Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Should employers use social media in the hiring process
Impact of social media on hiring
Impact of social media on hiring
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Should employers be using social media to make a decision about a future employer? Employers using social media to make decisions about future employers is something that shouldn't be done. It shouldn't be done because an online profile is not meant to be an online resume on social media. Another reason why it shouldn't be done because everything that people post and see on social media isn't always true. It is also a bad idea for employers to use social media to make decisions about future employees because what a future employee may post they can possibility post something and another person will take it the wrong way and it could be effective to the person. That is why it is wrong to use social media as a background check because people …show more content…
One piece of evidence in source 1 is, “employers should not be judging what people in their private lives do away from the workplace”(par 9). This refers to social media a future employee might not be posting on what he/she does as a worker the skills they have, they might post more about there life in what they do outside of their work. Having social media is more basically a use as an attraction to see funny things, local news, communicate with family out of state or other things that are not basically of work. An example would be, if there holding wine and another person sees it they'll probably think that the person has issues and the possibility is another person could get that picture and make bad use of iit. It isn't always good to post pictures like that because what a person post like a picture like that to some people it will look bad and the picture would look like a different …show more content…
A piece of evidence that supports this from source 2 is, “applicants may intercept poor treatment, such as screening via social media, as an indication of how they would be treated on the job ”(par 8). This means that it would effect what a future employee may post on their social media and the way they are treated. It would also make a difference because the person they're hiring off a background check on social media a person wouldn't in reality show the specific manner that future employee would really have. It would take people time to get hire easily because the way that social media quit works now is people now post things that have nothing to do with work experience they may have. That is why it is mostly not incorrigible for an employer to use social media to make decisions about future employees because it is only to know about the worker not its family gatherings that probably would be more in their social media like
Using the informal tone he enhances his argument by providing several thought-provoking statements that allow the reader to see the logic in the article, “Social media is designed for the information shared on it to be searched, and shared- and mined for profit… When considering what to share via social media, don 't think business vs. personal. Think public vs. private. And if something is truly private, do not share it on social media out of a misplaced faith in the expectation of privacy” (134). The reader should agree with Edmond that when posting or being a part of the social media bandwagon, you’re life and decisions will be up for display. Moreover, the business vs. personal and public vs. private point is accurate and logical, because evidently if you post something on any social media outlet you should expect that anyone and everyone can see it, regardless of your privacy settings. Edmond highlights that Facebook along with other social networking sites change their privacy settings whenever they please without
For example, Rosen states, “According to a recent survey by Microsoft, seventy percent of U.S. recruiters report that they have rejected candidates because of information found online,” (Rosen, Para. 3). Most of the time it is a necessity for companies to do online and background research on candidates because of wanting a safe environment to work in. Social media sites are the fastest way to see who a person truly is. But sometimes it can just be a character they posses because that’s what they’re followers want to see rather than their true self.
Over half of the applicants found on search engines and nearly two-thirds of the applicants found on social networking sites were not hired as a result of the information found on the sites. (Source H) Things found on the internet or social media are almost always taken out of context and doesn’t show what the person applying is actually like. Admission offices and employers are more likely to start and use social media to look up applicants. This can make it harder to get into a school or business if you have a social media account. According to and NACAC article, Eighty-eight percent of admission offices believed social media were either “somewhat” or “very” important to their future recruitment efforts. (Source B) Colleges now a days always look to see if applicants have a social media account that means that if they get access to the account there is a 38% chance that, that person does not get accepted. One-fourth of colleges surveyed indicated that they used Web search or social networking
Next, jobs are denied and people are fired for harmful comments and inappropriate pictures. People don’t realize their boss or coworkers might see their post. The article “How Social Media Can Hurt Your Career” states “If you want to use your social media to get hired...Don’t announce raises, interviews, or new jobs, Don’t badmouth employers and Don’t mention your job search when still employed” (2009). This is important because it shows what not to do on your profile. People get fired all the time for not following these simple rules. All in all, watch your page because you never know who will see
...HR professionals, but can be a dangerous ‘foe’ when used inappropriately.” (Davison, Maraist, & Bing, 2011) As long a recruiters apply uniform reviewing techniques social media can be successfully to help in hiring qualified individuals that will meet the needs of the company.
It is important to know if the person would fit the company’s culture or not. Companies check social network profiles to make sure that this particular applicant can be expected to fit the culture of the organizati...
Many believe that social media is essential for being employed for a high paying job, such as a lawyer or doctor, but it’s very far from that.
The biggest social media culprit is Facebook; think about it if a company employee or potential employees post their entire life history; why pay for a background check when an organization can get it for free. Although Facebook is a great source of information for potential employees some of the information is not always accurate. Who verifies the information that is put on Facebook as well with other social media sources? According to (Greenwald, 2007), “researchers and practitioners suggest that organizations must use a lot of caution when hiring applicants by thoroughly investigating their backgrounds. Though the process might be an additional step in the hiring process; it can save organizations a lot of liability and most importantly ensure a safe working environment for employees”. Although in some cases, what you do on your personal time or on social media could affect your business life. When seeking out potential jobs, you should always be truthful and if something comes back on a background check, have a good explanation for what was
Still, examples of the effects of past social media posts on the future do not hold importance only in monitoring behavior for paternal purposes. College admissions officers and potential employers reference social media posts to gain input about the type of person to hire, and a post implying the underage consumption of alcohol will diminish acceptance whether it was posted three days or three months
The way future candidates view social media has evolved drastically over the past ten years as technology has evolved. From websites like LinkedIn to Twitter, each website provides a unique opportunity for employers to view a future candidate. According to Media Bistro/Infographic, “92%of companies” use social media as an initial step to recruit future candidates. Another statistic Media Bistro/Infographic provides is that 73% of employees hire using social media and 20% of employers say it takes less time to hire via social media. What do these small statistics mean? Majority of the time if recruiters use social media, it is like an extra step to background checks and screenings before the interviews. Social Media allows for employers to have additional information of their prospective candidate before hiring. These statistics show that employers look at a person’s profile based on the information that is public or accessible; yet the employer uses that decision to hire the future candidate. Based on what a person post, there are heavy consequenc...
...al pictures. With the proper usage of Social Media one can successfully network with other and build up their reputation for future opportunities. When using social media one should be held to certain responsibilities and now the proper usage.
Social networking websites have also led to some people being fired or not even being hired in the first place.... ... middle of paper ... ... Students Need to Pay Attention! PBS.
..., which can result in decreased productivity. An employee may be spending more time viewing their friends’ posts and pictures, rather than focusing on their job. Social media can be addicting to some people. This should be monitored by all business owners. Employees can attend a party with people taking pictures, and then the pictures can be misconstrued or distorted. Online reputational concerns can be critical for businesses along with their employees. It can result in loss of employment, loss of economics, and unforgivable social humiliations. Businesses are at another disadvantage while using social media because followers can post negative comments on the business’s Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram site. Also, a hacker can retrieve the company’s page and post false information. A business or organization’s reputation will suffer from these actions. (Oravec 97)
Certainly, a hiring manager’s perception of your online presence is subjective, but the survey showed that of the employers who screen candidates via social networks, about one-third of them found information that caused them to hire a candidate. (Yes, you read that right. It resulted in them HIRING A CANDIDATE!) Those findings include: • Candidate’s background info supports job qualifications – 44% • Candidate’s site conveyed a professional image –
People often forgot this and instead have a false sense of privacy in social media. If you do not want a boss, or anyone else for that matter, to see what occurs in your private life, then you should not post it online. Edmond uses multiple examples in this essay including, “If something is truly private, do not share it on social media out of misplaced faith in the expectation of privacy”. I could not agree more with this quote. I have nothing to hide on my Facebook page but I also do not post inappropriate posts, comments, photos, or any truly personal information. Of course, in ten years I may look at my Facebook and I may question why I ever uploaded certain photos, but I will never be embarrassed or ashamed of what lives