Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Native american conflicts in america
Conflict between Indians and white settlers
Indian and settler relationship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Native american conflicts in america
The best way for the United States to make up for injustices is to return land to Native American group . .today i will be talking about how the indian should get their land back rather than money.one reason why i think they should get land rather than money is that they will probably wouldnt use it for useful things. Native american were here first and if they had their land they will have the natural resources to survive. My first reason why we should give their land back is because they were here first.Their land is more than just a piece of land, it means something to them it’s where they buried their ancestors and they were the ones who started to plant things and build house and other things.a quote from an articles Native Americans were here first. “We took their land while creating reservations for their surviving people to live on. It seems fair to most of us that we now owe them some form of reparations in order to make up for the past. After all, the Native Americans were the ones who gave up their lands to us”.Also These indian were vulnerable when their land was taken they also lost their dignity And self respect it would be fair if we gave them back there land. My second reason is if …show more content…
they had their land they will have the natural resources to survive. The us supreme court and un investigator agreed if the black hill was returned to them the reservation they would have natural resources, also a way to earn enough money to survive.this..a quote from a articles “The belief that “money can buy anything” is absurd and disgusting. Money cannot buy or return dignity and self-respect”.Also Some might argue that money can be used for educational purposes. My third reason is that they should get their land back rather than money, i they will probably wouldnt use it for useful things.”You have more than 70% of working-age people without jobs, and all kinds of problems that come along with that.
Very tough conditions." Also the belief that “money can buy anything” is absurd and disgusting. Money cannot buy or return dignity and self-respect”.working-age people without jobs, and all kinds of problems that come along with that. Very tough conditions." Also the belief that “money can buy anything” is absurd and disgusting. Money cannot buy or return dignity and self-respect”.and plus and they wouldn't use it all for schools .and probably wouldn't use it for useful
thing In conclusion these are the major reason why i think we should give them back their land like we said before “The belief that ‘’money can buy anything’’ is absurd and disgusting.money cannot buy dignity and self respect’”.in conclusion the best way for the united states to make up for injustice is to return land to native american group
English colonists that came to settle the New World had one conception of what property was; in their minds, property equaled money. This differed greatly from the Native Americans’ perspective, where property equaled survival. When the English colonists took land that naturally belonged to the Indians under the rights of the charter given to them by the English Crown, they misconstrued many of the conceptions of property that the Natives’ had. Even though the English were similar to the Natives in certain aspects, in most, such as who had the right to the land, how the land should be farmed, what value property actually had, and who pre-owned and could distribute the land, both cultures differed greatly, leading to eventual conflict between the English and Native Americans.
In an article written by Shelby Steele, a black American whose grandfather was born into slavery, he writes about his feelings toward reparations, saying that reparations would be an insult to his heritage. He states, "My first objection to reparation for slavery is that it feels like selling our birthright for a pot of porridge." He feels as though reparations for the past will not change the black American future, saying that today's black Americans problems are failure on their part not on white Americans. What would compensation for black injustices solve?
In May 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act which forced Native American tribes to move west. Some Indians left swiftly, while others were forced to to leave by the United States Army. Some were even taken away in chains. Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States, strongly reinforced this act. In the Second State of the Union Address, Jackson advocated his Indian Policy. There was controversy as to whether the removal of the Native Americans was justified under the administration of President Andrew Jackson. In my personal opinion, as a Native American, the removal of the tribes was not in any way justified.
First of all, they would not agree with the ownership of land section, as Native Americans believed that land could not belong to individuals in the first place. The African Americans in the Declaration of Wrongs and Rights also say “as natives of American soil” when in reality, the true natives of the land were the Native Americans. Also, the document continues to talk about how African Americans claim the right to remain in said lands. Native Americans were moved from their native lands several times. The Homestead Act in 1862 could be seen as an example, new settlers were encouraged to take “free soil” but at the same time move over Native American settlers. Another example of this can be seen with the Osage who already lived on a reserve, they had already been removed and deported. Railroad companies wanted to use their land and were willing to pay for it. Then another railroad company saw the same opportunity and tried to convince them to move. The Osage refused to move and then the government intervened with the 1870’s removal law, which moved the Osage and sold their land for 1.25 dollars an acre. Eventually the situation got better for the Osage since there was oil in their new lands. Another example of this would be the concentration attempts of the Lakota. It nevertheless made sense to the authors since African
Through all stages, a conflict existed between the Indigenous peoples and the United States. Under the illusion of forging a new democracy, free of hierarchies and European monarchies, the United States used the plantation labor of enslaved Africans and dispossessed massive numbers of Native peoples from their lands and cultures to conquer this land.15 Many Americans continue to experience the social, political, cultural and economic inequalities that remain in our Nation
There has always been a big debate on whether the Cherokee Indians should have or should not have been removed from the land they resided on. Although the common consensus of the whites was for removal, and for the Cherokees it was against removal, there were some individuals on each side that disagreed with their groups’ decision. The Cherokee Indians should have been removed from their homeland because the Cherokees would not have been able to survive on their own with the way they were living, they would not have been able to exist amidst a white population, and if they were removed, the whites would have helped them create a new and prosperous civilization.
“After 250 years of enslavement in America, African Americans were still terrorized in Deep South; they were pinned to the ghettos, overcrowded, overcharged, discriminated, and undereducated”. The best solution is to owe them reparations. To aid them out of their unjust inherit status. The novel is based on real life situations of many African Americans that had to face during slave, and post slave era in the United States of America. The purpose is to show that not having reparations for the African Americans lead to many downsides to the nation’s inequalities. In the novel “The Case for Reparations” by Ta-Nehisi Coates, he uses just ethics and remorse obligation, to demonstrate the nation should to pay for the damage done to the black community.
In this day and time the world is heavily concerned with political and social corrective ness, thus everyone is catered too and no money changes hands. The idea and arguments of paying reparations to the descendants of slaves has been in the American media and courthouses since the English barrister James Grahame published a groundbreaking book in 1850 setting the first claim for reparations in the United States. It is no surprise that these allegations arose so soon after the abolishing of slavery at the culmination of the Civil War. Free blacks and enslaved blacks are accredited with building a nation on their backs, that is not so; America was built on the backs of the heroic men who served in the American Revolution and the victorious soldiers who reconciled a broken country after the Civil War. Reparations cannot be paid to those whom it is not owed.
Due to the fact that they had originally obtained the land through Mexican and Spanish laws United States courts did not recognize their ownership of the land, and many lost their homelands1. These Mexican Americans lost land, which had belonged to their families for generations, and where many of their ancestors had been left to rest in peace1. Essentially they were stripped of their birth right and were left with practically nothing1. The film, Chicano! History of the Mexican American Civil Rights Movement, episode 1: Quest for a Homeland, discusses how Mexican American citizens or Chicanos came together to fight for their homelands, the difficulties they faced doing so, and it argues that Chicanos deserve to have the land that was taken from them, and the right to be treated equal to other American
Many tribes had reigning governments and tribal counsels as a way of life. With westward expansion brought changes. Many Americans were killing their livestock, the food they ate, and Americans were settling more and more on the Indian lands. In time, Indians began to fight back and take what had been theirs. Once this happened, the Americans decided to make the Indians like Americans, so we took their land and tried to make them Americans.
The United States as a country has no shortages of questionable actions. Some people say that the country has not paid for a few of the serious actions, although the country has. One of these questionable actions is slavery. The major question is how do people repay the African American Community for what the country did to them all those years ago. The U.S. government should not pay reparations to the African American community, the reason for this is because of lineage and the money problems the country.
There were several motives for the removal of the Indians from their lands, to include racism and land lust. Since they first arrived, the white Americans hadn’t been too fond of the Native Americans. They were thought to be highly uncivilized and they had to go. In his letter to Congress addressing the removal of the Indian tribes, President Jackson states the following:
Towards the development of the United States of America there has always been a question of the placement of the Native Americans in society. Throughout time, the Natives have been treated differently like an individual nation granted free by the U.S. as equal U.S. citizens, yet not treated as equal. In 1783 when the U.S. gained their independence from Great Britain not only did they gain land from the Appalachian Mountains but conflict over the Indian policy and what their choice was to do with them and their land was in effect. All the way from the first presidents of the U.S. to later in the late 19th century the treatment of the Natives has always been changing. The Native Americans have always been treated like different beings, or savages, and have always been tricked to signing false treaties accompanying the loss of their homes and even death happened amongst tribes. In the period of the late 19th century, The U.S. government was becoming more and more unbeatable making the Natives move by force and sign false treaties. This did not account for the seizing of land the government imposed at any given time (Boxer 2009).
In the 30 years after the Civil War, although government policy towards Native Americans intended to shift from forced separation to integration into American society, attempts to "Americanize" Indians only hastened the death of their culture and presence in the America. The intent in the policy, after the end of aggression, was to integrate Native Americans into American society. Many attempts at this were made, ranging from offering citizenship to granting lands to Indians. All of these attempts were in vain, however, because the result of this policies is much the same as would be the result of continued agression.
“We no longer want 40 acres and a mule, we want justice” an anonymous quote used to describe the fire behind the "Black Lives Matter" movement. Reparations for the legalized enslavement of African Americans is an idea that can be looked at as nonexistent in modern society. First, no amount of land or money can erase the emotional scarring of my ancestors. Secondly slavery has evolved into a new vehicle called systematic racism, that keeps most black working manual labor jobs ,more often than not under the authority of a white counterpart. The biggest question is how? How could you possibly amend slavery? Do you sue the descendent of a slave owner? Do you sue each state who legalized slavery? Even though at one point slavery was legalized in all states.