Should Juveniles Be Tried As Adults Essay

555 Words2 Pages

Introduction
When it comes to individuals committing serious or harsh crimes, a sentence should match the crime that was committed. However, say this individual is under the age of 18. Should that make a difference in the amount of time they should serve, or should they serve any time at all? Based on age, states or locations, crimes committed and many other factors, we will discuss whether or not juveniles should be tried as adults. There are many arguments back and forth on whether or not a juvenile should be tried as an adult for their crimes. The two main reasons that are prosed for juveniles being tried as adults are that 1) the sentence should be proportional to their crime no matter the age and 2) the harsher or severe punishment will help lower juvenile crime rates. However, according to research juvenile crime rates have increased and the deterrent effects are minimal or almost non-existent. According to research and studies, a child’s brain does not fully develop until the age of 25. With this in mind, it brings up …show more content…

For instance, in a juvenile court, instead of being charged with a crime and having a criminal record, it will be known as a delinquent act instead. Also, a juvenile court is typically known as a civil matter and this is where they determine whether the minor is a delinquent (Michon, 2018).
In previous society times juveniles were treated as adults no matter what the crime committed was. However, this has since changed due to it being seen as unconstitutional and unfair treatment to a person under the age of 18. Due to it being seen as unconstitutional, this caused many people to raise the needs for a different court system for juveniles. The idea behind a juvenile court system would be to try helping them instead of automatically punishing

Open Document