Transparency Paradox Case Study

QUESTION 1

Helen Nissenbaum writes about the transparency paradox. What does she mean by it? And how is it relevant with respect to the Internet? What do you think the correct solution to the transparency paradox is and why?

Transparency paradox can be explained as a theory that basically states that owing to rapid development in technology and innovation. There has been a ubiquitous usage of digital tools. Each of these tools collects some information about a person. Consent to use the information, transparency and individual privacy has become an issue (Bernstein, 2012). This new kind of developments has skewed the concepts of privacy and transparency. This has made interpretation of all the concepts related to privacy an issue. This has

What is the source of their disagreement? Explain not what they disagree about, but why they disagree. Who is right? And why?

The debate of Tim Wu and Christopher Yoo is about whether keep network neutrality. The Network Neutrality is about principle “non-discriminatory interconnection”, it refers that all users of the network should be received equal treatment. The Tim Wu is a supporter of network neutrality, he states the internet more like a highway rather than a fast food restaurant, so it should remain neutral. Because basic on the transportation and communication network should within scope of public interest, not on the individual difference. But the Christopher Yoo as a opponent thinks even if deviations the network neutrality there will not be necessarily damage users and innovation and then he suggests an alternative approach called “network

Because in the internet people talk simply by the language based on the typewriting and voice chat, nevertheless it is not always easy to form the close bonds of friendship, people can not stay together and express their affection with their physical behaviour (e.g, body language). I think they are right because i was try to make friends from internet but I feel it is not good for a real friendships. In the real world I have a best girlfriend we can go shopping, watching movies, go traveling together, we laughing and gossiping at each other. We enjoy this time. Although we often quarrel, we can reconciled after quarrel because a smile, hug or joke and we never hate each other. However I had another friend, we knew each other from the Facebook, in the beginning we were attracted each other because we had the same hobbies, we love go climbing but pity we can not go together. And when we disagree we can not explain in time. Thereby we can not avoid misunderstanding and I think it is important for the relationship. So I agree with the Cocking and Matthew the real friendships it impossible on the internet.

And in the internet people usually show their good side, thereby