of his rhetorical finesse or not, he wrote quite convincingly thus turning this blog into an excellent rhetorical artifact. Reed Hastings’ blog post aims to convince American Internet consumers that strong net neutrality is important by appealing to their values of choice, frugality and empathy while simultaneously making ISPs seem ill intentioned and Netflix seem honorable.

    Read More

  • Net Neutrality

    1150 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Internet came to be because of the user. Without the user, there is no World Wide Web. It is a set of links and words all created by a group of users, a forum or a community (Weinberger 96). The concept of net neutrality is the affirming concept behind the openness of the net (Vinton Cerf). Vinton Cerf stated, “The Internet was designed with no gatekeepers over new content or services. A lightweight but enforceable neutrality rule is needed to ensure that the Internet continues to thrive” (Vinton Cerf). Moreover, consumers would be protected under a monopolistic market due to network neutrality (Opposing Views). The Open Internet Coalition on Opposing Views.com state that in a perfect world there would be a variable amount of high-speed broadband competitors offering consumers plenty of choices. This would provide a market-based check on violations of Net Neutrality so consumers could pick a provider that respected the open concept. However, the world is imperfect and a mediator is needed to ensure networks remain open and the incentives to innovate and invest will continue to exist (Opposing Views). Lastly, there is an existence of fast and slow lanes without the implementation of network neutrality (Owen 7). This ...

    Read More

  • The Theme Of Freedom In Fahrenheit 451

    439 Words  | 1 Pages

    Net Neutrality requires to give everyone access to everything on the internet. This means that your internet provider won’t charge you for using specific websites. But with this, companies will have the ability to charge you for using basic things such as email, Spotify and even YouTube. Fast and slow lanes will also be included which may vary depending of what packages you paid for. But that is just the beginning, being that with this they will be able to control what you are able to see and not, ending Freedom of Speech in the

    Read More

  • Ffc Court Case Summary

    681 Words  | 2 Pages

    Facts: The FCC worries about the relationship of broadband and edge providers. That fear, being end-user providers will not be able to access edge providers as a whole. It might also reduce the quality of their end-user subscriber’s contact to certain edge providers. It may also reduce the earnings of favoring their own competing content or services, or to enable them or collect fees from edge providers. Since the advent of the Internet, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has confronted the questions of whether and how it should regulate

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues Of Net Neutrality

    1891 Words  | 4 Pages

    A recent and hotly debated topic among businesses, politicians, and internet users in the United States is that of net neutrality. With the rise of the internet over the past few decades, laws and regulations have struggled to keep up with the ever changing environment. As such, the problem of whether net neutrality should be enforced, and to what extent, has been a dividing issue. This problem has come into the public’s attention recently due to infringements and controversy surrounding policies by Internet Service Providers (ISPs). In the following paragraphs, I plan to first define the concept of net neutrality, related topics which are crucial for an informed ethical discussion of the topic, and also related cases in which net neutrality

    Read More

  • Transparency Paradox Case Study

    1883 Words  | 4 Pages

    The debate of Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo is about whether keep network neutrality. The Network Neutrality is about principle “non-discriminatory interconnection”, it refers that all users of the network should be received equal treatment. The Tim Wu is a supporter of network neutrality, he states the internet more like a highway rather than a fast food restaurant, so it should remain neutral. Because basic on the transportation and communication network should within scope of public interest, not on the individual difference. But the Christopher Yoo as a opponent thinks even if deviations the network neutrality there will not be necessarily damage users and innovation and then he suggests an alternative approach called “network

    Read More

  • Tim Wu: The Father Of Net Neutrality

    231 Words  | 1 Pages

    Tim Wu is known as “the father of Net Neutrality” for first coining the term “Net Neutrality”. He is a professor at Columbia Law School and the director of the Poliak Center at Columbia Journalism School. He commonly talks about other topics such as copyright, private power and free speech. Wu believes that net neutrality can prevent companies and carriers to offer “special” treatment to one specific provider instead of another. According to Wu, Net Neutrality benefits anyone in some way and believes that Internet transparency is critical because carriers fail to tell what services they provide for the user. At the core of Net neutrality, there is a free speech principle. It allows speakers and innovators to reach people that they would not

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

    537 Words  | 2 Pages

    ISPs, including ATT, express concern about the proposed rules of Net Neutrality that would prohibit it from slowing competitors’ web traffic or accessing content (Shatz). By not allowing the ability for ISPs to regulate its network and the bandwidth that moves through it, it can cause a variety of problems that un...

    Read More

  • Net Neutrality: The Future of the Internet?

    1925 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...s article “Ma Bell’s Revenge: The battle for Network Neutrality” shows us in a just a few of the hundreds of arguments which have been brought up over the proposal of network neutrality. Network neutrality essentially means that all data gets treated the same by an ISP or service, whether it be an incoming email or a gigantic video file, it’s is based on the principle that Internet users should be in control of what content they view and what applications they choose to use on the Internet. The Internet has operated according to this neutrality principle since its earliest days. In other words, net neutrality is about equal access to the Internet in terms of overall speed. Just as telephone companies are not permitted to tell consumers who they can call or what they can say, broadband carriers should not be allowed to use their market power to control activity online.

    Read More

  • Net Neutrality In Canada Essay

    873 Words  | 2 Pages

    The monopolistic nature of the internet service industry is often cited as a reason for net neutrality. Current internet technology tends to limit consumer options when choosing an ISP. To gain access to high speed internet services, consumers need to be directly connected to the ISP’s network through some variety of cable technology. This discourages ISP’s from building multiple overlapping networks and creates barriers for new entrants to the market. Building a network that can service a large group of consumers requires large amounts of capital and the incumbent service providers can lower their prices which makes

    Read More

  • Should Internet Service Providers Inhibit Net Neutrality?

    1599 Words  | 4 Pages

    Net neutrality is essentially the freedom of internet users being able to access all networks and enjoy all web services. These services include applications, websites, content and platforms without any discrimination by the Internet Service Providers (Stiegler 2). The term also connotes that consumers should access all the legal information on the World Wide Web at an equal rate of speed. These ISPs include Comcast, Verizon, and AT &T Network. Disturbing net neutrality can have adverse access to internet users and businesses in various ways.

    Read More

  • Cable Industry: Comcast, Directv, And Time Warner

    571 Words  | 2 Pages

    A tactic that has been used by companies within the cable industry is to lower internet speeds when consumers stream services like Netflix in order to diminish their appeal. The government has been reviewing the creation of new regulations that would prohibit this practice. These net neutrality regulations would reclassify these providers from information service providers to utility providers. This reclassification would make it so that there are much stricter standards by which companies are required to provide access and would disallow the throttling of internet speeds. Perhaps the largest threat that is facing the cable industry is from nontraditional competition.

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

    484 Words  | 1 Pages

    Net Neutrality is the principle that for all the Internet users can access network content, access device and select service providers in the extent permitted by law. It means governments should be responsible for Internet service providers to treat all data on Internet as the same level. Do not charge the fee by different user, website, platform and application. In order to prevent operators controlling the data for business interest so the government set up Net Neutrality. Make sure the equality of data transmission.

    Read More

  • Should The Government Regulate The Internet

    1193 Words  | 3 Pages

    Comcast could no longer block Netflix, or provide Hulu a fast lane. This regulation is an example of working regulations put on the Internet. The effect of these rules show that regulations can work, “The Internet’s openness has radically transformed all kinds of industries, from food delivery to finance, by lowering the barriers to entry. It has allowed a few bright engineers or students with an idea to launch a business that would be immediately available all over the world to over a billion potential customers. Start-ups do not need the leverage and bank accounts of Apple or Google to get reliable service to reach their users.

    Read More

  • Internet Regulation

    1274 Words  | 3 Pages

    Internet regulation is basically restricting or controlling access to certain aspects or information. Internet regulation consists of mainly two categories: Censorship of data, and controlling aspects of the Internet.

    Read More

More about Should People Regulate Net Neutrality?

Open Document